quite interesting answer
found that because of your link on the last post
Thank you, and thanks for reading.
so, how long would be considered "in the long run"?
~
That's what I wanted to bring to the attention, "in the long run" means thousands and thousands of games, which in reality you will hardly be playing with the same person. There are several articles on the subject, you can read
this one for example, to see that saying that poker "is already solved by algorithms" is a bit prematurely.
~
Can you please elaborate more on the last part of your post? Do you mean that the traditional roulette game after some transformation can become a game that depends not only on luck but on skill too?
This could be interesting, but I personally don't see the way of making roulette not purely luck based game.
~
Well, the truth is that I have begun to believe in ability and in choosing the correct option, because on some occasions that occur in roulette we can choose a path, in fact I have been reading a lot about it, when you play with many people you can give opportunities, and in this article that they have on the bitcasino.io blog it is very interesting:
https://bitcasino.io/blog/tipshackstricks/guide-to-rouletteOf course, it takes a lot of skill to use strategies appropriately and a bit of daring and expect anything while taking risks.
Thanks for the link. I read it, and, well, sorry but to me it looks like a typical promo article. Something similar might as well be written about the "complexity" of dice game or slots. I mean, there
are many options in those games, but what you choose doesn't affect the outcome. All those options are there to bring more fun to the game. And that's not a bad thing. The game should be as entertaining as possible. We are supposed to be playing for fun, after all.