I'm from Bangladesh. It's not a secret so I can share it publicly. However, I tried clearnet with VPN too and the result was also the same. I couldn't visit the site.
Bangladesh can be used now.
Will they count all the txs as laundered? Or they will only take care of txs from criminals? This has always been my interest because a lot of people uses mixer just to make sure no one can track their financial activities.
Nah... And I can give you an exemple with Bestmixer. They didn't considered every TXs laundered but they have done it with a criminal who used their service. (story: the guy was arrested with gold, luxury watches, BTC wallet, cash,...)
If you're not suspected of something, they won't track you.
And they were able to do it with bestmixer....since they had acess to the server during many months... (IPs, logs, chats,...)
They certainly use blockchain analytics companies to compare data. And probably also read everything here in the forum to collect info
I confirm
Probably yes, thanks for your explanation.
It is well known that authorities do not like mixer services.
Let's assume, for example, that a mixer stores all user data from the beginning.
The government seizes its servers and arrests the owner.
All the stored data now serve as evidence.
The penalty would be higher if the owner had laundered $100 million than if the government had found only the last three days' worth of data containing, say, $20,000.
Interesting choice of words, why would you say "laundered" instead of "obfuscated"?
In the example, I was talking about the government
They see it as laundering money, we don't. For us, privacy is a human right and neither illegal nor anything else.
One could also argue the other way: "the penalty could be lower if the owner cooperates and provides accurate details on all processed transactions, thereby effectively nullifying the obfuscation". One way or another, I wouldn't use this as an argument to convince users there is no logging.
Maybe.
We did not use it as a direct argument. We wrote: "It would be stupid to store user data over a long period of time, as this could also incriminate us." This is a statement.
