Pages:
Author

Topic: [ANN] [1080 | 1080TI] ETHlargement - The Hashrate Hardener - page 15. (Read 59500 times)

full member
Activity: 309
Merit: 100
Thanks Neurolicious, btw what's your temperature on all your cards when running at the mhs?

Fan speed 65% on all of them.
Founders edition is 60-65°C
All others are 50-52°C
It is a hot summer here so during winters they are even better I'd say mid 40's.
full member
Activity: 309
Merit: 100
With the EVGA FTW3 edition of the 1080ti, I get very high tempratures on the "PWR 4" sensor. PWR stands for Power by the way...
I have this problem with a few algos like Equihash and Ethash and I know it's not a problem with the ETHlargement, I was just hopping that someone might have found a solution to this? For example maybe if I add a thermal pad this would be fixed?

I'm talking about 78C on normal fan speeds and 71C on 100% speed. This is the temp of just one component while the rest (GPU and Memory) are close to 60C, some parts even lower.
I've read that others have the same problem but none have found a solution and I don't want to RMA it, it overclocks well and runs great so I won't risk an RMA.

That temp is completely normal, don't worry about it. As I remember they are supposedly rated to 105°C.
full member
Activity: 309
Merit: 100
Hey Neurolicious, can you share your oc setting for your 57mhs result?
Thanks

I have several different 1080TI's and the only ones I manage to get 57mh/s on are Gigabyte Gaming OC ones.
EVGA FTW3 = 54-55 mh/s
ROG Strix OC = 54-55 mh/s
Gigabyte founders edition = 52-54 mh/s (fluctuates alot)

Settings:

Core = +117
Memory = +1000(+500 on Afterburner)
TDP(PL) = 65%

Miner software is Phoenix. All the basic parameters except intensity I set to 14 "-mi 14"

Is it faster than Claymore miner?

Yeah in my experience it is slightly faster than Claymore in single-mode but nothing spectacular. In any way it is better imo because of lower dev fee.
full member
Activity: 728
Merit: 169
What doesn't kill you, makes you stronger
Any way that enables us to use 1080 ti ETHlargement on NICEHASH Huh

Have you read the instructions? You just start the software (ETHlargement) and you let it run. Whatever miner you're using will have higher hashrate if it's memory dependant.
Think of ETHlargement as a temporary GPU BIOS modification... as long as the software runs, it changes the way some data is communicated between the card's components.
full member
Activity: 728
Merit: 169
What doesn't kill you, makes you stronger
With the EVGA FTW3 edition of the 1080ti, I get very high tempratures on the "PWR 4" sensor. PWR stands for Power by the way...
I have this problem with a few algos like Equihash and Ethash and I know it's not a problem with the ETHlargement, I was just hopping that someone might have found a solution to this? For example maybe if I add a thermal pad this would be fixed?

I'm talking about 78C on normal fan speeds and 71C on 100% speed. This is the temp of just one component while the rest (GPU and Memory) are close to 60C, some parts even lower.
I've read that others have the same problem but none have found a solution and I don't want to RMA it, it overclocks well and runs great so I won't risk an RMA.
sr. member
Activity: 372
Merit: 250
The road of excess leads to the palace of wisdom
Hey Neurolicious, can you share your oc setting for your 57mhs result?
Thanks

I have several different 1080TI's and the only ones I manage to get 57mh/s on are Gigabyte Gaming OC ones.
EVGA FTW3 = 54-55 mh/s
ROG Strix OC = 54-55 mh/s
Gigabyte founders edition = 52-54 mh/s (fluctuates alot)

Settings:

Core = +117
Memory = +1000(+500 on Afterburner)
TDP(PL) = 65%

Miner software is Phoenix. All the basic parameters except intensity I set to 14 "-mi 14"

I know everyone seems to love Claymore and Phoenix, but I prefer to use ethminer from https://github.com/ethereum-mining/ethminer/releases and I don't get any fee. Also I don't get some annoying addon to the miner to switch to another pool for the dev's fee.

I'm using 1070s and getting around 32.4mh/s if I can get the memory above +700 (core at -200) and 1080s with the awesome pill doing around 34mh/s with +400 or +500 memory (one card doesn't like overclocking as much as the other).

Do all you people using Claymore or Phoenixminer do better a lot than that?

Is it faster than Claymore miner?
newbie
Activity: 40
Merit: 0
Hey Neurolicious, can you share your oc setting for your 57mhs result?
Thanks

I have several different 1080TI's and the only ones I manage to get 57mh/s on are Gigabyte Gaming OC ones.
EVGA FTW3 = 54-55 mh/s
ROG Strix OC = 54-55 mh/s
Gigabyte founders edition = 52-54 mh/s (fluctuates alot)

Settings:

Core = +117
Memory = +1000(+500 on Afterburner)
TDP(PL) = 65%

Miner software is Phoenix. All the basic parameters except intensity I set to 14 "-mi 14"

Is it faster than Claymore miner?
newbie
Activity: 102
Merit: 0
I have some cards that start around 45mh but will drop to the mid/high 30's once I apply any sort of memory oc.  Has anyone experienced this?  I have other rigs that work just fine and will run the overclocks just fine w/ a result of up to 55mh.

I'm using 65%/+100/+750
jr. member
Activity: 251
Merit: 6
I picked up a 1080ti (zotac amp extreme monstrosity) out of curiosity, just to test this.  I get up close to 55 mhs if I let the PL go up to 75%.  Most efficient setting is 50% PL, 42 mhs for 150W.  That's about as efficient as your average modded polaris.  Pretty solid given the versatility of this gpu for other algos.

With some more tinkering/tweaking, I'm getting about 50 mhs at 175W (hwinfo reading).

mclock +650
cclock -225
pl 55%

Did some additional tuning this morning.  Getting 51.1 mhs at 175W (hwinfo reading).

mclock +670
cclock -175
pl 55%

About 0.29 Mh/J.

I can get a higher hashrate, up to about 54.5, by feeding a little more power, but the hash/joule ratio isn't as good.

After these successful results I bought another 1080ti (gigabyte AIO water-cooled) and jammed it in my gaming computer case (along with the aforementioned zotac amp extreme).  I'm pretty pleased.  Both cards perform similarly.  If I let them run at about 190W each, I get about 107.5 MH/s total.  Dialing it back a little to 175W each gets me about 102.5 MH/s total.

Pretty happy with these results.  Thanks ohgodas.

I wonder what would happen if I stuck an Acorn in here.
newbie
Activity: 2
Merit: 0
Thanks Neurolicious, btw what's your temperature on all your cards when running at the mhs?
member
Activity: 239
Merit: 11
awesome for you that get it to work...my 1080 was around 32-36 mh/s but severe artifacts on screen makes me unhappy and it doesnt feel good. They will be put to other algos as of now Smiley
full member
Activity: 309
Merit: 100
Hey Neurolicious, can you share your oc setting for your 57mhs result?
Thanks

I have several different 1080TI's and the only ones I manage to get 57mh/s on are Gigabyte Gaming OC ones.
EVGA FTW3 = 54-55 mh/s
ROG Strix OC = 54-55 mh/s
Gigabyte founders edition = 52-54 mh/s (fluctuates alot)

Settings:

Core = +117
Memory = +1000(+500 on Afterburner)
TDP(PL) = 65%

Miner software is Phoenix. All the basic parameters except intensity I set to 14 "-mi 14"
newbie
Activity: 20
Merit: 0
57mh/s on 1080TI
showing up on pool aswell. cheers!

what settings are you using to get 57?
newbie
Activity: 2
Merit: 0
Hey Neurolicious, can you share your oc setting for your 57mhs result?
Thanks
full member
Activity: 729
Merit: 114
msi gtx 1080 Duke 8gb 41.3 Mh/s @ 62% TDP +1000 mem +0core.
full member
Activity: 214
Merit: 100
Do we need to force P0 state to get better results. I run the cards at P2 state, 180W, about 50MH/s which is worse than most others.
full member
Activity: 309
Merit: 100
57mh/s on 1080TI
showing up on pool aswell. cheers!
legendary
Activity: 4354
Merit: 3614
what is this "brake pedal" you speak of?
Please anyone feel free to correct me, but as far as i remember, you have to close all your overclock tools first (MSI afterburner, nvidia-smi, etc) then run the pill first and then run your mining software second. After those are both running smoothly, thats when you open your overclock tools and apply settings. The settings won't be the same as your max overclock settings before the pill tho. It will be slightly less so just play around with the values.

actually i havent noticed any difference in stability no matter what order i start them in.

just need sane clocks once in on the pill. once you find that and set it via ab or whatever, it just works whatever order the rig fires them up in.
jr. member
Activity: 169
Merit: 1
hello, i have msi seahawk gtx1080, pill works and getting 30mhs after i run the file and claymore. however any slight overclock (+50mhz) in afterburner makes mining crash. any advise please_ without it im able to overclock to +500 withut any issue. i understand it makes timings more agresive, however +50 crashes pc?  Huh

Please anyone feel free to correct me, but as far as i remember, you have to close all your overclock tools first (MSI afterburner, nvidia-smi, etc) then run the pill first and then run your mining software second. After those are both running smoothly, thats when you open your overclock tools and apply settings. The settings won't be the same as your max overclock settings before the pill tho. It will be slightly less so just play around with the values.

thank you for advise, but it doesnt work either. i restarted my pc, closed all apps, also msi afterburner. started pill, then claymore and when it starts hashing i started msi again, put there +50mhz and it crashes (artifacts and then freez). so not sure what to do, maximum seems to be 30Mh/s.
sr. member
Activity: 372
Merit: 250
The road of excess leads to the palace of wisdom
hello, i have msi seahawk gtx1080, pill works and getting 30mhs after i run the file and claymore. however any slight overclock (+50mhz) in afterburner makes mining crash. any advise please_ without it im able to overclock to +500 withut any issue. i understand it makes timings more agresive, however +50 crashes pc?  Huh

Please anyone feel free to correct me, but as far as i remember, you have to close all your overclock tools first (MSI afterburner, nvidia-smi, etc) then run the pill first and then run your mining software second. After those are both running smoothly, thats when you open your overclock tools and apply settings. The settings won't be the same as your max overclock settings before the pill tho. It will be slightly less so just play around with the values.

no idea if there is any "corrrect" way... but I get best stability if I apply overclocks (I use Nvidia Inspector), then run mining software, then run the pill.

I have 2 x MSI 1080 gamingX and they both seem to be fine with a +400 memory overclock, but one of them sometimes craps itself and I get screen artefacts after it's been mining for a while, but then sometimes it doesn't.

I'm using the pill to improve cryptonight-heavy hash-rate for mining Loki on the 1080s. Without the pill they do around 500h/s, with the pill 650-700h/s.

I'm also using 1070s and they will do 700h/s with or without the pill (obviously) - so the pill makes my 1080s hash nearly as well as a 1070 at a cryptonight variant. The 1070s all have +700 memory overclock.

I have also used all of these cards to mine ETH and it was a similar story - the pill made the 1080s hash around the same as my 1070s.

It is one of the coolest free releases I've ever seen and I've been mining since early 2016.
Pages:
Jump to: