Topic: [ANN] Announcing Galaxycoin - GLX, the new PoW/PoS coin, no premine! - page 19. (Read 100424 times)
July 19, 2013, 04:16:19 PM
anyone has wallet sync problem? looks like my wallet sync very slow, if not stuck. Can someone post some peer IPs?
July 19, 2013, 02:08:59 PM
Fair start, great adjustments, solid following, stable hashrate. What the hell cryptsy?
100% agree, need to email them to request it. It is on their list I believe.Yea, for over a week now it's been on the list
July 19, 2013, 02:06:20 PM
Fair start, great adjustments, solid following, stable hashrate. What the hell cryptsy?
100% agree, need to email them to request it. It is on their list I believe. July 19, 2013, 02:05:18 PM
Fair start, great adjustments, solid following, stable hashrate. What the hell cryptsy?
July 19, 2013, 02:04:43 PM
This is the one coin that needs to be on an exchange that for some reason is being ignored
July 19, 2013, 01:08:17 PM
The blockchain explorer correctly reflect all the PoS blocks, for example, block 20759 is one of the PoS block. Looks everything is fine.
July 19, 2013, 01:00:24 PM
my wallets from different computers sync well now..
no problems here now. all good.
July 19, 2013, 12:50:04 PM
my wallets from different computers sync well now..
July 19, 2013, 02:40:48 AM
Something's wrong Jim
http://glx.webboise.com:2790/chain/Galaxycoin - last block 22344
http://glx.coinmine.pl - last block 22469
http://glx.webboise.com:2790/chain/Galaxycoin - last block 22344
http://glx.coinmine.pl - last block 22469
July 19, 2013, 01:00:55 AM
I was unable to sync my wallet, so I deleted all the downloaded blocks (everything in the config dir except the wallet file and my config file), then it seems sync ok now (from scartch, now at block 22314). I am sure it has something to do with stake blocks. I received two 0.05 GLX, each time it deducts 64 GLX from my main balance, and put 64.05 GLX in stake, then mature for 50 or 70 blocks, then everything added to the balance. It may somehow messed up with the blocks. But now after resync everything seems fine.
July 19, 2013, 12:45:24 AM
Here you go:
79.164.42.138:15521
70.98.114.229:15521
166.78.177.212:15521
86.153.115.88:15521
2.10.6.170:15521
92.25.153.55:15521
24.181.237.137:15521
79.164.42.138:15521
70.98.114.229:15521
166.78.177.212:15521
86.153.115.88:15521
2.10.6.170:15521
92.25.153.55:15521
24.181.237.137:15521
Added these peers and the explorer seems to be keeping up. I'll try to keep an eye on it.
July 18, 2013, 11:54:28 PM
There seems to be some issues with the block explorer, I PM'ed the author to take a look at it. Hopefully it will be fixed soon.
I received some PMs asking about orphans. Yes there are some orphans with this coin, but it is a trade-off. The diff swing is a very good thing for mining without a mining pool, everyone will be able to get some blocks. But unfortunately at the very low diff, many people compete for the blocks, it's like the situation where a coin is just launched, so you may get some orphans there.
We still need to see if people like this algorithm, but it is one of a kind that does not exist in other coins. Personally I think it is good as at least I am able to get blocks all the time even the hash rate is pretty high.
I received some PMs asking about orphans. Yes there are some orphans with this coin, but it is a trade-off. The diff swing is a very good thing for mining without a mining pool, everyone will be able to get some blocks. But unfortunately at the very low diff, many people compete for the blocks, it's like the situation where a coin is just launched, so you may get some orphans there.
We still need to see if people like this algorithm, but it is one of a kind that does not exist in other coins. Personally I think it is good as at least I am able to get blocks all the time even the hash rate is pretty high.
I'm curious how much of a variance the code allows the diff to move? Is it a mean diff of last X blocks then allowing a drift lower of one or two standard deviations (assuming normal distribution)?
July 18, 2013, 11:30:45 PM
Here you go:
79.164.42.138:15521
70.98.114.229:15521
166.78.177.212:15521
86.153.115.88:15521
2.10.6.170:15521
92.25.153.55:15521
24.181.237.137:15521
79.164.42.138:15521
70.98.114.229:15521
166.78.177.212:15521
86.153.115.88:15521
2.10.6.170:15521
92.25.153.55:15521
24.181.237.137:15521
July 18, 2013, 11:05:03 PM
Block explorer needs more peer connections. I posted this in another thread...
I run the block explorer and it only has 1 connection. Someone with lots of connections, give me peer addresses.
EDIT: Either give me your peer addresses or add the block explorer as a node to your galaxycoin.conf
I run the block explorer and it only has 1 connection. Someone with lots of connections, give me peer addresses.
Code:
~$ ./galaxycoind getpeerinfo | grep addr
"addr" : "166.78.177.212:15521",
EDIT: Either give me your peer addresses or add the block explorer as a node to your galaxycoin.conf
Code:
addnode=glx.webboise.com
July 18, 2013, 08:52:44 PM
I compiled the updated client and re-synced the blockchain on the block explorer. Hopefully it's correct now.
Let me know if there are any further issues.
Let me know if there are any further issues.
I think the hamster fell off the wheel
July 18, 2013, 08:29:03 PM
It seems that there are some blocks of stakes created? since this is a PoW/PoS coin. Are they in the block explorer?
July 18, 2013, 08:06:30 PM
I compiled the updated client and re-synced the blockchain on the block explorer. Hopefully it's correct now.
Let me know if there are any further issues.
Let me know if there are any further issues.
http://glx.webboise.com:2790/chain/Galaxycoin - last block 21783
http://glx.coinmine.pl - last block 21817
yes, there is an issue.... somewhere....
July 18, 2013, 07:35:35 PM
I compiled the updated client and re-synced the blockchain on the block explorer. Hopefully it's correct now.
Let me know if there are any further issues.
Let me know if there are any further issues.
July 18, 2013, 07:04:47 PM
do you need to delete the block chain and resync?
July 18, 2013, 05:24:01 PM
There seems to be some issues with the block explorer, I PM'ed the author to take a look at it. Hopefully it will be fixed soon.
I received some PMs asking about orphans. Yes there are some orphans with this coin, but it is a trade-off. The diff swing is a very good thing for mining without a mining pool, everyone will be able to get some blocks. But unfortunately at the very low diff, many people compete for the blocks, it's like the situation where a coin is just launched, so you may get some orphans there.
We still need to see if people like this algorithm, but it is one of a kind that does not exist in other coins. Personally I think it is good as at least I am able to get blocks all the time even the hash rate is pretty high.
I received some PMs asking about orphans. Yes there are some orphans with this coin, but it is a trade-off. The diff swing is a very good thing for mining without a mining pool, everyone will be able to get some blocks. But unfortunately at the very low diff, many people compete for the blocks, it's like the situation where a coin is just launched, so you may get some orphans there.
We still need to see if people like this algorithm, but it is one of a kind that does not exist in other coins. Personally I think it is good as at least I am able to get blocks all the time even the hash rate is pretty high.
block explorer
Jump to: