its the default on linux, but on vstudio its in project settings, CUDA device section
I keep them "all" like the releases
Topic: [ANN] ccminer 2.3 - opensource - GPL (tpruvot) - page 89. (Read 500200 times)
no no, the v2 is the latest, for now
you can use "git clone" to replace the zip download + extract, but result is the same (its only important for linux which need to keep some execution permissions on the build scripts)
you can use "git clone" to replace the zip download + extract, but result is the same (its only important for linux which need to keep some execution permissions on the build scripts)
Epsylon, any way to build with compute capabilities limited let's say to 5.0 and Greater?
Thanks in advance
Anyone currently using this on Ubuntu 14.04?
I'm getting an error when I try to compile "nvcc fatal : Path to libdevice library not specified.
I did some editing on the Makefile to add "--dont-use-profile" options and set everything manually but I get a "cicc message not found"
(using "nvcc --dont-use-profile -ldir /usr/local/cuda/lib64/ -I /usr/local/cuda/include/ -L /usr/local/cuda/lib64/" argument)
I can run "nvcc --version" from the command line and it displays Cuda 6.5 installed correctly.
Is CUDA possibly not installed correctly? Hoping someone can help with this.
I'm getting an error when I try to compile "nvcc fatal : Path to libdevice library not specified.
I did some editing on the Makefile to add "--dont-use-profile" options and set everything manually but I get a "cicc message not found"
(using "nvcc --dont-use-profile -ldir /usr/local/cuda/lib64/ -I /usr/local/cuda/include/ -L /usr/local/cuda/lib64/" argument)
I can run "nvcc --version" from the command line and it displays Cuda 6.5 installed correctly.
Is CUDA possibly not installed correctly? Hoping someone can help with this.
Hi,
can anyone advice me how to mine on Suprnova's DGBGCoin Pool with ccminer 2.0?
The Pool shows me always the half of Hashrate from the Hashrate provided by ccminer 2.0.
I think thre is a problem with the difficulty, becaus after a while the miner find very less shares.
If I use ccminer 1.2 it works fine...
Has anyone the same problem on Suprnova's DGBGCoin Pool with ccminer 2.0?
can anyone advice me how to mine on Suprnova's DGBGCoin Pool with ccminer 2.0?
The Pool shows me always the half of Hashrate from the Hashrate provided by ccminer 2.0.
I think thre is a problem with the difficulty, becaus after a while the miner find very less shares.
If I use ccminer 1.2 it works fine...
Has anyone the same problem on Suprnova's DGBGCoin Pool with ccminer 2.0?
try "-f 2" some pools use different factors on this algo
Is there any chance of getting the DCR miner cap raised? At least base it on IPs and not number of miners connected, it's shitty having to diagnose 'server full' messages when only a handful of your rigs are getting them and if any of them disconnect it swaps to other rigs. It doesn't always trigger a failover event either so it'll just sit there and retry constantly.
Hi,
can anyone advice me how to mine on Suprnova's DGBGCoin Pool with ccminer 2.0?
The Pool shows me always the half of Hashrate from the Hashrate provided by ccminer 2.0.
I think thre is a problem with the difficulty, becaus after a while the miner find very less shares.
If I use ccminer 1.2 it works fine...
Has anyone the same problem on Suprnova's DGBGCoin Pool with ccminer 2.0?
can anyone advice me how to mine on Suprnova's DGBGCoin Pool with ccminer 2.0?
The Pool shows me always the half of Hashrate from the Hashrate provided by ccminer 2.0.
I think thre is a problem with the difficulty, becaus after a while the miner find very less shares.
If I use ccminer 1.2 it works fine...
Has anyone the same problem on Suprnova's DGBGCoin Pool with ccminer 2.0?
no no, the v2 is the latest, for now
you can use "git clone" to replace the zip download + extract, but result is the same (its only important for linux which need to keep some execution permessions on the build scripts)
you can use "git clone" to replace the zip download + extract, but result is the same (its only important for linux which need to keep some execution permessions on the build scripts)
Thanks again
Maybe your lines above could be placed in the FAQ?
no no, the v2 is the latest, for now
you can use "git clone" to replace the zip download + extract, but result is the same (its only important for linux which need to keep some execution permissions on the build scripts)
you can use "git clone" to replace the zip download + extract, but result is the same (its only important for linux which need to keep some execution permissions on the build scripts)
yep, i just use upx on the binary to reduce the release size (i keep them in a history folder to compare)
Thanks
yep, i just use upx on the binary to reduce the release size (i keep them in a history folder to compare)
its made on the 2013 for a good reason.. backward compatibility
I eventually managed to get Msvs 2013 Community.
I downloaded the zip from your GIT repository, put it in a temp dir loaded the sln and built.
All ok apart having a 57MB exe as result (I built as Release, x64).
Should I go git clone....
then git checkout [v2.0.0?]
and then?
Thanks
should be good
Thanks.
Playing with 960M now:
-l 32x16 gives best speed (385H/s), but temps too high for my laptop
-l 64x32 gives Cuda fault
-l 64x64 gives 120H/s, with temps below 70°C for my laptop (good for unattended mining)
-l 16x8 gives 60% of 32x16, with temps on 75-76°C
Just to let you know
should be good
Code:
-l, --launch-config gives the launch configuration for each kernel
in a comma separated list, one per device.
-l AxB with A and B to determine
Thanks for that.
Building: I've found Visual Studio Express 2013 Update 4.
Downloading right now.
Will it do?
Code:
-l, --launch-config gives the launch configuration for each kernel
in a comma separated list, one per device.
-l AxB with A and B to determine
its made on the 2013 for a good reason.. backward compatibility
Understood.
Now, what settings I could play with to improve Aeon mining performances under with my GPU?
Thanks
its made on the 2013 for a good reason.. backward compatibility
Visual Studio (Community or not) 2013, open the project, select release and build, nothing complicated
Unfortunately the 2013 version is no longer downloadable from a reputable source, so I've to stay with 2015
Visual Studio (Community or not) 2013, open the project, select release and build, nothing complicated
else, ive no idea for the 1050ti
else, ive no idea for the 1050ti
Jump to: