I wrote this report a while ago, but due to personal health issues was unable to post it. I first sent it to two valued members of this forum for a second opinion, but now I'm publicly posting it. For this report, I'm going to be using paid services that specialize in academic AI detection, instead of the two or three known ones we use. This is a rather complicated report.
Screenshots can be found here:
ScreenshotsUser:
YatsanPost 1.
You raise some really interesting points about the current global economic crisis and how governments should focus on savings spending. Indeed, there is that time when the government gets overspent. This is especially so during the social and medical fields. is soon over But during times of financial crises for many countries, budget cuts and cutbacks in spending seem to be very viable solutions. Simultaneously, governments should concentrate on investments in sectors more likely to create long-run impact, such as innovation, education, and infrastructure.
And then there's printing of money, you said it is not a sound solution. Money printing easily causes inflation to everyone. And makes things worse for everyone. At least without increases in goods and services. The biggest challenge for the government now is balancing this with reducing unnecessary spending. And ensuring that the government continues to invest in growth.
The geopolitical situation with Russia and Ukraine has also added several issues to a number of challenges. especially the loss of natural resources like oil and gas. It would be interesting to consider the possibility of a change in leadership in Russia. As this could truly reshape global economic relations, however, countries now have the task at hand to build resilience within their own economies. distribution of resources and investing in sustainable development to weather the storm ahead.
At first, Winston.ai detector doesn’t detect this as AI, only a mere 15-20%, after correcting some “mistakes” though that are in bold, this changes completely, from 20% Human, to 2% human
Winston.ai: 98% AI
Originality.ai:98% AI
Smodin: 100% AI
Post 2.
I understand how that can be, though-open a similar business right across from yours. Makes you feel like you're ripping off your hard work. In my mind, though, you can't avoid business competition. Had the other end not been quite as smoothly covered, I'd take it more as an act of jealousy and personal attack whereas to view it more as a challenge to improve service and customer experience is an effective method of dealing with competition. Another way is to emphasize what makes your business unique. The difference can be customer service. or the quality of your products. or a personal touch that others cannot easily replicate. That is where most people look for a difference-to stand apart by painting themselves as stronger than others. Customers are more likely to be loyal to brands they trust. To create a robust relationship means so much.
The other idea is that of collaboration. At certain points in time, companies offering the same product team up. It could be co-promotion of the same product or recommending a particular product to customers when it's not available in their line. It makes the battle a win-win situation. In the end, Competition is everywhere. And that's not necessarily a bad thing. Competition prepares us and can motivate us to grow. It is important to focus on your self-worth, rather than being distracted by what other people are doing.
Winston.ai initially detects 65% as human, but after a few corrections on the random periods ( . ) on the text, it detects 94% AI (or 6% human).
Originality, initially doesn’t detect it as ai, after a few corrections, it’s 100% AI. Even Copyleaks detects it after the few corrections.
Starting a hypothetical sentence "Had the other end not been quite as smoothly covered" is generally considered advanced for someone whose English isn't the first language, yet, someone with almost perfect grammar doesn't know where to place simple punctuation marks such as a comma or a period.
Post 3.
Thanks for sharing your experience! This is a great reminder of how important it is to always check the terms and conditions when it comes to promotions. It’s frustrating when casinos make their offers sound more appealing than they actually are. I’ve seen similar promotions where they promote it as a “bonus” only for it to be some form of cashback with strings attached, like wagering requirements.
The part about using the bonus only after the main balance is depleted is something that can easily catch people off guard. These hidden issues can turn what appears to be a positive experience into a serious problem. It is a lesson for all of us to always read good publications, no matter how misleading the announcements may seem. Casino marketing is very clever. And it's easy to overlook the details when you're happy with a bonus. Thanks again for the heads up. Hopefully more players will take care before diving into these plans!
Both detect 98-100% AI usage
Post 4.
I see your point entirely and concedes that the quest to find the identity of Satoshi Nakamoto often diverts from the true nature of Bitcoin. Its greatest appeal is in its structure of governance and the powers it gives users to maintain its identity. Personal and manages their own assets Satoshi's anonymity does not reflect this principle. It emphasizes that the internet doesn't depend on any individual.
Of course, knowing the identity of Satoshi doesn't change the fact about Bitcoin's technology or its value. The protocol is already good to go without needing any intermediate computation to be done. So, Satoshi's disclosure may be uncalled for and bring unnecessary protests or even legal issues that may not go well with Bitcoin's decentralization. As you said, pure Bitcoiners are interested in what Bitcoin can accomplish-financial independence. Accounting resistance and privacy Maybe instead of trying to expose Satoshi it's more important to protect the values of Bitcoin and let the technology speak for itself.
Both show high percentages of AI with a few corrections.
Let's see something else now. Using the first post, we'll try replying via ChatGPT to see what results in yields.
ChatGPTAn interesting question indeed: Satoshi Nakamoto's anonymity and its implications for the Bitcoin community. On the one hand, with Satoshi's anonymity, Bitcoin operates without central authority. Let it live on its own power. Fact is This probably is one key reason for growth on this decentralized system. Free from personal control, the Bitcoin community finds worth in communities and sovereignty. Therefore, there is a fear that exposure of Satoshi's identity will bring unanticipated psychological effects on the internet and employees. Another reason is that he supposedly holds a huge quantity of Bitcoin, equal to about 1 million BTC. Name recognition can induce the fear of losing much money. This may compromise market stability. Even though Satoshi commits to the principles of Bitcoin, the perception of control or The "founder effect" may still be in opposition to Bitcoin's core value of decentralization.
Besides, local leaders may believe that the name should be retained as Satoshi to retain the nature of Bitcoin as a "leaderless" currency, true to its principles. And it can also be feared that anonymity will attract There is a high level of scrutiny by governments or organizations and other bodies that can view Bitcoin in another light if they knew the origins of its creator. It is possible that Bitcoin activists pay little heed to any effort. Proving Satoshi's identity would be a diversion from the great value that Bitcoin has: it is a permissionless, distributed financial system. That being said, some believe that knowing who Satoshi is will "uncover some of the mystery surrounding Bitcoin" and, as such, improve its reputation.
ChatGPT's Reply
That’s an interesting take! The topic of Satoshi’s identity has always sparked debate in the community, and it’s true that some leaders seem cautious about the idea of Satoshi re-emerging. But rather than fear, many probably see it as preserving the unique foundation that makes Bitcoin what it is.
When Satoshi stepped away, they left Bitcoin as a truly decentralized, leaderless network. Bitcoin’s power comes from its community-driven nature, not from a single figurehead, and that’s a huge part of its appeal. If Satoshi were to come back and reveal themselves, it might shift focus away from the technology and toward the individual, which could introduce unwanted attention or even influence on Bitcoin’s direction. That’s a risk to the decentralized vision a lot of people want to protect.
So, I’d say it’s less about “privilege” and more about maintaining the decentralized, trustless nature that’s given Bitcoin its strength. Satoshi’s anonymity has become a powerful symbol of Bitcoin’s independence, which is probably why so many in the community would prefer it stays that way.
To summarize, there are a few tools, such as humanizers that make text almost undetectable on AI detectors. These services paraphrase the initial text, for example from "a truly decentralized leaderless network" to "permissionless, distributed financial system", in an attempt to retain the initial meaning of the sentence, but changing the wording completely. Moreover, because sometimes that's not enough, it purposely messes up your text, as we've seen here, by ending grammatically perfect sentences with random periods ( . ) in the text, and capitalized letters. This might be happening in conjuction with the humanizer and manually by the poster.