Topic: [ActiveMining] The Official Active Mining Discussion Thread [Self-Moderated] - page 172. (Read 771288 times)
January 04, 2014, 05:34:51 PM
I can't stop loving people investing in non regulated markets expecting crazy profits and later crying for not getting all the warranties of regulated markets.
January 04, 2014, 05:33:18 PM
So, we have vaporware, no dividends, no shares, no mining, no updates, is this a good summary of the situation here?
Don't forget the select few people that are trying as hard as they can to delay the implosion by attacking anyone who posts their doubt of the situation.
January 04, 2014, 05:30:33 PM
So, we have vaporware, no dividends, no shares, no mining, no updates, is this a good summary of the situation here?
January 04, 2014, 05:28:51 PM
Why are you here then? If you didn't invest due to your superior mental ability why are you posting in this thread or even in the securities section?
chalk this one up to a learning experience.
really? you wanna shoot the shit awhile?
Well your post contradicts itself then.
You stated:
As a matter of fact, I'm amazed that anyone "invests" anything with people in this forum based on an "IPO post." an IPO? on this forum? It looks like a gaming forum with nasty trolls and all! It's like: let's play stockbroker with play money called bitcoins, yay! That is insanity.
Which implies that you would never invest in a company based on an IPO post in this forum. Then you stated: chalk this one up to a learning experience.
Which I guess means you are actually invested in this company? I am going to make that assumption. Based on that being the case you just answered your own question: I'm amazed that anyone "invests" anything with people in this forum based on an "IPO post." an IPO? on this forum?
January 04, 2014, 05:24:44 PM
Calling eASIC is more likely to derail things than give you answers. Calling eASIC is irresponsible.
Grow the fuck up kids - 8 pages/day of trolly drivel.
Grow the fuck up kids - 8 pages/day of trolly drivel.
You still think this is all real, I suppose?
January 04, 2014, 05:19:58 PM
Calling eASIC is more likely to derail things than give you answers. Calling eASIC is irresponsible.
Grow the fuck up kids - 8 pages/day of trolly drivel.
Grow the fuck up kids - 8 pages/day of trolly drivel.
January 04, 2014, 04:59:48 PM
...Some people in here are so naive it's rediculous.
January 04, 2014, 04:59:43 PM
minerpart, you sure do think the law is quite magical.
January 04, 2014, 04:56:35 PM
As long as ACtM has shares, eASIC will not and can not comment on anything to do with product or chip development. It would open them to insider dealing charges.
If anything was said on here by ACtM staff that was substantively untrue (relating to eASIC) or could damage the reputation of eASIC they would have their lawyers close the thread within hours.
Think hard on that last fact.
Some people in here are so naive it's rediculous.
If anything was said on here by ACtM staff that was substantively untrue (relating to eASIC) or could damage the reputation of eASIC they would have their lawyers close the thread within hours.
Think hard on that last fact.
Some people in here are so naive it's rediculous.
January 04, 2014, 04:53:38 PM
wow the crumbs are multiplying like a herpes infection.
hahah… this thread has a case of the crumbs.
hahah… this thread has a case of the crumbs.
Not a crumbs personality here...just a shareholder that would like answers. I still have hope in Ken because he of all people would know the legal repercussions of not following through, but we need more than a "things are looking great! weekly update at this point especially when he made TIME SPECIFIC posts concerning when our shares will be trade-able. I am a web designer, and if I told my clients their sites would "definitely" be ready in a week, and it is not, and I don't update them on the status of their sites, trust me, I would be out of business real soon.
January 04, 2014, 04:49:44 PM
F that. Call eAsic, call every company that VMC has claimed to have a business relationship with. Let them all know that you are a victim of this scam and want answers.
yeah and I say call them over and over and over again until someone GIVES INVESTORS A PROPER ANSWER.
if this thing has hit the skids I want to know RIGHT FUCKING NOW. not 3 weeks from now.
January 04, 2014, 04:45:58 PM
wow the crumbs are multiplying like a herpes infection.
hahah… this thread has a case of the crumbs.
hahah… this thread has a case of the crumbs.
January 04, 2014, 04:44:59 PM
Q: What does it take to start a multimillion ASIC company?
A: Nothing, lol.
https://i.imgur.com/mHloTuY.jpg
A: Nothing, lol.
https://i.imgur.com/mHloTuY.jpg
January 04, 2014, 04:43:40 PM
F that. Call eAsic, call every company that VMC has claimed to have a business relationship with. Let them all know that you are a victim of this scam and want answers.
January 04, 2014, 04:41:53 PM
so other than call easic or Ken, then what? game over?
there is an answer to:
1. shares?
2. shipping product?
3. mining farm?
4. dividends?
who has those answers? and why can't they be questioned?
it's been months and we are all still in the dark.
Now it's 2014, my personal psychological barrier has been breeched…
WHERE IS THE PROFIT IN INVESTING IN THIS COMPANY!?
someone has to have a definitive answer FFS.
there is an answer to:
1. shares?
2. shipping product?
3. mining farm?
4. dividends?
who has those answers? and why can't they be questioned?
it's been months and we are all still in the dark.
Now it's 2014, my personal psychological barrier has been breeched…
WHERE IS THE PROFIT IN INVESTING IN THIS COMPANY!?
someone has to have a definitive answer FFS.
January 04, 2014, 04:38:40 PM
Please no-one call eASIC it's already been stated that they're received lots of contact with investors of Activemining which they shouldn't have to deal with.
Ken & VMC are the points of contact, please don't jeopardize the future of Activemining by doing something we could all later regret!
Ken & VMC are the points of contact, please don't jeopardize the future of Activemining by doing something we could all later regret!
January 04, 2014, 04:37:38 PM
Although I've said before the Trolls are likely paid this is a real shock.
I see a court case on the horizon.
I see a court case on the horizon.
January 04, 2014, 04:36:41 PM
lol. ok crumbswithinacrumbs.
January 04, 2014, 04:31:37 PM
I'd just like to point out that Icebreaker has been outed as an employee of Hashfast (which I for one have solid proof!) he may even be their CEO Eduardo deCastro:
Thread which bought this originally out in the open:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/open-letter-to-hashfast-in-response-to-refund-terms-391375
It's already come to light on numerous occasions that Icebreaker and Crumbs are one in the same.
Crumbs since the banning is now using the phoenix alts of DoloresMaze and his latest incarnation Bambilion.
Why is Hashfast showing Activemining so much attention?
Is it because they themselves are so bad that they are trying to divert the attention away from their delays and fraudulent activities, therefore trying to discredit every other potential competitor?
Please no-one call eASIC it's already been stated that they're received lots of contact with investors of Activemining which they shouldn't have to deal with.
Ken & VMC are the points of contact, please don't jeopardize the future of Activemining by doing something we could all later regret!
I appreciate that there can and has to be better communications from Ken & the team!!
Knybe what is your motivation to incite issues by calling eASIC, did you not state you are not even involved in this Security?
Anybody notice anything similar between knybe and somebody previously mentioned?
Thread which bought this originally out in the open:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/open-letter-to-hashfast-in-response-to-refund-terms-391375
It's already come to light on numerous occasions that Icebreaker and Crumbs are one in the same.
Crumbs since the banning is now using the phoenix alts of DoloresMaze and his latest incarnation Bambilion.
Why is Hashfast showing Activemining so much attention?
Is it because they themselves are so bad that they are trying to divert the attention away from their delays and fraudulent activities, therefore trying to discredit every other potential competitor?
Please no-one call eASIC it's already been stated that they're received lots of contact with investors of Activemining which they shouldn't have to deal with.
Ken & VMC are the points of contact, please don't jeopardize the future of Activemining by doing something we could all later regret!
I appreciate that there can and has to be better communications from Ken & the team!!
Knybe what is your motivation to incite issues by calling eASIC, did you not state you are not even involved in this Security?
Anybody notice anything similar between knybe and somebody previously mentioned?
January 04, 2014, 04:27:36 PM
I've already been down the road of contacting eASIC. They will tell you they can't tell you any details and they will refer your email (or call) directly back to Ken. So sending eASIC an email us as good as sending Ken one. They have had plenty of contact from shares holders in the past, as would be expected in a project with this time span.
Jump to: