Topic: AI Spam Report Reference Thread - page 2. (Read 23260 times)

This:

At least the campaign manager has kicked him from the campaign. Igebotz claimed it's likely to be a 7 day ban, although he's likely to not ever return after being caught.

2. A minimum of 10 posts in Gambling and/or Gambling Discussion is required per week to be eligible for the payment.

He still has his signature, so it must be a temporary ban.

What pushed him to the gambling board

Campaign Rules
2. A minimum of 10 posts in Gambling and/or Gambling Discussion is required per week to be eligible for the payment.

Wow, he's banned?

Hi Everyone,

I’m currently exploring potential investments in the crypto market and am torn between Floki (FLOKI) and Beam (BEAM). These two projects cater to very different niches, and I’m hoping to get some insights from this community on their pros and cons.

Floki (FLOKI):

   •   Meme coin with a strong community and branding tied to Elon Musk’s dog.
   •   Ecosystem includes NFTs, DeFi tools, and a metaverse project called Valhalla.
   •   High-risk, high-reward potential but limited practical use cases.

Beam (BEAM):

   •   Privacy-focused cryptocurrency built on the Mimblewimble protocol.
   •   Offers strong anonymity features for secure transactions.
   •   Competes with established privacy coins like Monero and Zcash.

What I’m Considering:

   •   Floki seems like a speculative opportunity that could explode with market hype, but it’s very volatile.
   •   Beam appeals to me for its real-world utility and focus on privacy, but it’s less talked about and might take longer to gain traction.

Questions for the Community:
   1.   Have you invested in either Floki or Beam? What has your experience been like?
   2.   Which do you think has more potential in the current market conditions?
   3.   Are there other projects similar to Beam or Floki that I should consider?

Looking forward to your thoughts and opinions. Thanks in advance for helping me out!

Thanks for your input, Patikno!
You raise a valid point about governments and banks disliking anonymity, which could indeed affect projects like BEAM. However, I wonder if there’s still a niche market for privacy-focused coins, especially with growing concerns around data breaches and surveillance.

On the other hand, SuperVerse’s focus on gaming and NFTs does seem to align with current market trends, but I’m curious if that sector might become oversaturated in 2024. Do you think SuperVerse has a unique edge over competitors in the gaming/NFT space, or is it relying mainly on the broader market rotation? Also i saw some YouTube videos saying
Super might be a scam, what do you think?

Looking forward to hearing your thoughts and keeping this discussion going!

Hello everyone,


I’ve been observing Clearpool’s performance lately, and it’s puzzling me. Despite the broader market moving positively, especially with Ondo showing a significant upward trend recently, Clearpool seems to be lagging behind significantly.


A few points I’ve been considering:

1.   Market Sentiment: Is there a lack of confidence in Clearpool compared to Ondo?

2.   Adoption and Use Cases: Has Ondo released updates or partnerships that Clearpool hasn’t matched?

3.   Tokenomics: Are there structural issues with Clearpool’s tokenomics that could be suppressing its growth?

4.   Liquidity and Trading Volume: Is there simply less interest or liquidity in Clearpool’s markets?


If anyone has insights or theories, especially those with knowledge of recent developments in Clearpool’s ecosystem, I’d love to hear your thoughts. Are we missing a catalyst that Ondo has? Or is this simply a delayed reaction, and Clearpool might catch up soon?

Looking forward to discussing this further!

Hi everyone,

As AI continues to grow in importance, many crypto projects are positioning themselves to benefit from this trend. I’m currently exploring two projects that are gaining attention for their potential in the AI space: Near Protocol (NEAR) and Render Token (RNDR).

NEAR Protocol (NEAR):
   •   A scalable Layer-1 blockchain known for low fees and high-speed transactions.
   •   Strong focus on building decentralized apps (dApps), some of which are AI-integrated.
   •   Ecosystem development is solid, with projects like Open Web Foundry emphasizing AI use cases.

Render Token (RNDR):
   •   A decentralized GPU rendering network, providing on-demand GPU power for AI, 3D rendering, and other compute-heavy tasks.
   •   Already being adopted for AI model training and rendering in the metaverse.
   •   With the growing demand for distributed computing in AI, its use case is very compelling.

What I’m Thinking:

   1.   NEAR offers broad versatility as a blockchain platform that could support various AI-enabled dApps.
   2.   RNDR is a specialized solution, directly tackling GPU resource demand for AI workloads.
   3.   Both projects seem promising, but they target different aspects of the AI revolution.

Questions for the Forum:

   1.   Which of these two projects do you think has more potential to benefit from the AI boom?
   2.   Is it better to go with NEAR for its infrastructure approach, or RNDR for its GPU-centric model?
   3.   Are there any other cryptos you’d recommend for gaining exposure to AI-related growth?

Looking forward to hearing your thoughts and insights!

I totally get why you're frustrated with all the phishing attempts and scams targeting $XION. It's crazy how these scammers come out of the woodwork as soon as a project announces something big. Your experience is a great reminder to always double-check info through official channels before doing anything.

And yeah, it's not surprising to see different prices for $XION on different exchanges. Market speculation, liquidity, and other factors can all impact prices. Just remember to stick with official sources, like the project team and reputable exchanges, to get the most accurate info and avoid any potential risks.

That's a fantastic find! A 25% APR on a 7-day lock-up is quite impressive. I've personally used similar short-term savings plans to boost my crypto holdings on Bitget. While the high yields are tempting, it's crucial to balance them with liquidity needs. I often allocate a portion of my portfolio to these short-term plans, while keeping the majority liquid for potential opportunities or unexpected expenses.

I've been keeping an eye on the crypto space, and I've noticed something interesting - memecoins are on the rise! Projects like ACT, PNUT, BAN, and GOAT were initially written off, but they've proven everyone wrong with their impressive growth and adoption.
I'm intrigued by Koma Inu, a dog-themed token that's been getting a lot of hype due to its connection to Shib and its 'protector of BNB' vibe. Have you invested in any memecoins that have paid off this year? I'd love to hear about your experiences!

Low esteem, low IQ, faking to be who you're not, seeking public validation, fitting in where you don't belong, and forcing knowledge are just a few of the million reasons why people use AI to communicate. Elon musk and China AI will take our jobs before 2030, and it's already happening on this forum.

Update - Legentbtc has been removed from our signature campaign, our mission of zero AI tolerance continues at Stake.

Seeing Bitcoin cross $100K feels surreal. I remember when $20K seemed like an impossible dream, and now here we are. For me, it’s not just about the price—it’s about how Bitcoin has redefined financial freedom and pushed the boundaries of what’s possible. 

The question is, what’s next? Are we heading for an even bigger rally, or will things slow down? Either way, it’s incredible to witness this moment. What’s your take?

I’ve been hearing a lot about Bitcoin mining lately and how it’s the backbone of the entire network. From verifying transactions to earning rewards, it seems like a fascinating process. 

But I’m curious—how does it really work? Is it all about expensive equipment and electricity costs, or are there other factors to consider? If anyone here is into mining or has tried it before, I’d love to hear your experiences and any tips for beginners. 

Let’s discuss!

I’ve been exploring BugsCoin, and it’s a refreshing take on reward systems in the crypto space. Unlike traditional setups, it’s built to offer tangible economic benefits for community engagement.

Whether it’s earning rewards from simulated investment competitions on AntTalk or accessing premium content, BugsCoin feels like it’s redefining how rewards work.

One feature I like is the token scarcity model, driven by liquidity management and burns, which could help sustain its value over time.

Anyone else using BugsCoin? What are your thoughts?

GOATS (GOATS) is a Telegram-based point-collecting game, combining meme coin fun with the potential for community-driven profitability. The project connects goat lovers and crypto enthusiasts, creating a space for engagement and collaboration.

While the game offers a unique way to interact with digital assets, its community-driven nature makes it an exciting opportunity for those interested in meme coins and decentralized projects. As more people join, the collective engagement creates a vibrant space for ideas, discussions, and potential growth.

Anyone participating in GOATS? What do you think about projects combining gaming and cryptocurrency? Let’s discuss!

You're absolutely right about the confusion between $PEP and $PEPE. Ensuring accurate communication, especially in discussions about tokens or projects, is essential to avoid misleading or misinforming others.

As for your point on meme coins, the criticism you bring up is valid. Many meme coins, including forks of popular tokens like DOGE, often lack intrinsic utility. Their value tends to be driven by speculation, community hype, and their "moonshot" potential rather than any fundamental technological innovation or real-world application. Forking such coins typically adds little value unless there is a meaningful and well-defined use case or innovation tied to the new project.

This phenomenon highlights the speculative nature of some areas of the crypto market. However, some developers and communities argue that even meme coins can serve as gateways for new users into the blockchain ecosystem or foster unique subcultures and engagement. What are your thoughts on how meme coins could potentially evolve to offer real utility?

You're right that predicting the next big altcoin is part luck and part strategy. While some altcoins can surge 10x or more, there's no guaranteed way to predict it. However, focusing on established projects with strong communities, like ADA, ALGO, or DOT, is a more reliable approach. These coins have a proven track record, and while their gains might be slower, they come with less risk. High returns are possible, but they often depend on timing and external factors, so luck plays a big role in those big swings.

You're absolutely right to be cautious about centralized projects or "shitcoins." When a business or organization behind a cryptocurrency is centralized, it often means there's a single point of failure. If the organization faces issues like mismanagement, fraud, or external regulatory pressure, the entire value of the token or coin could collapse, leaving investors at a loss.

In the case of centralized tokens, the risk is higher because trust is placed in a single entity, rather than in a decentralized, open-source system where no one person or group has total control. Cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin and Ethereum, for example, are designed to be decentralized, offering a degree of security that doesn't depend on one central organization.

Storing money in centralized tokens for the long term is risky, as the project could collapse if the organization behind it fails or loses credibility. People who invest in these projects might be speculating on short-term gains, but it's not a sound strategy for long-term wealth preservation.

For long-term security, many prefer decentralized, transparent, and community-driven projects that are less vulnerable to centralized failure. Ultimately, the value of a cryptocurrency should be driven by its fundamentals, community adoption, and technological advancements, not just by speculative hype.

Wow, he's banned? I'm surprised because I haven't seen ranked up accounts banned for AI, unless it wasn't announced in the other cases of Yatsan or legendbtc.

Oops yeah that didn't age well. What pushed him to the gambling board when he was comfortable making posts from his brain on the technical board though. 

I was just about to tag @Little Mouse when you pointed it out, I'm hoping he sees this, even though it's quite late already; he has been paid for the previous week. At least this will prevent him from being paid in the future and reserve his spot for someone who's interested in actually putting some effort in their posts.

You should report all these people straight to the campaign managers. I'm sure most reputable managers and campaigns won't want to pay for these sorts of posts.

Good catch, it's straight up AI, copy pasted from ChatGPT, with no changes made. I understand he could be struggling to meet his quota, but he didn't even make the effort to mask his AI, something we've seen quite a few times with users on signature campaigns.

I'd also report any of his posts that have AI content.

User: albert0bsd

Your post highlights key considerations about separating personal emotions from betting and addressing ethical boundaries. Betting against your preferred candidate or team may feel counterintuitive, but rational analysis often leads to better outcomes. Gambling is about logic, not allegiance.

When it comes to events involving human suffering, like wars or natural disasters, many draw the line. Profiting from potential loss of life is morally contentious and desensitizing for some, making it a personal decision whether to participate in such markets.

As 2024 ends, betting markets may shift focus to 2025. Staying informed is important, but so is ensuring your bets align with your values. Gambling should remain within ethical and emotional boundaries you're comfortable with.

Your perspective is well articulated, and the analogy with poker is particularly apt for understanding sports betting dynamics. Betting success indeed relies on having an analytical edge over the collective opinion of other players, much like choosing weaker opponents in poker to maximize your chances of winning.

The role of the bookmaker is often misunderstood. As the quote explains, their primary function is not to predict the outcome but to balance opinions and money flow, ensuring they minimize their own risk. In this sense, they act as brokers, merely facilitating the wagers rather than being the opponent. Their commission, while reducing overall player winnings, is the cost of using their platform, much like transaction fees in financial markets.

To gain a consistent edge, it's essential to focus on better analysis, deeper insights, and identifying inefficiencies in public perception. Just as in poker, success often comes down to preparation, patience, and knowing when and where to place your bets. By treating sports betting as a strategic game against other bettors rather than a gamble against the bookmaker, you can develop a more sustainable and informed approach.

Thanks for sharing your insights! Comparing the dice 98% strategy to Plinko's 16-row low-risk setup highlights a key difference: while dice offers quick wins, its all or nothing losses can be devastating. Plinko, with only 19.89% of outcomes as losses (0.5x), provides better longevity, making it a more sustainable option for players aiming to maximize wagering.

That said, as you and Agbamoni noted, gambling outcomes rely on luck. Even over millions of rolls or balls, probabilities don’t always align perfectly. Your suggestion of betting 0.05% of your bankroll is excellent for reducing risk and staying in the game longer.

Ultimately, strategies like this should be approached cautiously. Always treat gambling as entertainment, use funds you can afford to lose, and avoid chasing losses. Sharing such strategies adds value, but realistic expectations are key.

Is using Ai and then finding a way to disguise the posts from looking like it is from an Ai not enough hardwork for those who do that? Why can they not keep to their own writing style instead of passing through all this Ai thing. Anyone who is lazy or lacks confidence to make their own posts and contributions from their brain should not be enrolled in a campaign. They do no deserve it.

A small disclaimer on the site might help clarify that while trends can improve decision-making, they don’t override the inherent house edge.

The idea of a tutorial is spot on, especially for newcomers who might not be familiar with terms like "median multipliers" or "expected hit rates." A simple, interactive guide or FAQ section could go a long way in helping users understand how to interpret and apply the data.

I think showcasing some practical examples, like what "hot" and "cold" looked like in the last 100 rounds, could make the data more relatable. It might also help users visualize the value of your analysis.

It’s frustrating how these incidents can undermine trust in platforms. Staying cautious and reporting suspicious messages and websites is a proactive way to protect the broader community.

You’re handling this well, stay safe, and thanks for raising awareness!

Purchasing tokens pre-listing can offer significant profit potential, especially if the project gains traction after the listing. The downside is the lack of guarantees, it might not even make it to a reputable exchange or gain traction, leaving you with illiquid or low-value tokens.

Post-listing, you’re more likely to trade in a liquid market with a clearer view of market sentiment. However, the price might have already pumped, meaning you could miss out on the early adopter profits. It’s also important to remember that not all tokens pump after listing, some even decline due to early investors taking profits.

Thanks for sharing this, it’s fascinating to look back on Bitcoin’s early days and the unique ways it was introduced to the mainstream. The Bitcoin Bowl is definitely one of those standout moments where crypto started to make its mark beyond the tech crowd.

RC Robocoin was one of the first Bitcoin ATM companies. They launched in 2013 and were a big deal for introducing physical Bitcoin transactions to everyday people. Unfortunately, they didn’t last too long, with operations ceasing in 2015.

The D Las Vegas does claim to be the first casino to accept Bitcoin, but I think there’s a bit of context worth noting. From what I recall, their Bitcoin acceptance was initially limited to non-gambling activities like restaurants and gift shops. I’m not sure if they implemented Bitcoin gaming directly. It would be interesting to hear if someone can confirm or challenge that claim!

As the decentralized finance  landscape continues to grow, we're seeing the rise of innovative protocols that aim to transform traditional lending models. One project that has piqued my interest is Morpho Protocol.

Morpho Protocol is a decentralized lending platform that utilizes a unique blend of liquidity pools and peer-to-peer matching engines. This strategy fosters a more efficient, flexible, and community-oriented lending experience.

Central to Morpho Protocol is its governance token, MORPHO. This token empowers holders to engage in protocol governance, ensuring that the community has a voice in shaping the protocol's future.

I would love to hear your opinions on Morpho Protocol and its approach to decentralized lending. What do you see as the potential advantages and disadvantages of this model? How does it stack up against other decentralized lending protocols in the market?

Let's dive into this discussion

As we navigate the ever-changing world of cryptocurrency, it's important to keep up with new and emerging projects. In this thread, I want to introduce you to Koma Inu ($KOMA), a community-driven meme coin built on the BSC.

Background

Koma Inu is a relatively new project that has been gaining attention in the crypto space. With a strong emphasis on community engagement and transparency, the project aims to foster a loyal and dedicated group of supporters.

Key Features

1. Community-Driven: The community-driven nature of Koma Inu is reflected in its high liquidity and steady trading activity. The project’s team actively interacts with the community, providing regular updates on developments and future plans.

2. Transparency: The team behind Koma Inu is dedicated to transparency, ensuring that the community stays informed about the project's progress and upcoming initiatives.

3. Technological Innovation: Koma Inu's team is committed to continuously enhancing the platform, making sure it remains competitive and secure.

As we delve into the Koma Inu project, it's crucial to weigh the potential benefits and drawbacks. Some of the key advantages of Koma Inu include:

- A strong and engaged community

- High liquidity and steady trading activity

- A focus on transparency and technological advancement

However, like any investment, there are also risks to consider. These include:

- Market volatility and price fluctuations

- Regulatory uncertainty and possible changes in the cryptocurrency landscape

- Potential security risks and vulnerabilities


As we move forward, it's important to keep the conversation going and explore the potential benefits and challenges of Koma Inu. I invite you to share your thoughts and insights.

I want to share an exciting new cryptocurrency project that I believe deserves attention. CHEYENNE is a community driven token that operates on the Solana blockchain. This initiative is inspired by the story of Cheyenne, the first animal rescued by P'Nuts Freedom Farm, a nonprofit sanctuary dedicated to animal welfare.

The main goal of the token is to support P'Nuts Freedom Farm's mission while fostering a culture of compassion and kindness. Currently, the project is in its early phases, and the community plays a vital role in guiding its future.

Here are some important details about the CHEYENNE token:

Token Name: Cheyenne 

Ticker: CHEYENNE 

Blockchain: Solana 

Total Supply: 989,998,216 CHEYENNE 


I look forward to hearing your thoughts on CHEYENNE

I wanted to share some exciting news about MEMEFI, a project that has been generating a lot of buzz in the crypto community. After months of anticipation, MEMEFI is finally listing on some exchanges like BingX in some hours now.

For those who may not be familiar, MEMEFI is a multi-function token that powers the MemeFi ecosystem, which combines gaming, social media, and cryptocurrency. The project has a strong focus on community engagement and participation, with a fixed supply of 10 billion tokens.

The listing of MEMEFI is a major milestone for the project, and many people are eagerly waiting to see how it performs in the market. I came across an event hosted by BingX, with a total reward pool of 460,000 MEMEFI tokens, is also generating a lot of excitement.

What are your thoughts on MEMEFI? Are you waiting for the listing? Share your opinions and let's discuss

---

Note: I'm not affiliated with MEMEFI or BingX, just a curious crypto enthusiast.

~snip~
But with ChatGPT, I can ask the same thing, GPT will make me a long paragraphs of curated articles from google search, and answers my questions, then I can pick some points that I think is relevant, check on google about those specific points to verify, rephrase and rewrite them, add my opinion or counter argument, I can make the post in just 20-30 mins.

Based on your explanation, can we understand that valuing your time does not mean simply visiting a forum, which involves regular communication on topics that you understand well, but as a duty to do something? In this case, can we understand that you value your time so much that you do not read the forum out of interest in it, but rather prepare your posts to fulfill your subscription quota? Will this be any different from people communicating with a robot if you purposefully prepare answers from the Internet that you should know and not pull out of the network?

It is easy to say that AI tools cannot add a human opinion, but a person differs from a robot in that he can add phrases like "I am sure," "I think," etc.; in other words, not just copy robotic dry texts, but humanize them a little.

And yes, we can understand that here you are wasting your time. We may even begin to respect you and applaud you for “wasting” your time on us.