Author

Topic: [ActiveMining] The Official Active Mining Discussion Thread [Self-Moderated] - page 176. (Read 771288 times)

legendary
Activity: 826
Merit: 1004
Mods are gonna have to do some more slashing and burning in here… gone way off topic and leaning into trivial spats again.

oh and just to keep this on topic:

KEN WHERE ARE OUR FUCKEN CHIPS, FARMS, SHARES, AND SHIPPED MACHINES?

did eAsic fuck up?

We are not sure who really went wrong, Ken or eASIC, but it was one of them. I invested with the expectation that we would have eASIC chips in full production at the end of December as the absolute worst case scenario. We have passed that point and still only have <3TH online.

No shares, no eASIC, maybe a little hope?

Well, before the delays were announced, I had normal production starting in Feb. That wasn't a best or worse case scenario, it was a realistic one.

People just seem to ignore the facts when they are invested.
sr. member
Activity: 448
Merit: 250
Empathy is lacking in this thread - swap shoes with Ken, then consider how you'd react to the vitriol flooding in from a minority of investors and non-investors who completely drown out the rest of us.
member
Activity: 112
Merit: 10

Considering how far we are behind schedule and the fact that we can't even trade our shares anywhere, I feel that we deserve some DETAILED updates as to what on earth is going on. Additionally the problem of several weeks worth of dividends needs to be tended to.
Whatever you believe you deserve, you won't get it, so you may as well stop right there.
sr. member
Activity: 378
Merit: 250
Mods are gonna have to do some more slashing and burning in here… gone way off topic and leaning into trivial spats again.

oh and just to keep this on topic:

KEN WHERE ARE OUR FUCKEN CHIPS, FARMS, SHARES, AND SHIPPED MACHINES?

did eAsic fuck up?

We are not sure who really went wrong, Ken or eASIC, but it was one of them. I invested with the expectation that we would have eASIC chips in full production at the end of December as the absolute worst case scenario. We have passed that point and still only have <3TH online.

No shares, no eASIC, maybe a little hope?

Considering how far we are behind schedule and the fact that we can't even trade our shares anywhere, I feel that we deserve some DETAILED updates as to what on earth is going on. Additionally the problem of several weeks worth of dividends needs to be tended to.
Ken says the chips had to be reworked to accommodate a major software update. That is about all we have.
sr. member
Activity: 280
Merit: 250
TECHNOLOGY, BABY!
Mods are gonna have to do some more slashing and burning in here… gone way off topic and leaning into trivial spats again.

oh and just to keep this on topic:

KEN WHERE ARE OUR FUCKEN CHIPS, FARMS, SHARES, AND SHIPPED MACHINES?

did eAsic fuck up?

We are not sure who really went wrong, Ken or eASIC, but it was one of them. I invested with the expectation that we would have eASIC chips in full production at the end of December as the absolute worst case scenario. We have passed that point and still only have <3TH online.

No shares, no eASIC, maybe a little hope?

Considering how far we are behind schedule and the fact that we can't even trade our shares anywhere, I feel that we deserve some DETAILED updates as to what on earth is going on. Additionally the problem of several weeks worth of dividends needs to be tended to.
legendary
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1015
Mods are gonna have to do some more slashing and burning in here… gone way off topic and leaning into trivial spats again.

oh and just to keep this on topic:

KEN WHERE ARE OUR FUCKEN CHIPS, FARMS, SHARES, AND SHIPPED MACHINES?

did eAsic fuck up?

We are not sure who really went wrong, Ken or eASIC, but it was one of them. I invested with the expectation that we would have eASIC chips in full production at the end of December as the absolute worst case scenario. We have passed that point and still only have <3TH online.

No shares, no eASIC, maybe a little hope?
sr. member
Activity: 280
Merit: 250
TECHNOLOGY, BABY!
It'd be nice to get some updates on both the shares being available for trade as well as an adjusted timeline after the delays.
hero member
Activity: 658
Merit: 500
decentralize EVERYTHING...
yeah yeah I've pretty much stopped taking any of this seriously.

One thing I've learned this past year: Anyone and everyone involved in the mining business of Bitcoin (with a very few exceptions) is either an inept flake or a con man. …or both perhaps?

hohum… I really do hope this thing works out, but I'm prepared for the worst.
sr. member
Activity: 378
Merit: 250
Keep in mind kslaughter never gave a clear deadline for the chips. eASIC might very well be on track.

this is not "let's take our time lalalala" industry. this is a first to market or you're fucked more or less kind of environment.

there were "timelines" give by eAsic. there were mentioned of when ken received money and when he paid them more or less.

when you combine the two you have an idea of a "schedule". anything far off from it IS and looks bad. nda or not.

hashfast came out with their stuff already and they "came out" a bit after ActM
He said chips were going to be late for some reason which isn't precisely clear. Either there needed to be some changes for hashing software or they didn't work correctly - no one is really sure.
hero member
Activity: 602
Merit: 500
Keep in mind kslaughter never gave a clear deadline for the chips. eASIC might very well be on track.

this is not "let's take our time lalalala" industry. this is a first to market or you're fucked more or less kind of environment.

there were "timelines" give by eAsic. there were mentioned of when ken received money and when he paid them more or less.

when you combine the two you have an idea of a "schedule". anything far off from it IS and looks bad. nda or not.

hashfast came out with their stuff already and they "came out" a bit after ActM
hero member
Activity: 602
Merit: 500
Mods are gonna have to do some more slashing and burning in here… gone way off topic and leaning into trivial spats again.

oh and just to keep this on topic:

KEN WHERE ARE OUR FUCKEN CHIPS, FARMS, SHARES, AND SHIPPED MACHINES?

did eAsic fuck up?

@knybe, NDA
@superduh, NDA

NDA my fucking ass.. eAsic isn't supposed to be incompetent.. obviously either ken or them are.
sr. member
Activity: 330
Merit: 250
Mods are gonna have to do some more slashing and burning in here… gone way off topic and leaning into trivial spats again.

oh and just to keep this on topic:

KEN WHERE ARE OUR FUCKEN CHIPS, FARMS, SHARES, AND SHIPPED MACHINES?

did eAsic fuck up?

@knybe, NDA
@superduh, NDA
member
Activity: 103
Merit: 10
Mods are gonna have to do some more slashing and burning in here… gone way off topic and leaning into trivial spats again.

oh and just to keep this on topic:

KEN WHERE ARE OUR FUCKEN CHIPS, FARMS, SHARES, AND SHIPPED MACHINES?
hero member
Activity: 602
Merit: 500
Mods are gonna have to do some more slashing and burning in here… gone way off topic and leaning into trivial spats again.

oh and just to keep this on topic:

KEN WHERE ARE OUR FUCKEN CHIPS, FARMS, SHARES, AND SHIPPED MACHINES?

did eAsic fuck up?
sr. member
Activity: 644
Merit: 250
Gah.. It is January, where the hell are our shares?

you mean where the hell is anything!?!? chips, shares or anything!?!

You mean a picture of 40 cases and a general, no details update was not gold to you?
Glad not everyone is ban-wagoned that has invested.

@pankkake, your Ignore link is highlighted, and its the only one. Is that a present from the mods, cause it sure is funny from what I've read on the forums.

The brightness of the ignore link is a function of how many people have ignored you. I'm not sure what the minimum threshold is but the highlighting starts with a pale yellow and gets progressively darker until it eventually hits a nice gonorrhea-discharge orange
full member
Activity: 153
Merit: 100
Gah.. It is January, where the hell are our shares?

you mean where the hell is anything!?!? chips, shares or anything!?!

You mean a picture of 40 cases and a general, no details update was not gold to you?
Glad not everyone is ban-wagoned that has invested.

@pankkake, your Ignore link is highlighted, and its the only one. Is that a present from the mods, cause it sure is funny from what I've read on the forums.
sr. member
Activity: 644
Merit: 250
Gah.. It is January, where the hell are our shares?

you mean where the hell is anything!?!? chips, shares or anything!?!

It's coming, just give it another 2 weeks(TM)
hero member
Activity: 602
Merit: 500
Gah.. It is January, where the hell are our shares?

you mean where the hell is anything!?!? chips, shares or anything!?!
sr. member
Activity: 378
Merit: 250
Gah.. It is January, where the hell are our shares?
full member
Activity: 153
Merit: 100


What do you think hacking is?  The actual laws broken were "unauthorized access to computers and computer networks."  If you know that you don't belong on a system (like being B&), and you get on the system anyway (unlawful access), you could be V&.  Find out about that, it's kind of creepy.  Google it.
Again, I'm not saying that anyone will go after some kid d*cking around on a forum, but the laws are there.  No need to bring China into this.

*Getting B& is not a crime, but logging on after being banned is.  Just because something is a crime doesn't mean that you will surely get punished, only that you *could*, if things go wrong.  And i'm pretty sure you knew what i meant without me typing an essay about it.

Holy hell thanks for the laugh. There is no hacking going on by joining a forum over and over. None. There could be charge pressed if they accessed the admin panel and removed the ban, and you could prove it; or they are making some kind of death threats and the like. There is no illegal activity in being a troll on a forum. You have to ban the IP and so forth to mitigate the trolls/spambots and so forth.

I would love to see a case where a forum owner sued a troll tho. That would be classic.
FYI, here you go since you were too lazy to link it yourself.
http://www.expertlaw.com/forums/showthread.php?t=96783

It's not against the law but it is almost definitely against your ISP's ToS to use their network to evade bans and if bitcointalk cared enough to email [email protected] they can warn you/suspend your service if you're a repeat offender. It's the internet equivalent of trespassing.

Source: used to mod a forum with 20,000+ active users and contacted ISP's regularly

LOL, no ISP cares unless its blatant harassment or physical threats. Even threats to DoS and so forth will have to have proof before they even send you a letter in the mail let alone try to suspend your account. Source: Not in a pissing match, but yes I've been around on both sides.
Jump to: