[ActiveMining] The Official Active Mining Discussion Thread [Self-Moderated] - page 180.

Vigil

sr. member

Activity: 378

Merit: 250

Quote from: Bargraphics on January 02, 2014, 04:38:56 PM

Quote from: Vigil on January 02, 2014, 04:36:17 PM

Quote from: wizkid057 on January 02, 2014, 04:06:59 PM

Quote from: VinceSamios on January 02, 2014, 03:55:50 PM

[...]I guess that settles that. Sucks to be Vigil.

Quote from: wizkid057 on December 29, 2013, 05:57:35 PM

I actually know who the miner is... I would not have posted otherwise.

Log is legit. Quote is legit.

Wizkid did not confirm nor deny anything regarding ActM, Ken, or VMC involvement. Even if it is not our farm, it could be VMC machines in some sort of Beta as minerpart stated.

Quote from: wizkid057 on January 02, 2014, 04:06:59 PM

Quote from: VinceSamios on January 02, 2014, 03:55:50 PM

wizkid057: I dont even know who "ActM" is

Quote from: wizkid057 on December 29, 2013, 05:57:35 PM

I actually know who the miner is... I would not have posted otherwise.

Log is legit. Quote is legit.

That's pretty confirmed it isn't ActM

Not really. There is no definite: "It is not..." It also does not rule out the possibility that these are VMC machines.

Ozymandias

sr. member

Activity: 644

Merit: 250

I may have just broken my own nose due to extreme facepalm. I suppose it's time to take a wee bit of a break from this thread (though I'll likely just get sucked right back in). Have fun all!

stenkross

sr. member

Activity: 330

Merit: 250

Quote from: Vigil on January 02, 2014, 04:36:17 PM

Quote from: DoloresHazed on January 02, 2014, 04:31:35 PM

Quote from: wizkid057 on January 02, 2014, 04:06:59 PM

Quote from: VinceSamios on January 02, 2014, 03:55:50 PM

[...]I guess that settles that. Sucks to be Vigil.

Quote from: wizkid057 on December 29, 2013, 05:57:35 PM

I actually know who the miner is... I would not have posted otherwise.

Log is legit. Quote is legit.

Oh noes! wizkid057 is a crumbs alt!!!1! FUD!!!!!1!!

Wizkid did not confirm nor deny anything regarding ActM, Ken, or VMC involvement. Even if it is not our farm, it could be VMC machines in some sort of Beta as minerpart stated.

Here's a twist for you:
The company doing the mining is: *drumroll* ... eAsic!
Yep, the chips are done, but they keep telling Ken they are "delayed", so eAsic can hash with them first.

Bargraphics

hero member

Activity: 518

Merit: 500

Every man is guilty of all the good he did not do.

Quote from: Vigil on January 02, 2014, 04:36:17 PM

Quote from: wizkid057 on January 02, 2014, 04:06:59 PM

Quote from: VinceSamios on January 02, 2014, 03:55:50 PM

[...]I guess that settles that. Sucks to be Vigil.

Quote from: wizkid057 on December 29, 2013, 05:57:35 PM

I actually know who the miner is... I would not have posted otherwise.

Log is legit. Quote is legit.

Wizkid did not confirm nor deny anything regarding ActM, Ken, or VMC involvement. Even if it is not our farm, it could be VMC machines in some sort of Beta as minerpart stated.

Quote from: wizkid057 on January 02, 2014, 04:06:59 PM

Quote from: VinceSamios on January 02, 2014, 03:55:50 PM

wizkid057: I dont even know who "ActM" is

Quote from: wizkid057 on December 29, 2013, 05:57:35 PM

I actually know who the miner is... I would not have posted otherwise.

Log is legit. Quote is legit.

That's pretty confirmed it isn't ActM

Vigil

sr. member

Activity: 378

Merit: 250

Quote from: DoloresHazed on January 02, 2014, 04:31:35 PM

Quote from: wizkid057 on January 02, 2014, 04:06:59 PM

Quote from: VinceSamios on January 02, 2014, 03:55:50 PM

[...]I guess that settles that. Sucks to be Vigil.

Quote from: wizkid057 on December 29, 2013, 05:57:35 PM

I actually know who the miner is... I would not have posted otherwise.

Log is legit. Quote is legit.

Oh noes! wizkid057 is a crumbs alt!!!1! FUD!!!!!1!!

Wizkid did not confirm nor deny anything regarding ActM, Ken, or VMC involvement. Even if it is not our farm, it could be VMC machines in some sort of Beta as minerpart stated.

DoloresHazed

newbie

Activity: 7

Merit: 0

Quote from: wizkid057 on January 02, 2014, 04:06:59 PM

Quote from: VinceSamios on January 02, 2014, 03:55:50 PM

[...]I guess that settles that. Sucks to be Vigil.

Quote from: wizkid057 on December 29, 2013, 05:57:35 PM

I actually know who the miner is... I would not have posted otherwise.

Log is legit. Quote is legit.

Oh noes! wizkid057 is a crumbs alt!!!1! FUD!!!!!1!!

https://i.imgur.com/sikgl1z.gif
Is it live, or is it Intellihash^TM?

SebastianJu

legendary

Activity: 2674

Merit: 1083

Legendary Escrow Service - Tip Jar in Profile

Quote from: keepinithamsta on January 01, 2014, 08:58:28 PM

Quote from: SebastianJu on January 01, 2014, 08:10:13 PM

Quote from: kslaughter on January 01, 2014, 08:00:32 PM

Weekly Update 1/1/14

Happy New Year!

The new year looks bright for Active Mining as we continue to assemble our miners for quick delivery.

Not a lot of changes from last weeks update:

We are also continuing to develop our Intellihash program and with our 2013 sales at $6,311,788.33 we have a very good share of the market.

We have been working 100% on our core business.

ActiveMining-PR Staff

If you really assemble then why no picture of it? I mean its easy as pie to do.

I think Ken is confused. By "we continue to assemble our miners for quick delivery" he means that he's putting power supplies into cases.

Ah... now i understand. I knew its some kind of cheap rethorik but i could make sense of "assembling". But prebuilding is assembling too.

I really dont know what Ken is doing. It doesnt sound like he has much work to do but still he cant manage to write the verification script.

Vigil

sr. member

Activity: 378

Merit: 250

Quote from: minerpart on January 02, 2014, 03:45:53 PM

Vigil you have done a great job here - the new Colombo. I'm 75% convinced it's us or out first major customer taking a 'beta' product with support.

This could explain the wild fluctuations in hashrate. These could have been the first batch that were having issues or satisfactory chips with required software tune-ups.

Bargraphics

hero member

Activity: 518

Merit: 500

Every man is guilty of all the good he did not do.

Quote from: VinceSamios on January 02, 2014, 04:08:19 PM

Quote from: Vigil on January 02, 2014, 04:00:10 PM

Quote from: VinceSamios on January 02, 2014, 03:55:50 PM

VinceSamios: wizkid057 / Luke-Jr - would you guys mind confirming for the idiots in the ActM thread that the 250TH account is not ActM. plz, thanx.https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=297503.new#new
wizkid057: I dont even know who "ActM" is
VinceSamios: ActiveMining aka Virtual Mining Co aka Ken Slaughter
wizkid057: never heard of them
wizkid057: heh
VinceSamios: Can you do me a major favour and just pop in and say "it's not ActM" - would be super appreciated
wizkid057: then someone will ask me to say "its not XXX" or "its not YYY" ... I guess I made the mistake before by pointing out that its not hashfast, but, I think I'm just going to let users figure it out on their own from now on
VinceSamios: I see your point.
wizkid057: I'll just say here that I've never heard of "ActiveMining" until you mentioned it just now

I guess that settles that. Sucks to be Vigil.

Quote from: wizkid057 on December 29, 2013, 05:57:35 PM

I actually know who the miner is... I would not have posted otherwise.

Total BS. He never denied it was Active Mining or Ken. Ken may not even have opened the account acknowledging anything regarding ActM. I can sign up for Eligius and no one would have any idea who I was. Wizkid dodged the question.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=VDK90WWh8Ck

Do the maths, a data centre a day keeps the doctor at bay.

They have their own pool, swing and a miss

VinceSamios

sr. member

Activity: 448

Merit: 250

Quote from: Vigil on January 02, 2014, 04:00:10 PM

Quote from: VinceSamios on January 02, 2014, 03:55:50 PM

VinceSamios: wizkid057 / Luke-Jr - would you guys mind confirming for the idiots in the ActM thread that the 250TH account is not ActM. plz, thanx.https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=297503.new#new
wizkid057: I dont even know who "ActM" is
VinceSamios: ActiveMining aka Virtual Mining Co aka Ken Slaughter
wizkid057: never heard of them
wizkid057: heh
VinceSamios: Can you do me a major favour and just pop in and say "it's not ActM" - would be super appreciated
wizkid057: then someone will ask me to say "its not XXX" or "its not YYY" ... I guess I made the mistake before by pointing out that its not hashfast, but, I think I'm just going to let users figure it out on their own from now on
VinceSamios: I see your point.
wizkid057: I'll just say here that I've never heard of "ActiveMining" until you mentioned it just now

I guess that settles that. Sucks to be Vigil.

Quote from: wizkid057 on December 29, 2013, 05:57:35 PM

I actually know who the miner is... I would not have posted otherwise.

Total BS. He never denied it was Active Mining or Ken. Ken may not even have opened the account acknowledging anything regarding ActM. I can sign up for Eligius and no one would have any idea who I was. Wizkid dodged the question.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=VDK90WWh8Ck

Do the maths, a data centre a day keeps the doctor at bay.

stenkross

sr. member

Activity: 330

Merit: 250

Quote from: Vigil on January 02, 2014, 04:04:16 PM

Quote from: lobbes on January 02, 2014, 04:01:57 PM

At the end of the day, it is still just speculation, not evidence.

I could see the 'Ken secretly mining' theory, but I don't buy the 'element of surprise' argument for explaining why Ken wouldn't bolster credibility and sales by announcing such a positive piece of news. It just doesn't make sense to me.

Everyone knows Ken doesn't trust anyone. The whole project has been filled with "NDA" - he doesn't want anyone to know anything until he is ready.

As a shareholder I apreciate that you pump the stock value, I really do.
But please, save some gun powder for the time when it is actually possible to trade.

wizkid057

legendary

Activity: 1223

Merit: 1006

Quote from: VinceSamios on January 02, 2014, 03:55:50 PM

VinceSamios: wizkid057 / Luke-Jr - would you guys mind confirming for the idiots in the ActM thread that the 250TH account is not ActM. plz, thanx.https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=297503.new#new
wizkid057: I dont even know who "ActM" is
VinceSamios: ActiveMining aka Virtual Mining Co aka Ken Slaughter
wizkid057: never heard of them
wizkid057: heh
VinceSamios: Can you do me a major favour and just pop in and say "it's not ActM" - would be super appreciated
wizkid057: then someone will ask me to say "its not XXX" or "its not YYY" ... I guess I made the mistake before by pointing out that its not hashfast, but, I think I'm just going to let users figure it out on their own from now on
VinceSamios: I see your point.
wizkid057: I'll just say here that I've never heard of "ActiveMining" until you mentioned it just now

I guess that settles that. Sucks to be Vigil.

Quote from: wizkid057 on December 29, 2013, 05:57:35 PM

I actually know who the miner is... I would not have posted otherwise.

Log is legit. Quote is legit.

Vigil

sr. member

Activity: 378

Merit: 250

Quote from: lobbes on January 02, 2014, 04:01:57 PM

At the end of the day, it is still just speculation, not evidence.

I could see the 'Ken secretly mining' theory, but I don't buy the 'element of surprise' argument for explaining why Ken wouldn't bolster credibility and sales by announcing such a positive piece of news. It just doesn't make sense to me.

Everyone knows Ken doesn't trust anyone. The whole project has been filled with "NDA" - he doesn't want anyone to know anything until he is ready.

lobbes

full member

Activity: 240

Merit: 101

Quote from: Vigil on January 02, 2014, 03:33:31 PM

Quote from: stenkross on January 02, 2014, 03:27:04 PM

Quote from: Vigil on January 02, 2014, 03:14:37 PM

Quote from: stenkross on January 02, 2014, 03:11:43 PM

Quote from: Vigil on January 02, 2014, 02:59:18 PM

Like shit. I showed the plots which documented 24.5 TH increments in hashing power at Eligius. There are no other miners which can account for that. Here are the unstable testing miners:

Ken posted a picture of some empty work benches for crying out loud.
The man is desperate for showing us something that proves he is making some kind of progress!

What reason could he possible have to not show us the ultimate proof that he succeeded and that we (and him) will be millionares?

Because the product is not in shipping condition - still working out the bugs in the software (i.e., Intellihash), which is why the hashrates are jumping all over the place. They are still being tested and Ken wants to keep the element of surprise... or Ken is secretly running a mining farm with no intention of letting anyone else know.

Nope, I am not buying it.
It is far more likely that it belongs to some *unknown ASIC manufacturer* sponsored by some *unknown VC firm* to create, set up & mine their own hardware in *their own secret location*.
That is, if all known ASIC manufacturers have been eliminated as you claim.

And adding power in the exact increment of our advertised machines?

No. Highly unlikely. Much more likely that this is, in fact, ActM.

Ken was here. He did not deny it. Nor did the operator of Eligius deny whether it was ActM.

At the end of the day, it is still just speculation, not evidence.

I could see the 'Ken secretly mining' theory, but I don't buy the 'element of surprise' argument for explaining why Ken wouldn't bolster credibility and sales by announcing such a positive piece of news. It just doesn't make sense to me.

Vigil

sr. member

Activity: 378

Merit: 250

Quote from: VinceSamios on January 02, 2014, 03:55:50 PM

VinceSamios: wizkid057 / Luke-Jr - would you guys mind confirming for the idiots in the ActM thread that the 250TH account is not ActM. plz, thanx.https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=297503.new#new
wizkid057: I dont even know who "ActM" is
VinceSamios: ActiveMining aka Virtual Mining Co aka Ken Slaughter
wizkid057: never heard of them
wizkid057: heh
VinceSamios: Can you do me a major favour and just pop in and say "it's not ActM" - would be super appreciated
wizkid057: then someone will ask me to say "its not XXX" or "its not YYY" ... I guess I made the mistake before by pointing out that its not hashfast, but, I think I'm just going to let users figure it out on their own from now on
VinceSamios: I see your point.
wizkid057: I'll just say here that I've never heard of "ActiveMining" until you mentioned it just now

I guess that settles that. Sucks to be Vigil.

Quote from: wizkid057 on December 29, 2013, 05:57:35 PM

I actually know who the miner is... I would not have posted otherwise.

Total BS. He never denied it was Active Mining or Ken. Ken may not even have opened the account acknowledging anything regarding ActM. I can sign up for Eligius and no one would have any idea who I was. Wizkid dodged the question.

Vigil

sr. member

Activity: 378

Merit: 250

Quote from: Mabsark on January 02, 2014, 03:55:07 PM

Quote from: Vigil on January 02, 2014, 02:54:19 PM

Quote from: drawingthesun on January 02, 2014, 02:40:55 PM

Bargraphics, how soon until you visit Ken and take pictures of progress?

You can already monitor the progress on Eligius. We have 10 24.5 TH miners that are still going through some software debugging or potentially hardware issues.

You people are blind as all shit.

We're blind? You're the one who keeps claiming roughly 50 Th/s increments are roughly 25 Th/s increments.
You're also stupid for not realising that there are numerous ways of adding numbers together to make 50.

The fact is, there's zero evidence to support your claim and evidence disproving it in the form of Ken stating that he is still waiting for chips.

50 TH is divisible by 25 TH -> 2 x 25 = 50. All the increases were multiples of 25 TH. All the drops and power-ups were multiples of 25 TH. There are many ways to get 50 TH but not repeatedly and through multiple power-downs and restarts. The last addition was 25 TH (24.5 TH).

VinceSamios

sr. member

Activity: 448

Merit: 250

VinceSamios: wizkid057 / Luke-Jr - would you guys mind confirming for the idiots in the ActM thread that the 250TH account is not ActM. plz, thanx.https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=297503.new#new
wizkid057: I dont even know who "ActM" is
VinceSamios: ActiveMining aka Virtual Mining Co aka Ken Slaughter
wizkid057: never heard of them
wizkid057: heh
VinceSamios: Can you do me a major favour and just pop in and say "it's not ActM" - would be super appreciated
wizkid057: then someone will ask me to say "its not XXX" or "its not YYY" ... I guess I made the mistake before by pointing out that its not hashfast, but, I think I'm just going to let users figure it out on their own from now on
VinceSamios: I see your point.
wizkid057: I'll just say here that I've never heard of "ActiveMining" until you mentioned it just now

I guess that settles that. Sucks to be Vigil.

Quote from: wizkid057 on December 29, 2013, 05:57:35 PM

I actually know who the miner is... I would not have posted otherwise.

Mabsark

legendary

Activity: 826

Merit: 1004

Quote from: Vigil on January 02, 2014, 02:54:19 PM

Quote from: drawingthesun on January 02, 2014, 02:40:55 PM

Bargraphics, how soon until you visit Ken and take pictures of progress?

You can already monitor the progress on Eligius. We have 10 24.5 TH miners that are still going through some software debugging or potentially hardware issues.

You people are blind as all shit.

We're blind? You're the one who keeps claiming roughly 50 Th/s increments are roughly 25 Th/s increments.
You're also stupid for not realising that there are numerous ways of adding numbers together to make 50.

The fact is, there's zero evidence to support your claim and evidence disproving it in the form of Ken stating that he is still waiting for chips.

Vigil

sr. member

Activity: 378

Merit: 250

Quote from: VinceSamios on January 02, 2014, 03:47:21 PM

Quote from: Vigil on January 02, 2014, 03:41:14 PM

Quote from: VinceSamios on January 02, 2014, 03:37:47 PM

Actually much more likely someone is putting 50 x 500gh units online one at a time... or 12 x 2TH units (ahem cointerra)

CoinTerra's units run stable, numbnuts. The machines on Eligius are obviously not finalized in either hardware or software. Rule-out any unit which has been shipped to end-users.

Cointerra didn't get chips until new years eve... so if I'm a numbnuts its because I suggest 12 x 12th units might be cointerra. silly me.

Well, then Cointerra is out because these machines started on Dec. 24th. and were incrementally added to in multiples of 24.5 TH all the way to 254 TH (245 TH + initial 9 TH) on Dec. 30th.

VinceSamios

sr. member

Activity: 448

Merit: 250

Quote from: Vigil on January 02, 2014, 03:41:14 PM

Quote from: VinceSamios on January 02, 2014, 03:37:47 PM

Actually much more likely someone is putting 50 x 500gh units online one at a time... or 12 x 2TH units (ahem cointerra)

CoinTerra's units run stable, numbnuts. The machines on Eligius are obviously not finalized in either hardware or software. Rule-out any unit which has been shipped to end-users.

Cointerra didn't get chips until new years eve... so if I'm a numbnuts its because I suggest 12 x 12th units might be cointerra. silly me.

Topic: [ActiveMining] The Official Active Mining Discussion Thread [Self-Moderated] - page 180. (Read 771512 times)