[ANN] Bitcoin Cash - Pro on-chain scaling - Cheaper fees - page 486.

gembitz

hero member

Activity: 1834

Merit: 639

*Brute force will solve any Bitcoin problem*

Quote from: tekmobile on November 14, 2017, 04:52:31 PM

Quote from: mindrust on November 14, 2017, 04:45:38 PM

Quote from: tekmobile on November 14, 2017, 03:31:37 PM

And if core did increase the blocksize BCH is done for as their only current benefit is blocksize

Blocksize can be increased when scientists/engineers say it is ok to do so. But those B*CHes will come up with something else then. Cuz it aint no about blocksize/scaling at all. Wink

It is about destroying bitcoin.

Official news of a timed increase in say 0.15.2 would cause a huge scurry back as fears of being the last ones holding worthless coins would kick in BCH would dive 300% or more within a few hours and BTC would double in value overnight

r.i.p. bch longs :-D weeee

tekmobile

full member

Activity: 392

Merit: 154

Quote from: mindrust on November 14, 2017, 04:45:38 PM

Quote from: tekmobile on November 14, 2017, 03:31:37 PM

And if core did increase the blocksize BCH is done for as their only current benefit is blocksize

Blocksize can be increased when scientists/engineers say it is ok to do so. But those B*CHes will come up with something else then. Cuz it aint no about blocksize/scaling at all. Wink

It is about destroying bitcoin.

Official news of a timed increase in say 0.15.2 would cause a huge scurry back as fears of being the last ones holding worthless coins would kick in BCH would dive 300% or more within a few hours and BTC would double in value overnight

mindrust

legendary

Activity: 3276

Merit: 2442

Quote from: tekmobile on November 14, 2017, 03:31:37 PM

And if core did increase the blocksize BCH is done for as their only current benefit is blocksize

Blocksize can be increased when scientists/engineers say it is ok to do so. But those B*CHes will come up with something else then. Cuz it aint no about blocksize/scaling at all. Wink

It is about destroying bitcoin.

David48l

hero member

Activity: 600

Merit: 504

Quote from: boraboy on November 14, 2017, 03:59:26 PM

Quote from: gEMx on November 14, 2017, 03:45:27 PM

i sent this coin from one exchange to another. already been 3 hours and still 0/3 confirmations. wtf. i thought this was supposed to be faster than btc. " almost instantaneous"

What was the address you sent so we can verify?

It's just Fud.

Warning to recent users, this forum is full of Fud workers paid by blockstream. They will only tell lies and deception to defame bch, always check the information. Defamation and censorship on a very serious issue, keep this in mind

boraboy

member

Activity: 70

Merit: 10

I believe we are seeing a Market swap flippening happening. it will take awhile with the Backlog of Txs but eventually BCH will move up as those acquiring BCH will hold until its at segwit prices.

David48l

hero member

Activity: 600

Merit: 504

Quote from: tekmobile on November 14, 2017, 03:20:49 PM

https://cointelegraph.com/news/adam-back-bitcoin-block-size-increase-in-mid-term-is-possible

How funny, hypocrisy has no limits. They must look really desperate to make these statements, but they are just that, they will not escalate.
Roll Eyes

hv_

legendary

Activity: 2534

Merit: 1055

Clean Code and Scale

Quote from: classicsucks on November 14, 2017, 03:28:21 PM

Quote from: tekmobile on November 14, 2017, 03:20:49 PM

https://cointelegraph.com/news/adam-back-bitcoin-block-size-increase-in-mid-term-is-possible

What a chicken-shit LIAR Back is.

Quote

Bitcoin Core is not fundamentally opposed to on-chain scaling

As explained by Back, the Bitcoin Core development team has not been fundamentally opposed to on-chain Bitcoin scaling. In 2014 Back noted that a gradual block increase to 2MB, 4MB, and 8MB is a viable option in the mid-term, until second-layer payment channels are fully adopted by the industry, wallet platforms, and exchanges.

Blatant lying. And this is only 2 weeks after he confessed to Forbes that Blockstream's business model depends on sidechains broken layer 1 BTC.

But the image of Adam Back sweating while trying to carve zeroes and ones into a stone tablet is priceless!

Haha, made my day.

Midterm, without any real time frame. So bitcoin is nearly 9 years old then we calc midterm = 4.5 years?

Cheesy

adamantasaurus

sr. member

Activity: 728

Merit: 255

Man I can't believe this crap I panic traded all of my btc for a bunch of different coins I feel like there is going to be some major up and down swings with btc and bch what do you guys think?

boraboy

member

Activity: 70

Merit: 10

Quote from: gEMx on November 14, 2017, 03:45:27 PM

i sent this coin from one exchange to another. already been 3 hours and still 0/3 confirmations. wtf. i thought this was supposed to be faster than btc. " almost instantaneous"

What was the address you sent so we can verify?

classicsucks

hero member

Activity: 686

Merit: 504

Quote from: tekmobile on November 14, 2017, 03:37:10 PM

You all keep saying this is bitcoin make your minds up its either bitcoin hence here in the right place or its bitcoin cash

Who says it can't be both?

gEMx

newbie

Activity: 89

Merit: 0

i sent this coin from one exchange to another. already been 3 hours and still 0/3 confirmations. wtf. i thought this was supposed to be faster than btc. " almost instantaneous"

tekmobile

full member

Activity: 392

Merit: 154

Quote from: lonesomestranger on November 14, 2017, 03:33:34 PM

Quote from: chermah on November 14, 2017, 02:09:04 PM

Quote

Due to high transaction fee and delays in accepting and processing bitcoin transaction, we have temporarily suspended payments for goods with Bitcoin on https://fudmartng.com till it's favourable to our customers and us.Customers can pay with #BitcoinCash , #Dash and #Litecoin

Another business switching for alts, close your eyes baby we have no problem in bitcoin, everything is fine lol

Please BTC guys stop trolling us, this is a bitcoin cash topic ...

It is a BCH topic, but BCH is a fork from original Bitcoin, so we have the right to say what we think about it since BCH supporters are about to destroy Bitcoin!

You all keep saying this is bitcoin make your minds up its either bitcoin hence here in the right place or its bitcoin cash

classicsucks

hero member

Activity: 686

Merit: 504

Quote from: tekmobile on November 14, 2017, 03:31:37 PM

And if core did increase the blocksize BCH is done for as their only current benefit is blocksize

And then Blockstream is done - I doubt this will happen. They've been stalling a blocksize increase for almost 4 years now...

What will be funny is if they do try to increase BTC blocksize and they can't get consensus, or they do it too late, and everybody has already abandoned BTC...

GOP17

member

Activity: 168

Merit: 10

Quote from: gembitz on November 14, 2017, 03:21:31 PM

im kinda butthurt i missed the pumpining now ill buy back down to around .10? :\ hmmm poof!

ye mate me butt hurts too

lonesomestranger

full member

Activity: 770

Merit: 112

Quote from: chermah on November 14, 2017, 02:09:04 PM

Quote

Due to high transaction fee and delays in accepting and processing bitcoin transaction, we have temporarily suspended payments for goods with Bitcoin on https://fudmartng.com till it's favourable to our customers and us.Customers can pay with #BitcoinCash , #Dash and #Litecoin

Another business switching for alts, close your eyes baby we have no problem in bitcoin, everything is fine lol

Please BTC guys stop trolling us, this is a bitcoin cash topic ...

It is a BCH topic, but BCH is a fork from original Bitcoin, so we have the right to say what we think about it since BCH supporters are about to destroy Bitcoin!

tekmobile

full member

Activity: 392

Merit: 154

Quote from: classicsucks on November 14, 2017, 03:28:21 PM

Quote from: tekmobile on November 14, 2017, 03:20:49 PM

https://cointelegraph.com/news/adam-back-bitcoin-block-size-increase-in-mid-term-is-possible

What a chicken-shit LIAR Back is.

Quote

Bitcoin Core is not fundamentally opposed to on-chain scaling

As explained by Back, the Bitcoin Core development team has not been fundamentally opposed to on-chain Bitcoin scaling. In 2014 Back noted that a gradual block increase to 2MB, 4MB, and 8MB is a viable option in the mid-term, until second-layer payment channels are fully adopted by the industry, wallet platforms, and exchanges.

Blatant lying. And this is only 2 weeks after he confessed to Forbes that Blockstream's business model depends on sidechains broken layer 1 BTC.

And if core did increase the blocksize BCH is done for as their only current benefit is blocksize

gembitz

hero member

Activity: 1834

Merit: 639

*Brute force will solve any Bitcoin problem*

Quote from: classicsucks on November 14, 2017, 03:28:21 PM

Quote from: tekmobile on November 14, 2017, 03:20:49 PM

https://cointelegraph.com/news/adam-back-bitcoin-block-size-increase-in-mid-term-is-possible

What a chicken-shit LIAR Back is.

Quote

Bitcoin Core is not fundamentally opposed to on-chain scaling

As explained by Back, the Bitcoin Core development team has not been fundamentally opposed to on-chain Bitcoin scaling. In 2014 Back noted that a gradual block increase to 2MB, 4MB, and 8MB is a viable option in the mid-term, until second-layer payment channels are fully adopted by the industry, wallet platforms, and exchanges.

Blatant lying. And this is only 2 weeks after he confessed to Forbes that Blockstream's business model depends on sidechains broken layer 1 BTC.

it's not a lie even tho certain core members are beholden to segwit/ln :-D bitcoin will scale<<

classicsucks

hero member

Activity: 686

Merit: 504

Quote from: tekmobile on November 14, 2017, 03:20:49 PM

https://cointelegraph.com/news/adam-back-bitcoin-block-size-increase-in-mid-term-is-possible

What a chicken-shit LIAR Back is.

Quote

Bitcoin Core is not fundamentally opposed to on-chain scaling

As explained by Back, the Bitcoin Core development team has not been fundamentally opposed to on-chain Bitcoin scaling. In 2014 Back noted that a gradual block increase to 2MB, 4MB, and 8MB is a viable option in the mid-term, until second-layer payment channels are fully adopted by the industry, wallet platforms, and exchanges.

Blatant lying. And this is only 2 weeks after he confessed to Forbes that Blockstream's business model depends on sidechains broken layer 1 BTC.

But the image of Adam Back sweating while trying to carve zeroes and ones into a stone tablet is priceless!

gembitz

hero member

Activity: 1834

Merit: 639

*Brute force will solve any Bitcoin problem*

im kinda butthurt i missed the pumpining now ill buy back down to around .10? :\ hmmm poof!

tekmobile

full member

Activity: 392

Merit: 154

https://cointelegraph.com/news/adam-back-bitcoin-block-size-increase-in-mid-term-is-possible

Topic: [ANN] Bitcoin Cash - Pro on-chain scaling - Cheaper fees - page 486. (Read 704412 times)