https://chipmixer.com/ is back!
And also google + startpage show the proper search results again. The original page is hit number 1 and the scams have been relegated to rank 5 (and worse).
Glad to see
Topic: [ANN] ChipMixer.com - Bitcoin mixer / Bitcoin tumbler - mixing reinvented - page 34. (Read 92822 times)
July 30, 2021, 04:41:54 AM
Since the info is not here yet.
https://chipmixer.com/ is back!
And also google + startpage show the proper search results again. The original page is hit number 1 and the scams have been relegated to rank 5 (and worse).
Glad to see
https://chipmixer.com/ is back!
And also google + startpage show the proper search results again. The original page is hit number 1 and the scams have been relegated to rank 5 (and worse).
Glad to see
July 27, 2021, 06:55:42 PM
New keys are bech32 and they need to be imported with "p2wpkh:" at the begin of the each key in Electrum or they will look like empty.
July 26, 2021, 06:31:12 AM
Hello! Again, I did not receive chips after the confirmations. Sent a request for recovery from this mail [email protected]
Check, please.
Check, please.
July 23, 2021, 08:00:12 AM
Sorry for my stupid question but how much money is enough to make DDOS attacks profitable and how much profit from their continuation? Why is Chipmixer.com unable to restore their site even though they pay about 25 thousand dollars a week to promote that site? 
How much money does it take? That question should be asked of their competition, because I don't think anyone attacks them just for fun - people who for some reason don't know/want to use Tor are certainly looking for an alternative. It has absolutely nothing to do with CM paying for a promotion and not being able to stop an attack - there is a way (Cloudflare), but if you go back a page or two, you can find a reason why it's a bad option.
You can read some interesting things at the following link -> https://securelist.com/the-cost-of-launching-a-ddos-attack/77784/
July 23, 2021, 07:19:20 AM
Sorry for the late reply.
Great - thanks a lot.
Do you want to edit the new URL into the first post or should I put the info into the thread?
The page https://chipmixer.one/ (spelled correctly so that google finds the warning) is a new scam page to me.
Very brazen to have the following sentence on the page to let users finally fall into the trap under false facts:
Very brazen to have the following sentence on the page to let users finally fall into the trap under false facts:
Quote
Attention. Currently chipmixer.com is being subjected to a DDoS attack. The backup address chipmixer.one, works in normal mode.
Thank you!
July 23, 2021, 06:55:20 AM
Since the [Warning] Fake Chipmixer website thread is locked I thought it belongs in the [ANN] here. Will also mention it in the German part of the forum.
Maybe CryptoYar would like to extend his thread with this domain.
And in addition I have already mentioned it on safebrowsing.google.com.
Sorry for the late reply. Maybe CryptoYar would like to extend his thread with this domain.
And in addition I have already mentioned it on safebrowsing.google.com.
I have unlocked the topic and would also like to mention some chipmixer phishing websites have been active for a long time.
E.g 2021-01-30 ->> ChipMixer.cm
July 23, 2021, 01:31:34 AM
At this point, I believe that there's no reason to use the clearnet website. Not even one. ChipMixer probably wants it for SEO, but if you're familiar with this product, you should mix using Tor.
July 22, 2021, 03:07:01 PM
Looks like an expired certificate. I'm also getting an error with the clearnet site.
Yep, getting the same. It looks like the certificate was valid (only) between Thu, 22 Apr 2021 21:22:52 GMT and Wed, 21 Jul 2021 21:22:52 GMT (?)
That was weird.
Yeah. I'd just use the Tor v3 link.
July 22, 2021, 03:03:33 PM
Looks like an expired certificate. I'm also getting an error with the clearnet site.
As an aside, Chrome is the worst possible browser to use if you are considering maintaining any amount of privacy.
As an aside, Chrome is the worst possible browser to use if you are considering maintaining any amount of privacy.
July 22, 2021, 02:59:50 PM
That was weird.
July 22, 2021, 09:40:27 AM
100% a scam website.
Since the [Warning] Fake Chipmixer website thread is locked I thought it belongs in the [ANN] here. Will also mention it in the German part of the forum.
Maybe CryptoYar would like to extend his thread with this domain.
And in addition I have already mentioned it on safebrowsing.google.com.
July 22, 2021, 09:34:32 AM
The page https://chipmixer.one/ (spelled correctly so that google finds the warning) is a new scam page to me.
Very brazen to have the following sentence on the page to let users finally fall into the trap under false facts:
Very brazen to have the following sentence on the page to let users finally fall into the trap under false facts:
100% a scam website.
They registered this domain just few days ago, and interesting thing I noticed is that they are always offering the same P2SH address starting with 37v9 from their fake page, and I tried different tor identites.
So far there is zero balance and nobody sent or received any transaction.
Quote
Domain Name: chipmixer.one
Registry Domain ID: D0C64A5BE48B14AFC8950CDD619B5D422-GDREG
Registrar WHOIS Server: whois.namecheap.com
Registrar URL: http://www.namecheap.com
Updated Date: 2021-07-21T18:33:47Z
Creation Date: 2021-07-16T18:33:47Z
Registry Expiry Date: 2022-07-16T18:33:47Z
Registrar: NameCheap, Inc.
Registry Domain ID: D0C64A5BE48B14AFC8950CDD619B5D422-GDREG
Registrar WHOIS Server: whois.namecheap.com
Registrar URL: http://www.namecheap.com
Updated Date: 2021-07-21T18:33:47Z
Creation Date: 2021-07-16T18:33:47Z
Registry Expiry Date: 2022-07-16T18:33:47Z
Registrar: NameCheap, Inc.
July 22, 2021, 08:52:36 AM
The page https://chipmixer.one/ (spelled correctly so that google finds the warning) is a new scam page to me.
Very brazen to have the following sentence on the page to let users finally fall into the trap under false facts:
Very brazen to have the following sentence on the page to let users finally fall into the trap under false facts:
Quote
Attention. Currently chipmixer.com is being subjected to a DDoS attack. The backup address chipmixer.one, works in normal mode.
July 22, 2021, 02:08:27 AM
July 21, 2021, 03:31:47 PM
It shows the total chips as 0.000 BTC, but underneath that it shows a chip size of 0.002 BTC. I have never had to restore a session in the past, so I don't know if this is the usual layout or not. The coins have already been imported and moved, so why does it show a 0.002 BTC balance in the second field? Was it like that before as well or is this a visual bug?
I believe the "total chips" (above) represents the chips you haven't withdrawn yet (a.k.a generated the private key) and can still be merged/split/turned into vouchers, while the "private keys" (below) represents the ones you already withdrew and which private-keys can be seen on the step 3. July 21, 2021, 02:26:51 PM
I took part in the beta testing round for the v3 edition of ChipMixer. I've shared my feedback with you over PM and I found no problems with the service. A few hours ago I tried to resume my session just to see what would happen. I entered my session token and noticed this:
It shows the total chips as 0.000 BTC, but underneath that it shows a chip size of 0.002 BTC. I have never had to restore a session in the past, so I don't know if this is the usual layout or not. The coins have already been imported and moved, so why does it show a 0.002 BTC balance in the second field? Was it like that before as well or is this a visual bug?
It shows the total chips as 0.000 BTC, but underneath that it shows a chip size of 0.002 BTC. I have never had to restore a session in the past, so I don't know if this is the usual layout or not. The coins have already been imported and moved, so why does it show a 0.002 BTC balance in the second field? Was it like that before as well or is this a visual bug?
July 20, 2021, 09:43:08 PM
Were ChipMixer in a position to offer "clean chips" (coins with no taints or links to markets, other mixers, etc.) that might be extremely popular.
I have no idea how possible/easy/attractive that would be. That would interest a lot of people however.
Calling some chips "clean" makes other chips "dirty". This damages Bitcoin reputation making it bad people money. We do not want that. I have no idea how possible/easy/attractive that would be. That would interest a lot of people however.
If we went dishonest and offered "clean chips" without explaining what makes them "clean" we could attract a lot of people especially if we advertised at dark net websites.
But with our price strategy more customers and more volume does not make more money. It makes us want to attract honest privacy minded people that know a lot or want to learn and they know what our tool is worth for them.
Fair enough.
I was not implying that you should/could offer "clean" chips in any dishonest way. I also understand that various people have various reasons for wanting enhanced privacy.
July 20, 2021, 06:01:11 PM
Were ChipMixer in a position to offer "clean chips" (coins with no taints or links to markets, other mixers, etc.) that might be extremely popular.
I have no idea how possible/easy/attractive that would be. That would interest a lot of people however.
Calling some chips "clean" makes other chips "dirty". This damages Bitcoin reputation making it bad people money. We do not want that. I have no idea how possible/easy/attractive that would be. That would interest a lot of people however.
If we went dishonest and offered "clean chips" without explaining what makes them "clean" we could attract a lot of people especially if we advertised at dark net websites.
But with our price strategy more customers and more volume does not make more money. It makes us want to attract honest privacy minded people that know a lot or want to learn and they know what our tool is worth for them.
July 20, 2021, 12:04:12 PM
...
Were ChipMixer in a position to offer "clean chips" (coins with no taints or links to markets, other mixers, etc.) that might be extremely popular.
I have no idea how possible/easy/attractive that would be. That would interest a lot of people however.
Were ChipMixer in a position to offer "clean chips" (coins with no taints or links to markets, other mixers, etc.) that might be extremely popular.
I have no idea how possible/easy/attractive that would be. That would interest a lot of people however.
July 20, 2021, 09:37:59 AM
Yep, had the same issue importing the private-keys without the p2wpkh: prefix. If we all made the same mistake, imagine the other less-tech-savvy users. :P -snip-
I also made a similar mistake when importing a private key into an Electrum wallet (v.3.3.8) without using the prefix p2wpkh:.Apparently for Electrum must include the prefix p2wpkh: to get Segwit Address.
@Chipmixer, thank you for inviting me to try the onion v3 service in a closed beta.
Jump to: