I think you didn't read our last answer
I read it, and posting trivial statements like this are meaningless:
We ensure that each transaction is unique
Mixero uses an algorithm called CoinJoin.
-Our mixing protocol is not a simple CoinJoin
Make up your mind! The moment your initial statement got questioned, you changed your story.
Moreover the principle of CoinJoin does not require at all a sending at the same time and at the same amount per user, otherwise no service could ensure it given the impossible amounts to predict.
That's
literally what coinjoin does:
You are totally free not to trust us but we are absolutely not a "scam"
So, where's that signed message to prove you can mix 100 Bitcoin?
When we talk about a non-secure blockchain, we are talking about users' transactions that are traceable and absolutely not about security flaws.
You should work on your terminology, and not just use it as buzzwords.
It's being negative that is not useful, you can simply use the services you like without criticizing the newness or be constructive without playing on every word you can read.
Saying that we use CoinJoin adapted to our own methods is not contradicting ourselves at all. As I said, just not explained enough in the first post.
"-Our mixing protocol is not a simple CoinJoin" is a proof we doesn't use it?
It's the proof we use the CoinJoin with our own methods that's all.
And how do you want a signed message on 100 BTC now?
You are surrealist, that just the amount maximum you can send, we know that by all the development we did. So you ask other mixers signed message about 1000 BTC ?
And again, no, the CoinJoin is not users sending the same amount at the same time as you said before, it's easy to guess that it's just not feasible. Everything happens once the different amounts are received.
The image you have shown is a CoinJoin that separates exact amounts but does not receive them at the same time nor at the same amount by the users, among the images you have seen on Google you have seen that the principle you state is far from being the only possibility.
In the same article you took you can see your image is really not the only way to use CoinJoin... The following is the exact function of CoinJoin, it's not a division concept...
"In essence, a CoinJoin involves the combination of inputs by multiple users into a single transaction."
The image you select shows how a CoinJoin works once the different amounts have been received, in fact it separates them into exact amounts, a good method but not the only one, the important principle is a mixture of the different amounts before sending them back. Making exact divisions will not change anything, it is just often the case because an exact division is easier to implement, we even use it at one of the transaction stages, but as already explained we mix it with other methods.
But in this case all mixers are wrong if we follow your reasoning.
This will be our last answer to your comments, we are not here for a knowledge war, we know what our service is worth. We prefer to focus on the constructive like all comments here.
Good evening to you!
-Indeed a letter of guarantee is available when you send your BTC and you can obviously send it to our support address, unique intermediary for all your questions or possible problems; [banned mixer]@protonmail.com.
Having the PGP public key available somewhere on the website (may be on the footer section) liked or allow to download will be a good addition. That way it will be available to everyone to verify the signed message. send from the Letter of Guarantee.
Right!
It's a good features we'll add for sure thanks to you!
Maybe in the FAQ page to know how to be sure about transaction for example.
Have a nice day!
[moderator's note: consecutive posts merged]
