Q4 2015 financial results should be available on 27.01.16.
Our financial department asked for an additional week to finish it.
Our financial department asked for an additional week to finish it.
why delayed ?
Topic: [AMBER] X13 POW/POS| 10k AMBER=0,01% SHARES | BUY, HOLD & GET DIVIDENDS in BTC/$ - page 81. (Read 407556 times)
January 19, 2016, 10:24:21 AM
why delayed ?
January 19, 2016, 09:55:16 AM
Fitzy must be AmberCoinDev 
*ironie off
*ironie offit's true. on january 19th i saw them both online at the same time. fitzy even uses 1 space between words just like DEV!
edit: i'm stopping for now because i don't want to bury info dev posted. i'm glad there are others who are as fed up with the psychotic baseless claims as i am. have a great day gentlemen.
January 19, 2016, 09:54:29 AM
Fitzy must be AmberCoinDev *ironie off
*ironie offOh no, I've been caught!
So, whoever wants to get out, i will buy your Coins for 1000 Sat / each.
January 19, 2016, 09:47:12 AM
Fitzy must be AmberCoinDev *ironie off
*ironie off January 19, 2016, 09:42:29 AM
As for participation in "Amber Trip 2016".
At this time some details are being sorted out.
But our company will take part in this event for sure.
Before that an official start of "SUN POST" is planned.
At this time some details are being sorted out.
But our company will take part in this event for sure.
Before that an official start of "SUN POST" is planned.
January 19, 2016, 09:41:55 AM
Q4 2015 financial results should be available on 27.01.16.
Our financial department asked for an additional week to finish it.
Our financial department asked for an additional week to finish it.
January 19, 2016, 09:41:32 AM
Investment protection doesn't cover reinvestment because it is not a part of any round.
Payouts will not affect round price.
This option is only available if you buy shares from company during one of the rounds.
From the beginning option of investment protection was used several times.
As far as I remember 6 or 7 times.
Payouts will not affect round price.
This option is only available if you buy shares from company during one of the rounds.
From the beginning option of investment protection was used several times.
As far as I remember 6 or 7 times.
January 19, 2016, 09:41:01 AM
We have checked all transactions.
Voting result in Google Doc is final.
Payouts will be completed within 3 days (19.01-22.01)
Voting result in Google Doc is final.
Payouts will be completed within 3 days (19.01-22.01)
January 19, 2016, 09:30:37 AM
Maybe he was referring to Alpinist???
except we've already discussed alpinist's join date being 22 months before dev... and i registered a month or so before dev. if you can't figure out he was directly taking a shot at me... then i doubt you can figure out much. January 19, 2016, 09:24:50 AM
Well Alpinist has been around since April of 2013... 22 months before amber coin started and 18 months before dev registered. So there's that wrinkle in these theories. Plus between you, me, and him... he's the only one who had visited a amber trade office and posted pics. His credibility is a tad above your opinion. Tangibility and whatnot. Maybe he is dev *new crazy theory* lol. I'm gonna enjoy 1¢ shares from someone, I can feel it.
Sometimes i think you are ambercoindev, and it seems i´m right once AGAIN
Oh you registered nearly same date as ambercoindev here.
When is the dividend, ermmm, i mean , shitcoin payout happening?
Guys we are getting fooled here big time.
I use the word y'all with pretty good regularity... And ellipses. I'd love to see a single post by dev that has both of these markers.
Also why did it take me a month into q2 to register, and I didn't appear in this thread until damn near May? The real kicker... Why the fuck does my registered address show up on the voted for bitcoin side???
Maybe he was referring to Alpinist???
January 19, 2016, 09:15:12 AM
Well Alpinist has been around since April of 2013... 22 months before amber coin started and 18 months before dev registered. So there's that wrinkle in these theories. Plus between you, me, and him... he's the only one who had visited a amber trade office and posted pics. His credibility is a tad above your opinion. Tangibility and whatnot. Maybe he is dev *new crazy theory* lol. I'm gonna enjoy 1¢ shares from someone, I can feel it.
Sometimes i think you are ambercoindev, and it seems i´m right once AGAIN
Oh you registered nearly same date as ambercoindev here.
When is the dividend, ermmm, i mean , shitcoin payout happening?
Guys we are getting fooled here big time.
I use the word y'all with pretty good regularity... And ellipses. I'd love to see a single post by dev that has both of these markers.
Also why did it take me a month into q2 to register, and I didn't appear in this thread until damn near May? The real kicker... Why the fuck does my registered address show up on the voted for bitcoin side???
January 19, 2016, 09:13:10 AM
Well Alpinist has been around since April of 2013... 22 months before amber coin started and 18 months before dev registered. So there's that wrinkle in these theories. Plus between you, me, and him... he's the only one who had visited a amber trade office and posted pics. His credibility is a tad above your opinion. Tangibility and whatnot. Maybe he is dev *new crazy theory* lol. I'm gonna enjoy 1¢ shares from someone, I can feel it.
He probably isn't I was just putting forth a theory because in the past few days MOST (again NOT all) of the loudest Ambercoin dividend supporters have been new accounts with no credibility no matter which way you look at it. Also as I stated I was merely positing a possibility. I have learned from my time in crypto NEVER get sucked into the herd mindset so I make it a point now to try and point out other possibilities. It's called playing the Devils Advocate.
Dividend Voting was manipulated, and i knew it.
"Investment protection"
"Backed by AMBER"
"BUY, HOLD @ GET DIVIDENDS in BTC/$"
Yeah right, my A$$. Nothing is protected, nothing is backed, and NO dividends in BTC/$.
This was well planned from the beginning.
It´s sad that so many people losing their hard earned money here, thinking it´s legit and they would get dividends in BTC/$.
Instead they get AMBER coins which they not even can sell w/o crashing the market.
ARE THERE REALLY THAT MANY PEOPLE SO STUPID as a leaf of bread here , voting for AMBER payout as dividends?
No, of course not !!!!!!!!!!. Voting was manipulated, and it was easy to do for the company with all their fake shit.
Everyone with even just a half braincell would vote for BTC payout.
How hard would it be for them to "sell" those coins to themselves to have permanent control of the top 3-5 wallets (selling to yourself is Free) and win any vote they would need to.
Pretty smart setup if they did it like that.
Anyone here want to ownup to owning some of the top 5 accounts or should I assume those are all just freely gotten company shills?
January 19, 2016, 08:42:58 AM
In the wallet go to help -> debug window -> console ->then type in repairwallet
January 19, 2016, 08:19:05 AM
wallet updated but 3000 Amber missing: Generated but not accepted mined
Status: conflicted
Date: 1/15/2016 17:28
Source: Generated
Debit: 0.00 AMBER
Net amount: -26.81 AMBER
Transaction ID: 9cd42672f6b50a6f32f42c4654cfcd96a9c72087954bef8fcd3f0403cdcffa5c
Generated coins must mature 50 blocks before they can be spent. When you generated this block, it was broadcast to the network to be added to the block chain. If it fails to get into the chain, its state will change to "not accepted" and it won't be spendable. This may occasionally happen if another node generates a block within a few seconds of yours.
anyone this some
Status: conflicted
Date: 1/15/2016 17:28
Source: Generated
Debit: 0.00 AMBER
Net amount: -26.81 AMBER
Transaction ID: 9cd42672f6b50a6f32f42c4654cfcd96a9c72087954bef8fcd3f0403cdcffa5c
Generated coins must mature 50 blocks before they can be spent. When you generated this block, it was broadcast to the network to be added to the block chain. If it fails to get into the chain, its state will change to "not accepted" and it won't be spendable. This may occasionally happen if another node generates a block within a few seconds of yours.
anyone this some
January 19, 2016, 03:58:56 AM
DEV, it is written at Amber Trade page about investment protection:
"Repurchases of shares (investment protection):
We are ready to buy back all coins (shares in the company) bought from us at any time in any rounds of share offering at the purchase price. Thus, there is no risk of losing your investment.
"Repurchases of shares (investment protection):
We are ready to buy back all coins (shares in the company) bought from us at any time in any rounds of share offering at the purchase price. Thus, there is no risk of losing your investment.
Thanks for pointing that out, nearly forgot.
SO, if i get AMBER as dividends, i bought them from the company directly for 0.05$ /AMBER , thus i have investment protection.
I will of course sell them back to the company. Selling them at exchange gets me nearly nothing.
January 19, 2016, 03:49:39 AM
Well Alpinist has been around since April of 2013... 22 months before amber coin started and 18 months before dev registered. So there's that wrinkle in these theories. Plus between you, me, and him... he's the only one who had visited a amber trade office and posted pics. His credibility is a tad above your opinion. Tangibility and whatnot. Maybe he is dev *new crazy theory* lol. I'm gonna enjoy 1¢ shares from someone, I can feel it.
He probably isn't I was just putting forth a theory because in the past few days MOST (again NOT all) of the loudest Ambercoin dividend supporters have been new accounts with no credibility no matter which way you look at it. Also as I stated I was merely positing a possibility. I have learned from my time in crypto NEVER get sucked into the herd mindset so I make it a point now to try and point out other possibilities. It's called playing the Devils Advocate.
Dividend Voting was manipulated, and i knew it.
"Investment protection"
"Backed by AMBER"
"BUY, HOLD @ GET DIVIDENDS in BTC/$"
Yeah right, my A$$. Nothing is protected, nothing is backed, and NO dividends in BTC/$.
This was well planned from the beginning.
It´s sad that so many people losing their hard earned money here, thinking it´s legit and they would get dividends in BTC/$.
Instead they get AMBER coins which they not even can sell w/o crashing the market.
ARE THERE REALLY THAT MANY PEOPLE SO STUPID as a leaf of bread here , voting for AMBER payout as dividends?
No, of course not !!!!!!!!!!. Voting was manipulated, and it was easy to do for the company with all their fake shit.
Everyone with even just a half braincell would vote for BTC payout.
January 19, 2016, 03:40:43 AM
Well Alpinist has been around since April of 2013... 22 months before amber coin started and 18 months before dev registered. So there's that wrinkle in these theories. Plus between you, me, and him... he's the only one who had visited a amber trade office and posted pics. His credibility is a tad above your opinion. Tangibility and whatnot. Maybe he is dev *new crazy theory* lol. I'm gonna enjoy 1¢ shares from someone, I can feel it.
Sometimes i think you are ambercoindev, and it seems i´m right once AGAIN
Oh you registered nearly same date as ambercoindev here.
When is the dividend, ermmm, i mean , shitcoin payout happening?
Guys we are getting fooled here big time.
January 19, 2016, 12:53:20 AM
So he asked about a pure pos wallet and now it's amber coin, which oddly didn't have pos block until block 120,000 or so. This fails every aspect of Occam's razor.
Not necessarily, 100% pure PoS coins are not as favorable because of the possibility for abuse, not to mention by pre-mining 51% of Amber and then opening a small PoW phase in conjunction with PoS it deflects initial suspicions of being anything other then legit. While still allowing a massive generation of AMBER from the 51% held by the company to continually sell off to investors at an inflated rate or to pass off as "Dividends" when BTC from the ponzi scheme that is "open financial rounds" of the company direct selling AmberCoins at inflated rates dries up.
Now is all of this pure conjecture and a bit of a stretch? YES IT IS. BUT it also would not be the most sophisticated scam theres ever been so is therefore still within the realm of possibility.
AGAIN THERE IS NO 100% SOLID PROOF ANY OF THIS IS TRUE/CORRECT BUT THERE IS ALSO NO 100% SOLID PROOF IT ISN'T. I AM JUST PRESENTING THE ARGUMENT FOR THE WORST CASE SCENARIO AS I AM ALSO A SHAREHOLDER SO AMBER BEING A SCAM WOULD HURT ME AS WELL.
January 19, 2016, 12:07:28 AM
So he asked about a pure pos wallet and now it's amber coin, which oddly didn't have pos block until block 120,000 or so. This fails every aspect of Occam's razor.
January 18, 2016, 11:51:41 PM
Has anyone stopped to consider the POSSIBILITY that Alpinist IS AmberCoinDev or at the very least some sort of paid shill? I find it funny how they BOTH incorrectly use the words "a" and "an" in EXACTLY the same context so unless they went to the exact same sub-par English course I find it hard to dismiss that fact. Also is there anyone else that could go to one of the offices and make sure this is legit? Always better to have multiple verified sources of confirmation then just ONE.
Interesting points Socal.....I decided to investigate your claims and sure enough I found the following quotes from Ambercoindev:
"You can check a plenty of info" and "the more requests from a reputable members" and "it's very profitable to list an AmberCoin for any exchange now"
Now compare Ambercoindev's incorrect use of "a" and "an" to the following posts from Alpinist:
"yesterday I have visited an Amber Trade's office in Lithuania."
and
"I have been shown a photos of company's quarries"
Hmmm.........
Jump to: