Topic: [ANN] Bitcoin Cash - Pro on-chain scaling - Cheaper fees - page 619. (Read 704412 times)

Just for information purposes. Tokyo Sushi Bar the First to Accept Bitcoin Cash. Takahiro Gozu is the owner of the restaurant group that runs the Ginza Numazuko sushi restaurant. The place is well-known to Tokyo bitcoiners — it started accepting BTC payments in March 2015, has a bitcoin ATM on the premises, and is a popular place to take cryptocurrency industry visitors.
Gozu said he hadn’t heard much about Bitcoin Cash until recently. He was convinced to use it at the restaurant by Ken Shishido, who began co-organizing the Tokyo Bitcoin Meetup with Roger Ver in 2013

Quality just Quality 

It's node decentralisation that starts to become a problem the miners may create the blocks but the nodes have to verify them this consumes bandwidth and CPU cycles if the blocks get big enough that they cannot be transferred and verified by the time the next block is found then you get useless empty blocks

Since most mining is done in China and they need to use slow VPNs to talk to most of the outside world this may be a problem antpool already struggles to mine 1MB blocks

Well, your arrogant and disrespectful behavior just won you a place on my ignore list, kiddo, and I won't even comment on the fact that I am most probably older than your parents.

i do find it strange that you are here so much but have been out of bch for so long...
anyways..as long as your happy with you decisions, thats all that matters...for all of us.

1000btc ver lols , is this the cobbles tweet thing about 250btc or something

This new fork, will benefit bitcoin cash more than all the rest.
I dont want any free bgold,lol if i do i may pick them off market later ( if it survives) after the obvious dump...far less risk that way.

Out I have nothing I sold the initial dump and then re bought near the bottom just as it starting pumping from the koreans and then sold near the top I could have gone much higher but I didn't know how far it would go and wouldn't have been around if it crashed back hard so resold and been out ever since.

If I sold my BTC for BCH I would have far far less than I do now so I think I made the right choice plus I also benefit from also getting Bgold and S2X come november but I don't expect anything from S2X I think it will be a non starter it seems to have far far far more hate than what Bcash did plus with no adjustments to the difficulty re-targeting and I don't expect garzik to bring any mining power so support his fork he's just trusting the miners will follow through with the signalling

Have you seen the bets that Ver has accepted totalling 1000BTC over the BTC/S2 chain winning the majority he's crazy

tek m8, may i ask, are you in or out just now of bch?

The lower it goes the more sellout causing it to go even lower weak hands will start selling causing even bigger crashes until the strongest of hands are left worth something worthless

Its like gambling when you are on a winning streak you have to know when to quit while your ahead but some get cocky and loose it all

i predict retrace to .06 weeee


#poof!

i predict retrace to .06 weeee


#poof!

I've bought my original allocation back at some tidy profit - happy to speculate on a later rise

Looks like BCH is dying slowly.  

You are not correcting anyone, you only just ridiculed yourself so much and on so many levels that I don't even know where to begin.

You not only didn't understand what I said but not even what I was responding to, and not even what they were talking about.

The first person was talking about bitcoin cash saying that most blocks are under 0.1MB and that there was only one 8MB block and it's not a proof of 8MB blocks working. The correct response to that is that if there ever was even one single 8MB block mined/stored/transported then that exactly is the proof of 8MB blocks working and the fact that there weren't/aren't more has nothing to do with the software, network or miners, because the blocks logically cannot be bigger than how many transactions exist in the mempool at the moment the block is mined. This is such a simple logic that even a 10-year-old would understand that and the fact that he seems to not get it was the DUH moment.

The second person didn't use any of the above valid arguments in his response and instead said that the miners only use bigger blocks when it's needed otherwise they use smaller blocksizes, to which I said that this line of reasoning is nonsense because he is basically saying that the miners could make 8MB blocks but they don't "use" them because it's not needed, implying they have a choice. That is simply not true. The miners don't have such a choice. The only thing miners can decide is to exclude some transactions, so in effect, indirectly, they can make the block smaller than it could be given the number of available mempool transactions. But they absolutely cannot make the block bigger. The miners don't "use" big blocks, the miners don't "use" smaller blocksizes, they don't "use" anything. The only thing that's happening is that the software automatically writes the mempool transactions into the newly discovered block and the only thing that miners can possibly do in this matter is to exclude some of them, that's all that they can do, nothing else. They don't choose any blocksize, they don't use any blocksize, they don't get to decide anything except excluding transactions. Again, I think this, too, is an elementary school logic but maybe I am wrong here, maybe the nuances and semantics are too subtle for young people brains, or maybe it's a language issue.

Now you pompously come here, apparently having no clue what any of us was talking about, irrelevantly showing some line of code that doesn't even exist in any of all 4 bitcoin implementations (it did exist in the bitcoin-core source code but was removed almost 2 years ago - "read the code bro") and has absolutely nothing to do with the matter anyway, and thinking that you are actually correcting anyone? Well, your arrogant and disrespectful behavior just won you a place on my ignore list, kiddo, and I won't even comment on the fact that I am most probably older than your parents.