Author

Topic: [ActiveMining] The Official Active Mining Discussion Thread [Self-Moderated] - page 175. (Read 771512 times)

sr. member
Activity: 280
Merit: 250
IIIIII====II====IIIIII


Minerpart, whose account are you?  As soon as this account got out of noob jail, it started pimping Active Mining.  What's up with that?



Are you serious? I've been on here for four months. Regularly for four months. Not four HOURS like you you sad-case.

 Roll Eyes

I was recommended to ACtM, so I bought shares and signed up to this forum. I think that is pretty usual behaviour.
sr. member
Activity: 280
Merit: 250
IIIIII====II====IIIIII
how the world actually operates.



So the court case raised by the SEC which is currently on-going and involves Options offers to the US market from an un-licensed broker is not the real world in operation? You should get your head checked.  Cheesy
sr. member
Activity: 280
Merit: 250
IIIIII====II====IIIIII
We really need something substantial from Ken at this point.

I disagree. We are still on schedule on the amended time-scale. You are just piling on pressure for no reason. January is the month for full delivery on this project. You know we are currently waiting for the new batch of chips. Relax.
legendary
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1015
We really need something substantial from Ken at this point.
sr. member
Activity: 280
Merit: 250
IIIIII====II====IIIIII
The last laugh will be on all you little Trolls when the big news comes out and we don't re-list until after the fact.

Get your wallets out. Oh and remember what your dirty little game amounted to for you. Zilch. If you left this thread alone you might have been able to make some money here. lolly lolzy lols.

Smiley
sr. member
Activity: 280
Merit: 250
IIIIII====II====IIIIII
Also, minerpart, please explain to me how the IPO offer on the first page is a legally binding contract of anything on this rinky dink forum?? The man can go and change the wording of it to imply anything at his whim.

Honestly, I can't be bothered, you are not prepared to listen.
sr. member
Activity: 280
Merit: 250
IIIIII====II====IIIIII
entrophy it seems you are confused.

The other day we were talking about a specific, non-fraudulent, breach of legislation -  one is being prosecuted by the SEC right now on a 'fine punishment' basis.


Today we are talking about fraudulent taking of peoples issued shares. That is a far more serious offence and would be prosecuted with a prison sentence as the outcome.
sr. member
Activity: 316
Merit: 250
why r people posting in this thread? i want detailed explanations, thanks
hero member
Activity: 658
Merit: 500
decentralize EVERYTHING...
As a matter of fact, I'm amazed that anyone "invests" anything with people in this forum based on an "IPO post." an IPO? on this forum? It looks like a gaming forum with nasty trolls and all! It's like: let's play stockbroker with play money called bitcoins, yay! That is insanity.

chalk this one up to a learning experience.
hero member
Activity: 658
Merit: 500
decentralize EVERYTHING...
Also, minerpart, please explain to me how the IPO offer on the first page is a legally binding contract of anything on this rinky dink forum?? The man can go and change the wording of it to imply anything at his whim.
hero member
Activity: 658
Merit: 500
decentralize EVERYTHING...
Can you, minerpart, prove to me or anyone else without a shadow of a doubt that you "own" shares in this virtual company?

Think about it and prove to me that we all legally have rights to a claim in ACTM.

also, I truly want to believe that all will go well but my personal timeline and patience has run out. We are in the need-to-know phase and Ken is massively failing us.
sr. member
Activity: 280
Merit: 250
IIIIII====II====IIIIII
knybe, what are you on? The IPO is on page 1. Ken is bound to the share issue and div split as detailed in the prospectus. If he dishonestly breaches that pledge he will go to prison, end of, period. No ifs and no buts. Please get you perspective back on this.
hero member
Activity: 658
Merit: 500
decentralize EVERYTHING...
Yeah he has tenderly relieved us all of any connection whatsoever to ACTM... A screenshot of your Bitfunder account??? That's fucken laughable and hardly holds up as proof of anything. Now think hard; what else is there to link any of us to monies we have handed over to nonexistent BTCT/Bitfunder in the name of so far nonexistent Active Mining Corp??

Ken Slaughter has also failed to mention "shares" in the last two updates... What's more he has completely disappeared from this forum whereas before he had quite a presence.

I can think of 3 other situations in "bitcoin investment land" this past year, where no news absolutely did not equal to good news...

NDA=BS

p.s. I suggest we all get our proverbial pitchforks and torches at the ready because if one more scheme in this fake ass world of "bitcoin mining investments" gets away with it: we all look like assholes.

p.p.s. I just saw American Hustle and although it's a great movie... all I could think about was being conned.
sr. member
Activity: 280
Merit: 250
IIIIII====II====IIIIII
I would interpret the 'tender offer' as the whole process of tendering BF shares to ACtM and the relisting of them on another exchange. Think SEC.

In other words, because BF was shutting down Ken was obliged to offer his shareholders a new home. That's the tender offer - it was not a compulsory scheme.
sr. member
Activity: 378
Merit: 250
Sorry for the delay in getting Crypto-Trade up and running.  I am still working on some legal aspects of the tender offer.

(Guess I'm going to be a little active today). Anyone quite understand the bolded line? What are legal aspects of the ender offer referring to? What exactly is a tender offer?
sr. member
Activity: 378
Merit: 250
Empathy is lacking in this thread - swap shoes with Ken, then consider how you'd react to the vitriol flooding in from a minority of investors and non-investors who completely drown out the rest of us.
... by providing detailed updates. Or at least close to it. He never mentions what kind of delay, or even what the estimated setback in time would be. They just edit the webpage and remove shipping information and say the word delay. I would love to see why people put so much faith into the sporadic and general details that are given out as it is. His linkedin profile is a joke for a CEO of 3 companies. 2 being get rich quick schemes.  

Detailed, consistent updates are definitely the way to go. If you don't want scam accusations, if you don't want people hounding you down, and if you don't want people getting authorities involved then the best idea is to communicate all delays and changes to the plan as soon as possible to the people who have invested in you. Gathering money from people and then going AWOL from the only form of communication with these people for entire weeks at a time is not a good way to instill trust or confidence.

The reason we beg for pictures is because Ken isn't being detailed enough with his words. If he told us exactly where were at with miners we wouldn't scream for pictures. The reason we scream for shares is because he haven't been given an update about them for almost three weeks. We can understand that he has a lot on his plate. We're not asking him to work even harder if he is already at the edge, but I don't understand why it is wrong to expect someone to devote 10 minutes a day to this thread with a quick update when we hit a roadblock, make some progress, change plans, have new estimates. I personally don't think that is too much to ask. But that is just my very humble opinion.

Just some examples of what we would like to see instead of what we are seeing.
"We are working on xxxx." <<< "Expect xxxx to be done in 10 days at this rate."
or
"We have devoted 100% of our manpower to yyyy." <<< "As you know we started yyyy, #### of days ago and we are now about 50% of the way there."
or
"There was a delay with the chips." <<< "We have experienced an issue with zzzz part of the chips and have been informed that this will set us back #### of days."

Now these types of updates don't give us the full picture and could be ballparks and estimates, but they would allow for a lot of the speculation on this thread to be grounded in some form of reality and allow investors to be able to make smarter decisions. It will hinder the trolls from stirring up issues which will in turn slow down the howling and bickering that is on this forum and stop scaring away customers.

EDIT: I just only hope Ken will understand this. There is no decent reason to hide information (except for specific secrets such as how exactly Intelihash works) from us as this is merely a "Get to the market as soon as possible" endeavor. 
hero member
Activity: 518
Merit: 500
Hodl!
Additionally the problem of several weeks worth of dividends needs to be tended to.

I would have thunk that such a delay would have necessitated at least one custom payout by now, so much for thunking.
full member
Activity: 153
Merit: 100
Empathy is lacking in this thread - swap shoes with Ken, then consider how you'd react to the vitriol flooding in from a minority of investors and non-investors who completely drown out the rest of us.
... by providing detailed updates. Or at least close to it. He never mentions what kind of delay, or even what the estimated setback in time would be. They just edit the webpage and remove shipping information and say the word delay. I would love to see why people put so much faith into the sporadic and general details that are given out as it is. His linkedin profile is a joke for a CEO of 3 companies. 2 being get rich quick schemes. 
member
Activity: 103
Merit: 10
Yeah, Ken already has our money and business seems running. Why should he care about shares and such things...
sr. member
Activity: 378
Merit: 250
Just a reminder if you want to see if ACTM has any new/more hashrate or want to see the accumulated dividends this is the dividend payout address for our miners, this has been verified by Ken. https://blockchain.info/charts/balance?address=1DJpsvnM7xTnQbWEhLYyCyfxQyxwupEzCa
Jump to: