[ANN] cudaMiner & ccMiner CUDA based mining applications [Windows/Linux/MacOSX] - page 83.

AizenSou

hero member

Activity: 938

Merit: 1000

Quote from: Ignition75 on September 23, 2014, 09:31:02 AM

Quote from: AizenSou on September 23, 2014, 04:08:55 AM

Quote from: bigjme on September 23, 2014, 04:06:44 AM

haha why will he?

haha you don't know Chris. He's mining farm-fetish LOL.
Btw I'm considering this one, looking sexy as hell
www.zotac.com/products/graphics-cards/geforce-900-series/product/geforce-900-series/detail/geforce-gtx-970-amp-extreme-edition.html

http://www.pccasegear.com/index.php?main_page=product_info&cPath=193_1692&products_id=29123

Grin

What are you getting on x11 Aizen?

2 weeks delivering mate. Still waiting LOL. Gamers buy this baby like crazy (probably miners too).

vgeorgiev

newbie

Activity: 22

Merit: 0

Asus GTX970 -XCN 8500kh/s with ccminer-djm34-m7v7
Driver 344.11
Very bad result for me?
Help !!!

Amph

legendary

Activity: 3248

Merit: 1070

Quote from: Dotcommie on September 23, 2014, 08:53:52 AM

Quote from: PVmining on September 23, 2014, 07:16:42 AM

Quote from: Dotcommie on September 23, 2014, 07:04:46 AM

According to these 980 results, the numbers seem about right considering they're 970s...

...you talk like a politician... a little vague to guess the right numbers Wink

Fine. About 32.5Mhash minus 5 for the 750 in here = 27.5

Divide that by 2, and we get 13.75 at 80% TDP (if Afterburner 4 is reporting correctly). Compare that to 15Mh @ 100% TDP cryptomining blog got.

Maybe I'll be able to check true wattage tonight. They are running 74-79C, so it seems they are running very hot for the massive cooler they have on them. Maybe they're at 100% after all Huh

the cryptomining review is 980 based, not 970

PVmining

sr. member

Activity: 330

Merit: 252

Quote from: Dotcommie on September 23, 2014, 08:53:52 AM

... we get 13.75 at 80% TDP (if Afterburner 4 is reporting correctly). Compare that to 15Mh @ 100% TDP cryptomining blog got.

thanks!
nearly 14Mhash - not bad for a 970@JHA. The true wattage would be great.
which cards do you have exactly?

Ignition75

sr. member

Activity: 462

Merit: 250

www.dashpay.io

Quote from: AizenSou on September 23, 2014, 04:08:55 AM

Quote from: bigjme on September 23, 2014, 04:06:44 AM

haha why will he?

haha you don't know Chris. He's mining farm-fetish LOL.
Btw I'm considering this one, looking sexy as hell
www.zotac.com/products/graphics-cards/geforce-900-series/product/geforce-900-series/detail/geforce-gtx-970-amp-extreme-edition.html

http://www.pccasegear.com/index.php?main_page=product_info&cPath=193_1692&products_id=29123

Grin

What are you getting on x11 Aizen?

Dotcommie

sr. member

Activity: 476

Merit: 250

Quote from: PVmining on September 23, 2014, 07:16:42 AM

Quote from: Dotcommie on September 23, 2014, 07:04:46 AM

According to these 980 results, the numbers seem about right considering they're 970s...

...you talk like a politician... a little vague to guess the right numbers Wink

Fine. About 32.5Mhash minus 5 for the 750 in here = 27.5

Divide that by 2, and we get 13.75 at 80% TDP (if Afterburner 4 is reporting correctly). Compare that to 15Mh @ 100% TDP cryptomining blog got.

Maybe I'll be able to check true wattage tonight. They are running 74-79C, so it seems they are running very hot for the massive cooler they have on them. Maybe they're at 100% after all Huh

djm34

legendary

Activity: 1400

Merit: 1050

Quote from: PVmining on September 23, 2014, 07:16:42 AM

Quote from: Dotcommie on September 23, 2014, 07:04:46 AM

According to these 980 results, the numbers seem about right considering they're 970s...

...you talk like a politician... a little vague to guess the right numbers Wink

or a car salesman... trying to sell a car with a small engine Grin

(it runs as fast as a Ferrari, you just need to push harder on the gas pedal Grin

)

djm34

legendary

Activity: 1400

Merit: 1050

Quote from: Dotcommie on September 23, 2014, 07:04:46 AM

Quote from: djm34 on September 23, 2014, 06:44:58 AM

Quote from: Bombadil on September 23, 2014, 06:03:19 AM

Quote from: Dotcommie on September 22, 2014, 06:58:11 PM

So far I can't get my 970's to use more than 79% power, but they're still mining about as well as my rig of 6 750 non-Ti's or a rig of 5 Ti's.

Looks like the miners will need some tweaks to get them operating at full speed. I'm sure the usual suspects will be on it as soon as they get one of the new cards, but feel free to compile me some with newer computes to try out Grin

I would rather not spend hours messing around with visual studio again...

Can you give us some numbers on the hashrates you get? I'm interested :p

+1 would be interesting to know what it gets on m7
Is this 79% tdp is for all algo ? (won't be buying the 970... though... but the 980...)

Which release should I use for to get the most accurate result on m7? I have basically stuck with x11 and JHA the last few months and don't have too much time to mess around until the weekend, so I stuck it on JHA and it was only using %79. Maybe that's just how Afterburner is reporting it, but I need to shut down a different rig and swap the killowatt meter to my desktop when i get a chance to do real wattage comparisons.

According to these 980 results, the numbers seem about right considering they're 970s, but if it's actually operating at %80 then I'd guess it could beat the 980 they tested at 100% TDP on Jackpot.
http://cryptomining-blog.com/tag/nvidia-geforce-gtx-980/

which sounds a little strange for the exact same tech... with less cores Grin

(it might be a software problem... meaning the TDP isn't reported correcly...)

regarding the m7 use my latest release... (on cudamining.co.uk) or on github

regarding the low tdp usage, it could means that the card is choking on memory.... (I am afraid), now if you look at the 750ti, in most of the case, it is the tpd usage is quite similar... (will need to rework some of the algo...).

PVmining

sr. member

Activity: 330

Merit: 252

Quote from: Dotcommie on September 23, 2014, 07:04:46 AM

According to these 980 results, the numbers seem about right considering they're 970s...

...you talk like a politician... a little vague to guess the right numbers Wink

Dotcommie

sr. member

Activity: 476

Merit: 250

Quote from: djm34 on September 23, 2014, 06:44:58 AM

Quote from: Bombadil on September 23, 2014, 06:03:19 AM

Quote from: Dotcommie on September 22, 2014, 06:58:11 PM

So far I can't get my 970's to use more than 79% power, but they're still mining about as well as my rig of 6 750 non-Ti's or a rig of 5 Ti's.

Looks like the miners will need some tweaks to get them operating at full speed. I'm sure the usual suspects will be on it as soon as they get one of the new cards, but feel free to compile me some with newer computes to try out Grin

I would rather not spend hours messing around with visual studio again...

Can you give us some numbers on the hashrates you get? I'm interested :p

+1 would be interesting to know what it gets on m7
Is this 79% tdp is for all algo ? (won't be buying the 970... though... but the 980...)

Which release should I use for to get the most accurate result on m7? I have basically stuck with x11 and JHA the last few months and don't have too much time to mess around until the weekend, so I stuck it on JHA and it was only using %79. Maybe that's just how Afterburner is reporting it, but I need to shut down a different rig and swap the killowatt meter to my desktop when i get a chance to do real wattage comparisons.

According to these 980 results, the numbers seem about right considering they're 970s, but if it's actually operating at %80 then I'd guess it could beat the 980 they tested at 100% TDP on Jackpot.
http://cryptomining-blog.com/tag/nvidia-geforce-gtx-980/

djm34

legendary

Activity: 1400

Merit: 1050

Quote from: Bombadil on September 23, 2014, 06:03:19 AM

Quote from: Dotcommie on September 22, 2014, 06:58:11 PM

So far I can't get my 970's to use more than 79% power, but they're still mining about as well as my rig of 6 750 non-Ti's or a rig of 5 Ti's.

Looks like the miners will need some tweaks to get them operating at full speed. I'm sure the usual suspects will be on it as soon as they get one of the new cards, but feel free to compile me some with newer computes to try out Grin

I would rather not spend hours messing around with visual studio again...

Can you give us some numbers on the hashrates you get? I'm interested :p

+1 would be interesting to know what it gets on m7
Is this 79% tdp is for all algo ? (won't be buying the 970... though... but the 980...)

djm34

legendary

Activity: 1400

Merit: 1050

Quote from: enerbyte on September 23, 2014, 01:01:55 AM

Someone can help with this, it looks interesting.

no It doesn't... the sk-1024 looks interesting on itself but launched one month after the "cpu only" channel (primecoin) which isn't cpu only... (damn, I wish I knew something about primenumber Grin

) means the coin will have been raped by private gpu miner even before the gpu channel is out.

Also skein doesn't perform well on nvidia (or rather it performs a lot better on amd).... (need to check if it isn't the sha256 part though... )

and forgot to mention that this coin should have been launched 2 months... so basically they are not good at planning Grin

(and other surprise may arise)

Bombadil

hero member

Activity: 644

Merit: 500

Quote from: Dotcommie on September 22, 2014, 06:58:11 PM

So far I can't get my 970's to use more than 79% power, but they're still mining about as well as my rig of 6 750 non-Ti's or a rig of 5 Ti's.

Looks like the miners will need some tweaks to get them operating at full speed. I'm sure the usual suspects will be on it as soon as they get one of the new cards, but feel free to compile me some with newer computes to try out Grin

I would rather not spend hours messing around with visual studio again...

Can you give us some numbers on the hashrates you get? I'm interested :p

PVmining

sr. member

Activity: 330

Merit: 252

Quote from: Dotcommie on September 22, 2014, 06:58:11 PM

So far I can't get my 970's to use more than 79% power, but they're still mining about as well as my rig of 6 750 non-Ti's or a rig of 5 Ti's.

...which algos have you tried?
would be nice to have some info about CN and BBR...

bigjme

sr. member

Activity: 350

Merit: 250

Quote from: ivanlabrie on September 23, 2014, 05:32:53 AM

I need a 980 now... Grin

I miss mining at home and having a gaming beast of a gpu. Cry

right now, im looking to move my 780 to work, and my 980 for at home :p
what, no that wasn't crysis 3 i was playing, it was a client video Wink

ivanlabrie

hero member

Activity: 812

Merit: 1000

I need a 980 now... Grin

I miss mining at home and having a gaming beast of a gpu. Cry

bigjme

sr. member

Activity: 350

Merit: 250

Quote from: Amph on September 23, 2014, 04:54:46 AM

Quote from: bigjme on September 23, 2014, 04:36:40 AM

Quote from: Dotcommie on September 23, 2014, 04:20:44 AM

Quote from: bigjme on September 23, 2014, 02:23:05 AM

Quote from: Amph on September 23, 2014, 01:35:15 AM

Quote from: Dotcommie on September 22, 2014, 06:58:11 PM

So far I can't get my 970's to use more than 79% power, but they're still mining about as well as my rig of 6 750 non-Ti's or a rig of 5 Ti's.

Looks like the miners will need some tweaks to get them operating at full speed. I'm sure the usual suspects will be on it as soon as they get one of the new cards, but feel free to compile me some with newer computes to try out Grin

I would rather not spend hours messing around with visual studio again...

how many 970 do you have? two?

I was wondering the same, i am expecting it to be 2

Yup, 2. There was only room for 1 750ti underneath them so I sold my other one in my main desktop to my roomate. The Gigabyte gaming 970s are loooong, and they fit so close to the heatsink and sata connectors on my UD4H Z87 board that I thought it was going to short something out.

It's currently doing this weird thing where the monitors wake up from sleep and it reorganizes the open programs on my task bar. It also is having a bluescreen in win8.1 when shutting down or restarting, so I think I'm going to wipe all drivers and try again. Maybe it doesn't play nice with that minor update they pushed out when the 750 is running 144.11 and 970s are 144.16. I'm updating my mobo bios to a beta one now too, so hopefully things are better all around after that, who knows. Was all fine until 970s went in Cheesy

so we now know, 970 is 2.5 750ti's even at 80% efficiency.
If we can get to 100% it would be fair to say 3 750ti's
and i would guess at the 980 being 4 750ti's

sound reasonable?

i would say 3.5-3.6 for the 980, that's why i keep saying that they are overpriced

970 vs 980 is like 20%

i still may get a 980 so i will say when i find out (if others don't first)
i am not paying for the 980 though

Amph

legendary

Activity: 3248

Merit: 1070

Quote from: bigjme on September 23, 2014, 04:36:40 AM

Quote from: Dotcommie on September 23, 2014, 04:20:44 AM

Quote from: bigjme on September 23, 2014, 02:23:05 AM

Quote from: Amph on September 23, 2014, 01:35:15 AM

Quote from: Dotcommie on September 22, 2014, 06:58:11 PM

So far I can't get my 970's to use more than 79% power, but they're still mining about as well as my rig of 6 750 non-Ti's or a rig of 5 Ti's.

Looks like the miners will need some tweaks to get them operating at full speed. I'm sure the usual suspects will be on it as soon as they get one of the new cards, but feel free to compile me some with newer computes to try out Grin

I would rather not spend hours messing around with visual studio again...

how many 970 do you have? two?

I was wondering the same, i am expecting it to be 2

Yup, 2. There was only room for 1 750ti underneath them so I sold my other one in my main desktop to my roomate. The Gigabyte gaming 970s are loooong, and they fit so close to the heatsink and sata connectors on my UD4H Z87 board that I thought it was going to short something out.

It's currently doing this weird thing where the monitors wake up from sleep and it reorganizes the open programs on my task bar. It also is having a bluescreen in win8.1 when shutting down or restarting, so I think I'm going to wipe all drivers and try again. Maybe it doesn't play nice with that minor update they pushed out when the 750 is running 144.11 and 970s are 144.16. I'm updating my mobo bios to a beta one now too, so hopefully things are better all around after that, who knows. Was all fine until 970s went in Cheesy

so we now know, 970 is 2.5 750ti's even at 80% efficiency.
If we can get to 100% it would be fair to say 3 750ti's
and i would guess at the 980 being 4 750ti's

sound reasonable?

i would say 3.5-3.6 for the 980, that's why i keep saying that they are overpriced

970 vs 980 is like 20%

bigjme

sr. member

Activity: 350

Merit: 250

Quote from: Dotcommie on September 23, 2014, 04:20:44 AM

Quote from: bigjme on September 23, 2014, 02:23:05 AM

Quote from: Amph on September 23, 2014, 01:35:15 AM

Quote from: Dotcommie on September 22, 2014, 06:58:11 PM

So far I can't get my 970's to use more than 79% power, but they're still mining about as well as my rig of 6 750 non-Ti's or a rig of 5 Ti's.

Looks like the miners will need some tweaks to get them operating at full speed. I'm sure the usual suspects will be on it as soon as they get one of the new cards, but feel free to compile me some with newer computes to try out Grin

I would rather not spend hours messing around with visual studio again...

how many 970 do you have? two?

I was wondering the same, i am expecting it to be 2

Yup, 2. There was only room for 1 750ti underneath them so I sold my other one in my main desktop to my roomate. The Gigabyte gaming 970s are loooong, and they fit so close to the heatsink and sata connectors on my UD4H Z87 board that I thought it was going to short something out.

It's currently doing this weird thing where the monitors wake up from sleep and it reorganizes the open programs on my task bar. It also is having a bluescreen in win8.1 when shutting down or restarting, so I think I'm going to wipe all drivers and try again. Maybe it doesn't play nice with that minor update they pushed out when the 750 is running 144.11 and 970s are 144.16. I'm updating my mobo bios to a beta one now too, so hopefully things are better all around after that, who knows. Was all fine until 970s went in Cheesy

so we now know, 970 is 2.5 750ti's even at 80% efficiency.
If we can get to 100% it would be fair to say 3 750ti's
and i would guess at the 980 being 4 750ti's

sound reasonable?

Dotcommie

sr. member

Activity: 476

Merit: 250

Quote from: bigjme on September 23, 2014, 02:23:05 AM

Quote from: Amph on September 23, 2014, 01:35:15 AM

Quote from: Dotcommie on September 22, 2014, 06:58:11 PM

So far I can't get my 970's to use more than 79% power, but they're still mining about as well as my rig of 6 750 non-Ti's or a rig of 5 Ti's.

Looks like the miners will need some tweaks to get them operating at full speed. I'm sure the usual suspects will be on it as soon as they get one of the new cards, but feel free to compile me some with newer computes to try out Grin

I would rather not spend hours messing around with visual studio again...

how many 970 do you have? two?

I was wondering the same, i am expecting it to be 2

Yup, 2. There was only room for 1 750ti underneath them so I sold my other one in my main desktop to my roomate. The Gigabyte gaming 970s are loooong, and they fit so close to the heatsink and sata connectors on my UD4H Z87 board that I thought it was going to short something out.

It's currently doing this weird thing where the monitors wake up from sleep and it reorganizes the open programs on my task bar. It also is having a bluescreen in win8.1 when shutting down or restarting, so I think I'm going to wipe all drivers and try again. Maybe it doesn't play nice with that minor update they pushed out when the 750 is running 144.11 and 970s are 144.16. I'm updating my mobo bios to a beta one now too, so hopefully things are better all around after that, who knows. Was all fine until 970s went in Cheesy

Topic: [ANN] cudaMiner & ccMiner CUDA based mining applications [Windows/Linux/MacOSX] - page 83. (Read 3426930 times)