|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| mBTC
1 2 4 8 16 32 64 128 256 500 512 1000 1024 2000 2048 4000 4096 8000 8192
legendary
Activity: 3668
Merit: 6382
Looking for campaign manager? Contact icopress!
bar the brief moment when I though I'd been given an empty private key because I imported it as legacy (force of habit!) instead of segwit
Although the withdraw page has the correct Electrum prefixes if "Import to Electrum" is clicked, I think that it could be useful to add a red "(p2pkh:)" where the page tells: Importing them into Electrum they may require special prefix But I agree, the topic is covered, people have to just read  And yes, I've also tried it out the ToR v3 link ( thank you @ChipMixer for being kind and let us try it out). All went smoothly, no problems at all!
legendary
Activity: 2982
Merit: 4193
I think that privacy will be improved even more when Taproot goes mainnet for Bitcoin in few months, so my question is will ChipMixer also benefit from this?\
No. Taproot primarily benefits scripting whereby not all of the possible spending conditions are fulfilled revealed and specifically, Schnorr signatures allows for PK aggregation. Neither of those are current ChipMixer's usecase, where the private keys are prepared before the user initiates a session and the addresses are normal P2PKH or P2WPKH.
legendary
Activity: 2212
Merit: 7064
New Chipmixer Tor v3 worked very good during my testing and I am especially happy to finally see support for bc1 segwit addresses.
I think that privacy will be improved even more when Taproot goes mainnet for Bitcoin in few months, so my question is will ChipMixer also benefit from this?
legendary
Activity: 2912
Merit: 6403
Blackjack.fun
Also, destroying the session seems to work alright generating a new id and address.
I had a somewhat different experience while using the Tor browser... When I tried starting a new mix immediately after destroying the session, I still kept seeing/getting the previous session same ID/address but that wasn't an issue when I relaunched my browser. Force of habit, I dislike even using the same id for multiple sites in a row, I always close down and restart the connection or at least get a new identity after completing something over Tor, so after finishing and destroying it gave me a new session id, I tried recovering the older session there was nothing there so the destroying part worked and I didn't look twice over it, focused on restoring so indeed I missed one part there. But yeah, it keeps your session if you go right back you start from scratch with the same.
legendary
Activity: 2968
Merit: 3406
Crypto Swap Exchange
Also, destroying the session seems to work alright generating a new id and address.
I had a somewhat different experience while using the Tor browser... When I tried starting a new mix [immediately after destroying the session], I still kept seeing/getting the previous session [same ID/address] but that wasn't an issue when I relaunched my browser. - Not sure if that's how the Tor browser normally reacts since I rarely use it.@ChipMixer Thank you for allowing us to test v3
hero member
Activity: 2576
Merit: 882
Freebitco.in Support https://bit.ly/2I9BVS2
What about putting the fully functioning clearnet site behind Cloudflare, but simply displaying large warnings all over it that it is using Cloudflare along with links and recommendations to use the Tor site and explanations why, rather than just having a landing page with no mixing functions on the clearnet site? That way people who might just want to test it out, or are using some public computer without Tor, or for whom Tor is difficult to run due to ISP or government restrictions,* or just want to break the blockchain link and aren't worried about Cloudflare, etc., can still mix their coins while still being aware of the reduced privacy and increased risks they are taking?
I like this suggestion. There's probably a lot of people like me that want the privacy of it not being public knowledge how much coin I have or where it came from but have nothing to hide from the NSA.
sr. member
Activity: 456
Merit: 956
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1935098
@ChipMixer: Please disregard the PM I sent you, importing the private keys worked just fine after reading o_e_l_e_o's post above. Smartass that I am I didn't click on the "Import to Electrum" button but directly copy / pasted the private key from the "Withdraw" page. Also of course I didn't read the note about Electrum requiring a special prefix. Maybe put that part in bold? Not sure. Either way I didn't realize there was new information on that page, blinded by routine I guess.
There was no note when you tried it. It was added after your (and other person) feedback. Tor v3 version of ChipMixer is now online: http://chipmixorflykuxu56uxy7gf5o6ggig7xru7dnihc4fm4cxqsc63e6id.onion (chip mix or fly) It supports Segwit deposit addresses and chips may also be Segwit.
legendary
Activity: 2758
Merit: 6830
Yep, had the same issue importing the private-keys without the p2wpkh: prefix. If we all made the same mistake, imagine the other less-tech-savvy users.  An extra warning will probably save you some desperate emails (e.g "some wallets - like Electrum - require extra steps, use the button for their instructions").
legendary
Activity: 2912
Merit: 2066
I've also tested the new v3 site and I've tried my hardest to break something, but to no avail. It all worked very smoothly, bar the brief moment when I though I'd been given an empty private key because I imported it as legacy (force of habit!) instead of segwit. Also very nice that you can split deposits up in to multiple different vouchers.
Oooohh! That happened to me as well, except I wasn't smart enough to realize this by myself. Thanks o_e_l_e_o! @ChipMixer: Please disregard the PM I sent you, importing the private keys worked just fine after reading o_e_l_e_o's post above. Smartass that I am I didn't click on the "Import to Electrum" button but directly copy / pasted the private key from the "Withdraw" page. Also of course I didn't read the note about Electrum requiring a special prefix. Maybe put that part in bold? Not sure. Either way I didn't realize there was new information on that page, blinded by routine I guess.
legendary
Activity: 2268
Merit: 18588
Most of them already does. New users (both to mixing and bitcoin) use .com and we want to protect them from it. What about putting the fully functioning clearnet site behind Cloudflare, but simply displaying large warnings all over it that it is using Cloudflare along with links and recommendations to use the Tor site and explanations why, rather than just having a landing page with no mixing functions on the clearnet site? That way people who might just want to test it out, or are using some public computer without Tor, or for whom Tor is difficult to run due to ISP or government restrictions,* or just want to break the blockchain link and aren't worried about Cloudflare, etc., can still mix their coins while still being aware of the reduced privacy and increased risks they are taking? *Yes, I know about Tor bridges, but not everyone does or knows how to set them up.
I've also tested the new v3 site and I've tried my hardest to break something, but to no avail. It all worked very smoothly, bar the brief moment when I though I'd been given an empty private key because I imported it as legacy (force of habit!) instead of segwit. Also very nice that you can split deposits up in to multiple different vouchers.
legendary
Activity: 2912
Merit: 6403
Blackjack.fun
I did play a bit with the new test site and everything went smoothly
redeemed voucher, split it for fun, withdraw, imported private keys
deposited coins, split the chips, recombined, went again to withdraw,
deposited, moved to a wm restored the session, created a voucher, nothing wrong.
Also, destroying the session seems to work alright generating a new id and address.
Nice seeing segwit, should lower costs for both sides, I don't know how long we would still be able to enjoy 1sat/b next block confirmation.
staff
Activity: 2310
Merit: 2632
Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!
Hopefully you didn't fall for a scam site BTCagent87. Which URL did you use?
@chipmixer
Thanks for the opportunity to participate in the V3 test. It worked smoothly and I couldn't find any problems!
I have tested it via Brave Browser.
newbie
Activity: 1
Merit: 0
sr. member
Activity: 456
Merit: 956
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1935098
I have no idea what percentage of users uses it already, but for whoever doesn't use it yet: it's amazingly easy! If you haven't tried it yet, I recommend to at least download and try Tor browser. Most of them already does. New users (both to mixing and bitcoin) use .com and we want to protect them from it. Can someone give me an article, or explain, why the Tor's website can't be DDoS-ed same like clearnet's is?
It can be DDoSed. Main advantage here is DDoSing .onion will not remove it from Google. DDoSing .com will remove it and will make phishing websites earn more. How about this: - Put chipmixer.com behind Cloudflare, with only a landing page.
- The landing page shows a link to Tor browser, .onion URL and a link to a (newly created) clearnet URL without Cloudflare.
- The URL without Cloudflare can be for instance nocloudflare.chipmixer.com. If there's no DDOS, it's available. During DDOS, the landing page is still available to point towards the .onion site.
- This way, Cloudflare only knows you visited the clearnet landing page.
This is very good idea.
legendary
Activity: 3836
Merit: 4969
Doomed to see the future and unable to prevent it
I think people would prefer a ChipMixer wallet to cloudflare, actually they would prefer a root canal me thinks.
newbie
Activity: 3
Merit: 0
Hello! Once again, there were problems with receiving chips after the transaction received 3 confirmations. I paid according to the specified details, but did not receive the chips after the funds were credited to your wallet. I sent you a ticket from [email protected]Please process it.
legendary
Activity: 1568
Merit: 6660
bitcoincleanup.com / bitmixlist.org
How about this: - Put chipmixer.com behind Cloudflare, with only a landing page.
- The landing page shows a link to Tor browser, .onion URL and a link to a (newly created) clearnet URL without Cloudflare.
- The URL without Cloudflare can be for instance nocloudflare.chipmixer.com. If there's no DDOS, it's available. During DDOS, the landing page is still available to point towards the .onion site.
- This way, Cloudflare only knows you visited the clearnet landing page.
Chipmixer's coffers must be flowing with cash (to be clear: like any other successful service) so assuming they got an easy fiat offramp that can take hundreds of dollars per month, they can probably afford to buffer with Akamai or Fastly instead.
|
