Topic: [ANN] [ASIC-RESISTANT] UltraCoin (UTC) - Ultrafast 6 second transactions!! - page 334. (Read 946650 times)

You can crank up the intensity all the way without problem with the amount of memory you have allocated.  You're going to be shader-bound.  I don't like using -I for shader-bound coins, but you'd have to switch mining software to get access to -X (xIntensity)

What card are you using?

I must be doing something wrong as I only get 140 Kh/S. Someone with the better hash rate care to post their config please? Mine is below:

170-180kh at current nfactor

What's normal hashrate of a r9 290 in scrypt-jane?

just open nitro 2...

Why don't you send private invitations first, then open the pool after you have achieved what you want.  Send invitations only to those in Nitro 1 till it balances.

interesting

looking at the stats here I could almost verify that

I used 2x sets of sapphires
I used 1x that had H RAM the other had E RAM
also had an Gigabyte with E RAM

only 1 x set of saphires had low reject rate ( half of the rest ) I wonder if it had hynix RAM

pretty much all the cards hashed the same speed as normal just lower WU

Nitro: We gotta wait 2 more days when it's been 2-3 weeks at least since I've known you've had the highest hashrate problem? N-factor is only 2 weeks away. Every day counts. Please reconsider.  By delaying Nitro 2, you are still enabling the problem. Even if you did 'steal' miners from other pools, you would be allowing the other pools to be mining correctly, no orphans. miners and pools both make more UTC by opening Nitro 2. So it's a win win.


I wanted to remain loyal to my pool and spread the hashes, but I've lost 50% of my minings in pointless hashing due to orphans at leet. 4-5 UTC in last 5 hours, calculated at least 600 UTC loss for a 30 day period, but since there are variables, I'd say I've lost at least 450 coins for the last 3 weeks. I receive 25 UTC/day. so that's approximately half. Am I a loyal fool? At .00022, I am just breaking even for electric.

Laterbreh: I appreciate all you've done and loyalty is a big deal for me, which is why I haven't left leet until now. I can't afford to lose anymore, I've hit the turning point. Maybe another coin, another time, or if nitro really reduces it's hashrate. Mining at your pool is 2x more expensive. Nfactor coming up, i need to make back some UTC before it's too late. The thing I don't understand is why lesser pools than leet have 0 orphans from what I've read in the past in this thread.


An idea for the future: since miners and pool owners can't come to an agreement or figure this problem out, in my opinion, this is a problem that can only be solved by encoding something in the coin. We need a "pool-resistant" or "pool difficulty specific" coin for lack of better term, where a coin can sense which nodes have more hashing power than others and raises difficulty for those nodes with higher hashes.  

The accounts data can be moved even if it is encrypted, just need to keep the same salts in config files, and people can log in using their old account data if you want.

I was unaware of the trouble involved of porting over user data. I simply figured you could provide invites to select miners on Nitro1 (to circumvent the closed public registrations), have them move over, and then allow public registration.

Much appreciated. Think people will jump on p2pool when they are available. Don't want to rely on a centralized pool (which could grow 51%).

Hey, thanks for posting your .bat . I have 4x Sapphire Dual-X (SKU 11196-19-20G) stock clock 850Mhz/925Mhz boost clock. Other than that, my setup looks identical to yours.   I tried this .bat and got my hash rate up to 90, WU rate also increased, which is awesome but...bad news bears - one card went *dead* after a few hours of mining.

I think this has to do with my cards not getting enough power. I see your vddc setting is 1.12(0?), I have mine flashed to 1.113 and I don't think cgminer was able to bump up the voltage through the .bat I'll try flashing to 1.125v and 1.131v and see what happens.

What does --gpu-reorder accomplish?

I haven't had a chance to fix the issues yet, i will give it a shot tonight

How would that work? miners need to signup to the new pool to be able to move?  We can not auto create accounts for people. Most of the info we have for them is encrypted. And even if we could, the person moving is the one who has the option to create his account or not, we have no such right.

Any news on the p2pool ?
and/or code release ?

What if you open Nitro 2 with closed registrations at first, balance things out, and then open registrations? Trying to create balance with influx could become a difficult task.

Another big pool is having problems in the last two days, so I delayed Nitro2 till they resolve their issues, releasing Nitro2 now will be counterproductive, we do not want to take miners from other pools, we are trying to spread the hash, not pile up more miners on Nitro.
If you guys do not mind I'd rather wait 2 more days for this after which we will release Nitro2 that should give everyone proper time to prepare.
Also some other pools are doing quite well marketing right now, so do not want to jump in quick on their growth. Our idea behind Nitro2 is to
move some of our miners from pool A to pool B and not get a rush from new miners. The latest increase in miners on Nitro is not caused by us.
It should be resolved soon.

pos time is 1 year.

as far as i know nitro 2 is being built now

See if #6 works, maybe #3 and #5 are also helpful
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/thumbs-down-to-the-chncoin-linux-clients-192984