Topic: AI Spam Report Reference Thread (Read 22683 times)

Do you own a casino? Or would like to offer your own management service? Reach me in telegram or DM here. I'll explain you how selecting non gambling poster benefits. You are asking some irrelevant questions here and it's sort of defaming/questioning my campaign management. This is not the first time I'm dealing with this though. I remember someone questioned about 7 gambling post per week when I required in a campaign, while 10 gambling post existed long ago.

But atleast you can always credit a good manager for his works and I know little mouse no doubt is one.

Your client owns a casino, and their target/potential clients are on the gambling board; selecting a high-quality non-gambling poster is okay, but what benefit does it bring to your client?

The problem is you guys do not pay attention to the gambling posters on self-moderated threads mostly because they don't have tons of merits and end up with AI chatbot merchants- this is general observation.

Your client owns a casino, and their target/potential clients are on the gambling board; selecting a high-quality non-gambling poster is okay, but what benefit does it bring to your client?

The problem is you guys do not pay attention to the gambling posters on self-moderated threads mostly because they don't have tons of merits and end up with AI chatbot merchants- this is general observation.

It's not the first time I have done this. I accept non gambling quality users and monitor them. If after a certain time, I'm not satisfied, there have been few cases where I sent them DM to not post in gambling section or at least made it as their wish. It's better to get a quality non gambling user than a genuine gambling board spammer. Maybe it's just me who thinks this way.

Perhaps, time to blame managers for situation like this one. What's the point of employing a non- gambling poster for a gambling signature campaign.

This:

At least the campaign manager has kicked him from the campaign. Igebotz claimed it's likely to be a 7 day ban, although he's likely to not ever return after being caught.

2. A minimum of 10 posts in Gambling and/or Gambling Discussion is required per week to be eligible for the payment.

He still has his signature, so it must be a temporary ban.

What pushed him to the gambling board

Campaign Rules
2. A minimum of 10 posts in Gambling and/or Gambling Discussion is required per week to be eligible for the payment.

Wow, he's banned?

Hi Everyone,

I’m currently exploring potential investments in the crypto market and am torn between Floki (FLOKI) and Beam (BEAM). These two projects cater to very different niches, and I’m hoping to get some insights from this community on their pros and cons.

Floki (FLOKI):

   •   Meme coin with a strong community and branding tied to Elon Musk’s dog.
   •   Ecosystem includes NFTs, DeFi tools, and a metaverse project called Valhalla.
   •   High-risk, high-reward potential but limited practical use cases.

Beam (BEAM):

   •   Privacy-focused cryptocurrency built on the Mimblewimble protocol.
   •   Offers strong anonymity features for secure transactions.
   •   Competes with established privacy coins like Monero and Zcash.

What I’m Considering:

   •   Floki seems like a speculative opportunity that could explode with market hype, but it’s very volatile.
   •   Beam appeals to me for its real-world utility and focus on privacy, but it’s less talked about and might take longer to gain traction.

Questions for the Community:
   1.   Have you invested in either Floki or Beam? What has your experience been like?
   2.   Which do you think has more potential in the current market conditions?
   3.   Are there other projects similar to Beam or Floki that I should consider?

Looking forward to your thoughts and opinions. Thanks in advance for helping me out!

Thanks for your input, Patikno!
You raise a valid point about governments and banks disliking anonymity, which could indeed affect projects like BEAM. However, I wonder if there’s still a niche market for privacy-focused coins, especially with growing concerns around data breaches and surveillance.

On the other hand, SuperVerse’s focus on gaming and NFTs does seem to align with current market trends, but I’m curious if that sector might become oversaturated in 2024. Do you think SuperVerse has a unique edge over competitors in the gaming/NFT space, or is it relying mainly on the broader market rotation? Also i saw some YouTube videos saying
Super might be a scam, what do you think?

Looking forward to hearing your thoughts and keeping this discussion going!

Hello everyone,


I’ve been observing Clearpool’s performance lately, and it’s puzzling me. Despite the broader market moving positively, especially with Ondo showing a significant upward trend recently, Clearpool seems to be lagging behind significantly.


A few points I’ve been considering:

1.   Market Sentiment: Is there a lack of confidence in Clearpool compared to Ondo?

2.   Adoption and Use Cases: Has Ondo released updates or partnerships that Clearpool hasn’t matched?

3.   Tokenomics: Are there structural issues with Clearpool’s tokenomics that could be suppressing its growth?

4.   Liquidity and Trading Volume: Is there simply less interest or liquidity in Clearpool’s markets?


If anyone has insights or theories, especially those with knowledge of recent developments in Clearpool’s ecosystem, I’d love to hear your thoughts. Are we missing a catalyst that Ondo has? Or is this simply a delayed reaction, and Clearpool might catch up soon?

Looking forward to discussing this further!

Hi everyone,

As AI continues to grow in importance, many crypto projects are positioning themselves to benefit from this trend. I’m currently exploring two projects that are gaining attention for their potential in the AI space: Near Protocol (NEAR) and Render Token (RNDR).

NEAR Protocol (NEAR):
   •   A scalable Layer-1 blockchain known for low fees and high-speed transactions.
   •   Strong focus on building decentralized apps (dApps), some of which are AI-integrated.
   •   Ecosystem development is solid, with projects like Open Web Foundry emphasizing AI use cases.

Render Token (RNDR):
   •   A decentralized GPU rendering network, providing on-demand GPU power for AI, 3D rendering, and other compute-heavy tasks.
   •   Already being adopted for AI model training and rendering in the metaverse.
   •   With the growing demand for distributed computing in AI, its use case is very compelling.

What I’m Thinking:

   1.   NEAR offers broad versatility as a blockchain platform that could support various AI-enabled dApps.
   2.   RNDR is a specialized solution, directly tackling GPU resource demand for AI workloads.
   3.   Both projects seem promising, but they target different aspects of the AI revolution.

Questions for the Forum:

   1.   Which of these two projects do you think has more potential to benefit from the AI boom?
   2.   Is it better to go with NEAR for its infrastructure approach, or RNDR for its GPU-centric model?
   3.   Are there any other cryptos you’d recommend for gaining exposure to AI-related growth?

Looking forward to hearing your thoughts and insights!

I totally get why you're frustrated with all the phishing attempts and scams targeting $XION. It's crazy how these scammers come out of the woodwork as soon as a project announces something big. Your experience is a great reminder to always double-check info through official channels before doing anything.

And yeah, it's not surprising to see different prices for $XION on different exchanges. Market speculation, liquidity, and other factors can all impact prices. Just remember to stick with official sources, like the project team and reputable exchanges, to get the most accurate info and avoid any potential risks.

That's a fantastic find! A 25% APR on a 7-day lock-up is quite impressive. I've personally used similar short-term savings plans to boost my crypto holdings on Bitget. While the high yields are tempting, it's crucial to balance them with liquidity needs. I often allocate a portion of my portfolio to these short-term plans, while keeping the majority liquid for potential opportunities or unexpected expenses.

I've been keeping an eye on the crypto space, and I've noticed something interesting - memecoins are on the rise! Projects like ACT, PNUT, BAN, and GOAT were initially written off, but they've proven everyone wrong with their impressive growth and adoption.
I'm intrigued by Koma Inu, a dog-themed token that's been getting a lot of hype due to its connection to Shib and its 'protector of BNB' vibe. Have you invested in any memecoins that have paid off this year? I'd love to hear about your experiences!

Low esteem, low IQ, faking to be who you're not, seeking public validation, fitting in where you don't belong, and forcing knowledge are just a few of the million reasons why people use AI to communicate. Elon musk and China AI will take our jobs before 2030, and it's already happening on this forum.

Update - Legentbtc has been removed from our signature campaign, our mission of zero AI tolerance continues at Stake.

Seeing Bitcoin cross $100K feels surreal. I remember when $20K seemed like an impossible dream, and now here we are. For me, it’s not just about the price—it’s about how Bitcoin has redefined financial freedom and pushed the boundaries of what’s possible. 

The question is, what’s next? Are we heading for an even bigger rally, or will things slow down? Either way, it’s incredible to witness this moment. What’s your take?

I’ve been hearing a lot about Bitcoin mining lately and how it’s the backbone of the entire network. From verifying transactions to earning rewards, it seems like a fascinating process. 

But I’m curious—how does it really work? Is it all about expensive equipment and electricity costs, or are there other factors to consider? If anyone here is into mining or has tried it before, I’d love to hear your experiences and any tips for beginners. 

Let’s discuss!

I’ve been exploring BugsCoin, and it’s a refreshing take on reward systems in the crypto space. Unlike traditional setups, it’s built to offer tangible economic benefits for community engagement.

Whether it’s earning rewards from simulated investment competitions on AntTalk or accessing premium content, BugsCoin feels like it’s redefining how rewards work.

One feature I like is the token scarcity model, driven by liquidity management and burns, which could help sustain its value over time.

Anyone else using BugsCoin? What are your thoughts?

GOATS (GOATS) is a Telegram-based point-collecting game, combining meme coin fun with the potential for community-driven profitability. The project connects goat lovers and crypto enthusiasts, creating a space for engagement and collaboration.

While the game offers a unique way to interact with digital assets, its community-driven nature makes it an exciting opportunity for those interested in meme coins and decentralized projects. As more people join, the collective engagement creates a vibrant space for ideas, discussions, and potential growth.

Anyone participating in GOATS? What do you think about projects combining gaming and cryptocurrency? Let’s discuss!

You're absolutely right about the confusion between $PEP and $PEPE. Ensuring accurate communication, especially in discussions about tokens or projects, is essential to avoid misleading or misinforming others.

As for your point on meme coins, the criticism you bring up is valid. Many meme coins, including forks of popular tokens like DOGE, often lack intrinsic utility. Their value tends to be driven by speculation, community hype, and their "moonshot" potential rather than any fundamental technological innovation or real-world application. Forking such coins typically adds little value unless there is a meaningful and well-defined use case or innovation tied to the new project.

This phenomenon highlights the speculative nature of some areas of the crypto market. However, some developers and communities argue that even meme coins can serve as gateways for new users into the blockchain ecosystem or foster unique subcultures and engagement. What are your thoughts on how meme coins could potentially evolve to offer real utility?

You're right that predicting the next big altcoin is part luck and part strategy. While some altcoins can surge 10x or more, there's no guaranteed way to predict it. However, focusing on established projects with strong communities, like ADA, ALGO, or DOT, is a more reliable approach. These coins have a proven track record, and while their gains might be slower, they come with less risk. High returns are possible, but they often depend on timing and external factors, so luck plays a big role in those big swings.

You're absolutely right to be cautious about centralized projects or "shitcoins." When a business or organization behind a cryptocurrency is centralized, it often means there's a single point of failure. If the organization faces issues like mismanagement, fraud, or external regulatory pressure, the entire value of the token or coin could collapse, leaving investors at a loss.

In the case of centralized tokens, the risk is higher because trust is placed in a single entity, rather than in a decentralized, open-source system where no one person or group has total control. Cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin and Ethereum, for example, are designed to be decentralized, offering a degree of security that doesn't depend on one central organization.

Storing money in centralized tokens for the long term is risky, as the project could collapse if the organization behind it fails or loses credibility. People who invest in these projects might be speculating on short-term gains, but it's not a sound strategy for long-term wealth preservation.

For long-term security, many prefer decentralized, transparent, and community-driven projects that are less vulnerable to centralized failure. Ultimately, the value of a cryptocurrency should be driven by its fundamentals, community adoption, and technological advancements, not just by speculative hype.

Wow, he's banned? I'm surprised because I haven't seen ranked up accounts banned for AI, unless it wasn't announced in the other cases of Yatsan or legendbtc.

Oops yeah that didn't age well. What pushed him to the gambling board when he was comfortable making posts from his brain on the technical board though. 

I was just about to tag @Little Mouse when you pointed it out, I'm hoping he sees this, even though it's quite late already; he has been paid for the previous week. At least this will prevent him from being paid in the future and reserve his spot for someone who's interested in actually putting some effort in their posts.

You should report all these people straight to the campaign managers. I'm sure most reputable managers and campaigns won't want to pay for these sorts of posts.

Good catch, it's straight up AI, copy pasted from ChatGPT, with no changes made. I understand he could be struggling to meet his quota, but he didn't even make the effort to mask his AI, something we've seen quite a few times with users on signature campaigns.

I'd also report any of his posts that have AI content.

User: albert0bsd