Topic: [ANN] [ASIC-RESISTANT] UltraCoin (UTC) - Ultrafast 6 second transactions!! - page 296. (Read 946650 times)

You are missing something or missing ram...I use 8gb of ram in Win 8 64.

I dont say that is the best configuration, only working for me  hashrate up from 70 to 130 for 280x

But thx for yacminer, i tried your configuration but not working for me = 280x failed at start and 270s give hw error. :/

Use yacminer 3.5, problem solved.

I run -g 1 and match or beat those numbers on 280x and 270 cards.

280X - 135kh/s

--scrypt-chacha --nfmin 4 --nfmax 30 --starttime 1388361600 --no-submit-stale --expiry 10 --scan-time 1 --queue 0 --gpu-engine 0-1020 --gpu-memclock 1500 --gpu-fan 0-100 --temp-target 75 --temp-cutoff 100 --temp-overheat 90 --auto-gpu --auto-fan --rawintensity 8192 --buffer-size 2560 -g 1 -w 256 --lookup-gap 2

270 - 92kh/s

--scrypt-chacha --nfmin 4 --nfmax 30 --starttime 1388361600 --no-submit-stale --expiry 10 --scan-time 1 --queue 0 --gpu-engine 0-1000,0-1000 --gpu-memclock 1500,1500 --gpu-fan 0-100 --temp-target 75 --temp-cutoff 100 --temp-overheat 90 --auto-gpu --auto-fan --rawintensity 5120 --buffer-size 1400 -g 1 -w 128 --lookup-gap 2

After hours i found reason why some 280x (my Vaporx too) have low hashrate.

Reason was: combination a different card in one rig with eror scrypt configuration.

My working configuration below for combination 270s and 280x.


What was a problem ? PARTIALLY LOADED CONFIG

many config using this one in "gpu-threads" : "2,2,1,1", but this isnt work in combination different card. Configuration failed in loading miner and is only partialy loaded.

You must use only: "gpu-threads" : "2" or "gpu-threads" : "1" and for other card you must found working configuration in TC (for example best configuration for R9 270 is with "gpu-threads" : "1", but combination with 280x wont be work correct).


My advice: - if you have combination of different card dont use gpu-threads" : 2,2,1,... did not work.


Imho this is a solution for many trouble with really low hashrate in any other coin.


280,280,270,270 (130,130,69,69 khash/s) or with Intensity - 12 for 270, but with some HW  (130,130,85,85 khash/s)


Power consuption for complet rig is 665 W (280x - v 1.087, 270 - v 1.1)

Yet i am looking for 270 better combination gpu-thread 2 + TC + Intensity 12. for avg. hashrate above 85 khash/s

Glad someone else agrees with my thoughts  though I don't see it going below 250

I don't understand why people are willing to sell their coins at such low prices.   I hope they realise they waste mining resources and probably selling at a loss or just break-even. I wanna kick these people's bums!

I have taken previous bubbles into account and I am expecting definately sub 300, but not lower than 200.

Holdin

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NG1qooBzE2w

For sure!
Honestly I hope I am wrong and BTC goes back over 1000$, trust me I would be happier for it, its much easier to make$$$$ when things go up in price ;p

Fair enough. Sure is going to be an interesting next couple of years.

What people fail to see is, the price is arbitrary, the coin can survive at 10$ a coin, it doesn't matter what the price of BTC is.

What is important for someone speculating on the price is, the revolving door value.
How much money flows into BTC and how much money flows out of BTC.

There are plenty of coins in circulation, I would say there are more coins in circulation than demand actually needs, thus we have a decreasing price.

Bitcoin WILL hit 250$ then 100$ then maybe even 50$ at some point, my target is 250$ "ish" by August, the demand for bitcoins just isn't there, because bitcoin fails to solve any real world problems, the only advantage for bitcoin is low transfer fees to send money from point A to point B, and that is only the case if you immediately convert USD to BTC then at your destination you instantly convert BTC back to your local currency.

The amount of users using the coin, will give it a revolving door value, sure, this is guaranteed, but the current price of 400$+ is un-warranted, and un-necessary, and was the product of rampant speculation, which is now dying down.
As bitcoin gains adoption, people will invest in the INDUSTRY not the coin, they will invest in companies manufacturing

-Mining hardware
-Atms
-Point of Sales systems

Dumping money into BTC is not an "investment" into the coin, its simply speculating and hoping that enough new users will hop onboard to increase the revolving door value.

I just don't see it as a good short term investment, best thing to do, would be to wait for 100$ mark, buy , hold for 4 ~ 5 years while it gains users, its way too early and way too expensive still IMO.

But I am no expert, so what does my opinion count for? absolutely nothing its just what I SEE happening, and perspectives are unique to the viewer.

you have to also take into account the current inflation rate for BTC is pretty high ( last I checked it was around 10~11%), that means that in order to keep the current price, 11~12% MORE $$$$ has to flow into BTC to meet the inflation.

BTC would be at 0 if the issues were that devastating. I think the US IRS notice has more impact than India's or China's bank and exchange ban. The chinese can still operate with BTC, just not able to exchange for their own currency in their own country. The IRS notice makes it impossible to claim any kind of minings at this point, just isn't enough physical time to do all the paperwork involved. Either way, it kind of forces BTC back underground and if BTC doesn't dissolve, it  means cryptos still have huge weight and the governments of the world really have no say over crypto. And besides, we only allow the governments to have jurisdiction over cryptos if we let them.... Governments are scared shitless and this is the extent to what they can do other than making it illegal to own BTC which is nearly impossible to trace.

sell your UTC @ cryptorush 

I think btc at 100$ is purely sci-fi.

Truth is there's little to no reason for the price decline we're witnessing, except for FUD.

Looks to me like manipulation.

I'm sure he meant in relative terms.

Well sorry to bother you but when Nfactor goes up, difficulty goes down.

You're really thinking BTC will dip that low? I have a hard time seeing that despite what current trends suggest. With so many missing already (lost in inaccessible wallets), the amount in circulation is less than mined which affects supply and demand protocols. Furthermore, the cost to mine is increasing, along with the global acceptance rates---ATM's are sprouting up in droves. I think it will begin to rebound once these more robust, compliant exchanges come into fruition. This will allow the average, non technical user to get involved and allow much more efficient trading. I can certainly see the volatility decreasing but as for the price, well, it really could go in either direction. Who knows.

Sheez we only have 6 days left 'til the next N-Factor increase?? Gotta point all my rigs now at mining UTC! I see a possible difficulty spike in the next few days as well as an increase in price!

Only solution is nitro 2 close registrations, lock out users from nitro 1, close nitro 1.
Its a hard-reset to hash.


It doesnt matter at this point, coin is hovering at around 5~6 cents a coin if bitcoin continue its decline towards 100$, alt coin valuations will continue to plummet also, very few coins will be around.... the hard crypto-reset is around the corner , its gona be like mining in 2011 again, only ones who will be mining are people who doit for a hobby.

 Let the coin be as it is for now, no point in doing un-necessary work this early on.

Focus should be on making UTC a competitor with bitcoin, as bitcoin tips under 100$ a coin (pretty much guaranteed to happen now in my eyes by August~November), it will look weak and UTC might be able to over-take BTC then in market cap.

If you look at market cap http://blockchain.info/charts/market-cap   you can clearly see its heading to the original average market cap of around 700,000,000~1 billion USD, which to me puts a valuation of around 70~100$ per BTC.

UTC will be around half a cent a coin by then if nothing changes.


UTC is pretty well positioned though to be one of the first coins to be adopted as a replacement for BTC when BTC finally keels over and dies, lets face it, BTC was "beta software", the strongest algo will persist (the most fit to survive), first to market isn't everything.

Correct me if I am wrong here, but when Nitro1 goes down, everything looks perfect. Net hash remains constant, and the miner failovers seem to push everything out into a far better distribution ratio. Seems like a possible solution.