Topic: [ANN] ccminer 2.3 - opensource - GPL (tpruvot) - page 60. (Read 500113 times)
Latest ccminer 2.2 works like a charm with https://ethmonitoring.com (supported)
skunk algo
spmod5 228mh
cc 2.2 244mh
spmod5 228mh
cc 2.2 244mh
I built 2.2 with cuda 8.0 on ubuntu 16.04 64, the rig has 9 cards, but I always run in to below error.
if I use -d 0.1.2.3.4.5.6.7 or -d 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8 to run 8 cards only, it works well.:
if I use -d 0.1.2.3.4.5.6.7 or -d 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8 to run 8 cards only, it works well.:
Code:
*** ccminer 2.2 for nVidia GPUs by tpruvot@github ***^M
Built with the nVidia CUDA Toolkit 8.0 64-bits^M
^M
Originally based on Christian Buchner and Christian H. project^M
Include some algos from alexis78, djm34, sp, tsiv and klausT.^M
^M
BTC donation address: 1AJdfCpLWPNoAMDfHF1wD5y8VgKSSTHxPo (tpruvot)^M
^M
[2017-08-14 02:23:29]^[[36m Starting on stratum+tcp://sigt.suprnova.cc:7106^[[0m^M
[2017-08-14 02:23:29] NVML GPU monitoring enabled.^[[0m^M
[2017-08-14 02:23:29] 9 miner threads started, using 'skunk' algorithm.^[[0m^M
[2017-08-14 02:23:31]^[[33m Stratum difficulty set to 1^[[0m^M
[2017-08-14 02:23:31] GPU #3: Intensity set to 20, 1048576 cuda threads^[[0m^M
[2017-08-14 02:23:31] GPU #5: Intensity set to 18, 262144 cuda threads^[[0m^M
[2017-08-14 02:23:31] GPU #1: Intensity set to 21, 2097152 cuda threads^[[0m^M
[2017-08-14 02:23:31] GPU #4: Intensity set to 20, 1048576 cuda threads^[[0m^M
[2017-08-14 02:23:31] GPU #6: Intensity set to 18, 262144 cuda threads^[[0m^M
[2017-08-14 02:23:31] GPU #2: Intensity set to 18, 262144 cuda threads^[[0m^M
[2017-08-14 02:23:31] GPU #8: Intensity set to 18, 262144 cuda threads^[[0m^M
[2017-08-14 02:23:31] GPU #0: Intensity set to 21, 2097152 cuda threads^[[0m^M
[2017-08-14 02:23:31] GPU #7: Intensity set to 18, 262144 cuda threads^[[0m^M
[2017-08-14 02:23:37] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 1080, 713.70 kH/s^[[0m^M
[2017-08-14 02:23:37] GPU #3: GeForce GTX 1070, 708.17 kH/s^[[0m^M
[2017-08-14 02:23:37] GPU #3: GeForce GTX 1070, 708.17 kH/s^[[0m^M
[2017-08-14 02:23:37]^[[33m GPU #3: unspecified launch failure^[[0m^M
[2017-08-14 02:23:37]^[[33m GPU #3: skunk_setBlock_80:693 unspecified launch failure^[[0m^M
[2017-08-14 02:23:37]^[[33m GPU #3: result does not validate on CPU!^[[0m^M
[2017-08-14 02:23:37]^[[33m GPU #3: result does not validate on CPU!^[[0m^M
[2017-08-14 02:23:37]^[[33m GPU #3: result does not validate on CPU!^[[0m^M
[2017-08-14 02:23:37]^[[33m GPU #3: result does not validate on CPU!^[[0m^M
[2017-08-14 02:23:37]^[[33m GPU #3: result does not validate on CPU!^[[0m^M
[2017-08-14 02:23:37]^[[33m GPU #3: result does not validate on CPU!^[[0m^M
[2017-08-14 02:23:37]^[[33m GPU #3: result does not validate on CPU!^[[0m^M
[2017-08-14 02:23:37]^[[33m GPU #3: result does not validate on CPU!^[[0m^M
[2017-08-14 02:23:37]^[[33m GPU #3: result does not validate on CPU!^[[0m^M
[2017-08-14 02:23:37]^[[33m GPU #3: result does not validate on CPU!^[[0m^M
[2017-08-14 02:23:37]^[[33m GPU #3: result does not validate on CPU!^[[0m^M
[2017-08-14 02:23:37]^[[33m GPU #3: result does not validate on CPU!^[[0m^M
[2017-08-14 02:23:37]^[[33m GPU #3: result does not validate on CPU!^[[0m^M
[2017-08-14 02:23:37]^[[33m GPU #3: result does not validate on CPU!^[[0m^M
[2017-08-14 02:23:37]^[[33m GPU #3: result does not validate on CPU!^[[0m^M
[/code/
Built with the nVidia CUDA Toolkit 8.0 64-bits^M
^M
Originally based on Christian Buchner and Christian H. project^M
Include some algos from alexis78, djm34, sp, tsiv and klausT.^M
^M
BTC donation address: 1AJdfCpLWPNoAMDfHF1wD5y8VgKSSTHxPo (tpruvot)^M
^M
[2017-08-14 02:23:29]^[[36m Starting on stratum+tcp://sigt.suprnova.cc:7106^[[0m^M
[2017-08-14 02:23:29] NVML GPU monitoring enabled.^[[0m^M
[2017-08-14 02:23:29] 9 miner threads started, using 'skunk' algorithm.^[[0m^M
[2017-08-14 02:23:31]^[[33m Stratum difficulty set to 1^[[0m^M
[2017-08-14 02:23:31] GPU #3: Intensity set to 20, 1048576 cuda threads^[[0m^M
[2017-08-14 02:23:31] GPU #5: Intensity set to 18, 262144 cuda threads^[[0m^M
[2017-08-14 02:23:31] GPU #1: Intensity set to 21, 2097152 cuda threads^[[0m^M
[2017-08-14 02:23:31] GPU #4: Intensity set to 20, 1048576 cuda threads^[[0m^M
[2017-08-14 02:23:31] GPU #6: Intensity set to 18, 262144 cuda threads^[[0m^M
[2017-08-14 02:23:31] GPU #2: Intensity set to 18, 262144 cuda threads^[[0m^M
[2017-08-14 02:23:31] GPU #8: Intensity set to 18, 262144 cuda threads^[[0m^M
[2017-08-14 02:23:31] GPU #0: Intensity set to 21, 2097152 cuda threads^[[0m^M
[2017-08-14 02:23:31] GPU #7: Intensity set to 18, 262144 cuda threads^[[0m^M
[2017-08-14 02:23:37] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 1080, 713.70 kH/s^[[0m^M
[2017-08-14 02:23:37] GPU #3: GeForce GTX 1070, 708.17 kH/s^[[0m^M
[2017-08-14 02:23:37] GPU #3: GeForce GTX 1070, 708.17 kH/s^[[0m^M
[2017-08-14 02:23:37]^[[33m GPU #3: unspecified launch failure^[[0m^M
[2017-08-14 02:23:37]^[[33m GPU #3: skunk_setBlock_80:693 unspecified launch failure^[[0m^M
[2017-08-14 02:23:37]^[[33m GPU #3: result does not validate on CPU!^[[0m^M
[2017-08-14 02:23:37]^[[33m GPU #3: result does not validate on CPU!^[[0m^M
[2017-08-14 02:23:37]^[[33m GPU #3: result does not validate on CPU!^[[0m^M
[2017-08-14 02:23:37]^[[33m GPU #3: result does not validate on CPU!^[[0m^M
[2017-08-14 02:23:37]^[[33m GPU #3: result does not validate on CPU!^[[0m^M
[2017-08-14 02:23:37]^[[33m GPU #3: result does not validate on CPU!^[[0m^M
[2017-08-14 02:23:37]^[[33m GPU #3: result does not validate on CPU!^[[0m^M
[2017-08-14 02:23:37]^[[33m GPU #3: result does not validate on CPU!^[[0m^M
[2017-08-14 02:23:37]^[[33m GPU #3: result does not validate on CPU!^[[0m^M
[2017-08-14 02:23:37]^[[33m GPU #3: result does not validate on CPU!^[[0m^M
[2017-08-14 02:23:37]^[[33m GPU #3: result does not validate on CPU!^[[0m^M
[2017-08-14 02:23:37]^[[33m GPU #3: result does not validate on CPU!^[[0m^M
[2017-08-14 02:23:37]^[[33m GPU #3: result does not validate on CPU!^[[0m^M
[2017-08-14 02:23:37]^[[33m GPU #3: result does not validate on CPU!^[[0m^M
[2017-08-14 02:23:37]^[[33m GPU #3: result does not validate on CPU!^[[0m^M
[/code/
I built 2.2 with cuda 8.0 on ubuntu 16.04 64, the rig has 9 cards, but I always run in to below error.
if I use -d 0.1.2.3.4.5.6.7 or -d 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8, it works well.:
if I use -d 0.1.2.3.4.5.6.7 or -d 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8, it works well.:
Code:
*** ccminer 2.2 for nVidia GPUs by tpruvot@github ***^M
Built with the nVidia CUDA Toolkit 8.0 64-bits^M
^M
Originally based on Christian Buchner and Christian H. project^M
Include some algos from alexis78, djm34, sp, tsiv and klausT.^M
^M
BTC donation address: 1AJdfCpLWPNoAMDfHF1wD5y8VgKSSTHxPo (tpruvot)^M
^M
[2017-08-14 02:23:29]^[[36m Starting on stratum+tcp://sigt.suprnova.cc:7106^[[0m^M
[2017-08-14 02:23:29] NVML GPU monitoring enabled.^[[0m^M
[2017-08-14 02:23:29] 9 miner threads started, using 'skunk' algorithm.^[[0m^M
[2017-08-14 02:23:31]^[[33m Stratum difficulty set to 1^[[0m^M
[2017-08-14 02:23:31] GPU #3: Intensity set to 20, 1048576 cuda threads^[[0m^M
[2017-08-14 02:23:31] GPU #5: Intensity set to 18, 262144 cuda threads^[[0m^M
[2017-08-14 02:23:31] GPU #1: Intensity set to 21, 2097152 cuda threads^[[0m^M
[2017-08-14 02:23:31] GPU #4: Intensity set to 20, 1048576 cuda threads^[[0m^M
[2017-08-14 02:23:31] GPU #6: Intensity set to 18, 262144 cuda threads^[[0m^M
[2017-08-14 02:23:31] GPU #2: Intensity set to 18, 262144 cuda threads^[[0m^M
[2017-08-14 02:23:31] GPU #8: Intensity set to 18, 262144 cuda threads^[[0m^M
[2017-08-14 02:23:31] GPU #0: Intensity set to 21, 2097152 cuda threads^[[0m^M
[2017-08-14 02:23:31] GPU #7: Intensity set to 18, 262144 cuda threads^[[0m^M
[2017-08-14 02:23:37] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 1080, 713.70 kH/s^[[0m^M
[2017-08-14 02:23:37] GPU #3: GeForce GTX 1070, 708.17 kH/s^[[0m^M
[2017-08-14 02:23:37] GPU #3: GeForce GTX 1070, 708.17 kH/s^[[0m^M
[2017-08-14 02:23:37]^[[33m GPU #3: unspecified launch failure^[[0m^M
[2017-08-14 02:23:37]^[[33m GPU #3: skunk_setBlock_80:693 unspecified launch failure^[[0m^M
[2017-08-14 02:23:37]^[[33m GPU #3: result does not validate on CPU!^[[0m^M
[2017-08-14 02:23:37]^[[33m GPU #3: result does not validate on CPU!^[[0m^M
[2017-08-14 02:23:37]^[[33m GPU #3: result does not validate on CPU!^[[0m^M
[2017-08-14 02:23:37]^[[33m GPU #3: result does not validate on CPU!^[[0m^M
[2017-08-14 02:23:37]^[[33m GPU #3: result does not validate on CPU!^[[0m^M
[2017-08-14 02:23:37]^[[33m GPU #3: result does not validate on CPU!^[[0m^M
[2017-08-14 02:23:37]^[[33m GPU #3: result does not validate on CPU!^[[0m^M
[2017-08-14 02:23:37]^[[33m GPU #3: result does not validate on CPU!^[[0m^M
[2017-08-14 02:23:37]^[[33m GPU #3: result does not validate on CPU!^[[0m^M
[2017-08-14 02:23:37]^[[33m GPU #3: result does not validate on CPU!^[[0m^M
[2017-08-14 02:23:37]^[[33m GPU #3: result does not validate on CPU!^[[0m^M
[2017-08-14 02:23:37]^[[33m GPU #3: result does not validate on CPU!^[[0m^M
[2017-08-14 02:23:37]^[[33m GPU #3: result does not validate on CPU!^[[0m^M
[2017-08-14 02:23:37]^[[33m GPU #3: result does not validate on CPU!^[[0m^M
[2017-08-14 02:23:37]^[[33m GPU #3: result does not validate on CPU!^[[0m^M
[/code/
Built with the nVidia CUDA Toolkit 8.0 64-bits^M
^M
Originally based on Christian Buchner and Christian H. project^M
Include some algos from alexis78, djm34, sp, tsiv and klausT.^M
^M
BTC donation address: 1AJdfCpLWPNoAMDfHF1wD5y8VgKSSTHxPo (tpruvot)^M
^M
[2017-08-14 02:23:29]^[[36m Starting on stratum+tcp://sigt.suprnova.cc:7106^[[0m^M
[2017-08-14 02:23:29] NVML GPU monitoring enabled.^[[0m^M
[2017-08-14 02:23:29] 9 miner threads started, using 'skunk' algorithm.^[[0m^M
[2017-08-14 02:23:31]^[[33m Stratum difficulty set to 1^[[0m^M
[2017-08-14 02:23:31] GPU #3: Intensity set to 20, 1048576 cuda threads^[[0m^M
[2017-08-14 02:23:31] GPU #5: Intensity set to 18, 262144 cuda threads^[[0m^M
[2017-08-14 02:23:31] GPU #1: Intensity set to 21, 2097152 cuda threads^[[0m^M
[2017-08-14 02:23:31] GPU #4: Intensity set to 20, 1048576 cuda threads^[[0m^M
[2017-08-14 02:23:31] GPU #6: Intensity set to 18, 262144 cuda threads^[[0m^M
[2017-08-14 02:23:31] GPU #2: Intensity set to 18, 262144 cuda threads^[[0m^M
[2017-08-14 02:23:31] GPU #8: Intensity set to 18, 262144 cuda threads^[[0m^M
[2017-08-14 02:23:31] GPU #0: Intensity set to 21, 2097152 cuda threads^[[0m^M
[2017-08-14 02:23:31] GPU #7: Intensity set to 18, 262144 cuda threads^[[0m^M
[2017-08-14 02:23:37] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 1080, 713.70 kH/s^[[0m^M
[2017-08-14 02:23:37] GPU #3: GeForce GTX 1070, 708.17 kH/s^[[0m^M
[2017-08-14 02:23:37] GPU #3: GeForce GTX 1070, 708.17 kH/s^[[0m^M
[2017-08-14 02:23:37]^[[33m GPU #3: unspecified launch failure^[[0m^M
[2017-08-14 02:23:37]^[[33m GPU #3: skunk_setBlock_80:693 unspecified launch failure^[[0m^M
[2017-08-14 02:23:37]^[[33m GPU #3: result does not validate on CPU!^[[0m^M
[2017-08-14 02:23:37]^[[33m GPU #3: result does not validate on CPU!^[[0m^M
[2017-08-14 02:23:37]^[[33m GPU #3: result does not validate on CPU!^[[0m^M
[2017-08-14 02:23:37]^[[33m GPU #3: result does not validate on CPU!^[[0m^M
[2017-08-14 02:23:37]^[[33m GPU #3: result does not validate on CPU!^[[0m^M
[2017-08-14 02:23:37]^[[33m GPU #3: result does not validate on CPU!^[[0m^M
[2017-08-14 02:23:37]^[[33m GPU #3: result does not validate on CPU!^[[0m^M
[2017-08-14 02:23:37]^[[33m GPU #3: result does not validate on CPU!^[[0m^M
[2017-08-14 02:23:37]^[[33m GPU #3: result does not validate on CPU!^[[0m^M
[2017-08-14 02:23:37]^[[33m GPU #3: result does not validate on CPU!^[[0m^M
[2017-08-14 02:23:37]^[[33m GPU #3: result does not validate on CPU!^[[0m^M
[2017-08-14 02:23:37]^[[33m GPU #3: result does not validate on CPU!^[[0m^M
[2017-08-14 02:23:37]^[[33m GPU #3: result does not validate on CPU!^[[0m^M
[2017-08-14 02:23:37]^[[33m GPU #3: result does not validate on CPU!^[[0m^M
[2017-08-14 02:23:37]^[[33m GPU #3: result does not validate on CPU!^[[0m^M
[/code/
yes, i guess ocminer tweaked it on a 1060. A message about that in its channel generaly fix it 
Not a single miner I have tried is reported accurately on suprnova.cc, so I am guessing it has to be supernova. I see reported hash from 11 MH/s to 45 MH/s and I keep at 17MH/s in reality.
SIGT has been a very hard coin to predict in general no calculators are right either, only way to track is by how much you get paid in the end.
SIGT has been a very hard coin to predict in general no calculators are right either, only way to track is by how much you get paid in the end.
yep :/ ZEC bounty empoisoned the opensource work... new devs gave ideas to sp
even nicehash stopped publishing their work
damniatx: no... i already tried, their wallet is weird and not compatible with bitcoin style protocols
even nicehash stopped publishing their work
damniatx: no... i already tried, their wallet is weird and not compatible with bitcoin style protocols
Intensity 17 for ccminer 2.2 seems to lower power draw and temps nicely, 83-84% power, 66-67C with 67% Fan Speed.
Hash is still above others @ 17.7-17.8 MH/s or so.
Thanks for your work btw, too bad so many violate the GPL3 licensing with the private builds.
Hash is still above others @ 17.7-17.8 MH/s or so.
Thanks for your work btw, too bad so many violate the GPL3 licensing with the private builds.
The diff change can trigger a small pause (500ms) that generally doesnt hurt
are you looking to add NEXUS (SHA3) algo in the future ?
The diff change can trigger a small pause (500ms) that generally doesnt hurt
Nice, nearly 19 MH/s on a GTX 1060 6GB with intensity at 18 with -202 memory clock ccminer-x86-2.2: https://github.com/tpruvot/ccminer/releases
Was getting 17 MH/s with just about every miner before that on exact same settings.
Power has some drops however, any idea why it keeps happening? Have same thing with krnlx. Goes from 91-89 to 34-35 every minute or so, seem to utilize more power as well compared to others which are 83-86. Would this cause any issues long term?
ccminer-x86-2.2:
3 other miners compared earlier:
Was getting 17 MH/s with just about every miner before that on exact same settings.
Power has some drops however, any idea why it keeps happening? Have same thing with krnlx. Goes from 91-89 to 34-35 every minute or so, seem to utilize more power as well compared to others which are 83-86. Would this cause any issues long term?
ccminer-x86-2.2:
3 other miners compared earlier:
try to mine other coins with krnlx miner.. and see the difference, he optimised skunk yes (and i reused that) but he brokes most other algos too
if there is an issue with that, its suprnova fault.. or a lie of sp.. i dont mine there
and no, i didnt "simply" put knrlx code
and no, i didnt "simply" put knrlx code
woa. I'm so sorry. I got the same hash reporting on with the latest build.
if there is an issue with that, its suprnova fault.. or a lie of sp.. i dont mine there
and no, i didnt "simply" put knrlx code
and no, i didnt "simply" put knrlx code
-
Is this miner also affected by the inaccurate hashrate reporting?
its very close to cuda 8, but requires the latest drivers
I'm using CUDA 8.0, anyone try CUDA 9.0? Just wondering if any improvement on performance?
yep, actually vs2013 is the only way to support (and compare) all the recent CUDA versions (6.5 to 9.0)
Just now was succefully compiled latest ccminer 2.2 under vs2015. 0001-make-sources-vs2015-compatible.patch (it's 12 Mb, because it includes libcurl_a.lib and libeay32MT.lib for both 32/64-bit platforms).
libcurl_a.lib compiled by me from sources and precompiled libeay32MT.lib from here. Both x86 and x64 releases compiled fine.
Everyone can test build under vs2015 with this patch and make a report here. To make patch use:
Code:
git apply 0001-make-sources-vs2015-compatible.patch
p.s. Already tested, all works fine.
yep, actually vs2013 is the only way to support (and compare) all the recent CUDA versions (6.5 to 9.0)
Jump to: