Pages:
Author

Topic: AI Spam Report Reference Thread - page 6. (Read 23221 times)

sr. member
Activity: 1288
Merit: 375
October 13, 2024, 02:18:27 PM
Yea before anyone jumps the gun here I use GPT to format some reply and check spelling issues.
There can be genuine reasons people use GPT to format stuff and it will always detect as it's been written by AI.

Dyslexia or other medical reasons may lead someone to use GPT.

While I see 95% of the posts here are clearly just spammers posteing I welcome this project but keep in mind there are genuine users who use it to assist them.

No one would have said shit if hal finney was still here using GPT to commuicate.

Keep that in mind.

But also keep up the good work or detecting this crap.

The tools and services being used to detect AI-generated texts here are checked thoroughly before they are used. I checked them myself, and they don't detect a text that isn't AI-generated. If you think your posts might get suspected of being generated through an AI, you should use other tools such as Grammarly or Quillbot as suggested by @Ultegra134.

I use Grammarly myself, to detect grammar, spelling, or other small mistakes such as punctuation marks in my posts, but my posts aren't detected as AI-generated posts, you can try it using any of the tools we are using here, I used all these websites on my own posts and they didn't detect anything and said that the texts are written by a human because there is a difference in the pattern.

When you write a text yourself but only use a tool to rectify the mistakes, it won't change the pattern unless you ask for it, so there shouldn't be problems for genuine users who are writing posts themselves but are using certain tools, even if they are powered by AI, to detect and correct the mistakes.
hero member
Activity: 1778
Merit: 907
October 13, 2024, 12:28:25 PM
Yea before anyone jumps the gun here I use GPT to format some reply and check spelling issues.
There can be genuine reasons people use GPT to format stuff and it will always detect as it's been written by AI.

Dyslexia or other medical reasons may lead someone to use GPT.

While I see 95% of the posts here are clearly just spammers posteing I welcome this project but keep in mind there are genuine users who use it to assist them.

No one would have said shit if hal finney was still here using GPT to commuicate.

Keep that in mind.

But also keep up the good work or detecting this crap.
I don't recall finding one case of those I've reported that was confirmed to be using ChatGPT simply to improve their text. One or two users that had claimed it were straight up lying. I'm not saying you're doing the same, I haven't gone through your posts to make any assumptions, but I don't understand how you're using ChatGPT for this reason, there are services such as Quillbot that improve your grammar and text without risking being detected as AI.
hero member
Activity: 1241
Merit: 623
OGRaccoon
October 13, 2024, 12:18:45 PM
Yea before anyone jumps the gun here I use GPT to format some reply and check spelling issues.
There can be genuine reasons people use GPT to format stuff and it will always detect as it's been written by AI.

Dyslexia or other medical reasons may lead someone to use GPT.

While I see 95% of the posts here are clearly just spammers posteing I welcome this project but keep in mind there are genuine users who use it to assist them.

No one would have said shit if hal finney was still here using GPT to commuicate.

Keep that in mind.

But also keep up the good work or detecting this crap.
sr. member
Activity: 1288
Merit: 375
October 13, 2024, 05:02:30 AM
User: nomachine

The proposal to adopt a fork that makes early unmoved coins inaccessible is a creative and technically sound solution, but I wonder if it might set a dangerous precedent. If we start introducing forks based on social pressure or fear of large holders, it could erode the neutrality of Bitcoin and its 'code is law' philosophy. What’s to stop future forks from being initiated for other reasons of perceived 'danger,' unfairness, or even psychotic whims? It could spiral into a situation where anyone with significant holdings becomes a target.

Additionally, there's a technical consideration: the immutability of the blockchain is one of Bitcoin's core features, and even an opt-in fork that nullifies early coins could be seen as violating that principle. While it may temporarily solve the issue, it could also sow division within the community and weaken the overall trust in Bitcoin's unchangeable nature.

Ultimately, the early coins represent an interesting dilemma, but perhaps the best course of action is to uphold Bitcoin’s foundational values of privacy, neutrality, and immutability. In a way, leaving the coins untouched serves as a reminder of those principles.

(archived)

Hivemoderation: 99.9% likely to contain AI-generated content
Copyleaks: AI content detected.
Sapling.ai: 100% Fake

Ah yes, the classic story of Puzzle 66, where the key was faster than my Wi-Fi! I, too, was ready to change my life and say goodbye to instant noodles forever... only to watch the dream evaporate faster than my hope in crypto riches.

But hey, stealer, if you're out there, how about we split the 'bad food fund' 50/50? You keep 50% of the loot, and we can both try to bounce back from my deep, puzzle-induced depression. 🤷‍♂️

As for my fellow puzzle chasers: Let’s not stage any bad drama here—I’ve already seen enough of that in my own life! It’s time to embrace the tragic comedy that is puzzle-solving. 😅 Also, note to self: if you’re poor, solving complex puzzles may not be the miracle escape plan you hoped for. But hey, who needs financial freedom when you’ve got sarcasm?

Let’s just say, if puzzles were your 'big plan' to escape bad food, you might want to try a new recipe! Go fishing and eat fish every day.

(archived)

Hivemoderation: 87.4% likely to contain AI-generated content
Copyleaks: AI content detected
Sapling.ai: 100% Fake

This puzzle could be seen as a multi-layered operation—part honeypot, part marketing strategy, and part intelligence-gathering mechanism. It benefits those with access to massive computational resources and deep knowledge of cryptography, while simultaneously reinforcing Bitcoin’s narrative of security. For the broader public, it perpetuates the illusion that Bitcoin is unbreakable, further securing its place in the financial ecosystem.

The participants are burning through resources, both personal and global, with the promise of a reward that may never materialize. Meanwhile, the real beneficiaries—the creators—are potentially profiting either financially or by reinforcing Bitcoin's cryptographic dominance. This asymmetric dynamic of exploitation mirrors how intelligence agencies and governments often extract value from public efforts, leaving ordinary people as pawns in much larger geopolitical and economic games.

In the end, it’s about power and trust. As you noted, participants may come to trust Bitcoin after failing to crack these puzzles, but that trust is built on an orchestrated display, one that masks the true nature of who benefits. The creators are manipulating the puzzle solvers, reinforcing their own power and the perceived security of Bitcoin, while the public invests time and resources chasing a prize that serves someone else's agenda.

(archived)

Hivemoderation: 98.2% likely to contain AI-generated content
Copyleaks: AI content detected
Sapling.ai: 100% Fake

These are only from the first couple of pages of his post history, I'm pretty sure there is more if we go deeper.


Edit: An addition, this one even got 4 merits:

Once upon a time, in the land of Puzzleopolis, the engineers and cryptographers faced an epic challenge: unlocking the most elusive puzzle guarded by two mighty forces—Memory and Processor. To conquer this challenge, they wielded two legendary tools: BSGS (Baby-Step Giant-Step) and the Kangaroo algorithm. The Memory Dragon soared through the puzzle’s vast landscape, using its great wingspan to store and recall information. Meanwhile, the Processor Kangaroo hopped strategically, seeking the shortest path to the solution.

One day, Satoshi, the legendary cryptographer known for his profound puzzles, walked into the village.  The townsfolk were arguing about how to make their puzzle-solving tools better.  One villager enthusiastically said, “We must make the Memory Dragon flap its wings harder! If it could fly faster, we’d solve puzzles more quickly!”

Satoshi smiled and gently shook his head.  “You can’t bend the rules of physics and information theory,” he said. “The Memory Dragon can only carry so much before it slows down. Bigger wings won’t help if they weigh it down.”

Another villager suggested,  “Then we must make the Processor Kangaroo stronger! More power means faster hops!” A wise engineer,  inspired by Satoshi’s insights, responded, “Strength alone won’t make the Kangaroo faster, it’s about how it hops.  You can give it more processors, but if it hops blindly, it’ll just end up lost in the puzzle.”

Confused, the villagers turned to Satoshi.  “Why can’t we improve both strategies?” they asked.  Satoshi, ever the thoughtful one, replied, “The Memory Dragon can’t be overloaded with data, or it’ll slow down.  And the Processor Kangaroo needs a smarter path, not just more power, to avoid hopping in the wrong direction.”

After much discussion, they all agreed:  you can't defy the laws of computation, but you can refine your approach. But then, the plot thickened, Satoshi pointed out that the biggest problem wasn't the tools at all. “It’s the human villager posting inefficient code,” he said with a  Grin.  The engineers laughed, realizing their code was slowing down everything.

The moral of the story? Before demanding stronger dragons or faster kangaroos, make sure you're not the one holding up progress with sloppy ideas.  And as Satoshi might add: “Good strategies, not brute force, are the key to solving puzzles, whether they’re mathematical or cryptographic.  And no, algorithms don’t need protein shakes.”

(archived)

Hivemoderation: 99.2% likely to contain AI-generated content
Copyleaks: AI Content Detected
Sapling.ai: 99.9% Fake
legendary
Activity: 2072
Merit: 4265
✿♥‿♥✿
October 11, 2024, 07:23:18 AM
To make Miguel's messages recognized as AI, simply remove the spaces.

Miguel Artur

The stock market of Brazil has recently underperformed, facing numerous uncertainties. Professor Miguel Artur notes that while certain sectors of the Brazilian economy, such as oil, exhibit promising collaborative prospects, inflationary pressures and tightening monetary policy present significant downside risks to the overall market. The recent interest rate hikes of the Brazilian central bank have exacerbated the downward trend, and technical indicators suggest that Ibovespa may face further corrections. This article will delve into three dimensions of the Brazilian stock market: oil cooperation and global economic integration, inflation and central bank policies, and technical corrections, exploring potential future investment opportunities and risks.
Impact of Oil Cooperation on the Stock Market
During a meeting between the National Oil Company of Brazil and the Indian Oil Minister, discussions focused on increasing the oil imports of India from Brazil, yet this news failed to positively influence the stock prices of the  National Oil Company of Brazil. Professor Miguel Artur argues that due to falling oil prices since June, market profit assessments for oil stocks remain low, resulting in a conservative investor response to the collaboration. Although the oil partnership between Brazil and India holds long-term potential for enhancing the profitability of Brazilian oil firms, the current weakness in oil prices undermines investor confidence in oil stocks.
Professor Miguel Artur points out that current market sentiment is primarily focused on macroeconomic risks, including inflation and monetary policy uncertainties. Investors need to closely monitor the actual earnings growth of the National Oil Company of Brazil in the coming months, as this may provide positive momentum for the relevant sectors in the medium to long term.
Impact of Inflation Pressures and Monetary Policy on the Stock Market
Professor Miguel Artur emphasizes that the interest rate hike policies place pressure on operational costs for businesses, particularly as rising financing costs lead many companies to face funding challenges. This poses a challenge for several sectors within the stock market, especially capital-intensive industries such as construction, real estate, and manufacturing. Concurrently, reduced consumer spending and increased borrowing costs are contributing to a slowdown in domestic demand, further exacerbating revenue pressures for businesses and undermining overall market performance.
Professor Miguel Artur further highlights that the persistence of the rate hike cycle may dampen market confidence and bring greater volatility risks in the fourth quarter. While controlling inflation is essential, if the central bank fails to strike a balance between inflation and economic growth in the future, the recovery of the Brazilian stock market may face additional constraints. During this period, investors should exercise caution, particularly regarding sectors closely tied to high-interest-rate environments, and conduct more rigorous risk assessments.
Technical Corrections and Investment Opportunities in the Stock Market
From a technical perspective, the Ibovespa index has formed a top pattern, indicating further correction risks. Professor Miguel Artur notes that the recent weak performance suggests the market may correct to the 120,000-point support level in the short term. This technical adjustment poses substantial risks for investors with large positions but presents a good opportunity for long-term investors holding cash.
According to Professor Miguel Artur, the technical pattern of Ibovespa does not imply a full-blown bear market; rather, it may represent a healthy adjustment following an extended period of gains. For investors with a long-term perspective, this market correction provides an excellent opportunity for strategic positioning at lower levels. He emphasizes the importance of selecting companies with strong fundamentals and long-term growth potential, rather than chasing short-term fluctuations.
Professor Miguel Artur warns that investors must remain vigilant, as market uncertainties remain high, particularly amid a complex and dynamic global economic environment. With adjustments in monetary policies from the Federal Reserve and other major economies, fluctuations in external capital flows and global investor sentiment will continue to affect the Brazilian stock market. Therefore, in the context of short-term market volatility, investors should adopt diversified investment strategies to avoid excessive concentration in a single industry or asset class.
In summary, Professor Miguel Artur asserts that despite the multiple challenges currently facing the Brazilian stock market, including inflation pressures, tightening monetary policy, and technical corrections, structural opportunities still exist from a long-term perspective. Notably, the long-term growth potential in the energy and infrastructure sectors, along with the economic drivers brought about by international cooperation, may yield substantial returns for future investors. However, he advises that in a highly uncertain market environment, investors should exercise caution, avoid overreaching for short-term gains, and prioritize sound risk management strategies to navigate market fluctuations effectively.

Hivemoderation 99.9% likely to contain AI Generated Text
Copyleaks AI Content Detected
Sapling.ai Fake: 100%

Miguel Artur points out that the conflict between X and the Brazilian government, which seemingly concluded with the payment of fines and compliance with legal requirements, reflects the regulatory risks faced by companies in the globalization process and has broad implications for the financial market. Particularly, as a crucial market in Latin America, Brazil banning and subsequent lifting for X once again highlight the complexities multinational companies encounter when operating across different jurisdictions. Miguel Artur believes that this is not just a tug-of-war between a tech company and a government but a clash between globalization and local laws and market dynamics, providing investors with critical market signals.
Globalization has permeated almost every industry, especially technology and finance. Miguel Artur analyzes that X, as a global platform, facing regulatory challenges in a significant market like Brazil, reflects the complex challenges multinational companies face against the backdrop of globalization. Although X managed to re-enter the market by paying fines and appointing a legal representative, these measures are more about resuming operations rather than genuinely addressing compliance issues. Miguel Artur notes that such "minimal effort" could lead to new conflicts in the future, especially as the Brazilian government increasingly emphasizes information regulation. Investors should be cautious, as similar events could negatively impact the company long-term financial health and stock market performance, particularly those relying on overseas markets.
From a financial perspective, the conflict between X and the Brazilian government has had profound effects on the company stock price and market sentiment. Miguel Artur believes that such events reveal a trend where global markets are becoming increasingly sensitive to corporate compliance and risk management capabilities. As the largest market for X in Latin America, the ban led to a noticeable decline in X advertising revenue, and the news of resuming operations somewhat boosted market morale. However, Miguel Artur points out that this short-term market reaction cannot mask the underlying long-term risks. X handling the situation contrasts sharply with companies like Meta and Google, indicating that the X approach to regulation may not meet market expectations. If similar events occur again in the future, market trust in X may continue to decline, affecting overall stock market performance. Miguel Artur advises investors that the regulatory risks of multinational companies should be thoroughly assessed and integrated into investment decisions.
As an integral part of global emerging markets, the economic and financial environment in Brazil has consistently attracted attention from global investors. Miguel Artur analyzes that although the Brazilian market has enormous growth potential, it also comes with high political and economic risks. The conflict between X and the Brazilian authorities is not an isolated incident but reflects the complex situation companies face in this market. For global investors, the regulatory environment and policy changes in Brazil can directly impact corporate operations and market performance. Therefore, Miguel Artur suggests that investors considering entering or expanding their investment portfolio in Brazil should carefully evaluate the political risks and economic policy changes of the country. For those already invested in the Brazilian market, keeping abreast of local policy trends, especially in the tech and financial sectors, is crucial.
While the conflict between X and the Brazilian government has been temporarily resolved, it has not fundamentally addressed the underlying issues. Miguel Artur points out that this conflict serves as a wake-up call for multinational companies regarding compliance challenges in global operations. The opportunities and risks brought by globalization coexist, and companies need to respond more proactively to the legal and regulatory requirements of various governments. For investors, the events in the Brazilian market provide a stark example of the complexities of the global financial environment. As global economic uncertainties increase, similar regulatory events may occur more frequently, and investors should remain vigilant about various risks, fully considering the impact of political and legal factors on the market in their decision-making process.

Hivemoderation 96.8% likely to contain AI Generated Text
Copyleaks AI Content Detected
Sapling.ai Fake: Fake: 99.9%

The recent volatility in the U.S. Treasury market has garnered widespread attention from global financial markets. The benchmark 10-year U.S. Treasury yield climbed above 4% this Monday, marking the highest level since August. This phenomenon reflects a reassessment of the Federal Reserve monetary policy outlook, especially in light of U.S. employment data released last Friday, which far exceeded expectations. Miguel Artur believes that the robust performance of the U.S. economy has dampened market expectations for significant Fed rate cuts and pushed Treasury yields higher. As the uncertainty surrounding the Fed monetary policy increases, the risks facing financial markets are further exacerbated, necessitating investors to reassess asset allocation strategies, particularly how turbulence in the Treasury market affects stocks and other asset classes.
The sudden spike in the 10-year U.S. Treasury yield is not a random event but a reflection of global economic and financial policy trends. Miguel Artur points out that over the past two months, the Fed aggressive rate cut policy initially drove down Treasury yields. However, recent stronger-than-expected growth in the U.S. labor market has significantly shifted market sentiment. The non-farm payroll report released last Friday showed that the U.S. economy remains resilient, alleviating concerns about a recession. This report directly altered trader expectations of future Fed monetary policy, with a general belief that the Fed is unlikely to continue a significant 50 basis point rate cut in November.
Miguel Artur emphasizes that as Treasury yields rise, there is greater uncertainty regarding the Fed policy path. Some market analysts had expected the Fed to gradually push interest rates back to neutral levels. However, recent economic data suggest that the resilience of inflation and the labor market may prompt the Fed to maintain higher interest rates to counter potential overheating risks. Therefore, the volatility in Treasury yields not only reflects adjustments in Fed policy but also demonstrates the high sensitivity of global capital markets to different economic signals.
The rise in U.S. Treasury yields will undoubtedly have a profound impact on the stock market. Miguel Artur analyzes that the surge in Treasury yields, particularly the 10-year yield surpassing 4%, signifies an increase in risk premiums in the fixed income market, which pressures stock market valuations. Specifically, higher Treasury yields typically reduce the attractiveness of stocks relative to bonds, especially when investors seek safer, more stable returns.
Miguel Artur believes that in such an economic environment, stock investors need to reassess their current portfolios. With future Fed rate cut expectations being lowered, investors might reconsider the prospects of sensitive sectors like technology and finance. Stocks in these sectors are often more affected by changes in the interest rate environment because their valuations often depend on future cash flow discount rates. Additionally, Miguel Artur particularly warns that current market volatility indicates a risk of overvaluation in the stock market, especially as the Fed may tighten monetary policy, increasing future uncertainty for the stock market.
In the face of current market volatility, Miguel Artur points out that investors must prioritize risk management, particularly in a global economic and financial environment fraught with uncertainties. The strong performance of U.S. employment data has not only altered the Fed monetary policy path but also triggered concerns about future inflationary pressures. Miguel Artur notes that although current inflation levels have eased, the continued recovery of the labor market could lead to a resurgence of inflation in the future, posing new challenges to global capital markets.
Miguel Artur suggests that investors should consider adopting more flexible strategies in asset allocation to cope with potential market fluctuations. For example, as Treasury yields rise, some investors may choose to shift towards fixed income products to secure relatively stable returns. Meanwhile, he cautions that short-term volatility in the Treasury market may intensify, but from a long-term perspective, the economic fundamentals still support the Fed gradual adjustment of interest rate policy. Therefore, Miguel Artur encourages investors to focus on the overall trend of the global economy rather than short-term fluctuations when making long-term investment decisions.
Looking ahead, Miguel Artur points out that as global economic uncertainties increase, investors should pay more attention to changes in economic data and monetary policy to make more informed investment decisions. The rise in U.S. Treasury yields and the adjustment of Fed rate cut expectations indicate that financial markets may face more volatility in the future. However, Miguel Artur believes that as long as investors can fully consider risks and adjust their investment strategies flexibly, there is an opportunity to achieve steady returns amid market turbulence. In this context, a deep understanding of financial knowledge and the rational application of risk management will become key factors for investors to stand out in a complex market environment.

Hivemoderation 99.9% likely to contain AI Generated Text
Copyleaks AI Content Detected
Sapling.ai Fake: Fake: 99.2%
hero member
Activity: 1778
Merit: 907
October 11, 2024, 05:09:46 AM
Another newbie, hasn't posted since 2018, has suddenly woken up and has changed their email address. Perhaps they realized that it's now "easier" to get their posts up by using AI. Little did he know that he would be caught with the first post he created.

User: Tono82

Post 1.
Here are some tips to secure your Bitcoin wallet from hackers:
* Use a Hardware Wallet: This is the safest way. Hardware wallets store your private keys offline, making it very difficult for hackers to access them.
* Create a Strong Password: Combine uppercase and lowercase letters, numbers, and symbols. Avoid using easily guessed personal information.
* Enable Two-Factor Authentication (2FA): Add an extra layer of security with 2FA. This requires you to enter a verification code in addition to your password when logging in.
* Avoid Public Wi-Fi: Never access your wallet over a public Wi-Fi network as it is vulnerable to attacks.
* Update Software: Always update your wallet software and devices to the latest version to fix security vulnerabilities.
* Beware of Phishing: Do not click on suspicious links or attachments in emails or messages. Phishing is a common tactic used by hackers to steal personal information.
* Keep a Backup of Your Private Keys: Keep a backup of your private keys in a safe place separate from your primary device.
* Use a Trusted Wallet: Choose a reputable and widely used Bitcoin wallet.
* Don’t Share Personal Information: Avoid sharing personal information such as seed phrases or passwords with anyone.
* Educate Yourself: Stay educated about cybersecurity and the latest trends in Bitcoin wallet attacks.

Additional Tips:
* Verify the Destination Address: Always double-verify the destination address before sending Bitcoin.
* Avoid Untrusted Exchanges: Choose exchanges that have good security and are officially regulated.
* Consider Encryption: Encrypting your device can provide an additional layer of protection.
Important: Remember that security is your responsibility. By following the tips above, you can significantly reduce the risk of losing your Bitcoin to hackers.

Always do your own research before making any investment decisions.
Stay motivated and be vigilant!!!
GPTZero: 100% Probability AI Generated
Copyleaks: AI Content Detected
Sapling.ai: Fake 100%
legendary
Activity: 2072
Merit: 4265
✿♥‿♥✿
October 10, 2024, 12:53:09 AM
Well, I've just seen one that for me is clearly a GPT chat because of the structure but I've passed 3 detectors just in case, and..:

1. AI content tells me that it is 87% human.

2. AI checker says: PASSES AS HUMAN!

3. Writefull GTP says: 1% likely this comes from GPT-3, GPT-4 or ChatGPT.

What do you think is the trick? I use GPT chat (not for writing on the forum, obviously) and that's the typical response structure it uses.

DenisReach

To answer the question "How much was Bitcoin worth in 2009?" we need to understand that during the early months of Bitcoin's existence, it didn’t have any market value in the traditional sense. At that time, Bitcoin was still in its experimental phase, and early adopters used it mostly for testing the system, without giving much attention to its price.

### January 2009: The Birth of Bitcoin
Bitcoin was launched on January 3, 2009, when its creator, Satoshi Nakamoto, mined the first block of the blockchain — known as the "genesis block." During this time, there were no exchanges for trading Bitcoin, and the cryptocurrency had no established market price. Miners earned bitcoins, but there was little to no demand for them. In essence, Bitcoin had no monetary value in those initial months.

### Early Transactions
One of the first known transactions was when Satoshi Nakamoto sent 10 bitcoins to cryptographer Hal Finney. However, this transfer also had no monetary value — it was done purely for experimental purposes.

### Fall 2009: The First Valuation
It wasn't until October 2009 that there was an attempt to assign a value to Bitcoin. A user on the Bitcointalk forum, under the nickname NewLibertyStandard, proposed calculating Bitcoin's value based on the electricity costs of mining. According to his calculations, $1 USD could buy 1,309.03 BTC. This means that, at that time, 1 Bitcoin was worth approximately $0.0007.

### First Transaction for Real Goods
The first known transaction where Bitcoin was used to purchase real-world goods occurred on May 22, 2010. Programmer Laszlo Hanyecz famously paid 10,000 BTC for two pizzas. At that time, those bitcoins were worth about $41, marking the first tangible use of Bitcoin for commerce.

### WebMoney’s Popularity in 2009
In 2009, WebMoney was one of the most popular online payment systems, especially in the post-Soviet space. People used it for online transactions, business payments, and freelance work. Given WebMoney’s dominance during this period, it’s fascinating to think how Bitcoin, a relatively unknown digital currency at the time, would eventually grow to challenge traditional systems like WebMoney and others.

### Conclusion
In 2009, Bitcoin had little to no market value and was primarily seen as an experimental digital currency. The first real attempts to assign it value emerged toward the end of the year, and at the time, one Bitcoin was worth fractions of a cent. Bitcoin’s journey from a niche experiment to a globally recognized asset with multi-billion-dollar market capitalization has been nothing short of extraordinary.



Hivemoderation 99.9% likely to contain AI Generated Text
Copyleaks AI Content Detected
Sapling.ai Fake: 100%

The theory that Satoshi Nakamoto might still be alive and even active in the Bitcoin network, especially with recent transactions involving old accounts, is always a hot topic of debate in the crypto community. If the 50 BTC from the mentioned wallets were indeed moved on September 20, 2024, it would certainly raise eyebrows.

1. **Wallet Activity**: The addresses you listed, created in 2009, belong to the early Bitcoin era. Whenever large amounts of BTC from early wallets move, it attracts attention. However, it's essential to note that these wallets could belong to any early Bitcoin miner, not necessarily Satoshi himself.

2. **Community Reactions**: Whenever such movements happen, speculation runs wild about Satoshi being behind the activity. However, there's no concrete evidence proving Satoshi himself is still alive or involved. Even if these funds were moved, it could simply mean someone regained access to the private keys after many years or inherited control of those funds.

3. **Satoshi as Adam Back**: Adam Back, CEO of Blockstream, has been one of the frequent names linked to being Satoshi, mainly due to his cryptographic background and early involvement with Bitcoin projects. However, Back has always denied these claims, emphasizing the decentralized nature of Bitcoin, which Satoshi himself championed.

While these transfers, if confirmed, could stir up interest, it's important to wait for blockchain analysis and further investigation before jumping to conclusions that Satoshi is back in action.

Hivemoderation 99.9% likely to contain AI Generated Text
Copyleaks AI Content Detected
Sapling.ai Fake: 99.1%
legendary
Activity: 1358
Merit: 1565
The first decentralized crypto betting platform
October 09, 2024, 10:45:18 PM
Well, I've just seen one that for me is clearly a GPT chat because of the structure but I've passed 3 detectors just in case, and..:

1. AI content tells me that it is 87% human.

2. AI checker says: PASSES AS HUMAN!

3. Writefull GTP says: 1% likely this comes from GPT-3, GPT-4 or ChatGPT.

What do you think is the trick? I use GPT chat (not for writing on the forum, obviously) and that's the typical response structure it uses.

DenisReach

To answer the question "How much was Bitcoin worth in 2009?" we need to understand that during the early months of Bitcoin's existence, it didn’t have any market value in the traditional sense. At that time, Bitcoin was still in its experimental phase, and early adopters used it mostly for testing the system, without giving much attention to its price.

### January 2009: The Birth of Bitcoin
Bitcoin was launched on January 3, 2009, when its creator, Satoshi Nakamoto, mined the first block of the blockchain — known as the "genesis block." During this time, there were no exchanges for trading Bitcoin, and the cryptocurrency had no established market price. Miners earned bitcoins, but there was little to no demand for them. In essence, Bitcoin had no monetary value in those initial months.

### Early Transactions
One of the first known transactions was when Satoshi Nakamoto sent 10 bitcoins to cryptographer Hal Finney. However, this transfer also had no monetary value — it was done purely for experimental purposes.

### Fall 2009: The First Valuation
It wasn't until October 2009 that there was an attempt to assign a value to Bitcoin. A user on the Bitcointalk forum, under the nickname NewLibertyStandard, proposed calculating Bitcoin's value based on the electricity costs of mining. According to his calculations, $1 USD could buy 1,309.03 BTC. This means that, at that time, 1 Bitcoin was worth approximately $0.0007.

### First Transaction for Real Goods
The first known transaction where Bitcoin was used to purchase real-world goods occurred on May 22, 2010. Programmer Laszlo Hanyecz famously paid 10,000 BTC for two pizzas. At that time, those bitcoins were worth about $41, marking the first tangible use of Bitcoin for commerce.

### WebMoney’s Popularity in 2009
In 2009, WebMoney was one of the most popular online payment systems, especially in the post-Soviet space. People used it for online transactions, business payments, and freelance work. Given WebMoney’s dominance during this period, it’s fascinating to think how Bitcoin, a relatively unknown digital currency at the time, would eventually grow to challenge traditional systems like WebMoney and others.

### Conclusion
In 2009, Bitcoin had little to no market value and was primarily seen as an experimental digital currency. The first real attempts to assign it value emerged toward the end of the year, and at the time, one Bitcoin was worth fractions of a cent. Bitcoin’s journey from a niche experiment to a globally recognized asset with multi-billion-dollar market capitalization has been nothing short of extraordinary.

legendary
Activity: 3010
Merit: 8114
October 09, 2024, 06:35:06 PM
User : bigmanik
...

I have checked his post history as well. Not sure how should I describe him. He got some merits from the Technical discussion board and he was motivated to create more posts. I don't know if he has used AI to create these posts because his recent posts are just one-liners. It seems like he is doing everything to get some merits. Probably he will end up doing plagiarism to earn some merits.

I don't think this guy even reads his own posts. They're just a mishmash of shit they found on the internet. After getting bored with that, they went to straight AI posting.

Well i cant blame you for being a bit surprised to see random assets like Notcoin and PEPE in your Binance account. Its actually uncommon Binance doesn’t usually just drop coins into accounts for no reason, so here are a few things that might explain it:

Airdrops: Sometimes projects send out free tokens (called airdrops) to users, which could be why these coins appeared.

New Listings: Binance often adds new coins to the platform, and you might have received some as part of a promotion or incentive.

Account Updates: If it’s been a while since you used your account, Binance may have updated its policies or given out new assets as part of a verification process.


To figure this out, you could:

Check Binance Announcements: They might have posted about any recent airdrops, listings, or promos.

Look Through Your Account History: There could be some transactions or deposits you’re not familiar with.

Contact Binance Support: They should be able to tell you exactly why these coins are in your account.


That should help you understand how these assets got there and what your next steps are!

Hivemoderation: 99.9% likely to contain AI Generated Text
Sapling.ai: 100% Fake

And then yeah, this is pretty tacky & demanding seeing as how they just write BS:

legendary
Activity: 3234
Merit: 5637
Blackjack.fun-Free Raffle-Join&Win $50🎲
October 09, 2024, 09:07:39 AM
hero member
Activity: 840
Merit: 522
October 09, 2024, 06:22:42 AM
User : bigmanik


GPTZero -> Probability AI generated 76%
ZeroGPT -> Your Text is Most Likely Human written, may include parts generated by AI/GPT 48.01%
CopyLeaks -> AI Content Detected

Now they ask for merits as well.

Please feel free to drop a merit

I have checked his post history as well. Not sure how should I describe him. He got some merits from the Technical discussion board and he was motivated to create more posts. I don't know if he has used AI to create these posts because his recent posts are just one-liners. It seems like he is doing everything to get some merits. Probably he will end up doing plagiarism to earn some merits.
legendary
Activity: 3010
Merit: 8114
October 07, 2024, 07:44:02 PM
I'll answer you here too, you say that I used AI and you trusted me and it's not right because there I explained to you that your tools don't work, I admitted to using it for translations and that I didn't check because I thought I having written everything well, but the lyrics were edited by mistake but they were written by me so now either you admit that your tools don't work or you have to take the credit too...
using AI as a translation tool is not the same as using AI to write posts, so if your analysis tools can be imperfect even artificial intelligence can go crazy, and that's what happened!

The tools do work; they're just not perfect. In the 1st post in this thread I state the following:

- you should post 3 or more examples of AI-generated text from one account
- where at least 2 detectors give a score of 70% or higher likely to be AI-generated.

This helps reduce the chance of an account being unfairly tagged in the event of a false positive.

I'm not against using ChatGPT or whatever to translate posts, but your posts seem to be created using a prompt that says "write a reply to this."
sr. member
Activity: 406
Merit: 330
October 07, 2024, 09:37:25 AM

so now
OR put a neutral trust on him too


Where do you see the red tag for using AI?

Dude, take a breath. I changed your tag, although he was already neutral, but you don't want to accept the fact that you should calmly read the first post first, which said that yes, AI text detectors are imperfect, and that's why the OP suggested providing multiple options.
But you stubbornly check only one. sapling.ai

Why didn't you read the first post? Don't you use multiple checkers to summarize the result?
I know. It's not profitable for you.

Besides, your compatriot wrote that he used an AI tool for translation. What do you want to see in this case? Isn't it equivalent to the fact that you are working with AI anyway?

In addition, please understand that moderators independently check all our reports.


I'll answer you here too, you say that I used AI and you trusted me and it's not right because there I explained to you that your tools don't work, I admitted to using it for translations and that I didn't check because I thought I having written everything well, but the lyrics were edited by mistake but they were written by me so now either you admit that your tools don't work or you have to take the credit too...
using AI as a translation tool is not the same as using AI to write posts, so if your analysis tools can be imperfect even artificial intelligence can go crazy, and that's what happened!
so I kindly ask you to change your position on the trusts you have unfairly stuck on me!
legendary
Activity: 2072
Merit: 4265
✿♥‿♥✿
October 07, 2024, 09:03:46 AM

so now
OR put a neutral trust on him too


Where do you see the red tag for using AI?

Dude, take a breath. I changed your tag, although he was already neutral, but you don't want to accept the fact that you should calmly read the first post first, which said that yes, AI text detectors are imperfect, and that's why the OP suggested providing multiple options.
But you stubbornly check only one. sapling.ai

Why didn't you read the first post? Don't you use multiple checkers to summarize the result?
I know. It's not profitable for you.

Besides, your compatriot wrote that he used an AI tool for translation. What do you want to see in this case? Isn't it equivalent to the fact that you are working with AI anyway?

In addition, please understand that moderators independently check all our reports.

full member
Activity: 187
Merit: 103
October 07, 2024, 05:57:09 AM
1. You still didn't provide the name of the translation tool you use. Most popular ones don't give false positives even with Sapling detector.
2. You are welcome to search through my posts as much as you wish. If you will find a way to show how to make my posts be detected with all 3 mentioned detectors without using an AI tool, just with regular ones like Google or Deepl, it will be very interesting and useful for many in this topic. Try, it can change many things. But as for now I don't believe your story at all.

no i do better, i signal lovemay..



i also prove the tool flag ai the simple translated text



Shouldn't parents have permission to involve children in such fights? It's hard to imagine any normal parent willing to watch their child get beaten, no matter how much it costs. Not everything should be valued in money. If society slides to the point where it will be allowed to bet on your children, it's scary to imagine what kind of generation we will see in old age.

https://archive.is/esCTo
sapling.ai Fake: 99.9%
writefull ai true



I would say it a little differently. The world is moving towards madness. This is probably too harsh a word, but why change something that has been working for a long time because of those who woke up one day and decided that they are of the opposite gender? For me, such characters are scammers. Are there many cases of reverse gender reassignment, when a girl suddenly decides to play for a men's team, deciding that she is a man? Such actions are disadvantageous to the teams themselves, but it is clear to everyone that a man will be stronger than a woman. It is also not fair to organize competitions when the teams are not equal. It does not matter that this transgender felt like a woman, a cat, or someone else; it is necessary to test people for mental stability and only then allow them to compete.
Who will argue that transgender people have something wrong with their brains?

https://archive.is/vKFdc
Fake: 99.3%



I have come across stories of people who were banned from several casinos because they changed their IP. The casino was unhappy that the user had multiple accounts that pretended to be different people using different IP addresses, but the casino allocated the same MAC address, browser fingerprint, and many other traces. It is likely that many casinos will not like this behavior, but there are many offers on the Internet to purchase software that allows players to register multiple accounts with completely different data.

https://archive.is/BpwGv
sapling.ai Fake: 99.9%
hive 71%
humbot ai true



https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/--5512149
I would say that the one who starts the game should be ready to lose money because you need to understand that games are not a distribution of money to those in need. The concept of the game is present with us from childhood; we play and are not always winners. It is naive to think that by investing our deposit, we will be able to increase it several times; rather, we need to prepare for the opposite. This is the cultivation of patience, understanding, and acceptance of what can happen. Otherwise, you need to completely limit yourself to gambling.




https://archive.is/wip/Cp6p4
sapling.ai 100% FAKE



I don't think he uses AI (lovemay..), because I know him and he's someone who fights for the community
but the tools you use suck

so now
OR put a neutral trust on him too
OR admit that the tools don't work
legendary
Activity: 1974
Merit: 3049
October 07, 2024, 05:54:46 AM
..
I guess the result of your appeal will be in several more tags.

Do you know how much I care? Nothing
I'll start using your tools too and we'll see the shit that comes out of it

then when your tools give your posts 100% fake I will also start asking for bans

Do you want to tag me in red? I have nothing to lose. You yes. Go ahead.

Furthermore, I don't take morals from someone who has been banned and then unbanned

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/ban-appealupdate-total-table-ban-status-need-feedback-from-global-mods-5144410
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/dt1-member-lovesmayfamilis-ban-5141782

I am not stupid. Go ahead, I am waiting for the red tags to start using your tool against you at full throttle. It will be funny since the tool doesn?t work.

1. You still didn't provide the name of the translation tool you use. Most popular ones don't give false positives even with Sapling detector.
2. You are welcome to search through my posts as much as you wish. If you will find a way to show how to make my posts be detected with all 3 mentioned detectors without using an AI tool, just with regular ones like Google or Deepl, it will be very interesting and useful for many in this topic. Try, it can change many things. But as for now I don't believe your story at all.

P.S. The way you ignore the double posting rule doesn't give you additional points.
full member
Activity: 187
Merit: 103
October 07, 2024, 05:34:29 AM
...

bullshit... I took one of my (more than one) posts in Italian, translated it into English and it gave me 100% fake
Do we really have to start a war using this tool?

it's fine for me
I have a lot of time and I have nothing to lose

If I get banned for this I'll create another account and start using your tool against you

as soon as I come across 3 posts that are 100% fake I will ask for your ban and since the tool doesn't work, we will be laughing



https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.64602707


I have come across stories of people who were banned from several casinos because they changed their IP. The casino was unhappy that the user had multiple accounts that pretended to be different people using different IP addresses, but the casino allocated the same MAC address, browser fingerprint, and many other traces. It is likely that many casinos will not like this behavior, but there are many offers on the Internet to purchase software that allows players to register multiple accounts with completely different data.


fake 99.9%

legendary
Activity: 2072
Merit: 4265
✿♥‿♥✿
October 07, 2024, 05:30:48 AM
You can check; I didn't use one tool; I checked on three. They are all in the proof. Also, why did you edit the posts yesterday if you claim you didn't use AI?
Google Translate and Chatbot GPT will give different results. Before showing your posts and the posts of those I posted who also use AI, I checked many other posts from your local section.
However, using AI reveals yours and several others.
So stop shouting; follow rule 32.
Why should I check posts in Italian when it is obvious that you will speak fluently there?

Also, go through this topic. Moderators will never delete posts if they disagree with the reports.


are we kidding? are you kidding me? I ask the staff to intervene in this regard






full member
Activity: 187
Merit: 103
October 07, 2024, 05:30:12 AM
..
I guess the result of your appeal will be in several more tags.

Do you know how much I care? Nothing
I'll start using your tools too and we'll see the shit that comes out of it

then when your tools give your posts 100% fake I will also start asking for bans

Do you want to tag me in red? I have nothing to lose. You yes. Go ahead.

Furthermore, I don't take morals from someone who has been banned and then unbanned

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/ban-appealupdate-total-table-ban-status-need-feedback-from-global-mods-5144410
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/dt1-member-lovesmayfamilis-ban-5141782

I am not stupid. Go ahead, I am waiting for the red tags to start using your tool against you at full throttle. It will be funny since the tool doesn?t work.
legendary
Activity: 1974
Merit: 3049
October 07, 2024, 05:26:10 AM
Ha senso in effetti, sono veramente scarso.
Ora al momento sono incazzato perchè mi hanno additato di usare AI usando dei tool di merda che non funzionano.
Ho dimostrato che prendendo un mio post in italiano e traducendolo in inglese mi da fake 100%.
Mi hanno dato un trust senza un motivo solo per fare +1 e prendere merits e questo non è giusto.

Fake: 0.1%

translated in english

Quote
It makes sense, actually; I'm really lacking. Right now, I'm angry because I've been accused of using AI with those useless tools that don't work. I demonstrated that taking one of my posts in Italian and translating it into English gives me a 100% fake rating. They gave me a trust without reason, just to add +1 and earn merits, and that's not fair.

Fake: 100%


I would like to know what shitty tool you use, totally unreliable that considers translated posts 100% fake
are you relly kidding me?
you accuse people like this just to +1 and get merit without me having done anything
without me having spammed

I didn't make 20 posts a day to make money for a signature LIKE YOU or take merits, LIKE you
you have to take away this merit and maybe you also have to stop using a shitty tool like this for free, which obviously I have amply demonstrated that it doesn't work

I demand an apology obviously

Wow! What surprises me is that when I use a Google.Translate tool I get this text:

Quote
It makes sense actually, I'm really bad.
Now at the moment I'm pissed because they pointed out to me that I'm using AI using shitty tools that don't work.
I proved that taking a post of mine in Italian and translating it into English gives me 100% fake.
They gave me a trust without a reason just to do +1 and get merits and this is not fair.

This text is the translation result from Deepl:

Quote
It makes sense actually, I am really poor.
Now at the moment I'm pissed off because I've been accused of using AI using shitty tools that don't work.
I proved that taking one of my posts in Italian and translating it into English gives me 100% fakes.
They gave me a trust for no reason just to make +1 and take merits and that is not fair.

Which tool did you use to get your 100% fake on one (just one) detector? Try the same tool to show the same result on all 3 detectors first. We know that there can be false positives, but not on several texts in a row on all the 3 detectors.

I guess the result of your appeal will be in several more tags.
Pages:
Jump to: