Topic: [ActiveMining] The Official Active Mining Discussion Thread [Self-Moderated] - page 179. (Read 771288 times)
January 02, 2014, 07:01:54 PM
While it would be great if it were ACtM hardware, it doesn't matter at the end of the day. Ken is still close to assembling and shipping our hardware and he just said we are going to have a great year ahead. I'm more than happy with that assessment - from the man who has the details.
January 02, 2014, 07:00:37 PM
Quantify 'high' certainty please. Are you able to say 'total' certainty kleeck?
I would bet a lot of Bitcoin on this, how is that?
Not an acceptable response my friend. I value your opinion and have respect for you as one of the trustable few, however unless you can say 'total' certainty there will be doubts for all lurkers. As you are happy to place your reputation on the line over this matter it is important that you can demonstrate you are not getting played.
I won't repeat. I've said my piece. A few here have shown an incredible capacity for deluding themselves. To be clear, this address not being ActM/VMC does not mean that this venture cannot be successful to some degree, but it is certainly behind the competition at this point - namely the individuals behind that Eligius address.
January 02, 2014, 06:54:52 PM
Quantify 'high' certainty please. Are you able to say 'total' certainty kleeck?
I would bet a lot of Bitcoin on this, how is that?
Not an acceptable response my friend. I value your opinion and have respect for you as one of the trustable few, however unless you can say 'total' certainty there will be doubts for all lurkers. As you are happy to place your reputation on the line over this matter it is important that you can demonstrate you are not getting played.
January 02, 2014, 06:53:45 PM
This reminds me of the whole Labcoin saga.
No photos, no proof of any kind, lack of communication...Actually is seems to be even worse, there are no two more weeks promises, and no one is able to have some fun and impulsively trade shares.
What happened to of all the ActM cheerleaders that "knew" that Labcoin was a scam? How come their scam radar is not going off?
No photos, no proof of any kind, lack of communication...Actually is seems to be even worse, there are no two more weeks promises, and no one is able to have some fun and impulsively trade shares.
What happened to of all the ActM cheerleaders that "knew" that Labcoin was a scam? How come their scam radar is not going off?
They all went a bit mental and got banned from here.
January 02, 2014, 06:49:53 PM
Quantify 'high' certainty please. Are you able to say 'total' certainty kleeck?
I would bet a lot of Bitcoin on this, how is that?
January 02, 2014, 06:46:19 PM
Just goes to show how easily fooled some people are.
Even by themselves it seems!
And by others!
If you won't believe Bargraphics, who I think has a fine reputation on these boards, then perhaps you will believe me when I say it.
I have confirmed, with high certainty, that the Eligius address in question is NOT ActiveMining or VMC equipment.
What I was told was in confidence as was the evidence displayed to me. My reputation here will have to suffice until the party running this operation comes forth. I will say that I attempted to find information in the wild linking the operator with the address to properly "leak" the information, but there simply is no connection to be made at this time.
January 02, 2014, 06:46:03 PM
Just goes to show how easily fooled some people are.
Even by themselves it seems!
And by others!
If you won't believe Bargraphics, who I think has a fine reputation on these boards, then perhaps you will believe me when I say it.
I have confirmed, with high certainty, that the Eligius address in question is NOT ActiveMining or VMC equipment.
Shilling for Terrahash's scam is what you consider a fine reputation?
You must consider Pirateat40 a prince, and Inaba a pillar of the community.
I guess for starters we can compare yours to mine. You won't show your face in public yet I will.
January 02, 2014, 06:45:05 PM
Quantify 'high' certainty please. Are you able to say 'total' certainty kleeck?
January 02, 2014, 06:42:15 PM
Just goes to show how easily fooled some people are.
Even by themselves it seems!
And by others!
If you won't believe Bargraphics, who I think has a fine reputation on these boards, then perhaps you will believe me when I say it.
I have confirmed, with high certainty, that the Eligius address in question is NOT ActiveMining or VMC equipment.
January 02, 2014, 06:41:10 PM
Just goes to show how easily fooled some people are.
Even by themselves it seems!
And by others!
If you won't believe Bargraphics, who I think has a fine reputation on these boards, then perhaps you will believe me when I say it.
I have confirmed, with high certainty, that the Eligius address in question is NOT ActiveMining or VMC equipment.
January 02, 2014, 06:40:35 PM
This reminds me of the whole Labcoin saga.
No photos, no proof of any kind, lack of communication...Actually is seems to be even worse, there are no two more weeks promises, and no one is able to have some fun and impulsively trade shares.
What happened to of all the ActM cheerleaders that "knew" that Labcoin was a scam? How come their scam radar is not going off?
No photos, no proof of any kind, lack of communication...Actually is seems to be even worse, there are no two more weeks promises, and no one is able to have some fun and impulsively trade shares.
What happened to of all the ActM cheerleaders that "knew" that Labcoin was a scam? How come their scam radar is not going off?
January 02, 2014, 06:05:01 PM
This is a numbers game of probability and it is naive to think that deception is not the prevalent tool used by people on this forum to expand their wealth, protect their investments and maintain their influence. You simply can not trust anyone here as we are all competing against each other.
One other thing that must be understood about the more pressing issue of shares access is that there will be a very real and as of yet undisclosed reason to explain Ken's deafening silence here. He his clearly approaching an announcement regarding a decentralised trading platform.
One other thing that must be understood about the more pressing issue of shares access is that there will be a very real and as of yet undisclosed reason to explain Ken's deafening silence here. He his clearly approaching an announcement regarding a decentralised trading platform.
January 02, 2014, 05:45:21 PM
So because he denies the name, it must be true? Your logic if put to the test:
acknowledgement == true but skeptic
denial == true by denial
Well that explains religion, but doesn't actually have ties to reality.
Sure it is weird that he never heard of the name, but in no way either denying the name nor knowing the name constitutes the tides moving in and out more than owning an arbitrary mining pool. He stated he knows the owner but will neither confirm nor deny the owner. It was a redirect no doubt, but not answering does not logically make it true.
The lack of information as to where the actual units/chips/shares/etc is the one thing you should be concerned about. As Jo said, if they do exist and its being hidden, they are mining for pure profit before slowly shipping out units for max profit.
acknowledgement == true but skeptic
denial == true by denial
Well that explains religion, but doesn't actually have ties to reality.
Sure it is weird that he never heard of the name, but in no way either denying the name nor knowing the name constitutes the tides moving in and out more than owning an arbitrary mining pool. He stated he knows the owner but will neither confirm nor deny the owner. It was a redirect no doubt, but not answering does not logically make it true.
The lack of information as to where the actual units/chips/shares/etc is the one thing you should be concerned about. As Jo said, if they do exist and its being hidden, they are mining for pure profit before slowly shipping out units for max profit.
January 02, 2014, 05:44:20 PM
Just goes to show how easily fooled some people are.
Even by themselves it seems!
And by others!
January 02, 2014, 05:38:06 PM
Just goes to show how easily fooled some people are.
Even by themselves it seems!
January 02, 2014, 05:35:56 PM
Wow big conversation went on today. Guys, whether the mining on Eligius is Actm or not it does not matter. There are two problems. 1 We don't have access to our shares, we have no timeline to figure out when we will. Ken has dropped any information regarding shares 2 weeks ago and hasn't been keeping up since. 2. The miners are not pointing at the AcTM dividend address. This means if they are ACTM stuff, Ken is stealing from us or keeping us out of the loop, both of these are bad no matter how you spin it.
You guys are arguing that Ken will release good news before he opens up trading, well there is the good news right there. It hasn't been announced AND we are still not trading. It really isn't more complicated than that.
You guys are arguing that Ken will release good news before he opens up trading, well there is the good news right there. It hasn't been announced AND we are still not trading. It really isn't more complicated than that.
January 02, 2014, 05:21:44 PM
It is highly suspicious that someone like wiz claims to have never heard of ActiveMining when it is the top thread in 'Securities', with approaching one quarter of a million views. Ask yourself how many people in this community who frequent this forum and run Bitcoin mining pools have never visited the 'Securities' pages of bitcointalk. Then ask yourself of those who have visited 'Securities', how many will have magically missed the ActiveMining thread each end every time they have visited and would have no conscious memory or awareness of ActiveMining. Because of his outward refusal to post "It is not Active Mining" and his comment, "I'll just say I've never heard of Active Mining" I am extremely sceptical of wiz's honesty in this matter to say the least.
When you have exhausted and can discount all other available explanations what you are left with has the greatest likelihood of being the truth, namely the Eligius mining pool's top miner is using multiple ActM units which are the 24TH miners described on the eAsic press release. It is merely a matter of time until Vigil is vindicated.
Just goes to show how easily fooled some people are.
When you have exhausted and can discount all other available explanations what you are left with has the greatest likelihood of being the truth, namely the Eligius mining pool's top miner is using multiple ActM units which are the 24TH miners described on the eAsic press release. It is merely a matter of time until Vigil is vindicated.
Just goes to show how easily fooled some people are. January 02, 2014, 04:59:16 PM
[...]I guess that settles that. Sucks to be Vigil.
I actually know who the miner is... I would not have posted otherwise.
Log is legit. Quote is legit.
wizkid057: I dont even know who "ActM" is
Log is legit. Quote is legit.I actually know who the miner is... I would not have posted otherwise.
That's pretty confirmed it isn't ActM
Ignorance is bliss
January 02, 2014, 04:49:55 PM
Besides the fact you just PM'd me and I told you unequivocally that they are not VMC Machines.
Responded prior to getting your message. January 02, 2014, 04:46:15 PM
[...]I guess that settles that. Sucks to be Vigil.
I actually know who the miner is... I would not have posted otherwise.
Log is legit. Quote is legit.
wizkid057: I dont even know who "ActM" is
Log is legit. Quote is legit.I actually know who the miner is... I would not have posted otherwise.
That's pretty confirmed it isn't ActM
Besides the fact you just PM'd me and I told you unequivocally that they are not VMC Machines.
Jump to: