I just get PM from one member about this thread.
Reason for give this negative trust is that
deisik is part of stake.com signature campaign and posting up to 200 posts per week. To reach that amount of posts, he reply (quote) to many post individually instead to use multi-quote option. I write this very clear in my sent feedback, and I do not see any problem in that, maybe only amount risked is to big.
I see most of you think that I abuse trust in this case, did anyone actually read what I posted and check deisik post history?
Example 1 :
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5107721.20deisik is quote&post :
here is the likely scenario that always happen;
half the noobs will buy now at 3700$, the other half will buy when the price goes pass 4000$, the smart will start selling the 4-5 area to the noobs, price will fall back to 3-3.4k , the noobs will freak out, sell for lose , the smart buy and make profit, rinse and and repeat , shut up and take my money
I basically agree with this scenario
Though I don't actually expect prices to break out beyond 4k any time soon. The market doesn't look strong now, so the smart ones will likely start selling earlier if they haven't already. We had been staying for too long in a very tight range to penetrate easily current resistance levels as they had likely also been going lower over time (read, it may take time as well as some effort and a few up and down cycles)
Put differently, we should now start thinking in terms of hundreds of dollars, not in thousands, when analyzing possible price action. This may be our new base scale
Then he find another post from
exstasie which is just few post above, and quote that in new post :
I said a week or two ago that if bears couldn't dump through the $3,400 area, that the pump to $5K is still on. I think that's where we are now
We have risen measly $200
And now you are saying that we are on our way to 5k. We will be there if we reliably break the 4k resistance and stand there, with it becoming a new major support level. But considering for how long we had been stuck at 3.5k, it doesn't look like a plausible assumption unless there is some major news (positive, naturally) followed by real events that add value to Bitcoin (I don't know what it could be). Obviously, some random comment won't cut it
This is how he is increased the number of posts, just by checking his post history anyone can find many cases of such posting.
So why is wrong to tag such user as signature spammer?
http://archive.li/YH7DJ 
