>Randomly sells chunks of coins whenever he likes at whatever price he likes for as long as he likes
Yeah, this is WAY fucking worse than an ICO.
These are my thoughts and concerns too^^
What's the reasoning?
I don't like how the dev can willy nilly do whatever he likes with a huge majority of the coins
400k in circulation? Have they all been distributed the same way?
Making a direct nice penny if so, trying to understand the benefit to others
>Randomly sells chunks of coins whenever he likes at whatever price he likes for as long as he likes
Yeah, this is WAY fucking worse than an ICO.
1) Selling coins á la ICO carries the risk of running out of funds should the price of whatever cryptocurrency you are hedging against goes down "unexpectedly"
2) This small quantity model works as a slow pace distribution. If you choose to buy or not, you are very welcome to the community in both cases anyway. Ricardo is very active at the slack channel, so please direct your questions directly to him.
You can see this model being replicated already here:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1969334.40
Not sure how it works better then an ICO. From what I can tell, dev made a token and holds entire supply.
Slowly sells them to public, collects btc for himself.
In theory, why the hell would the dev continue working on the project if 1) all coins finally sell (and he's maxed his profit) or 2) people no longer wanna buy them.
you're selling your coin directly to people for direct profit. HOW IS THIS NOT A MASSIVE ISSUE