You know, I have no idea if this is a good thing to consider but I will lay it out:
Anyone that follows Counterparty knows that they run on the Bitcoin blockchain, have an online wallet, is a well respected company, has their own exchange, the list could go on. I personally have messed with the token creation and it's cheap and easy to create your own token.
Counterparty XCP was created by burning Bitcoin to a non-spendable address.
Dogeparty was started in the same fashion by sending Dogecoin to a non-spendable address and trading it out for DogeParty tokens.
http://www.dogeparty.io/Would it not be an easier, cheaper idea to have a burning party so that all the investors hung out to dry with Octo could burn their Octo to a non-spendable address and create OctoParty? You could also hold a crowd sale that accepted Bitcoin for a certain period of time and rewarded them with OcotParty. Use the Bitcoin raised to fund the developers, projects like gaming, websites and marketing.
There would be a few pluses to this idea:
1.You don't have to maintain a separate Blockchain.
2. Bitcoin's blockchain is secure.
3. You already can store OctoParty in the Counterwallet.
4. You already can trade OctoParty in the Counterwallet.
5. Counterparty and XCP are already successful and trusted by many.
6. Being on their platform may help get listed on exchanges again since Swarm, GEMZ, XCP, LTBcoin and StorjCoinX are already on exchanges like Cryptsy, Bittrex and Poloniex. (all Counterparty created assets and all listed highly on Coinmarketcap.)
7. It wouldn't reward the devs who abandoned this coin since the premine would no longer matter like it would if Octocoin blockchain became successful. I'm assuming as long as we maintained a Octocoin block explorer we could block any trades for OctoParty coming from the devs premine addresses or any addresses that received from the premine addresses.
8. It may open up the potential uses for this coin alongside other Counterparty created assets.
9. It just seems like it may be a way easier, yet still fair way for us to take back what we lost investing into Octocoin.
10. Maybe it would lower the stigma of an alt coin takeover just trying to find marks to pass the bag to. Many alt coin takeovers do just create more bagholders. I don't think as much as many of us would have liked a successful Octocoin or our original Bitcoin back that we are looking for bagholders. I think most of us really enjoyed the thought of being part of something special and different.
Of course, the negatives are you are tied to the Counterparty system and the Bitcoin blockchain which in the future could become compromised or go in directions we cannot forsee. But if I understand correctly, Counterparty could move to any other blockchain they wish in the future.
You are also tied to Bitcoin and Counterparty if there were ever any future security issues. I mean They seem on top of things with Counterwallet but at the same time, it would be out of our hands on the development side. The only thing we have control over would be the sites for gaming or other uses for the token.
The questions are:
1. In order to block Octocoin being burned from dev pre-mine address or any associated addresses, you would have to at least get another block explorer going and maintain it during the crowdsale and burnsale. Can anyone do this?
2. What sort of governing system would you have to help guide OctoParty Projects?
3. If we create excess OctoParty for future projects, contests, promotions, payments, etc and hold them in multisig wallets, how do you decide who gets that power? Granted you can permanently lock the created tokens and cap the coin after the crowdsale for Bitcoin, the burnsale for Octocoin and the excess OctoParty are created.
(EDIT: YOU CAN CREATE VOTE TOKENS TO SEND TO ADDRESSES SO THE COMMUNITY CAN VOTE ON ALL IDEAS OR PEOPLE WHO WOULD CONTROL MULTISIG WALLETS TO PAY DEVELOPERS FOR APPLICATIONS AND GAMES. SEE NEXT POSTS FOR CLARIFICATION.)
Please respond with thoughts, ideas and criticisms.