My list of individuals or individuals, under high suspicion of being trolls
tekmobile
https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/tekmobile-1024303
roeks
https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/roeks-1115744
bitcoinPsycho
https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/bitcoinpsycho-1105439
rios
https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/riils-645981
Curiously they act together, warning to navigators
Topic: [ANN] Bitcoin Cash - Pro on-chain scaling - Cheaper fees - page 595. (Read 704412 times)
will bitmain only accept bch for miners ?
At the moment it seems that they only accept bitcoin cash
will bitmain only accept bch for miners ?
In short, bitcoin cash is exactly that bitcoin without segwit / paypal, but without waiting in confirmation times and extremely low rates.
Do you realize that saying that Segwit = paypal is retarded, as Segwit has nothing to do with centralization? If anything, BCash is more "paypal" because it has larger blocks. It is arguable whether these larger blocks are too large or not. But there has to be reasonable limit to block size, not some "gigablock" nonsense where blocks are so large you might as well store everyone's balance in a MySQL database, forget about the blockchain and be done with it.
PLEASE NO MORE FUD
You are on my list of core salaried trolls
Your comment is totally false and irrational and without grounds
Curiously, everyone on my list gets along very well.
I don't understand the BCash fanatics irrational objections to Segwit. As far as I can tell, it's just a clever optimisation and rearrangement of how data is stored to save space. Where is the objection? It's like hating file compression because it exists and it can save space 
Use segwit if you want, I do not need to go to the core forum to talk about it.
I simply say do not come here to talk bad about the benefits of bitcoin cash.
I only defend a bitcoin for people and not for companies
This is what one of your beloved members of the core army says
https://twitter.com/Excellion/status/783994642463326208
You can go to lick her ass if you want, I'm not paid for it like you
While tando in Bitcoin core
https://blockchain.info/es/unconfirmed-transactions
And the commissions thanks to their beloved core developers
https://blockchain.info/tx/11e347f941c95751ec9e6fc158c9cd5440bb9339f751412d71ebdbc7ab10dd27
In short, bitcoin cash is exactly that bitcoin without segwit / paypal, but without waiting in confirmation times and extremely low rates.
Do you realize that saying that Segwit = paypal is retarded, as Segwit has nothing to do with centralization? If anything, BCash is more "paypal" because it has larger blocks. It is arguable whether these larger blocks are too large or not. But there has to be reasonable limit to block size, not some "gigablock" nonsense where blocks are so large you might as well store everyone's balance in a MySQL database, forget about the blockchain and be done with it.
Please, no more FUD
You are on my list of core trolls
Or he is very ignorant and manipulative or doing an excellent job troll and fud
Your incompetence overwhelms me, Or is very ignorant and manipulative or doing an excellent job troll and fud
I will explain more slowly. Segwit is the basis on which future implementations core, Lightning network style, sidechains, = payment channels, = paypal
if you want to applaud your fud comments go to the bitcoin core forum, in fact should be there celbrando the price and not wasting time here. Unless you get paid for it
currently in core slow transactions
https://blockchain.info/es/unconfirmed-transactions
high rates
https://blockchain.info/tx/1cdd0e96eb93bd0b0964fe56f7f5111aff0bcb9c95ff0bb7d63c6cbb8127d352
explain to my grandfather that to pay in a trade when a tourist trip will first have to open a payment channel that will never use again, and will have to pay to open, pay to send and pay to close. Go rather looks like paypal
Check out this promising project BitCore
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/annmain-bitcore-btx-datacarriersize-up-to-220-bytes-1883902
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/annmain-bitcore-btx-datacarriersize-up-to-220-bytes-1883902
There is only 1 bitcoin.All other delusions are are there to steal bitcoin from the noobs who will pay for what is given free.
I have the same opinion, all forks of Bitcoin are just cheap clones, meant to confuse people and to distabilize Bitcoin. How many forks will follow after Bitcoin Gold? 1, 2, 10 ? How many briliant minds will try to improve Bitcoin in the future, following only their own advantages? Just let the Bitcoin the way it is !
in 10 years BTC could be down to 1.5625 BTC where BCH could have powered through 3-4 times as many blocks and only have a reward of 0.02441406 BCH or 0.01220703 BCH so to remain profitable the difficulty would need to be really low and really fast blocks
Your scenario is possible, but implausible.
Correct, it would be ridiculous to think that in 10 years the various groups of developers of bitcoin cash do not update the EDA
Well core is taking more than 3 years to scale bitcoin ... maybe
Various groups of developers ? you mean the ones that failed on XT, classic and unlimited
Well the developer does not see it as a priority and had openly said so even though the users have gave more than a few examples of how to fix it and many have suggested to just remove it altogether because its not needed anymore
The only conclusion can be that he is taking a bribe from the miners because they need it or he thinks the hard fork required would kill BCH and its best to just let it struggle
Please, no more FUD
You are on my list of core trolls
Both the multiple development groups and users of bitcoin cash are free to comment and contribute to development. Not as in the case of core that censor everything that does not respond to blockstream / Axa, bancons, capitalism, elites, government, etc.
I would like to hear your opinion then on why there is a delay in fixing the EDA im no full time developer but can code and could fix the EDA in well under an hour so its not time requirements.
I could even fork the code now and fix the EDA but it would need promotion and all the other stuff required to raise awareness and to convince everyone to use it which I do not have the time or interest in doing
in 10 years BTC could be down to 1.5625 BTC where BCH could have powered through 3-4 times as many blocks and only have a reward of 0.02441406 BCH or 0.01220703 BCH so to remain profitable the difficulty would need to be really low and really fast blocks
Your scenario is possible, but implausible.
Correct, it would be ridiculous to think that in 10 years the various groups of developers of bitcoin cash do not update the EDA
Well core is taking more than 3 years to scale bitcoin ... maybe
Various groups of developers ? you mean the ones that failed on XT, classic and unlimited
Well the developer does not see it as a priority and had openly said so even though the users have gave more than a few examples of how to fix it and many have suggested to just remove it altogether because its not needed anymore
The only conclusion can be that he is taking a bribe from the miners because they need it or he thinks the hard fork required would kill BCH and its best to just let it struggle
Please, no more FUD
You are on my list of core trolls
Both the multiple development groups and users of bitcoin cash are free to comment and contribute to development. Not as in the case of core that censor everything that does not respond to blockstream / Axa, bancons, capitalism, elites, government, etc.
I don't understand the BCash fanatics irrational objections to Segwit. As far as I can tell, it's just a clever optimisation and rearrangement of how data is stored to save space. Where is the objection? It's like hating file compression because it exists and it can save space
Its because anyone can steal your coins that's why in the time its been available on litecoin and more recently bitcoin you've see all those 0 complaints of everyone's coins going missing
I don't understand the BCash fanatics irrational objections to Segwit. As far as I can tell, it's just a clever optimisation and rearrangement of how data is stored to save space. Where is the objection? It's like hating file compression because it exists and it can save space
In short, bitcoin cash is exactly that bitcoin without segwit / paypal, but without waiting in confirmation times and extremely low rates.
Do you realize that saying that Segwit = paypal is retarded, as Segwit has nothing to do with centralization? If anything, BCash is more "paypal" because it has larger blocks. It is arguable whether these larger blocks are too large or not. But there has to be reasonable limit to block size, not some "gigablock" nonsense where blocks are so large you might as well store everyone's balance in a MySQL database, forget about the blockchain and be done with it.
in 10 years BTC could be down to 1.5625 BTC where BCH could have powered through 3-4 times as many blocks and only have a reward of 0.02441406 BCH or 0.01220703 BCH so to remain profitable the difficulty would need to be really low and really fast blocks
Your scenario is possible, but implausible.
Correct, it would be ridiculous to think that in 10 years the various groups of developers of bitcoin cash do not update the EDA
Well core is taking more than 3 years to scale bitcoin ... maybe
Various groups of developers ? you mean the ones that failed on XT, classic and unlimited
Well the developer does not see it as a priority and had openly said so even though the users have gave more than a few examples of how to fix it and many have suggested to just remove it altogether because its not needed anymore
The only conclusion can be that he is taking a bribe from the miners because they need it or he thinks the hard fork required would kill BCH and its best to just let it struggle
in 10 years BTC could be down to 1.5625 BTC where BCH could have powered through 3-4 times as many blocks and only have a reward of 0.02441406 BCH or 0.01220703 BCH so to remain profitable the difficulty would need to be really low and really fast blocks
Your scenario is possible, but implausible.
Correct, it would be ridiculous to think that in 10 years the various groups of developers of bitcoin cash do not update the EDA
Well core is taking more than 3 years to scale bitcoin ... maybe
in 10 years BTC could be down to 1.5625 BTC where BCH could have powered through 3-4 times as many blocks and only have a reward of 0.02441406 BCH or 0.01220703 BCH so to remain profitable the difficulty would need to be really low and really fast blocks
Your scenario is possible, but implausible.
So is the Bitcoin Cash Faster in Transactions Then BTC ? And about the security does it have same security as BTC or it's more secure or less secure ?
thanks!
thanks!
If you ask in a bitcoin cash forum, about bitcoin cash and you get two and even three negative answers about the currency and without fundamentals ....
.... of course it is being trolleyed.
Trolled by the army of trolls paid by bitcoin core (banks, companies and elites, .... blocstream)
So is the Bitcoin Cash Faster in Transactions Then BTC ? And about the security does it have same security as BTC or it's more secure or less secure ?
thanks!
thanks!
To which someone has some doubt skip the fud trolls.
The correct answer would be:
Having more storage capacity in the blocks, transactions are verified before bitcoin core. See example
https://blockchain.info/es/unconfirmed-transactions
With bitcoin cash you have the security that your transaction will be confirmed in the next block. In a correct working environment, the time between blocks is 10 minutes
The only certain thing on the part of the fud trolls is that currently the btc cash network does not work as well as it should. Due to the automatic adjustment of difficulty, this variable abruptly, which causes oscillations in the time between blocks. During periods it extracts blocks too fast, every minute, and in others excessively slow, every hour.
Currently there are several development teams in bitcoin cash, not in core that is completely centralized. Keep in mind that btc cash came out just 2 months ago and they have to improve protocol.
In short, bitcoin cash is exactly that bitcoin without segwit / paypal, but without waiting in confirmation times and extremely low rates.
See examples of bitcoin core / segwit paypal
https://blockchain.info/es/unconfirmed-transactions
Random transfer, check the commission!
https://blockchain.info/tx/3a7bffdd6efd2fdef45e344d22d22ae88336d694e9f0e7fdae51fed026ad0385
I don't get all these ripoffs
So is the Bitcoin Cash Faster in Transactions Then BTC ? And about the security does it have same security as BTC or it's more secure or less secure ?
thanks!
thanks!
Some days it is faster and other days much slower.It has only a fraction of bitcoin hashrate and anyone with a reasonable sized mining operation could perform a 51% attack at will if their timing is right.Stick with bitcoin as in the real bitcoin.
PLEASE NO MORE FUD
Jump to: