I noticed during tests that different CUDA SDK give different speeds for algo, or break it.
like
LBC: 6.5 or 7.0 breaks it
LYRA2Z: 7.0 faster then 8.0
are there other known algos that are faster on particular SDK?
I sure will not test all combinations, but I can upload 2.2.1 x64 windows (SM5 und up only!) build on 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0 if someone will post results.
Topic: [ANN] ccminer 2.3 - opensource - GPL (tpruvot) - page 56. (Read 500193 times)
v2.2.1, 1080 Ti, tribus, 80 MH/s -> 100 MH/s
Not on my todo list
your cpuminer can do it, i find it strange that you can not implement it here too
It's a boring task. Any volunteers?
Maybe an opportunity for a budding Cuda programmer to sharpen their skills. Not me.
I just love this software. Thanks! Just got the latest upgrade and my 1060 is loving it and running cooler by the looks of it.
Sorry for the newbie question: Is there a ccminer with XEVAN algo? ty.
I heard some folks were talking about it on some telegram channel and even there were some hashrates!
but if I'm not mistaken, those hashrates were not so impressive and it was clear that with some CPU power it would be more wise to mine Xevan, especially with AMD Risen processors.
Hm let me search my telgram and I will try to find it
Oh, my bad , i found it, but there were discussion about mining with ccminer for other cpu algos, like YesScrypt and NeoScrypt
I do not have linlk , but I'm pretty sure in case you're interested in this as well, you may google it using these key phrases ccMiner from Djm3I YesScrypt
the hashrates were like 1000 sol/s per gtx1060
dumb question. Is equihash and cryptonight working on linux build? I can get the algos working, but not these 2. Using Ubuntu 16.04 and GTX 1070's Cuda 8.0.
Thank you.
Equihash and Cryptonight are working well with Linux/Ubuntu 14.04 and 16.04.Thank you.
With Linux, you have to compile yourself the sources from GitHub.
... and thank you Epsylon3 for this precious mining tool, now in version 2.2.
Not on my todo list
your cpuminer can do it, i find it strange that you can not implement it here too
It's a boring task. Any volunteers?
The 2.2.1 is working good with GTX 1060, should there be some hashrate improvements? The hashrate is same as it was with 2.2 when mining LBC.
Not on my todo list
your cpuminer can do it, i find it strange that you can not implement it here too
CCminer 2.2 with scrypt algo 100% cpu load 
(rig with 6x1060 cards)
rig with 2 cards 1060 -> 30-40% cpu load
(rig with 6x1060 cards)rig with 2 cards 1060 -> 30-40% cpu load
i love you too
CCminer 2.2 with scrypt algo 100% cpu load (rig with 6x1060 cards)
rig with 2 cards 1060 -> 30-40% cpu load
(rig with 6x1060 cards)rig with 2 cards 1060 -> 30-40% cpu load
Ok Thanks =) Can you make equihash work for all pools so that we can use ccminer instead of ebwf ?
Not on my todo list
It is not possible to solo mine digibyte because of the change in bitcoin core i think , the method for rpc is not working. Only nanashi version is running but it is slow, is there any chance to implement this ?
Do you mean that nanashi ccminer has full support for getblocktemplate?
I dont know the technical details but nanashi has no getwork option and also coinbase option I dont know what it is so you can solo mine with the latest dgb wallet , as with ccminer we dont have no getwork option , It is not possible to solomine.
It is not possible to solo mine digibyte because of the change in bitcoin core i think , the method for rpc is not working. Only nanashi version is running but it is slow, is there any chance to implement this ?
Do you mean that nanashi ccminer has full support for getblocktemplate?
Sorry for the newbie question: Is there a ccminer with XEVAN algo? ty.
It is not possible to solo mine digibyte because of the change in bitcoin core i think , the method for rpc is not working. Only nanashi version is running but it is slow, is there any chance to implement this ?
dumb question. Is equihash and cryptonight working on linux build? I can get the algos working, but not these 2. Using Ubuntu 16.04 and GTX 1070's Cuda 8.0.
Thank you.
Thank you.
I was solo mining with my own wallet at stratum.solo.nicehash.com:3334...
But the block was not solved for ages after this message, and finally was relayed by AntPool eventually...
But the block was not solved for ages after this message, and finally was relayed by AntPool eventually...
That's not wallet mining. With pool mining you have to wait until the block matures then the block minus fee will be sent to
the specified address in your wallet. However, there should be a record of the find in your user stats at Nicehash.
You should probably take it up with Nicehash support.
WERE YOU SOLO MINING WITH A BITCOIN WALLET? --
If so, your share was 100%. If you did not get a reward in your wallet, it is possible some other miner hit the solution a millisecond prior to you. Something seems peculiar here.
--scryptr
I was solo mining with my own wallet at stratum.solo.nicehash.com:3334...
But the block was not solved for ages after this message, and finally was relayed by AntPool eventually...
I tend to agree. Many miners report "Yay" when a block is solved and "Yes" for a share.
Considering how much is involved it might be worth trying to find out what happened.
Considering how much is involved it might be worth trying to find out what happened.
I seriously have no clue on what this n+2nd. version of ccminer(what seems to be stable on my old config) should output..
Honestly I was not even aware how these "shares" work, or what they represent.. like 5 hours ago XD
..since that time I already know way too much about the "probability" of getting those 000 in the SHA256
YOU WERE "SOLO-MINING" AT A POOL--
With your BitCoin address. Not the same, exactly. The pool, as a middleman, will take 2% and should payout the entire remainder of the block reward to you.
Solo-mining on a wallet, for smaller alt-coins, sometimes gets a false "Yay!!!" that fails to confirm. If there was no orphaned block, or even a good block, reported at the pool around the same minute, there was something wrong.
--scryptr
EDIT: THERE IS ONLY ONE SOLUTION FOR ANY BLOCK INCLUDED IN THE BLOCKCHAIN--
As I understand it, each block gets only one solution in the blockchain. However, because the network involved in solving blocks is so astronomically huge, two or more solutions may be found within just milliseconds. Only one of them is included in the blockchain. Network latency, variations in time synchronization, and other factors may allow for a false positive.
Please correct me if I am wrong. --scryptr
Jump to: