Author

Topic: [ANN] CRAVE 1st POS Masternodes | Dark Assets | I2P | Market =Embrace The Dark= - page 180. (Read 826716 times)

sr. member
Activity: 462
Merit: 500
LOL your Developer has gone through and removed hundreds of references to DRK and SDC in the GitHub, why not give credit where credit is due.. And Emilioman you love to call SDC trash.. yet Crave has used plenty of code from the project... does that make Crave trash then?  Both Drk and SDC are open source projects so its a bit weird/SCAMMISH that the dev wants to hide the fact that most of the crave code has been forked from decent projects that have been around for a while and that have good devs, or even give any credit where credit is due.

https://github.com/industrialcoinmagic/crave/blob/75f4b3d5fe3cd0816b91721cf01b2ea6f520fec0/src/stealth.h



sr. member
Activity: 252
Merit: 250
I've got no issues at all.
No sync problems (always downloaded whole blockchain from the beginning)
No stake problems (works like a charm for me).
I don't use any node,I don't use crave.conf

And one more time:do NOT talk to SDC/DASH trolls and losers
Well ..If you didn't use crave.conf ,so..what you're using.Share with us.Any idea will be great .Is that mean that you doing only stake ??Reason why I'm asking ,because I'm very close to shoot off all my nodes and change only for stake.Thank you

Yes,I've never created crave.conf
Yes,I only stake (I've got almost 11k Crave so it's alright for me-I'm too noob to create MNs because I don't know how to open the bloody 9999 port on my router Smiley
Thank you.BTW.It's very easy open port .First you have to check out your firewall ( Control Panel ,Firewall, advance ,inbound rules,new rule,crave-qt.exe.property,ports ,must be set up for any port  ,be sure that all marks,private,domain,public. Next masternode port must be the same as port in crave.conf.I did that for all my nodes after error"no capeable masternode port.And all my nodes are listed but with very poor income after last wallet update.

Thank you but I don't know how to open port 9999 on my router.
Even if I do it by guide for my ASUS DSL-N14U and check it online it says port is closed.
So because I'm noob about it I decided just to stake.
legendary
Activity: 2184
Merit: 1028
#mitandopelomundo
Emilioman you really are retarded..

lov u pookielax31 aka Mr. Boh on twitter
you make me more rich with your fudstorm and dump.
I bought more than 30 btc under 100k again.
This coin is real, this community is amazing and you and your dirty racist prejudiced shadowtrash community know it

legendary
Activity: 1610
Merit: 1008
Forget-about-it
sorry to backtrack.
BLUR 30 Days period only! Started March 28th at block 17,000. Ends at block 60,200. we are close to block 40,000 meaning over half the Burn period has gone by. At this rate expect the blur Burn period to end on April 28th or 29th. depending on blockchain speed.

https://github.com/industrialcoinmagic/darkpoold/blob/master/lib/burn.py#L75
  
Quote
    total_time = config.BURN_END - config.BURN_START
        partial_time = config.BURN_END - tx['block_index']
        multiplier = config.BURN_MULTIPLIER * (1 + (.5 * Fraction(partial_time, total_time)))
        earned = round(burned * multiplier)  
above is showing the burn total time is based on a start and an end. and also that its a decreasing reward from start to finish.


https://github.com/industrialcoinmagic/darkpoold/blob/master/lib/config.py#L72
Quote
BLOCK_FIRST_MAINNET_TESTCOIN = 17000
BURN_START_MAINNET_TESTCOIN = BLOCK_FIRST_MAINNET_TESTCOIN
BURN_END_MAINNET_TESTCOIN = 26280000    # Fifty years, at 1 minute per block.

BLOCK_FIRST_MAINNET = BLOCK_FIRST_MAINNET_TESTCOIN
BURN_START_MAINNET = BURN_START_MAINNET_TESTCOIN
BURN_END_MAINNET = BURN_START_MAINNET + 30*24*60    # 30 days burn period with 1 min target time per block.

MAX_BURN_BY_ADDRESS = 1000 * UNIT    # 1K CRAVE.
BURN_MULTIPLIER = 5                     # from 7.5 to 5 BLUR per 1 CRAVE.
Blue text is showing the base rate of blur awarded per cravecoin burned. It is subject to the first quotes BURN_MULTIPLIER, rewarding early burners by a maximum of 2.5 extra blur per crave burned. (hint not many got burned in the first week or two.)

Red text showing BURN_START_MAINNET = BURN_START_MAINNET_TESTCOIN = BLOCK_FIRST_MAINNET_TESTCOIN = 17000 which is when burn period started.
also showing BURN_END_MAINNET = BURN_START_MAINNET + 43200
where burn start mainnet = 17000
therefore as we can see the ability to burn crave will end close to the end of this month at block 60200

There we may now put the questions to rest Cheesy


newbie
Activity: 6
Merit: 0
i would try the workaround like any other coin...
Backup you older wwallet.dat sync with a new one then relace it with your backup. Possible run repairwallet. ..

This worked for me yesterday.
member
Activity: 81
Merit: 10
I'm working on a patch to try to skip the check at block 3712...
so at least people who are having problems can sync

Don't mean to sound like an ass..  I just hope this crap gets fixed


I have the "block 32713 problem" with the last update
All of you guys saying you are stuck at this block, isn't it something to do with the secp256k1 update?

It won't compile with latest secp256k1,  but it does compile fine if you roll back
Some people are not even compiling and being stuck at that block
So I don't think its a problem with secp256k1


I updated my wallet and I always sync fine with the last version of secp256k1

Did you compile with latest secp256k1 ?   Did you patch key.cpp?



No, I did not compile with the latest version. I installed the version before the current release and it compiles and works fine..
i would try the workaround like any other coin...
Backup you older wwallet.dat sync with a new one then relace it with your backup. Possible run repairwallet. ..
legendary
Activity: 938
Merit: 1000
I'm working on a patch to try to skip the check at block 32712...
so at least people who are having problems can sync

Don't mean to sound like an ass..  I just hope this crap gets fixed


I have the "block 32713 problem" with the last update
All of you guys saying you are stuck at this block, isn't it something to do with the secp256k1 update?

It won't compile with latest secp256k1,  but it does compile fine if you roll back
Some people are not even compiling and being stuck at that block
So I don't think its a problem with secp256k1


I updated my wallet and I always sync fine with the last version of secp256k1

Did you compile with latest secp256k1 ?   Did you patch key.cpp?



No, I did not compile with the latest version. I installed the version before the current release and it compiles and works fine..

Ok,  I'll try that.  



hero member
Activity: 644
Merit: 500
I'm working on a patch to try to skip the check at block 3712...
so at least people who are having problems can sync

Don't mean to sound like an ass..  I just hope this crap gets fixed


I have the "block 32713 problem" with the last update
All of you guys saying you are stuck at this block, isn't it something to do with the secp256k1 update?

It won't compile with latest secp256k1,  but it does compile fine if you roll back
Some people are not even compiling and being stuck at that block
So I don't think its a problem with secp256k1


I updated my wallet and I always sync fine with the last version of secp256k1

Did you compile with latest secp256k1 ?   Did you patch key.cpp?



No, I did not compile with the latest version. I installed the version before the current release and it compiles and works fine..
newbie
Activity: 6
Merit: 0
I also had problems with the wallet I downloaded yesterday.
But it is only the 32712 taken to move, then normalizes and works normally.


legendary
Activity: 938
Merit: 1000
I'm working on a patch to try to skip the check at block 3712...
so at least people who are having problems can sync

Don't mean to sound like an ass..  I just hope this crap gets fixed


I have the "block 32713 problem" with the last update
All of you guys saying you are stuck at this block, isn't it something to do with the secp256k1 update?

It won't compile with latest secp256k1,  but it does compile fine if you roll back
Some people are not even compiling and being stuck at that block
So I don't think its a problem with secp256k1


I updated my wallet and I always sync fine with the last version of secp256k1

Did you compile with latest secp256k1 ?   Did you patch key.cpp?


sr. member
Activity: 308
Merit: 250
Millionaires Club 47
I've got no issues at all.
No sync problems (always downloaded whole blockchain from the beginning)
No stake problems (works like a charm for me).
I don't use any node,I don't use crave.conf

And one more time:do NOT talk to SDC/DASH trolls and losers
Well ..If you didn't use crave.conf ,so..what you're using.Share with us.Any idea will be great .Is that mean that you doing only stake ??Reason why I'm asking ,because I'm very close to shoot off all my nodes and change only for stake.Thank you

Yes,I've never created crave.conf
Yes,I only stake (I've got almost 11k Crave so it's alright for me-I'm too noob to create MNs because I don't know how to open the bloody 9999 port on my router Smiley
Thank you.BTW.It's very easy open port .First you have to check out your firewall ( Control Panel ,Firewall, advance ,inbound rules,new rule,crave-qt.exe.property,ports ,must be set up for any port  ,be sure that all marks,private,domain,public. Next masternode port must be the same as port in crave.conf.I did that for all my nodes after error"no capeable masternode port.And all my nodes are listed but with very poor income after last wallet update.
legendary
Activity: 938
Merit: 1000
i have run 10 nodes and have no error what is the error?

tail -f debug.log

and look at the messages about spork



what has spork error got to do with anything spork used for going on different chain without doing anything to normal blockchain  Huh

what is the actual error

I think they were referring to this:

GetSpork::Unkown Spork
CheckBlock() : skipping transaction locking checks
CheckBlock() : skipping masternode payment checks

sr. member
Activity: 448
Merit: 250
I'm working on a patch to try to skip the check at block 3712...
so at least people who are having problems can sync

Don't mean to sound like an ass..  I just hope this crap gets fixed


I have the "block 32713 problem" with the last update
All of you guys saying you are stuck at this block, isn't it something to do with the secp256k1 update?

It won't compile with latest secp256k1,  but it does compile fine if you roll back
Some people are not even compiling and being stuck at that block
So I don't think its a problem with secp256k1



you can use old version sologap has old precompiled version
hero member
Activity: 644
Merit: 500
I'm working on a patch to try to skip the check at block 3712...
so at least people who are having problems can sync

Don't mean to sound like an ass..  I just hope this crap gets fixed


I have the "block 32713 problem" with the last update
All of you guys saying you are stuck at this block, isn't it something to do with the secp256k1 update?

It won't compile with latest secp256k1,  but it does compile fine if you roll back
Some people are not even compiling and being stuck at that block
So I don't think its a problem with secp256k1


I updated my wallet and I always sync fine with the last version of secp256k1
legendary
Activity: 938
Merit: 1000
I'm working on a patch to try to skip the check at block 3712...
so at least people who are having problems can sync

Don't mean to sound like an ass..  I just hope this crap gets fixed


I have the "block 32713 problem" with the last update
All of you guys saying you are stuck at this block, isn't it something to do with the secp256k1 update?

It won't compile with latest secp256k1,  but it does compile fine if you roll back
Some people are not even compiling and being stuck at that block
So I don't think its a problem with secp256k1

sr. member
Activity: 448
Merit: 250
i have run 10 nodes and have no error what is the error?

tail -f debug.log

and look at the messages about spork



what has spork error got to do with anything spork used for going on different chain without doing anything to normal blockchain  Huh

what is the actual error
hero member
Activity: 644
Merit: 500
I'm working on a patch to try to skip the check at block 3712...
so at least people who are having problems can sync

Don't mean to sound like an ass..  I just hope this crap gets fixed


I have the "block 32713 problem" with the last update
All of you guys saying you are stuck at this block, isn't it something to do with the secp256k1 update?
legendary
Activity: 938
Merit: 1000
I'm working on a patch to try to skip the check at block 3712...
so at least people who are having problems can sync

Don't mean to sound like an ass..  I just hope this crap gets fixed


I have the "block 32713 problem" with the last update

Sorry,  yes 32712 it starts for me,  and I've seen it at 32713 also

legendary
Activity: 1551
Merit: 1002
♠ ♥ ♣ ♦ < ♛♚&#
I'm working on a patch to try to skip the check at block 3712...
so at least people who are having problems can sync

Don't mean to sound like an ass..  I just hope this crap gets fixed


I have the "block 32713 problem" with the last update
full member
Activity: 191
Merit: 100
Crave is about to reach a huge market capitalization, so of course we have whales manipulating the market and keeping crave in lower levels, do not be fooled whales are buying all yours cheap coins ... So keep calm, just buy and hold, coin already proved to be very strong, and a small spark could take crave above 600K in less than 2 hours.

Unhappily 95% of all traders are like cattle, they just buy and sell in panic, and whales loves this stupid comportment. Do not fall in panic, burn the manipulators, lets buy all their coins in the dips, this way they can not rebound in low levels and they will be burned to dead.
Jump to: