Topic: [ANN] [BITG] BitGreen | Sustainable Cryptocurrency | NO ICO - POS/MN - page 17. (Read 92577 times)

If that were the prevailing goal then segwit 2x would have happened, it may be the goal of some to just fork to get richer but in most cases the forked coins look to serve a purpose. Bcash bigger blocks, bitcoin gold for GPU mining, but the added value of forking is that you actually do attain TX history of BTC ya know? So for all the forks it's like they automatically get a % of the bitcoin community to adopt them...some do, others just dump and move on.

This coin on the other hand just hijacks the name and doesnt fork off at all.....maybe because its too much work?

Not only of that one but there were also a lot of BTC forks lately and why should you hold those afterwards? Yes it is well distributed around a lot of small holders. But there is also a big concentration on a few individuals. Imho all those BTC forks only had one goal: Make rich richer.

You are right it is not forked from BTC, but then your implying that the distribution of bitcoin is unbalanced because of the Mt. Gox trustee?? 

You do realize that bitcoin is probably the most widely distributed crypto in existence right?

konnezk works as paid BC dev for several projects yes true. Hes not the brain behind any of those hes paid for the BC thats it. For the rest of the advisors I really would like to know which of them you think is fake? and why?

Thank you to everyone giving positive as well as constructive feedback!

Please read our new blog article and learn what Bitcoin Green is:

An Introduction to Bitcoin Green

https://medium.com/@bitcoingreen/an-introduction-to-bitcoin-green-ff30d8e2d40e

This is not forked from BTC. Forking BTC directly gives the same major unbalanced distribution BTC already has (i.e. Mt. Gox) and is prone to fail.

My prediction coming true shows I do have a clue, thanks for you're irrelevant comment though 

I will show up here to agree with post and again criticize the useless defense of such a coin by the holders. I was also prone to public outbursts of defense for shitty/scam projects many times on bitcoin talk here. It is challenging to feel love and support for a coin then to invest in a new project, while not supporting the coin publicly (in hope of valuation) for obvious reason. Of course everybody wants the coin they are holding to gain, so the coin automatically has plenty of the supporters posting for its promotion... in total ignorance of the teams credibility, ability, or code efficacy.

I am changing my ways now and I am no longer holding any of these "out-of-nowhere" alt coins. Anybody can clone dash or pivx or whatever and rebrand it. I cloned Zcash in 5 minutes and with a few simple command line statements changed every single instance of the word Zcash to the name of my new coin. It is very easy requiring less than 5 minutes. However it is not so easy to get the genesis block on Zcash network because of deliberate obfuscation of such by the devs. However, this is likely not the case with bitg, dash, or any of those other coins that have genesis block generating scripts to easily accomplish the goal of a new coin in 5 minutes. Anybody investing in cryptos should know this by now. I never released my Zcash clone because there is absolutely no point in doing so. It was simply research at this time.

My point is, the efficacy/validity of this project can only be shown by the integrity of the team. If you do not know if the team has integrity then you should not be holding this coin. I made some good money from bitg and dumped at $7, thank god. Why did I dump them? Not because I dont like the idea of a green bitcoin. The thing I dont like is the total scam websites and twitter accounts made about 5 years ago (prior to scamlaunch/bitg) ... I did plenty of due diligence and I saw the "Spiderman" character involved with a big number of scam coins as the "lead dev" .. most of the coins failed. I can name a few just from memory- phor, hodl, well I forget the others . just websearch "con easy" I mean "konez" github for his weak-ass github page .. and if you want a review on one of the scam projects here is one:

https://bitcoinexchangeguide.com/hodl-coin/


and even if you think these projects are legit how can one guy be a "lead dev" on about 5 different coins (that I noticed in 30 mins of web searches)..

and the fake websites when investigating these supposed advisors of BITG.

this coin is a scam. if you don't believe me, then just ask yourselves how a lead dev can work on so many coins that are failing/broken and still have any attention to bitg, the one "legitimate" (yeah rite) coin.

I am not going to say any more here because all of the data is available through web searches, plenty enough to ask yourselves why you would hold such a coin.

Additionally, has the the "team" made good on any of the statements presented on the roadmap? After long enough the public will realize none of it has been adhered to and no longer value the coin.

I am all about proof of stake coins that do not involve proof of work mining and environmental destruction. however, at this time we have only one way to guarantee any value of a coin and that is the absurd amount of power ($) spent on generating the coin giving it a "floor" value .. ie: bitcoin.

when the coins spit out like water pouring with no energy involved to create, the ONLY thing you have to rely on is the INTEGRITY OF THE DEVELOPERS. in this case, I don't see any. Apologies folks, I am calling bullshit on this one.

wow, you have no clue about crypto's. Go back to moms basement

You are right. It is very evident right now that these young MN coins are being dumpster-ed by the investors due to the bear market that we are experiencing right now. I also don't know if the 50k area will hold for BITG. This is a very important support and once it breaks down, 40k area is easily achievable. 

Pretty much what you say you are not doing is exactly what you are doing 

The detail you go into about the specs are astonishing....wow just because it has 21m coins and 3m in circulation makes it a winner huh? Man it must have taken hours or research to come to that conclusion....

Go back 4-5 pages and you will see my post saying this coin WILL dump to 50-55k, guess I was right huh? Sorry but the only thing this coin has going for it is branding, and even then it's hijacking the bitcoin name and not even forking off. This is nothing more than a pivx/dash masternode clone with POS and a green branding angle.

Not that it's a terrible project, just don't believe hype, these young masternode coins are prone to consistent dumping right now.

0.00040000 satoshis X 2500 = 1.
Or 1 bitcoin.
So I am guessing this is what the the DEVS decided for a fair and start price and amount for a BITG masternode, what u guys think?
Current price around 0.00053333 satoshis
   

Here interesting people in the community gather, I would even say unique people indeed. If at least a small part of their income people put in a piggy Bank to help the environment, the world will be much better and cleaner.

Spam comment quoted by another spam comment quoted by another one just saying they will invest 10k THEN quoted by another spam comment saying "Wow, I should think about this!"

Jesus when will they implement something for this forum that eliminates so much pointless posting? Are they all bots looking to farm signiture campaigns or are they used just to bump threads?!

On a lighter note, I hate to say it but I anticipate more dumping from BITG, seems like the chart is going to follow the same pattern as several other masternode coins. As the initial excitement and small amount of hype wears the dumping from masternode owners will take its toll.

You can see it with soooo many other charts, I don't see why BITG would be immune to it. Look for sub 60/55k sat prices soon.

what is the pre-mine for?

how many masternodes does the dev own?

Where is the team most active? Telegram, slack, discord etc...

Wow, I need to think about this too, for the love of the environment

I will invest $10000 for a start, once I see how it goes, I will decide on whether to add or not

Sure. People should not be so mad about making bitcoin and nobody cares for how we go about it

One reason I will support this is because,if the we get Bitcoins and the whole ecosystem is wiped, then where shall we move to?Another planet