[ANN] [1080 | 1080TI] ETHlargement - The Hashrate Hardener - page 19.

Cyper_BLC

sr. member

Activity: 490

Merit: 270

Reverse Engineer

nice work,
have you plan to do that for 1070's ? is it possible ?

upps i found my answer, thnx eliovp

Quote from: Eliovp on May 03, 2018, 03:30:41 PM

Quote from: Kriss.Kross on May 02, 2018, 09:20:54 AM

Quote from: OhGodAGirl on May 01, 2018, 07:51:18 PM

OhGodAGod is sadly already taken. But I'm just a girl, nothing more.

Love your work ... when a pill for another Nvidia card (especially for GTX 1070) will be release ?

Doubt that one will ever be released.

The GTX 1070 doesn't have G5X memory and thus the injection doesn't work. Neither will it on any other non G5X card.

The mining cards P104/102 already have this mod (FAW/RRD) so this tool only applies to the non mining G5X cards, which are 3 types..?

What it does is, it accesses the memory block and injects those 2 changes.

I've done this mod on the P104 when we first recieved the prototype months ago.
It jumped from stock 28Mh to 36Mh with just those 2 changes.

It's a nice little trick yes

Zam54

newbie

Activity: 1

Merit: 0

Got 51mh/s
Vert Nice ty

dragonmike

hero member

Activity: 1274

Merit: 556

Quote from: kdminhkhanh on May 17, 2018, 10:10:55 AM

Why is it only available for 1080 1080ti without the for 1060 and 1070?

Because 1080's and 1080Ti's use GDDR5X as opposed to GDDR5 for the two models you mentioned. Different memory type, different timings. Capish?

kdminhkhanh

newbie

Activity: 5

Merit: 0

Why is it only available for 1080 1080ti without the for 1060 and 1070?

androstan1234

jr. member

Activity: 251

Merit: 6

I picked up a 1080ti (zotac amp extreme monstrosity) out of curiosity, just to test this. I get up close to 55 mhs if I let the PL go up to 75%. Most efficient setting is 50% PL, 42 mhs for 150W. That's about as efficient as your average modded polaris. Pretty solid given the versatility of this gpu for other algos.

Adzivu

member

Activity: 200

Merit: 12

I will. Does anyone know why is there no checkmark on CUDA for GPU1, but there is for GPU0 on GPU-Z?

promomei

sr. member

Activity: 399

Merit: 254

Quote from: Adzivu on May 16, 2018, 08:11:19 AM

I don't know what I'm doing wrong.
Win 10, latest build
Latest drivers 397.64 - Asus ROG Strix 1080Ti Gaming OC
Stock clocks, Claymore 11.6 or 11.7 I am getting around 70 Mh/s, when I run ETHlargement nothing happens.
If I try to change the clocks my hashrate decreases a lot.
GPU-Z for GPU0 http://gpuz.techpowerup.com/18/05/16/6gm.png
GPU-Z for GPU1 http://gpuz.techpowerup.com/18/05/16/vjz.png

https://gyazo.com/34301d2b9b1629ec3c9074e3df626b0b

try SSL Port 5555

Adzivu

member

Activity: 200

Merit: 12

I don't know what I'm doing wrong.
Win 10, latest build
Latest drivers 397.64 - Asus ROG Strix 1080Ti Gaming OC
Stock clocks, Claymore 11.6 or 11.7 I am getting around 70 Mh/s, when I run ETHlargement nothing happens.
If I try to change the clocks my hashrate decreases a lot.
GPU-Z for GPU0 http://gpuz.techpowerup.com/18/05/16/6gm.png
GPU-Z for GPU1 http://gpuz.techpowerup.com/18/05/16/vjz.png

https://gyazo.com/34301d2b9b1629ec3c9074e3df626b0b

jewbsv

newbie

Activity: 21

Merit: 0

Quote from: Adzivu on May 15, 2018, 08:54:40 PM

I am trying to make this work but looks like I'm an idiot.

I have two Asus ROG Strix 1080Ti.
On stock clocks without ETHlargement I get around 70 Mh/s with Claymore 11.7 on Windows 10.

(EthDcrMiner64.exe -epool eu1.ethermine.org:4444 -ewal myaddress -eworker adzi1 -epsw x)

When I change clock settings to 70% Power Limit, Core +0 and Memory +650 I get 36-40 Mh/s with ETHlargement running.
How long do I need to leave it running to get around 100 Mh/s? Does it show after 3-5 hours?

At me here so
Asus ROG Strix 1080Ti.
P0-off
memory -5800(+300Mhz)
core-850mv/1608Mhz
Power Limit-100%
power 185W
55,6 Mh
Edit curve in avteberner

rusty91

newbie

Activity: 21

Merit: 0

Quote from: Adzivu on May 15, 2018, 08:54:40 PM

I am trying to make this work but looks like I'm an idiot.

I have two Asus ROG Strix 1080Ti.
On stock clocks without ETHlargement I get around 70 Mh/s with Claymore 11.7 on Windows 10.

(EthDcrMiner64.exe -epool eu1.ethermine.org:4444 -ewal myaddress -eworker adzi1 -epsw x)

When I change clock settings to 70% Power Limit, Core +0 and Memory +650 I get 36-40 Mh/s with ETHlargement running.
How long do I need to leave it running to get around 100 Mh/s? Does it show after 3-5 hours?

This thing work instantaneously. Open it as admin and just keep running in the background. Nothing more. You will see 50MH/s within few seconds...

Adzivu

member

Activity: 200

Merit: 12

I am trying to make this work but looks like I'm an idiot.

I have two Asus ROG Strix 1080Ti.
On stock clocks without ETHlargement I get around 70 Mh/s with Claymore 11.7 on Windows 10.

(EthDcrMiner64.exe -epool eu1.ethermine.org:4444 -ewal myaddress -eworker adzi1 -epsw x)

When I change clock settings to 70% Power Limit, Core +0 and Memory +650 I get 36-40 Mh/s with ETHlargement running.
How long do I need to leave it running to get around 100 Mh/s? Does it show after 3-5 hours?

BitBlitzer

newbie

Activity: 24

Merit: 0

Quote from: dragonmike on May 15, 2018, 04:58:25 AM

Quote from: BitBlitzer on May 14, 2018, 12:25:25 PM

I've got a Gainward GTX 1080 Phoenix, +1000 mem PL 60% and hashing at 37-38 MH/s on ethereum. Without the pill it only pulls 26 MH/s. The trick is to start the miner and set your overclock and after its running start the pill treatment in compatibility mode (win 8.). I've maxed out the memory overclock so can't push it further. But if I change the overclock in MSI Afterburner while it's running it crashes. It's been stable now for 24h almost. But 38MH/s@130 W is pretty damn good. Better than a RX580 for sure. ATM i have the GTX 1080 and a RX580 pulling 270W from the wall and RX580's almost always pull atleast 130W for the card itself.

I've got 5 EVGA 1080 SC's and it just won't work.
If I do the above, even if I apply a small o/c (and apply the pill in RevA) Claymore will show a bunch of red lines and crash. It's just pointless.

I had to start the pill with the troubleshooting option the first time for it to work. And I think what that does is put it in Windows 8 compatibility mode. How far can you push the memory overclock without the pill?

And I don't use rev A, it just gives 1-2 MH/s extra so try with the compatibility settings and ignore Rev A.

dragonmike

hero member

Activity: 1274

Merit: 556

Quote from: BitBlitzer on May 14, 2018, 12:25:25 PM

I've got a Gainward GTX 1080 Phoenix, +1000 mem PL 60% and hashing at 37-38 MH/s on ethereum. Without the pill it only pulls 26 MH/s. The trick is to start the miner and set your overclock and after its running start the pill treatment in compatibility mode (win 8.). I've maxed out the memory overclock so can't push it further. But if I change the overclock in MSI Afterburner while it's running it crashes. It's been stable now for 24h almost. But 38MH/s@130 W is pretty damn good. Better than a RX580 for sure. ATM i have the GTX 1080 and a RX580 pulling 270W from the wall and RX580's almost always pull atleast 130W for the card itself.

I've got 5 EVGA 1080 SC's and it just won't work.
If I do the above, even if I apply a small o/c (and apply the pill in RevA) Claymore will show a bunch of red lines and crash. It's just pointless.

BitBlitzer

newbie

Activity: 24

Merit: 0

I've got a Gainward GTX 1080 Phoenix, +1000 mem PL 60% and hashing at 37-38 MH/s on ethereum. Without the pill it only pulls 26 MH/s. The trick is to start the miner and set your overclock and after its running start the pill treatment in compatibility mode (win 8.). I've maxed out the memory overclock so can't push it further. But if I change the overclock in MSI Afterburner while it's running it crashes. It's been stable now for 24h almost. But 38MH/s@130 W is pretty damn good. Better than a RX580 for sure. ATM i have the GTX 1080 and a RX580 pulling 270W from the wall and RX580's almost always pull atleast 130W for the card itself.

seriousirony

newbie

Activity: 52

Merit: 0

1080ti's FE, 65% plvl, -100/+600 = 50-52 Mh/s (depending on card) = happy! Thanks! Grin

MagicSmoker

full member

Activity: 420

Merit: 184

Quote from: kyovlodik on May 14, 2018, 08:53:07 AM

...

Thanks for the condescending reply; sorry I analyzed your software before mindlessly running. Also, thanks for dodging my question regarding the callback to 2.21.242.213:80 and 2.21.242.237:80 -- it's clear I pinched a nerve with this one.

Much hostility, totally unfunny response! Hope you don't get any additional donations! Wow!

Here's some more hostility for you: why don't you run a whois on those domains yourself and see where they point? Looks like 2.21.242.237, for example, goes to Akamai in the EU.

You almost did some serious detective work... except you didn't.

whitebrow

newbie

Activity: 28

Merit: 5

Quote from: kyovlodik on May 14, 2018, 08:53:07 AM

Quote from: OhGodAGirl on May 13, 2018, 07:59:31 PM

Wow, look, there are actually three addresses! Microsoft's tool is also causing a DNS request to be made to access go.microsoft.com! Wow! Totally hacked! Wow!

Wow! It's also contacting 192.168.56.153 which would create martian packets on the internet that would not get routed. Wow, totally can't be something internal to the analysis service, we are contacting the Russian mafia with silly tricks! Wow! Much hack! So scary!

Thanks for the condescending reply; sorry I analyzed your software before mindlessly running. Also, thanks for dodging my question regarding the callback to 2.21.242.213:80 and 2.21.242.237:80 -- it's clear I pinched a nerve with this one.

Much hostility, totally unfunny response! Hope you don't get any additional donations! Wow!

Much friendship, totally funny response!

dragonmike

hero member

Activity: 1274

Merit: 556

Quote from: kyovlodik on May 14, 2018, 08:53:07 AM

Quote from: OhGodAGirl on May 13, 2018, 07:59:31 PM

Wow, look, there are actually three addresses! Microsoft's tool is also causing a DNS request to be made to access go.microsoft.com! Wow! Totally hacked! Wow!

Wow! It's also contacting 192.168.56.153 which would create martian packets on the internet that would not get routed. Wow, totally can't be something internal to the analysis service, we are contacting the Russian mafia with silly tricks! Wow! Much hack! So scary!

Thanks for the condescending reply; sorry I analyzed your software before mindlessly running. Also, thanks for dodging my question regarding the callback to 2.21.242.213:80 and 2.21.242.237:80 -- it's clear I pinched a nerve with this one.

Much hostility, totally unfunny response! Hope you don't get any additional donations! Wow!

Be careful, or OHGODAHUSBAND might be unleashed in your general direction! Cheesy

Such husband. Many dangerous. Much wow!

kyovlodik

newbie

Activity: 3

Merit: 0

Quote from: OhGodAGirl on May 13, 2018, 07:59:31 PM

Wow, look, there are actually three addresses! Microsoft's tool is also causing a DNS request to be made to access go.microsoft.com! Wow! Totally hacked! Wow!

Wow! It's also contacting 192.168.56.153 which would create martian packets on the internet that would not get routed. Wow, totally can't be something internal to the analysis service, we are contacting the Russian mafia with silly tricks! Wow! Much hack! So scary!

Thanks for the condescending reply; sorry I analyzed your software before mindlessly running. Also, thanks for dodging my question regarding the callback to 2.21.242.213:80 and 2.21.242.237:80 -- it's clear I pinched a nerve with this one.

Much hostility, totally unfunny response! Hope you don't get any additional donations! Wow!

Kryptowolf512

full member

Activity: 420

Merit: 105

German Translator - Hire me on Bitcointalk!

https://www.virustotal.com/#/file/1261052e34b3205dc04f5dd9e4b76d2649dbcda738dc8e2665b07f56d659e716/detection

Why a community score of -24?

Topic: [ANN] [1080 | 1080TI] ETHlargement - The Hashrate Hardener - page 19. (Read 59575 times)