So out of 161 Shareholders we had a total of 40 Votes for BTC and 22 votes for AMBER.
That's a total of 62 Votes out of 161 possible voters = 38.5% of the voting population actually voted.
40 people out of 161 = 25% of the populace wants BTC
However the vote was decided by
22 People out of 161 = 13.6% of the populace wanted AMBER.
I can't believe that 13% of the people made the decision for all of us.
I hate elitists, I hate that you counted one person's vote as more valuable than someone else's.
Have you ever owned a stock? It works the same way. When shareholders or the company propose a vote on something everyone who owns shares gets to vote on the proposition. You get one vote for each share you own - and this makes sense. A person who purchased 1 millions shares should have a greater say than a person who purchase just 1 share. This is not the issue.
As for how the vote turned out. Didn't we all know in our hearts it was going to be a vote for AMBER. Remember when the DEV announced some big purchases from the company at ridiculously high prices and we all scratched our heads wondered who would pay so much for coins that were a fraction of the cost on the exchanges? Those investors are obviously very friendly to the company and were going to vote their shares however the company wanted them to. There is nothing odd about that either. Most publicly traded companies hold 51% of the stock so each time there is a vote, the shareholders get a say, but the company is assured of getting the majority of votes. People complain about that but no one is forcing them to invest in the company.
To answer the question, is this a scam, we have some circumstantial evidence it might be. But we have some it isn't. My question is, if its a scam why pay out any dividends in BTC or AMBER. They are giving away coins (AMBER) they could have sold on the open markets. Then again, they are pre-mined coins that cost nothing. Maybe the company left the DEV high and dry and now he is trying to hold the coin together?
At this point I am thinking its not an actual scam or at least it was not intended to be a scam. I do believe they intended to pay out dividends in BTC. But at some point the company decided it did not want to pay holders of AMBER with company profits. Think about it, how does mining AMBER benefit the company? If you bought AMBER from the company you are investing in the company. If you mined AMBER you invested only in the coin and the company does not see any financial benefit from that.
AmberTrade should have pre-mined all coins then offered them for sale to investors. They could have used the sale of AMBER to fund their projects, in which case shareholders would have a right to be paid dividends for their investments.
Did we get screwed? Yes. We were told we would be paid in BTC and now we will be paid in AMBER based on a price that is ridiculously high compared to the market price. The question we all have to answer is what happens next. There are other coins that pay out miners and investors in the currency not in BTC or USD. In fact, isn't POS paying interest or dividends in the currency that is staking?
If we are getting paid in AMBER based on the profits of the company then there is a loose link to claim the coin is backed by the company still.
IMO, the coin as dropped so far in value, its not worth it for me to dump my coins. Personally, I think the problem with Cryptsy is a much greater threat to our investments in Cryptocurrencies than what's going on with AMBER. The Cryptsy situation show just how vulnerable EVERY exchange is and if there are no reliable exchanges then none of these currencies are worth anything.