It seems that listing on Open Ledger DEX is free, maybe submit the application form?
https://dex.openledger.info/welcome
Topic: [ANN] [ARO] | Arionum | CPU+GPU+Masternode | PHP Based |Decentralized Revolution - page 51. (Read 71588 times)
May 04, 2018, 08:08:02 AM
May 04, 2018, 02:55:34 AM
Dear arodev and android wallet dev please add new wallet creation.on android app.
May 04, 2018, 02:12:07 AM
I think I asked this before, but no one replied me.
With 10-30 H/s is it better to log in to aro.cool or aropool.com?
With aro.cool, as it pays 100% on historic shares, it should be better with lower hashrates. But that's not what I'm seeing, I'm mining on there for like 48h now and only got around ~7 ARO.
On main pool, it pays more or less the same, and sometimes I hit the jackpot and got 3xx ARO at once.
Anyone care to explain?
We can't know for sure,as we don't have enough info about the pools. With 10-30 H/s is it better to log in to aro.cool or aropool.com?
With aro.cool, as it pays 100% on historic shares, it should be better with lower hashrates. But that's not what I'm seeing, I'm mining on there for like 48h now and only got around ~7 ARO.
On main pool, it pays more or less the same, and sometimes I hit the jackpot and got 3xx ARO at once.
Anyone care to explain?
However:
It does not matter which pool you pick if both pools have the same historic range (length for historic shares) and the same deadline.
Over long periods of time (lets say weeks) you will get the same result on either pool
For short mining periods: you probably get a quicker payout with 100% historic, but you'll never hit that jackpot...
Yes definitely.
But point is that I seem to be getting quicker payout with aropool than aro.cool... and that makes few sense to me.
aro.cool seems more stable, as aropool is the default. though payout is not as frequent, you tend to get a larger amount per payout on aro.cool as mentioned since it includes historic shares (it essentially averages out anyhow). I have miners pointed at both pools, and there have been times I found aropool was unavailable. If you value supporting a smaller more stable pool, go with aro.cool. However I can attest that I have not ever hit a block submit on aro.cool for the large payout.
I do think aro.cool should be supported, which is why I have miners pointed at both. If everyone only mines one pool it will make for an overall worse experience due to increased hashrate on network.
May 04, 2018, 01:09:24 AM
Awesome! Keep us posted when all things are up and running.
May 04, 2018, 12:56:25 AM
nice. do it and i'm coming there since your riecoin pool is among the best, if not the best one
May 03, 2018, 02:39:01 PM
May 03, 2018, 12:13:42 PM
I think I asked this before, but no one replied me.
With 10-30 H/s is it better to log in to aro.cool or aropool.com?
With aro.cool, as it pays 100% on historic shares, it should be better with lower hashrates. But that's not what I'm seeing, I'm mining on there for like 48h now and only got around ~7 ARO.
On main pool, it pays more or less the same, and sometimes I hit the jackpot and got 3xx ARO at once.
Anyone care to explain?
We can't know for sure,as we don't have enough info about the pools. With 10-30 H/s is it better to log in to aro.cool or aropool.com?
With aro.cool, as it pays 100% on historic shares, it should be better with lower hashrates. But that's not what I'm seeing, I'm mining on there for like 48h now and only got around ~7 ARO.
On main pool, it pays more or less the same, and sometimes I hit the jackpot and got 3xx ARO at once.
Anyone care to explain?
However:
It does not matter which pool you pick if both pools have the same historic range (length for historic shares) and the same deadline.
Over long periods of time (lets say weeks) you will get the same result on either pool
For short mining periods: you probably get a quicker payout with 100% historic, but you'll never hit that jackpot...
Yes definitely.
But point is that I seem to be getting quicker payout with aropool than aro.cool... and that makes few sense to me.
May 03, 2018, 11:36:42 AM
I think I asked this before, but no one replied me.
With 10-30 H/s is it better to log in to aro.cool or aropool.com?
With aro.cool, as it pays 100% on historic shares, it should be better with lower hashrates. But that's not what I'm seeing, I'm mining on there for like 48h now and only got around ~7 ARO.
On main pool, it pays more or less the same, and sometimes I hit the jackpot and got 3xx ARO at once.
Anyone care to explain?
We can't know for sure,as we don't have enough info about the pools. With 10-30 H/s is it better to log in to aro.cool or aropool.com?
With aro.cool, as it pays 100% on historic shares, it should be better with lower hashrates. But that's not what I'm seeing, I'm mining on there for like 48h now and only got around ~7 ARO.
On main pool, it pays more or less the same, and sometimes I hit the jackpot and got 3xx ARO at once.
Anyone care to explain?
However:
It does not matter which pool you pick if both pools have the same historic range (length for historic shares) and the same deadline.
Over long periods of time (lets say weeks) you will get the same result on either pool
For short mining periods: you probably get a quicker payout with 100% historic, but you'll never hit that jackpot...
May 03, 2018, 09:14:29 AM
Love the progress this project has made and the great communication to the community. Just curious if Devs have any plan to try to get onto another exchange? Octaex is pretty terrible and order book is so thin. Even cryptopia would be a huge improvement.
May 03, 2018, 08:14:41 AM
I think I asked this before, but no one replied me.
With 10-30 H/s is it better to log in to aro.cool or aropool.com?
With aro.cool, as it pays 100% on historic shares, it should be better with lower hashrates. But that's not what I'm seeing, I'm mining on there for like 48h now and only got around ~7 ARO.
On main pool, it pays more or less the same, and sometimes I hit the jackpot and got 3xx ARO at once.
Anyone care to explain?
With 10-30 H/s is it better to log in to aro.cool or aropool.com?
With aro.cool, as it pays 100% on historic shares, it should be better with lower hashrates. But that's not what I'm seeing, I'm mining on there for like 48h now and only got around ~7 ARO.
On main pool, it pays more or less the same, and sometimes I hit the jackpot and got 3xx ARO at once.
Anyone care to explain?
May 03, 2018, 01:53:18 AM
Would there be a problem if I mine simultaneously on my GPUs and using the wallet to mine Arionum with my CPU? Would both interfere with each other?
May 02, 2018, 11:44:46 PM
Mining this coin with CPU is relaxing...
AMD FX-4300 4 cores minging @ 4 to 5.4 H/s Linux ariocpminer
Intel I3 3 cores mining @ 1.8 to 2 H/s Windows10 Arionum wallet
low hashrates so I use pool: aro.cool
started mining April 27 got 43.34 Arionum rewarded up until today May 1
AMD FX-4300 4 cores minging @ 4 to 5.4 H/s Linux ariocpminer
Intel I3 3 cores mining @ 1.8 to 2 H/s Windows10 Arionum wallet
low hashrates so I use pool: aro.cool
started mining April 27 got 43.34 Arionum rewarded up until today May 1
Why not also using the ariocppminer (or javaminer) on Windows10 ?
Arionum wallet hashrate is really not good when compared to those (not sure why) and ariocppminer has specific windows optimisations
(Windows is the platform on which you gain the most H/s when comparing arioccpminer to javaminer)
Thanks for the tip, I will try arioccp on windows10 this weekend.
May 02, 2018, 03:33:36 PM
how is the aws profitability working out? cheaper to buy?
At the moment the problem is the m5.large are being throttled by AWS. The c5.large instances don't, however they do cost more, and you are bordering on being too close to being unprofitable. It depends if you want to invest or trying to hit and run if you know what I mean?
Is the m5.large throttling new? Is this expected to be the case from this point forward? Thanks!
May 02, 2018, 02:51:58 PM
wow this coin is really picking up steam...
time not to miss the train!
time not to miss the train!
I agree. It's looking great!
How are some of the miners getting hash rates in the thousands? I want a piece of that pie! I'm just trucking along at 14 with my Ryzen 1600.
May 02, 2018, 10:34:53 AM
wow this coin is really picking up steam...
time not to miss the train!
time not to miss the train!
May 02, 2018, 09:18:09 AM
Mining this coin with CPU is relaxing...
AMD FX-4300 4 cores minging @ 4 to 5.4 H/s Linux ariocpminer
Intel I3 3 cores mining @ 1.8 to 2 H/s Windows10 Arionum wallet
low hashrates so I use pool: aro.cool
started mining April 27 got 43.34 Arionum rewarded up until today May 1
AMD FX-4300 4 cores minging @ 4 to 5.4 H/s Linux ariocpminer
Intel I3 3 cores mining @ 1.8 to 2 H/s Windows10 Arionum wallet
low hashrates so I use pool: aro.cool
started mining April 27 got 43.34 Arionum rewarded up until today May 1
Why not also using the ariocppminer (or javaminer) on Windows10 ?
Arionum wallet hashrate is really not good when compared to those (not sure why) and ariocppminer has specific windows optimisations
(Windows is the platform on which you gain the most H/s when comparing arioccpminer to javaminer)
May 02, 2018, 08:07:45 AM
how is the aws profitability working out? cheaper to buy?
At the moment the problem is the m5.large are being throttled by AWS. The c5.large instances don't, however they do cost more, and you are bordering on being too close to being unprofitable. It depends if you want to invest or trying to hit and run if you know what I mean?
May 02, 2018, 07:41:32 AM
how is the aws profitability working out? cheaper to buy?
May 02, 2018, 05:15:01 AM
Is it possible to use AES?
At present, the library has special code paths for AVX, AVX2 and AVX512f. I hope to include some additional optimizations, but they will probably be along the SSE path; I haven't evaluated if AES instructions would offer any speedup.
Good day dan, i followed all the prompts as stated in the java miner, but once i reach the setting of an alias and i click enter, the application just closes. Tried running it again but it keeps on closing the application. Then once i delete the config file, the prompts start from begining.
Is there any fix for this? My core is i7 and i downloaded the arionum-miner-java-avx2.exe file
I think ur CPU dont support it, what i7 do you have?
I have on my test system an i7 2600 and i can run: ariocppminer_avx.exe , when i try to run the ariocppminer_avx2.exe it opens and closes.
But, when i try the avx2 on a 4th gen i7, it is working.
I think the i7 1st and 2nd gen dont fully support AVX2 so u should use AVX
In practice i dont have any differents in speed, so dont worry to use AVX instead of AVX2 because on my i7 4th gen i get the same speeds
Sandy bridge is only avx, avx2 has been introduced with haswell
May 02, 2018, 03:53:21 AM
Is it possible to use AES?
At present, the library has special code paths for AVX, AVX2 and AVX512f. I hope to include some additional optimizations, but they will probably be along the SSE path; I haven't evaluated if AES instructions would offer any speedup.
Good day dan, i followed all the prompts as stated in the java miner, but once i reach the setting of an alias and i click enter, the application just closes. Tried running it again but it keeps on closing the application. Then once i delete the config file, the prompts start from begining.
Is there any fix for this? My core is i7 and i downloaded the arionum-miner-java-avx2.exe file
I think ur CPU dont support it, what i7 do you have?
I have on my test system an i7 2600 and i can run: ariocppminer_avx.exe , when i try to run the ariocppminer_avx2.exe it opens and closes.
But, when i try the avx2 on a 4th gen i7, it is working.
I think the i7 1st and 2nd gen dont fully support AVX2 so u should use AVX
In practice i dont have any differents in speed, so dont worry to use AVX instead of AVX2 because on my i7 4th gen i get the same speeds
Jump to: