Topic: [ANN] ChipMixer.com - Bitcoin mixer / Bitcoin tumbler - mixing reinvented - page 52. (Read 92708 times)

I think for electrum it's in preferences where you can either choose to prioritise low fees or privacy (it's probably a checkbox that says enhance privacy or something similar).


Have you thought about adding the warning to the captcha screen, up until then I didn't see one. (or have a signed message in pgp or bitcoin of the public key that was generated by let's encrypt - allowing for identify verification at the bottom of the pages).

@jackg:

what do u mean with coin control features ?

im using electrum

 

Attention:

At least one Tor exit node serves chipmixer.com as plain-text stripping SSL encryption and replacing deposit address with their own.

If you use Tor - please use Tor link: http://chipmixerwzxtzbw.onion/

I'd say protbaly abywherr beyond a week, but the longer you wait the better your security will be...

And if your wallet has coin control features and you don't need to consolidate, it might not merge them - if privacy is preferred in the configuration.

@jackg:

ok split chips for differrent adresses, ok thats clear thats extends the privacy, got it

but what when i want to get rid of the impact of chipmixer and want to exchange the keys ( sweeping) ?

which time is enough to wait to still hold an certain level of privacy ? 

best regards   

For optimal privacy it's never.

If you can help it, don't put all your funds together in one address. You can merge a few like if you had a 0.512 chip and a few 0.002 chops and you wanted to get something for $60 then you could clearly merge those small chips together if necessary but I'd try to keep other chips separate.

i got an question

@figmentofmyass:


so when it's time to sweep ?

example : deposit coins  --> get voucher --> wait 2 weeks --> redeem voucher --> withdraw chips -->  import private keys to wallet

best regards

moejoejay

Thank you for your answer

I suggest that large amounts of coins must be mixed slowly, ranging from 10 to 100 BTC every day. Hackers are unprofessional about Bitcoin mixing, and the details are not done well. Hackers think that mixing through chipmixer.com will be anonymous, and the blockchain is public. The data exists forever and anyone can access it at any time. "Total anonymity" is a university question. You can’t make mistakes. Chipmixer.com can only cut off the tracking of input and output, and adds a lot of anonymous features. Chips, each chip has tens of thousands of times the address for you to hide, merge, split, spend at any time, or temporarily spend, and there are many more) This is great. If you use it correctly, the security agency cannot track the source. If you want to be "completely anonymous", follow-up work depends on you. The hacker’s mistakes are merged together. This is a fatal error. Even a lot of private key bitcoins are sent to the same address. This is a failure, so it is easy to trace. After all, few people mix more than one hundred in this time period. Bitcoin, it is easy to think of what hackers do. The correct approach is to send each private key to an address and must not be merged together. Only by doing the details can you successfully mix the currency.

Hi! [email protected] Hello, I'm a novice! I've been visiting the forum for some time. Many experts have bachelor's degree theses. I believe chipmixer is the most anonymous technology. Can you give me some advice? Through chipmixer cleaning, how much BTC should be cleaned every day is reasonable! I want to know how to be completely anonymous, what details do I pay attention to, what is the hacker's mistake?
https://blog.clain.io/binance-hack-2019-deep-dive-into-the-money-laundering/

Hi, bitmaker999 you're right. The twitter incident involves a lot of celebrities. It's a sensation all over the world. The law enforcement department of the United States will definitely follow it up to the end. The only way to trust and anonymous chipmixer is for community members. Community members don't want to lose you.

Hello there!
Due to the incident with Twitter, I think that ChipMixer server could be seized as it had happened to BestMixer. So, you, guys better move your server out of EU and USA - somewhere in offshore. Whois record says that your server is located  in Hessen - Frankfurt Am Main. Don't make bestmixer's faults.

2000mBTC: 17472 address.
4000 mBTC: 4332 addresses
2000 mBTC+ 4000 mBTCUse general functions，There are more choices

To continue this list, let's see how many addresses hold such amounts:
1000 mBTC: 88063 addresses
1024 mBTC: 338 addresses
2000 mBTC: 17472 addresses
2048 mBTC: 114 addresses
4000 mBTC: 4332 addresses
4096 mBTC: 145 addresses
8000 mBTC: 1318 addresses
8192 mBTC: 57 addresses
16000 mBTC: 317 addresses
16384 mBTC: 2 addresses
32000 mBTC: 112 addresses
32768 mBTC: 0 addresses
My guess is not many people would use the option to convert 8192 mBTC into 8000 mBTC, while it requires a large amount of Bitcoin to be held in those chips.

Hi ChipMixer,

An increasing number of people believe that there is ongoing nepotism and corruption greatly damaging the prestige, brand value and relevance of Bitcointalk, and this also has direct consequences on who gets selected to the best bounty campaigns.

Have you ever discussed how to alleviate these issues with your campaign manager, or has he every commented on the situation for your benefit ?

Have you ever seen or been made aware of these two threads?

1) 🔥 [Defamation] At Its Worst During ChipMixer Applications 🔥

2) Vile Chipmixer Bounty Abuse, Probably the Biggest Con Job on Bitcointalk

Specifically, one of the most active sections of the forum, Turkish local has become grossly dejected after all the influential members there incurred excessive libel, defamation and coercion to change their trust lists, so all the highly qualified members from that section would be effectively disqualified from your prestigious campaign.

The end result: one of the most crypto-enthusiastic regions in the world currently has absolutely no Chipmixer banners circulating...

Would be fantastic if you can review these travesties and give your feedback to me either here or privately.

All the Best,
Vispilio

Hello, I'm a novice! I want to know how to operate to be absolutely anonymous. I have a large amount of bitcoin cleaning, how much BTC should be cleaned every day is reasonable. Option: I clean 10-500 BTC every day?

All chips should refer to the general function, 2048 m BTC: change to 2btc. 4096 m BTC: change to 4btc. Bt8192. Let's choose more general functions. In fact, 2.4% of the cost is reasonable. If all chips use universal functions, even 5% of the cost will not care

It is best to compare it with other mixing services.

If you mix with common mixer - you deposit 1 BTC at one address and receive sum of 1 BTC at two-three addresses around 24 hours later. Those transactions may be matched and solved like sudoku puzzle.

If you mix with Coin Join - you deposit 1 BTC and nine other people deposit 1 BTC. Then all of you receive 1 BTC with same transaction and your identity is "you are one of the ten" (which is why you do many rounds of mixing).

If you mix with us - you deposit 1 BTC and receive 1000 mBTC worth of chips created up to month before your deposit. You pick chip sizes to withdraw, you pick when to spend them and at what combination - which mean that every existing chip (both before and after your deposit) increases your privacy.

They do, there is a "commonize" function starting from 0.512 BTC. You pay around 2,35 % fee with doing that.

EDIT: Did not see the post of HeRetiK before, sorry.

In general: yes! Having more potential matches makes it less likely to find the one you're looking for.

You can go a step further: 10 BTC sounds better than 8 too! But it doesn't fit the "split" and "merge" options.