Is this miner support scrypt-jane?
It's getting there
So, for now answer is NO?
Topic: [ANN] cudaMiner & ccMiner CUDA based mining applications [Windows/Linux/MacOSX] - page 1036. (Read 3426921 times)
January 05, 2014, 02:08:30 PM
It's getting there
So, for now answer is NO?
January 05, 2014, 02:02:04 PM
Is this miner support scrypt-jane?
It's getting there
January 05, 2014, 01:59:15 PM
Is this miner support scrypt-jane?
January 05, 2014, 01:17:39 PM
@cbuchner1 I could finally build a working x86 release, (couldn't build x64, yet) I'm getting 2.07 Kh/s with scrypt-jane on a GTX 660 (Non-Ti) but what I'm also getting is a lot of "hash > target (false positive)" debug lines.
What does it mean?
What does it mean?
January 05, 2014, 10:32:36 AM
What is the trick?
The trick is to force computation onto the 3D side. You do this by starting Cudaminer when 2D is running, and then disable 2D. This keeps the 2D running for the program only and forces the 2D computation into the 3D program. Its like running an 8 bit program on a 32 bit system without emulation.GPU #0: GeForce GTX 560 Ti result does not validate on CPU (i=5432, s=1)!
GPU #0: GeForce GTX 560 Ti result does not validate on CPU (i=5859, s=1)!
GPU #0: GeForce GTX 560 Ti result does not validate on CPU (i=4586, s=0)!
GPU #0: GeForce GTX 560 Ti result does not validate on CPU (i=923, s=1)!
GPU #0: GeForce GTX 560 Ti result does not validate on CPU (i=2834, s=0)!
GPU #0: GeForce GTX 560 Ti result does not validate on CPU (i=6629, s=0)!
January 05, 2014, 06:16:53 AM
EDIT: I was trying to use the tesla kernel. It doesn't appear to like Jane. I can squeeze out 2.3 KH/s on my gtx 780 using K9x2. Going to keep tinkering.
2.4 kHash with K4x4 on GTX 660Ti, I also use -C 1
Tesla, Fermi and Legacy Kernels don't do scrypt-jane yet.
January 05, 2014, 04:25:41 AM
What is the trick?
The trick is to force computation onto the 3D side. You do this by starting Cudaminer when 2D is running, and then disable 2D. This keeps the 2D running for the program only and forces the 2D computation into the 3D program. Its like running an 8 bit program on a 32 bit system without emulation. January 05, 2014, 04:23:14 AM
This is what I'm getting if I compile the github version:
I had to feed it a different libcurl as you can see because it crashes with the original one.
I had to feed it a different libcurl as you can see because it crashes with the original one.
January 05, 2014, 03:17:45 AM
Hi everyone. Finally I can reply to this post. Is there any chance you can have a look at mt question abiut cuda miner save me multi posting? New account so my first post couldnt be here. Thanks to anyone that looks
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.4308623
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.4308623
January 05, 2014, 03:06:28 AM
The github version adds maybe 10 or 15 kHash/s more (by supporting the -C 1 flag). It will be in the next cudaminer release, toggether with scrypt-jane (Yacoin) mining support.
git pull and build the latest (with all the latest scrypt-jane h4x), I get 10khash/s less than if I git reset --hard 744d7b7923e106fadfc20eff9833d5d7a5da93c8 (December 28th) on scrypt, on my 660ti.
Does anyone else see this?
January 05, 2014, 02:39:41 AM
I was using Asus GPU Tweak to overclock with 2D enabled, starting Cudaminer, then disabling 2D in GPU Tweak. This forced it to use the drivers in 3D.
I tried this with my GTX 570. Cudaminer reported 3308 KHash/sec and continued on its way lol, but no blocks were being submitted and GPU usage went down to 0%.
January 05, 2014, 02:37:23 AM
Hey, Treggar, are you a scam artist or not?
Your pool gets 'DDoSed' and you ignore communications regarding the coins you've essentially stolen?
Your pool gets 'DDoSed' and you ignore communications regarding the coins you've essentially stolen?
This isn't really the place for this subject, this is the cudaminer thread.
But I'll humor you with an answer (I hadn't checked my messages, sorry). I turned on auto payout for all members and sent out all pending coins before I shut it all down. Honestly, out of the 365,000 coins that I sent out, why would I scam you out of the 44 that I show were sent to you? aka about 7 cents worth if you trade them for BTC.
January 05, 2014, 02:06:56 AM
Will the change in Dave Andersen's code on github increase the hash for a 660ti card already running at 290kh???
you're already running it. It's in the 2013-12-18 release.
The github version adds maybe 10 or 15 kHash/s more (by supporting the -C 1 flag). It will be in the next cudaminer release, toggether with scrypt-jane (Yacoin) mining support.
I just mined my first Yacoin block SOLO. One 660Ti plus 2 GT 640 cards add up to 4.5 kHash/s, which is significant hashing power for Yacoin (the whole Yacoin network is around 1000-1500 kHash/s only, with blocks being generated once per minute.)
EDIT: I was trying to use the tesla kernel. It doesn't appear to like Jane. I can squeeze out 2.3 KH/s on my gtx 780 using K9x2. Going to keep tinkering.
January 05, 2014, 01:08:41 AM
What is the trick?
The trick is to force computation onto the 3D side. You do this by starting Cudaminer when 2D is running, and then disable 2D. This keeps the 2D running for the program only and forces the 2D computation into the 3D program. Its like running an 8 bit program on a 32 bit system without emulation.Hey, Treggar, are you a scam artist or not?
Your pool gets 'DDoSed' and you ignore communications regarding the coins you've essentially stolen?
January 04, 2014, 11:52:15 PM
What is the trick?
The trick is to force computation onto the 3D side. You do this by starting Cudaminer when 2D is running, and then disable 2D. This keeps the 2D running for the program only and forces the 2D computation into the 3D program. Its like running an 8 bit program on a 32 bit system without emulation. January 04, 2014, 11:38:16 PM
What is the trick?
The trick is to force computation onto the 3D side. You do this by starting Cudaminer when 2D is running, and then disable 2D. This keeps the 2D running for the program only and forces the 2D computation into the 3D program. Its like running an 8 bit program on a 32 bit system without emulation. January 04, 2014, 11:27:02 PM
Try it with a pool that doesn't change coins. maybe the change of the coin which causes a disconnect breaks it?
That's what multipool is. Multipool.us just gives you the coins percentage.
January 04, 2014, 11:12:44 PM
will explain after work ~ 10 pm cst
I was monitoring the miner output via multipool and middlecoin. My payouts have not changed yet. appartently either this breaks the connection or the server is detecting bad scrypt output and is disconnecting. I thought this was awesome, and it worked last night. It is now not working with the pools I had it on.
Try it with a pool that doesn't change coins. maybe the change of the coin which causes a disconnect breaks it?
January 04, 2014, 10:59:38 PM
will explain after work ~ 10 pm cst
I was monitoring the miner output via multipool and middlecoin. My payouts have not changed yet. appartently either this breaks the connection or the server is detecting bad scrypt output and is disconnecting. I thought this was awesome, and it worked last night. It is now not working with the pools I had it on.
January 04, 2014, 08:20:54 PM
Will the change in Dave Andersen's code on github increase the hash for a 660ti card already running at 290kh???
you're already running it. It's in the 2013-12-18 release.
The github version adds maybe 10 or 15 kHash/s more (by supporting the -C 1 flag). It will be in the next cudaminer release, toggether with scrypt-jane (Yacoin) mining support.
I just mined my first Yacoin block SOLO. One 660Ti plus 2 GT 640 cards add up to 4.5 kHash/s, which is significant hashing power for Yacoin (the whole Yacoin network is around 1000-1500 kHash/s only, with blocks being generated once per minute.)
Ahh Ok.... i'll wait on the new cudaminer then, what do you think the ETA is, not wanting to rush you.
Congrats on you Yacoin... are they worth anything yet??
Jump to: