[ANN] cudaMiner & ccMiner CUDA based mining applications [Windows/Linux/MacOSX] - page 87.

Ignition75

sr. member

Activity: 462

Merit: 250

www.dashpay.io

Quote from: patlaka2000 on September 21, 2014, 10:15:09 AM

So I've got 2700 mh on my 750ti with 344.11 drivers. Is this optimal for the moment?

Yep, that's on the money, if you fancy a bit of OC'ing you can get the 750ti to 2.85 Mh/s on x11, but it takes a bit of fiddling to be right on the edge without crashing.

bathrobehero

legendary

Activity: 2002

Merit: 1051

ICO? Not even once.

Quote from: djm34 on September 21, 2014, 02:36:13 PM

and if you are still running on scrypt with a gpu... then you are a moron (and there isn't even a point explaining to you as you would probably not understand...)

Hehe, exactly.

I actually like that nvidia is behind in scrypt because the majority of people getting into mining will start with scrypt and they will go with amd, so less competition for nvidia-friendly algos (if there's any left which is still profitable Cry

).

bigjme

sr. member

Activity: 350

Merit: 250

Yeh I won't buy yet either

Amph

legendary

Activity: 3248

Merit: 1070

Quote from: bigjme on September 21, 2014, 02:37:58 PM

dont trust most reviewers. especially gpu ones, they get highly funded by either amd or nvidia so are close to always bias and use old results, which we have been 50% performance jumps in 1 release

yeah, i'm waiting for a review of one of you, otherwise i must wait until i'll do one myself, but i'm waiting for a decrease in price, i never buy hw pieces at launch

Quote from: djm34 on September 21, 2014, 02:46:36 PM

Quote from: go6ooo1212 on September 21, 2014, 02:44:40 PM

Quote from: djm34 on September 21, 2014, 02:42:16 PM

Quote from: bigjme on September 21, 2014, 02:37:58 PM

dont trust most reviewers. especially gpu ones, they get highly funded by either amd or nvidia so are close to always bias and use old results, which we have been 50% performance jumps in 1 release

I don't know how they do to even have a card... at the moment.

..Adn deffinately GTX980 cant consume 308W of maximum 180W by specification...

right I didn't even pay attention to that... 308w is kind of a lot for card rated 165W... (with 2x6pin... meaning you can't get those additional 150w out of nowhere...)

actually it isn't watt (it is written power Grin

)... must be some arbitrary unit...

legit review indeed lmao

bigjme

sr. member

Activity: 350

Merit: 250

Or own the main community website where reviews could be posted with configs, tutorials, and downloads?

I wish :p I have approached evga actually so we will see

djm34

legendary

Activity: 1400

Merit: 1050

Quote from: jpouza on September 21, 2014, 02:55:31 PM

Quote from: djm34 on September 21, 2014, 02:42:16 PM

Quote from: bigjme on September 21, 2014, 02:37:58 PM

dont trust most reviewers. especially gpu ones, they get highly funded by either amd or nvidia so are close to always bias and use old results, which we have been 50% performance jumps in 1 release

I don't know how they even manage to get a card... so early

Some reviews are really cheated, unfortunetly.

Do you know how to be a nvidia tester? Subscription?

by tester ? you mean getting free cards ? well.... I wish I knew too... Grin

I guess you have to have a major blog with lots of hits or be some kind of journalist...

jpouza

legendary

Activity: 2716

Merit: 1116

Quote from: djm34 on September 21, 2014, 02:42:16 PM

Quote from: bigjme on September 21, 2014, 02:37:58 PM

dont trust most reviewers. especially gpu ones, they get highly funded by either amd or nvidia so are close to always bias and use old results, which we have been 50% performance jumps in 1 release

I don't know how they even manage to get a card... so early

Some reviews are really cheated, unfortunetly.

Do you know how to be a nvidia tester? Subscription?

We have a respectable site here in Brazil and they receive the nvidia reference sample as well, check it out:

http://adrenaline.uol.com.br/tecnologia/sons/244/videocast-tech-as-placas-gtx-980-e-970-chegam-chutando-a-porta.html

http://adrenaline.uol.com.br/biblioteca/analise/982/msi-geforce-gtx-970-gaming-4g.html

http://adrenaline.uol.com.br/biblioteca/analise/986/gigabyte-gtx-970-g1-gaming.html

http://adrenaline.uol.com.br/biblioteca/analise/984/nvidia-geforce-gtx-980.html

jpouza

legendary

Activity: 2716

Merit: 1116

Quote from: go6ooo1212 on September 21, 2014, 02:44:40 PM

Quote from: djm34 on September 21, 2014, 02:42:16 PM

Quote from: bigjme on September 21, 2014, 02:37:58 PM

dont trust most reviewers. especially gpu ones, they get highly funded by either amd or nvidia so are close to always bias and use old results, which we have been 50% performance jumps in 1 release

I don't know how they do to even have a card... at the moment.

..And deffinately GTX980 cant consume 308W of maximum 180W by specification...

Indeed, but I think 308W may be the entire system consumption from the wall....

djm34

legendary

Activity: 1400

Merit: 1050

Quote from: go6ooo1212 on September 21, 2014, 02:44:40 PM

Quote from: djm34 on September 21, 2014, 02:42:16 PM

Quote from: bigjme on September 21, 2014, 02:37:58 PM

dont trust most reviewers. especially gpu ones, they get highly funded by either amd or nvidia so are close to always bias and use old results, which we have been 50% performance jumps in 1 release

I don't know how they do to even have a card... at the moment.

..Adn deffinately GTX980 cant consume 308W of maximum 180W by specification...

right I didn't even pay attention to that... 308w is kind of a lot for card rated 165W... (with 2x6pin... meaning you can't get those additional 150w out of nowhere...)

actually it isn't watt (it is written power Grin

)... must be some arbitrary unit...

go6ooo1212

legendary

Activity: 1512

Merit: 1000

quarkchain.io

Quote from: djm34 on September 21, 2014, 02:42:16 PM

Quote from: bigjme on September 21, 2014, 02:37:58 PM

dont trust most reviewers. especially gpu ones, they get highly funded by either amd or nvidia so are close to always bias and use old results, which we have been 50% performance jumps in 1 release

I don't know how they do to even have a card... at the moment.

..And deffinately GTX980 cant consume 308W of maximum 180W by specification...

djm34

legendary

Activity: 1400

Merit: 1050

Quote from: bigjme on September 21, 2014, 02:37:58 PM

dont trust most reviewers. especially gpu ones, they get highly funded by either amd or nvidia so are close to always bias and use old results, which we have been 50% performance jumps in 1 release

I don't know how they even manage to get a card... so early

bigjme

sr. member

Activity: 350

Merit: 250

dont trust most reviewers. especially gpu ones, they get highly funded by either amd or nvidia so are close to always bias and use old results, which we have been 50% performance jumps in 1 release

djm34

legendary

Activity: 1400

Merit: 1050

Quote from: jpouza on September 21, 2014, 02:21:27 PM

Quote from: Amph on September 21, 2014, 12:34:20 PM

so what about 970 mining? no review for that, only 980 overpriced gpu?

Amph, I just found this Scrypt mining comparision between 970 and 980GTX...about 90KH/s in favour to 980GTX.

Source: http://www.extremetech.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/Litecoin.png

subirimagenes

At least in Scrypt, nvidia still sucks behind AMD Sad

Don´t know the others algos for this 970 comparision...

Cheers

again don't trust those review....

first I never been able to get to 900kh/s with my R9 290x (rather 700kh)
second my 780ti is doing around 750khash/s, so you should get more...

and if you are still running on scrypt with a gpu... then you are a moron (and there isn't even a point explaining to you as you would probably not understand...)

I'd be happy to test on a 980 but so far, all I saw was pre-order with 2 to 3 weeks delay....

jpouza

legendary

Activity: 2716

Merit: 1116

Just a thought...980GTX is out of question for mining purposes, 970GTX is more price x performance friendly...I will replace my four 750Ti and my 600W PSU with 4 x 970GTX and a 1200W PSU...will post the results when done.

Cheers

Travis9x

full member

Activity: 170

Merit: 100

Quote from: Raistilin on September 21, 2014, 12:37:19 PM

any plans for ccminer to add statistics like other miners out there or is there a version that has that already?

Average hashrate, current difficulty, etc would all be nice

ccMiner and nvMiner both have average hashrate statistic. Using the "split screen" tool also gets you other statistics & info.

jpouza

legendary

Activity: 2716

Merit: 1116

Quote from: Amph on September 21, 2014, 12:34:20 PM

so what about 970 mining? no review for that, only 980 overpriced gpu?

Amph, I just found this Scrypt mining comparision between 970 and 980GTX...about 90KH/s in favour to 980GTX.

Source: http://www.extremetech.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/Litecoin.png

subirimagenes

At least in Scrypt, nvidia still sucks behind AMD Sad

Don´t know the others algos for this 970 comparision...

Cheers

patlaka2000

newbie

Activity: 21

Merit: 0

I'm mining x11

Raistilin

newbie

Activity: 48

Merit: 0

any plans for ccminer to add statistics like other miners out there or is there a version that has that already?

Average hashrate, current difficulty, etc would all be nice

Amph

legendary

Activity: 3248

Merit: 1070

so what about 970 mining? no review for that, only 980 overpriced gpu?

djm34

legendary

Activity: 1400

Merit: 1050

Quote from: myagui on September 21, 2014, 12:22:06 PM

Quote from: patlaka2000 on September 21, 2014, 10:15:09 AM

So I've got 2700 mh on my 750ti with 344.11 drivers. Is this optimal for the moment?

That's almost double what I get when mining with the previous drivers. That's not optimal, that's spectacular!
Now seriously, what are you mining again? Grin

~ Myagui

that's strange, what version of ccminer are using ? mine has only one algo Grin

Topic: [ANN] cudaMiner & ccMiner CUDA based mining applications [Windows/Linux/MacOSX] - page 87. (Read 3426944 times)