Pages:
Author

Topic: [ANN] ChipMixer.com - Bitcoin mixer / Bitcoin tumbler - mixing reinvented - page 8. (Read 92822 times)

legendary
Activity: 2702
Merit: 4002

Also, don't you think that after chipmixer, these governing bodies may be a crackdown against other mixers too  Huh If I was to use any mixer, I would just postpone the idea and wait for a month or so, to see how things move on.
Will delaying a month make a difference? As long as these mixers are centralized, you cannot trust the privacy provided to you, especially if you want to do something that you do not want governments to know.
It will only be good if you want to hide your trace from other ordinary people, for example, to be famous or an influential person, and you do not want people to know your balance, and so on.
Most central mixers fail to save your logs so if the other party is a government with enough funding to track you down, and some of these mixers may be honeypots.
legendary
Activity: 3276
Merit: 2442
by now chipmixer is gone. What are the best alternatives right now?

The services section has a good headcount of mixers to look at such as Coinonomize.biz, YoMix and sinbad.

There is no shortage of mixers but the question is are these mixers safe ? I mean they say that they don't keep the logs but in fact we have seen that they do. There is no way we can trust the mixers on their wording.

Also, don't you think that after chipmixer, these governing bodies may be a crackdown against other mixers too  Huh If I was to use any mixer, I would just postpone the idea and wait for a month or so, to see how things move on.

After this fiasco, I wouldn't trust any of the crypto mixers out there. I wouldn't promote them in my signature space because you are probably going to get scammed when you need the only service they claim to provide, privacy. Why would I vouch for a service that's not going to honor its word when it is most needed? If the so called "best crypto mixer" out there can't accomplish it, what makes anyone think the other services will?
newbie
Activity: 1
Merit: 0
I feel sorry for this man, he will probably be imprisoned for 10-20 years.

Of course, I was more surprised that the server was in the USA.
Well don't use email and hosting in the US, even without a court order the authorities have physical access to the servers.

Many people ask about logs - I think that the intelligence services in the U.S. have long ago established control over the server and have access to all transactions.

I wish the founder good luck, he will need it.



legendary
Activity: 3136
Merit: 1172
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
by now chipmixer is gone. What are the best alternatives right now?

The services section has a good headcount of mixers to look at such as Coinonomize.biz, YoMix and sinbad.

There is no shortage of mixers but the question is are these mixers safe ? I mean they say that they don't keep the logs but in fact we have seen that they do. There is no way we can trust the mixers on their wording.

Also, don't you think that after chipmixer, these governing bodies may be a crackdown against other mixers too  Huh If I was to use any mixer, I would just postpone the idea and wait for a month or so, to see how things move on.
newbie
Activity: 22
Merit: 5
The prosecutor said that those keys were confiscated, and everybody who is using an BTC Mixer/Cleaner service is actually doing money laundering. So , what will happen now? I used to buy FOOD each day , by washing my BTC and using those keys. I did it to keep it separated from others things I did. I don't want police to know i watch porn, i send money to girls to show tits for example and so on.
Please advice
The prosecutor is really saying that? Do you have a link of this claim please? I'm not much familiar with American laws, but AFAIK to launder or to clean funds, you need to use dirty funds first. If you are obfuscating your transactions from clean funds, you are just concealing legal funds, you are not laundering anything, for me. This statement doesn't seem to respect the Fifth Amendment at least.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Money_Laundering_Control_Act

depending. it is money laudering laudering the money for you , or for others knowing the funds come from illicit, they can always say that you knew that on chipmixer there are money from drugs, human trafficking, and you put your coins there, knowing that you will get dirty coins , helping others people evade the law
hero member
Activity: 1456
Merit: 940
🇺🇦 Glory to Ukraine!
The prosecutor said that those keys were confiscated, and everybody who is using an BTC Mixer/Cleaner service is actually doing money laundering. So , what will happen now?

They never stated that. Their claim was that CM was involved in money laundering because, according to them, a significant number of coins originated from illicit activities. But they did not claim that all users of CM were involved in money laundering. It's important to distinguish between the two claims.

I don't want police to know i watch porn, i send money to girls to show tits for example and so on.
Please advice

What would be the police's interest in such a matter? Is it considered illegal in your jurisdiction?
legendary
Activity: 2604
Merit: 2353
The prosecutor said that those keys were confiscated, and everybody who is using an BTC Mixer/Cleaner service is actually doing money laundering. So , what will happen now? I used to buy FOOD each day , by washing my BTC and using those keys. I did it to keep it separated from others things I did. I don't want police to know i watch porn, i send money to girls to show tits for example and so on.
Please advice
The prosecutor is really saying that? Do you have a link of this claim please? I'm not much familiar with American laws, but AFAIK to launder or to clean funds, you need to use dirty funds first. If you are obfuscating your transactions from clean funds, you are just concealing legal funds, you are not laundering anything, for me. This statement doesn't seem to respect the Fifth Amendment at least.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Money_Laundering_Control_Act
newbie
Activity: 5
Merit: 4


The prosecutor said that those keys were confiscated, and everybody who is using an BTC Mixer/Cleaner service is actually doing money laundering. So , what will happen now? I used to buy FOOD each day , by washing my BTC and using those keys. I did it to keep it separated from others things I did. I don't want police to know i watch porn, i send money to girls to show tits for example and so on.
Please advice



The Output Wallet adresses behind the private keys were public on the blockchain anyways, regardless if the LE could have all the information/private keys through the backup now.

The only difference in this case is that, they now know 100% which of those split chips ( 0.004 , 0.008  etc ) is 100% linked to CM and which are not.


However, even if they have a full log of all private keys ( claimed and unclaimed ), the final adress whatever service it is link to needs to be first identified. After that this Service behind this final url has to identify the user too.

So up to the service, jurisdiction etc there can be still stored logs of the user or not.  Also even if they have all those logs it takes ages to identify the user and if so they have to proove that he was the individual whom used CM. So this cant be fully proven because you could say that you bought those coins from a p2p trade...

so i would not worry about that.
legendary
Activity: 2604
Merit: 2353
Cloudflare is basically a legitimized man-in-the-middle attack, ie. while the data gets encrypted between User / Cloudflare and Cloudflare / ChipMixer the data still gets decrypted -- and possibly stored -- on Cloudflare's server.
This is correct.
In case of other mixers using CloudFlare, CloudFlare knows your input address and output addresses. In our case, if we would use CloudFlare, CloudFlare would know input addresses and private keys. CloudFlare is US company so it is reasonable to think that any three letter institution could get an access by court order.
In this report the FBI claims that you were hosting Chipmixer website at a US provider DigitalOcean until May 2022, why have you made this choice if you think US companies can easily hand over access to any "three letter institution"?

Quote
Until May 2022, chipmixer.com was a functional clearnet website that was hosted at a U.S. virtual private server (VPS) provider, DigitalOcean.

Your assumption was right indeed, because they claim to have accessed it in November 2021.

Quote
On November 23, 2021, the FBI served a federal search warrant to DigitalOcean for chipmixer.com, which was located at the IP address 46.101.124.25. DigitalOcean provided the FBI an image of the server.

In addition, I don't understand why you've wanted to run your business at US if you thought it could break some american laws according to US courts themselves.  
There were no reliable hosting providers available at more permissive jurisdictions?
It's a little bit confusing for me.

https://www.justice.gov/opa/press-release/file/1574581/download

newbie
Activity: 22
Merit: 5


The prosecutor said that those keys were confiscated, and everybody who is using an BTC Mixer/Cleaner service is actually doing money laundering. So , what will happen now? I used to buy FOOD each day , by washing my BTC and using those keys. I did it to keep it separated from others things I did. I don't want police to know i watch porn, i send money to girls to show tits for example and so on.
Please advice
legendary
Activity: 2534
Merit: 1713
Top Crypto Casino
As mentioned in a post in a different thread, it could be anything or nothing. Maybe the OS and related server updates were on the same disk. Eventually it will be made public but not all of it has to be related to the running of the actual mixing part of the website. Could it be 7TB was the size of the disk but the used space was much less?

As for the 7 TB: we know absolutely nothing of what ChipMixer held there (IIRC), besides private keys (which if I remember correctly were not supposed to be deleted). The only thing I remember highlighted is that they delete logs.
sr. member
Activity: 434
Merit: 250
at present, is there a chipmixer-style mixer service? a service that gives private keys as chips? Right now I'm only finding old-fashioned, headache-inducing mixer services,entering time intervals, downloading letters of guarantee... welcome back to the year 2015  Cry
legendary
Activity: 1512
Merit: 7340
Farewell, Leo
To me, it looks like the ChipMixer operators have run it quite competently
I'm not so sure, because if the feds didn't break into Mihn's place, then he likely didn't have the control in the first place. I read it was hosted on DigitalOcean, whose reputation I'm not aware of, but I'm aware it's a middleman. The best course of a mixer is to run it on some machine you possess, and to obfuscate your location, use Tor.

I think that ChipMixer's biggest mistake was to not go fully anonymous from the beginning.




As for the 7 TB: we know absolutely nothing of what ChipMixer held there (IIRC), besides private keys (which if I remember correctly were not supposed to be deleted). The only thing I remember highlighted is that they delete logs.
legendary
Activity: 3290
Merit: 16489
Thick-Skinned Gang Leader and Golden Feather 2021
In addition, of course, to the private keys for the chips that were being produced for the service. Is it possible that the size of these nodes is 7 terabytes?
A node is 0.5 TB, times 4 servers makes 2 TB. Maybe times a few backups to reach 7 TB.
User data and private keys will never be that large, no matter how much they logged.
hero member
Activity: 2338
Merit: 757
By having the private keys, law enforcement was able to seize all the Bitcoin controlled by those keys.
If ChipMixer would have deleted them after handing out a chip, they wouldn't have been able to do that.

We do not know what it the content and source of 7GB data mentioned before. I may imagine the situation where CM operator deleted private keys and/or session data as it was promised, but if server has been hosted using serious datacenter, regular backups were done. In my opinion it is not impossible that some data comes from backups (restore points) made by hosting operator.
It is 7TB. If backups were done that include the private keys, that was a big mistake. I can guarantee you that these 7TB include private keys, since I have seen funds withdrawn from ChipMixer (imported private keys)) disappear on the day of the ChipMixer takedown.


It is still hard for me to believe that Chipmixer, which we have considered reliable and supported by the most honest members of the forum for years, has kept user data in those 7 terabytes that were discovered.
It occurred to me that it might contain nodes data that Chipmixer was supposed to be running on the blockchain. I don't expect that ChipMixer uses nodes from another party.
In addition, of course, to the private keys for the chips that were being produced for the service. Is it possible that the size of these nodes is 7 terabytes?
legendary
Activity: 2534
Merit: 1713
Top Crypto Casino
The part that I do not understand is how far back the retrieval of funds goes. If they managed to seize $46 million in Germany via the confiscated servers and the 7TB back up data (if I understood correctly), would that have been all the unused chips that were not sent out to those that wanted to mix and it so happened to account to $46 million, or was it something else.

Maybe you are right, the 7TB data could have been contained minimal mix related information, we have to wait for the information to be put out by the relevant agencies to understand what data it contained.

Besides the fact that these types of speculations have no productive outcome, I personally believe this is too far fetched.
After all, ChipMixer has been one of the longest-standing mixers out there, mixing a ton of BTC, meanwhile others have come and gone. Even to the point where a few months ago people started speculating whether CM was a honeypot.

To me, it looks like the ChipMixer operators have run it quite competently, with the one mistake (if actually true) to store 7 actual TB of data. What makes or breaks a privacy service (for me) is that they collect and store as little data as possible.
In a business context, 7TB is nothing. That's what people have in their personal home NAS systems. But for a privacy service, I don't know what kind of big files you really need to permanently store.

One remark: I had a personal theory that 7TB was just the amount of purchased server storage (again, nothing for a powerful / enterprise server), which was simply mostly empty. Law enforcement could have seized old, funded keys by getting their hands on the drives and performing forensic techniques to recover permanently deleted files.
However, since even chips created a few days before the takedown were affected, this is not really plausible.
hero member
Activity: 882
Merit: 5834
not your keys, not your coins!
I dont want to make false conclusions but the operators of CM didnt even made an own based research hosting wise.
Besides the fact that these types of speculations have no productive outcome, I personally believe this is too far fetched.
After all, ChipMixer has been one of the longest-standing mixers out there, mixing a ton of BTC, meanwhile others have come and gone. Even to the point where a few months ago people started speculating whether CM was a honeypot.

To me, it looks like the ChipMixer operators have run it quite competently, with the one mistake (if actually true) to store 7 actual TB of data. What makes or breaks a privacy service (for me) is that they collect and store as little data as possible.
In a business context, 7TB is nothing. That's what people have in their personal home NAS systems. But for a privacy service, I don't know what kind of big files you really need to permanently store.

One remark: I had a personal theory that 7TB was just the amount of purchased server storage (again, nothing for a powerful / enterprise server), which was simply mostly empty. Law enforcement could have seized old, funded keys by getting their hands on the drives and performing forensic techniques to recover permanently deleted files.
However, since even chips created a few days before the takedown were affected, this is not really plausible.
legendary
Activity: 2534
Merit: 1713
Top Crypto Casino
I will not detract from what you said because you have a valid point because internet and privacy do not mix well but now that (probably) the biggest mixer is out of business, it really does not look for the other mixers out there. I have no doubt soon they all will have to either shut down voluntarily in order to avoid having their domains seized or will suffer the same fate as Chipmixer.

It is impossible to be anonymous when you offer your services on a .com domain anyway. The US practically owns every .com domain out there. How on earth can they seize any .com domain they want? That's because they own the domain providers too. (hosting/domain providers pay taxes to the government which make them a government partner)

Privacy and Internet don't mix well.
newbie
Activity: 5
Merit: 4
Well just to add something on top of it,



Hetzner doesnt even offer Crypto payments to pay the invoice/rent hosting.


So chipmixer used a provider who resells the server of hetzner which means that that this " middleman " provider could snoop around aswell and as also a security breach itself on top of that   or CM paid the invoices through paypal maybe directly at hetzner?

on top of that: Hetzner needs an ID document in order to get a server  ( in case you order directly from them )


I dont want to make false conclusions but the operators of CM didnt even made an own based research hosting wise.
legendary
Activity: 3276
Merit: 2442
That is just another question in a long list of other questions about exactly what happened. If someone wanted to create a mixer or anonymity based service they should at least have researched about that. As you said, to have hosting based in a jurisdiction that could damage the privacy promises they made to their customers is basically contradictory and counterproductive to their aims.

Well in my point of view if "he" or " them " worked way more professional then why did they choose an " onshore " hosting even if its maybe one out of X servers in their internal structure.

I mean choosing such an jurisdiction for hosting such a website doesnt make any sense. I mean we talk about hetzner which reacts very strict to any kind of abuse against their ToS and chipmixer/crypto falls for sure under their terms.


So imo i think they didnt even work properly from the beginning when choosing the server location. They might have some technical knowledge to setup the infrastructure but they didnt even think twice about the server location itself.


It is impossible to be anonymous when you offer your services on a .com domain anyway. The US practically owns every .com domain out there. How on earth can they seize any .com domain they want? That's because they own the domain providers too. (hosting/domain providers pay taxes to the government which make them a government partner)

Privacy and Internet don't mix well.
Pages:
Jump to: