Topic: An obvious case of trust abuse (DT members welcome) - page 5. (Read 2827 times)

I did not negotiate the purchase of an account in 2014 as it hadn't been sold. I was negotiating but it ended with nothing:


Why did you omit that part? It was just a couple posts below. Anyway, someone bought this account later (like in 2016), though I'm not sure as I didn't follow it. But it wasn't me. As I said, I'm not involved in this kind of activities and back in the day it was more like entertainment because you could actually buy a Hero account and legitimately get away with it, which I specifically mentioned (you may want to translate that part for me)


The real problem is that I didn't buy any accounts in any place over here (to begin with)
 
And yes, I wrote about that particular case of the attempted account purchase in other topics, and so what? If you are trying to build a case against me or discredit me somehow (which tells more about yourself than me, just in case), you may want to start a new thread, really. But you are welcome, anyway. It will be fun to watch as you fail miserably


I actually support this view (other than it being a foul accusation, of course), and I'm happy that I didn't buy that account (or any other account, for the record) as it would now have turned into a toxic asset, a liability


The truth is that I never bought (or sold) any accounts here, neither in 2014 nor in any other year, whether it was allowed or not

Who cares if he bought in 2014 ?It was allowed at that time.
Your poor try to discredit OP just shows what an idiot you are.
You wanna discredit him for a possible account purchase in 2014 ?

Maybe you should start tagging nearly all DT and legendary members for it.

fucking idiot and merit whore

This is what I write about. It was an attempt that was in May. You then twice, wrote about it in other topics.
in June https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.7220375
in July https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.7714515
The problem is that now it is not clear whether you bought in another place or not. I do not think that buying and selling accounts is a good practice for the forum.

I looked at your posts. Why did you negotiate the purchase of an account in 2014?
http://archive.li/FdM1t

I think I should in fact give you a neg rating after all


And while we are at it, I will pay 1 dollar in litecoins for every single week within which I made more than 250 (two hundred and fifty) posts since 2017 (2017 included, obviously) because I know it with almost 100% certainty that I never made that many posts in any given week in the last few years (let alone 275). But if I'm in fact mistaken about it, then whoever proves me wrong here will be able to earn dough, as simple as it gets. My post history is as it was before today (apart from new posts added, of course)

As the saying goes, when money talks, bullshit walks


Good riddance


What if the accusations of spamming are in fact ludicrous? And which post do you refer to? Maybe, this one:


I often merge my previous replies into one (like this one). Get used to it

I've already spent more time on this subject than it deserves.  Best of luck to you.

What if you deleted your previous posts just like you did in this thread? You were not too quick in doing that. I wonder what made you change your mind to delete that post.

I think you wrote everything essential in your post, and fact that deisik is only interested in how to convince DT members, and others to tag me it speaks for itself. 1100 post in two months is something quite natural for him, but only when signature campaign is asking that from them.

I am not the only one who thinks that he is signature spammer, it is proven fact from past and it is not false information as he write in my trust summary. In time when he is in Coinroll signature campaign posting 200-300 posts per week is also normal thing.

Just few quotes what respected campaign manager think about his posting :

I consider this issue neither resolved nor handled as essentially nothing has changed apart from me leaving a neutral rating for the perp. Further, I've been accused of spamming even in this thread itself. And since I challenged these people to provide any real evidence of that (which they failed to do so far), I think they should be given some time before they can be officially declared slanderers and forum enemies as well as given negative rating too (just kidding, though who knows)

In this way, I will keep this thread open for the time being


So how's your quest for my spam posts going, found something?

Yes, lets.  Quit whining, lock this thread, and talk to Lucius like an adult.

I think OP could lock the thread now. Seems both are not agree with DT's opinions eventually. Since both of you are not on DT network, other DT member can't help you expect leave own opinions. No one can force some other to remove feedback. But if both of you or anyone were DT network then other DT could help you by leave counter feedback's and by exclusion/inclusion. On the other hand DT members have received too much untrusted feedback's more than you and they can't open thread for every single feedback's. So don't worry about untrusted  feedback's, if it become trusted on future then may be other DT's could leave counter feedback's.

I definitely like your doublespeak


Let's make things simple

You come up with a couple of posts from my recent post history which you consider spam and then we continue talking. Until then all your insinuations like stake.com promoting spam, me making over 200 posts a week, numbers telling a story of their own, some truth being there, etc are just that (i.e. insinuations only)

Really, if it is mostly spam, or a significant part of it is spam (what you seem to be implying here), you won't actually have to dig a lot deeper as such posts won't be hard to find, right? Otherwise, your whole narrative starts looking like another unsubstantiated accusation itself (well, at least that's how it feels)

@deisik
Suchmoon just illustrated the crux of the matter.  It's not beyond the realm of possibilities that Lucius will end up on DT2, but if he continues to leave frivolous reviews such as this the odds are getting smaller and smaller.  




I didn't go looking into your post history too deep, but for fuck's sake!  1100 posts in two months to promote a casino which has already been accused of promoting spam?  That seems like a lot to me, and it's actually twice your average posting habits.  The table below includes your posts made during the campaign.  

Date Registered: November 02, 2013
Total posts: 20857
Average Daily Posts: 10.15
Average Weekly Posts: 76.04
Average Monthly Posts: 324.15

Indeed the number seem to show that Lucius' claim was accurate for the time period in question.  You posted nearly twice your average during the campaign.  Again, I didn't dig deep enough to try and ascertain your posting habits, and see what are what aren't shit-posts, but certainly the numbers do tell a story of their own.

It seems to me that you are taking this situation as seriously as you are because maybe you're insulted by the allegation.  Perhaps you are as offended as you are because you know there's some truth to it.  You have other negative feedback, which on it's face would seem more concerning, but yet you are not bothered by it.

Take a closer look at yourself and assess why this is so important to you.  Lucius is not DT2 so his review is as meaningless as the other reviews you've been ignoring for years.  Lucius has already indicated that he would have discussed the issue with you in private.  The longer you keep bickering in public the more likely both of you will be insulted enough to develop a grudge that cannot be repaired.  

LOL if you bothered to read even one post I made hehe. Your posts often make me laugh ...you are always doing this.

I never said you did. Learn to read skank. You are simply endorsing actions that are not sanctioned by theymos. You support abuse you are an abuser. Remember how you said it goes??

There is no point saying the system is working great when it is obviously not giving the results theymos intended.

My achievements surpass anything you will ever dream of here.

If you had bothered to read the thread or at least looked at the trust pages of involved individuals you would know that I didn't post red trust for the OP so there is nothing for me to remove.

Quit shitposting your butthurt nonsense on every fucking thread and start working on your own positive contributions to the forum.

No it demonstrates that people don't give 1 fuck what theymos says here and just do what they want with red trust.
It demonstrates that you support giving red trust outside of what theymos said red trust was for. Hence you are abusing the trust system and presenting yet another net negative post.


1. is he a scammer?
2. is he strongly likely to scam?

NO?? so remove the red trust then because RED trust is for SCAMMERS and those STRONGLY likely to scam.

this is a neutral trust UNLESS the project is a scam and he is aware of this.

200 posts in one week is not spamming unless the content is low quality and crap.. even then that is worth a neutral and reporting to the  mods to take care of it.

It does not apply at all, i.e. the score is no longer affected by the amount risked.


You posted the thread. You made your point. There is nothing else to do here.


The situation has been handled. Users (including DT members) looked at it, the counterparty responded. The outcome not being what you wanted doesn't mean the system failed. It actually shows that the system works properly as opposed to bending to your will.

I read this post only recently:
I'm not sure if this still applies at current Bitcoin prices.

If it is worth to mention, someone reads DT and not-DT feedbacks and can come to conclusion that they scammed someone for more or less 4 million dollars.
Intentionally putting wrong numbers there is simple wrong, so where exactly is line between trust abuse and not trust abuse? One fake risked amount? 2? 100?

That's not what I meant to say, I've rephrased my post a bit, please read it again.