Topic: [ANN] cudaMiner & ccMiner CUDA based mining applications [Windows/Linux/MacOSX] - page 86. (Read 3426944 times)
September 22, 2014, 07:22:41 AM
September 22, 2014, 07:16:25 AM
Yep which we wont get for another 10 days or so when the cards are released properly i believe? atleast in the UK that is.
Power wise at 150w, 2 970's is better then my 780 at closer to 300W. But as you said, the 980 is only 175W i believe? plus i may end up with 2
step up program? you mean the one where you can upgrade to the next model for free if you brought your card after x date?
Power wise at 150w, 2 970's is better then my 780 at closer to 300W. But as you said, the 980 is only 175W i believe? plus i may end up with 2
that's why going to 2xGtx980 seems to be a good option...
anybody already tried the step up program of evga ?
anybody already tried the step up program of evga ?
step up program? you mean the one where you can upgrade to the next model for free if you brought your card after x date?
September 22, 2014, 07:14:31 AM
Looks like the 750ti still isn't a bad option to be honest. The problem I've got, I've gotten my 270x toxic's so efficient now, (undervolting and underclocking) it's 500 watts a rig @ 16.5 Mh/s x11 with the 270x toxics and 400 watts a rig using 750ti GA Blacks.
The difference is about 20-25%, hardly worth selling the toxics and buying the 750ti's.
I really hope the 970 is as efficient as the 750ti power to hash, then I can start adding some density to the rigs again.
The difference is about 20-25%, hardly worth selling the toxics and buying the 750ti's.
I really hope the 970 is as efficient as the 750ti power to hash, then I can start adding some density to the rigs again.
Absolutely, the 750 TI's are still a great option. The key advantage so far with the 970/980's, is as you said, density.
Edit: And gaming, obviously!
So gaming wise, what sort of performance do you thin dual 970's with have over a 980? i know that 980 is supposedly ~15% faster then a 780ti, making it around 25% faster then my 780. But what jump do we think for 2 970's for the extra £50 ($70)?
i am still waiting on 970 reviews from my trusted reviewers. Just to note, i wont be paying for the 970's or the 980, i am swapping my 780 for them
i am still waiting on 970 reviews from my trusted reviewers. Just to note, i wont be paying for the 970's or the 980, i am swapping my 780 for them
Going strictly by the spec sheets, I'd say that 2x 970 will probably sit in the region of 30% more gaming performance than 1x 980. For mining, the gap should be greater, further favoring the 970's, but note that I'm ignoring the hash/power ratio. This is all just guesswork though, we really need proper reviews & testing to know the right figures.
~ Myagui
anybody already tried the step up program of evga ?
September 22, 2014, 07:07:22 AM
Looks like the 750ti still isn't a bad option to be honest. The problem I've got, I've gotten my 270x toxic's so efficient now, (undervolting and underclocking) it's 500 watts a rig @ 16.5 Mh/s x11 with the 270x toxics and 400 watts a rig using 750ti GA Blacks.
The difference is about 20-25%, hardly worth selling the toxics and buying the 750ti's.
I really hope the 970 is as efficient as the 750ti power to hash, then I can start adding some density to the rigs again.
The difference is about 20-25%, hardly worth selling the toxics and buying the 750ti's.
I really hope the 970 is as efficient as the 750ti power to hash, then I can start adding some density to the rigs again.
Absolutely, the 750 TI's are still a great option. The key advantage so far with the 970/980's, is as you said, density.
Edit: And gaming, obviously!
So gaming wise, what sort of performance do you thin dual 970's with have over a 980? i know that 980 is supposedly ~15% faster then a 780ti, making it around 25% faster then my 780. But what jump do we think for 2 970's for the extra £50 ($70)?
i am still waiting on 970 reviews from my trusted reviewers. Just to note, i wont be paying for the 970's or the 980, i am swapping my 780 for them
i am still waiting on 970 reviews from my trusted reviewers. Just to note, i wont be paying for the 970's or the 980, i am swapping my 780 for them
Going strictly by the spec sheets, I'd say that 2x 970 will probably sit in the region of 30% more gaming performance than 1x 980. For mining, the gap should be greater, further favoring the 970's, but note that I'm ignoring the hash/power ratio. This is all just guesswork though, we really need proper reviews & testing to know the right figures.
~ Myagui
September 22, 2014, 07:06:34 AM
i am still waiting on 970 reviews from my trusted reviewers. Just to note, i wont be paying for the 970's or the 980, i am swapping my 780 for them
EDIT: http://www.overclock3d.net/reviews/gpu_displays/msi_gtx970_gaming_review/6
seems the 970 is actually slightly faster then 780, even without overclocks, making an SLI, close to double, for £520.... WHAT?
??
EDIT: http://www.overclock3d.net/reviews/gpu_displays/msi_gtx970_gaming_review/6
seems the 970 is actually slightly faster then 780, even without overclocks, making an SLI, close to double, for £520.... WHAT?
??...BUT, i read a lot in reviews that the OC versions of the 970 suck a lot of energy compared to stock.
In some tests the need 30-35w more compared to the 980 reference. It depends on the card/manufactor.
waiting for good miner reviews too - and for me personally the energy consumption is the most important factor!
September 22, 2014, 07:01:35 AM
@Ignition75:
The problem with that reasoning, is that there will be plenty of 780 & 780 TI on sale soon enough, and lot's of people will find that the 980 is overpriced for it's segment. Adding to this, that TI versions will come along in the next few months, and the 980's resale price will suffer more dramatically than the 970's (even if it's the same % drop, it's just more 'cash' in the case of the 980).
I would be much happier with a 980 than 2x 970's, personally. The problem is that the price gap between these two is really hard to justify given their relative performance spots. For me, it's 2x 970's for sure (note: my motivation is both mining & gaming).
If anyone wants a couple more 750 TI's for their farm, please PM. I'm going to part ways with either 2x or 4x 750 TI's, and will take a reasonable offer from a fellow cuda miner. They're posted for sale online as well, so might be gone soon also. These are 2x EVGA Superclocked, and 2x EVGA FTW. (Europe)
~ Myagui
The problem with that reasoning, is that there will be plenty of 780 & 780 TI on sale soon enough, and lot's of people will find that the 980 is overpriced for it's segment. Adding to this, that TI versions will come along in the next few months, and the 980's resale price will suffer more dramatically than the 970's (even if it's the same % drop, it's just more 'cash' in the case of the 980).
I would be much happier with a 980 than 2x 970's, personally. The problem is that the price gap between these two is really hard to justify given their relative performance spots. For me, it's 2x 970's for sure (note: my motivation is both mining & gaming).
If anyone wants a couple more 750 TI's for their farm, please PM. I'm going to part ways with either 2x or 4x 750 TI's, and will take a reasonable offer from a fellow cuda miner. They're posted for sale online as well, so might be gone soon also. These are 2x EVGA Superclocked, and 2x EVGA FTW. (Europe)
~ Myagui
Looks like the 750ti still isn't a bad option to be honest. The problem I've got, I've gotten my 270x toxic's so efficient now, (undervolting and underclocking) it's 500 watts a rig @ 16.5 Mh/s x11 with the 270x toxics and 400 watts a rig using 750ti GA Blacks.
The difference is about 20-25%, hardly worth selling the toxics and buying the 750ti's.
I really hope the 970 is as efficient as the 750ti power to hash, then I can start adding some density to the rigs again.
September 22, 2014, 06:53:53 AM
@Ignition75:
The problem with that reasoning, is that there will be plenty of 780 & 780 TI on sale soon enough, and lot's of people will find that the 980 is overpriced for it's segment. Adding to this, that TI versions will come along in the next few months, and the 980's resale price will suffer more dramatically than the 970's (even if it's the same % drop, it's just more 'cash' in the case of the 980).
I would be much happier with a 980 than 2x 970's, personally. The problem is that the price gap between these two is really hard to justify given their relative performance spots. For me, it's 2x 970's for sure (note: my motivation is both mining & gaming).
If anyone wants a couple more 750 TI's for their farm, please PM. I'm going to part ways with either 2x or 4x 750 TI's, and will take a reasonable offer from a fellow cuda miner. They're posted for sale online as well, so might be gone soon also. These are 2x EVGA Superclocked, and 2x EVGA FTW. (Europe)
~ Myagui
The problem with that reasoning, is that there will be plenty of 780 & 780 TI on sale soon enough, and lot's of people will find that the 980 is overpriced for it's segment. Adding to this, that TI versions will come along in the next few months, and the 980's resale price will suffer more dramatically than the 970's (even if it's the same % drop, it's just more 'cash' in the case of the 980).
I would be much happier with a 980 than 2x 970's, personally. The problem is that the price gap between these two is really hard to justify given their relative performance spots. For me, it's 2x 970's for sure (note: my motivation is both mining & gaming).
If anyone wants a couple more 750 TI's for their farm, please PM. I'm going to part ways with either 2x or 4x 750 TI's, and will take a reasonable offer from a fellow cuda miner. They're posted for sale online as well, so might be gone soon also. These are 2x EVGA Superclocked, and 2x EVGA FTW. (Europe)
~ Myagui
So gaming wise, what sort of performance do you thin dual 970's with have over a 980? i know that 980 is supposedly ~15% faster then a 780ti, making it around 25% faster then my 780. But what jump do we think for 2 970's for the extra £50 ($70)?
i am still waiting on 970 reviews from my trusted reviewers. Just to note, i wont be paying for the 970's or the 980, i am swapping my 780 for them
EDIT: http://www.overclock3d.net/reviews/gpu_displays/msi_gtx970_gaming_review/6
seems the 970 is actually slightly slower then a 780 in most benchmarks (gaming), that makes an SLI, close to around 1.8x a 780, for £520....
September 22, 2014, 06:49:09 AM
@Ignition75:
The problem with that reasoning, is that there will be plenty of 780 & 780 TI on sale soon enough, and lot's of people will find that the 980 is overpriced for it's segment. Adding to this, that TI versions will come along in the next few months, and the 980's resale price will suffer more dramatically than the 970's (even if it's the same % drop, it's just more 'cash' in the case of the 980).
I would be much happier with a 980 than 2x 970's, personally. The problem is that the price gap between these two is really hard to justify given their relative performance spots. For me, it's 2x 970's for sure (note: my motivation is both mining & gaming).
If anyone wants a couple more 750 TI's for their farm, please PM. I'm going to part ways with either 2x or 4x 750 TI's, and will take a reasonable offer from a fellow cuda miner. They're posted for sale online as well, so might be gone soon also. These are 2x EVGA Superclocked, and 2x EVGA FTW. (Europe)
~ Myagui
The problem with that reasoning, is that there will be plenty of 780 & 780 TI on sale soon enough, and lot's of people will find that the 980 is overpriced for it's segment. Adding to this, that TI versions will come along in the next few months, and the 980's resale price will suffer more dramatically than the 970's (even if it's the same % drop, it's just more 'cash' in the case of the 980).
I would be much happier with a 980 than 2x 970's, personally. The problem is that the price gap between these two is really hard to justify given their relative performance spots. For me, it's 2x 970's for sure (note: my motivation is both mining & gaming).
If anyone wants a couple more 750 TI's for their farm, please PM. I'm going to part ways with either 2x or 4x 750 TI's, and will take a reasonable offer from a fellow cuda miner. They're posted for sale online as well, so might be gone soon also. These are 2x EVGA Superclocked, and 2x EVGA FTW. (Europe)
~ Myagui
September 22, 2014, 06:42:11 AM
it depends, until we see the results for the 970, better results that is, we wont know for sure.
If the 970 is equal to 2.5 750ti's then it will be worth it. Same power roughly, same rough cost, but higher density. the 980 is too expensive to be worth it for miners.
Right now i have to choose between 2 970's or a 980 for gaming and mining (replacements for my 780), and i am leaning towards the 970 side of things
If the 970 is equal to 2.5 750ti's then it will be worth it. Same power roughly, same rough cost, but higher density. the 980 is too expensive to be worth it for miners.
Right now i have to choose between 2 970's or a 980 for gaming and mining (replacements for my 780), and i am leaning towards the 970 side of things
I have a 980 and 970 EVGA superclocked on order, they arrive into Melbourne in a couple of days, I think I will cancel the 980, not sure yet.
You gotta also think of resale value.
Just recently, I sold most of my farm on eBay. GA 290 BF4 Editions sold like hotcakes and got good prices, 280x's sold OK, 270x toxics I'm struggling to get half my money back, even though they are not that old.
Gamers want the big cards so if you want decent resale value, 980 might be the way to go...
Yes but at the current price of them, resale in even a year would be much lower.
Yes my EVGA hydro copper 780 is still around £600 new, but you wont find any on ebay. And for me, mining is second so the gaming is important. And i have a huge case so space isn't an issue either.
Chris, in case you don't know our Jamie, he's gaming while mining so he needs the fastest card in the world.
Send me the pics of your new babies, you ****ing whale, Chris LOL.
OK Nvidia Jesus...Haha...
September 22, 2014, 06:39:57 AM
it depends, until we see the results for the 970, better results that is, we wont know for sure.
If the 970 is equal to 2.5 750ti's then it will be worth it. Same power roughly, same rough cost, but higher density. the 980 is too expensive to be worth it for miners.
Right now i have to choose between 2 970's or a 980 for gaming and mining (replacements for my 780), and i am leaning towards the 970 side of things
If the 970 is equal to 2.5 750ti's then it will be worth it. Same power roughly, same rough cost, but higher density. the 980 is too expensive to be worth it for miners.
Right now i have to choose between 2 970's or a 980 for gaming and mining (replacements for my 780), and i am leaning towards the 970 side of things
I have a 980 and 970 EVGA superclocked on order, they arrive into Melbourne in a couple of days, I think I will cancel the 980, not sure yet.
You gotta also think of resale value.
Just recently, I sold most of my farm on eBay. GA 290 BF4 Editions sold like hotcakes and got good prices, 280x's sold OK, 270x toxics I'm struggling to get half my money back, even though they are not that old.
Gamers want the big cards so if you want decent resale value, 980 might be the way to go...
Yes but at the current price of them, resale in even a year would be much lower.
Yes my EVGA hydro copper 780 is still around £600 new, but you wont find any on ebay. And for me, mining is second so the gaming is important. And i have a huge case so space isn't an issue either.
Chris, in case you don't know our Jamie, he's gaming while mining so he needs the fastest card in the world.
Send me the pics of your new babies, you ****ing whale, Chris LOL.
September 22, 2014, 06:37:06 AM
it depends, until we see the results for the 970, better results that is, we wont know for sure.
If the 970 is equal to 2.5 750ti's then it will be worth it. Same power roughly, same rough cost, but higher density. the 980 is too expensive to be worth it for miners.
Right now i have to choose between 2 970's or a 980 for gaming and mining (replacements for my 780), and i am leaning towards the 970 side of things
If the 970 is equal to 2.5 750ti's then it will be worth it. Same power roughly, same rough cost, but higher density. the 980 is too expensive to be worth it for miners.
Right now i have to choose between 2 970's or a 980 for gaming and mining (replacements for my 780), and i am leaning towards the 970 side of things
I have a 980 and 970 EVGA superclocked on order, they arrive into Melbourne in a couple of days, I think I will cancel the 980, not sure yet.
You gotta also think of resale value.
Just recently, I sold most of my farm on eBay. GA 290 BF4 Editions sold like hotcakes and got good prices, 280x's sold OK, 270x toxics I'm struggling to get half my money back, even though they are not that old.
Gamers want the big cards so if you want decent resale value, 980 might be the way to go...
Yes but at the current price of them, resale in even a year would be much lower.
Yes my EVGA hydro copper 780 is still around £600 new, but you wont find any on ebay. And for me, mining is second so the gaming is important. And i have a huge case so space isn't an issue either.
September 22, 2014, 06:32:39 AM
it depends, until we see the results for the 970, better results that is, we wont know for sure.
If the 970 is equal to 2.5 750ti's then it will be worth it. Same power roughly, same rough cost, but higher density. the 980 is too expensive to be worth it for miners.
Right now i have to choose between 2 970's or a 980 for gaming and mining (replacements for my 780), and i am leaning towards the 970 side of things
If the 970 is equal to 2.5 750ti's then it will be worth it. Same power roughly, same rough cost, but higher density. the 980 is too expensive to be worth it for miners.
Right now i have to choose between 2 970's or a 980 for gaming and mining (replacements for my 780), and i am leaning towards the 970 side of things
I have a 980 and 970 EVGA superclocked on order, they arrive into Melbourne in a couple of days, I think I will cancel the 980, not sure yet.
You gotta also think of resale value.
Just recently, I sold most of my farm on eBay. GA 290 BF4 Editions sold like hotcakes and got good prices, 280x's sold OK, 270x toxics I'm struggling to get half my money back, even though they are not that old.
Gamers want the big cards so if you want decent resale value, 980 might be the way to go...
September 22, 2014, 06:26:07 AM
Drivers are installed for all GPUs in device manager.
If I POST/display off an NV GPU ccminer detects the cards and is able to mine. Just not when on iGPU.
I'm using the H81 BTC Pro btw, I had read some others with this board might have been having this issue, where they had to have a display on one of the cards...
If I POST/display off an NV GPU ccminer detects the cards and is able to mine. Just not when on iGPU.
I'm using the H81 BTC Pro btw, I had read some others with this board might have been having this issue, where they had to have a display on one of the cards...
I'm using several of those and haven't had that issue. I think you might misconfigured your BIOS. You have to turn render standby or whatever it's called off along with a few other things.
September 22, 2014, 06:05:15 AM
no just the display drivers. the cuda runtime that is needed is in the drivers already
That's 2 hours of my life I want back lol...
So it seems the GTX980 and 970 didn't make the big splash everyone was expecting.
So where to from here for someone that wants to update his farm a little?
Just keep buying 750ti's until they release the 980ti and 970ti?
Stop selling my AMD cards?
Hard to know which way to go, seems like things are hanging in the balance right now.
it depends, until we see the results for the 970, better results that is, we wont know for sure.
If the 970 is equal to 2.5 750ti's then it will be worth it. Same power roughly, same rough cost, but higher density. the 980 is too expensive to be worth it for miners.
Right now i have to choose between 2 970's or a 980 for gaming and mining (replacements for my 780), and i am leaning towards the 970 side of things
September 22, 2014, 05:58:46 AM
no just the display drivers. the cuda runtime that is needed is in the drivers already
That's 2 hours of my life I want back lol...
So it seems the GTX980 and 970 didn't make the big splash everyone was expecting.
So where to from here for someone that wants to update his farm a little?
Just keep buying 750ti's until they release the 980ti and 970ti?
Stop selling my AMD cards?
Hard to know which way to go, seems like things are hanging in the balance right now.
September 22, 2014, 04:43:06 AM
Hi all,
Is there any way that ccminer/nvminer can detect that it can run CUDA if the primary display GPU is not NV? I.e. there are multiple NV cards installed, but I am POSTing and displaying off iGPU, and in which case nvminer is throwing an error about not being able to find CUDA devices. When POSTing off an NV GPU this issue does not occur.
I am asking because I need this functionality for a special configuration where I must POST/display off iGPU.
Thanks!
Is there any way that ccminer/nvminer can detect that it can run CUDA if the primary display GPU is not NV? I.e. there are multiple NV cards installed, but I am POSTing and displaying off iGPU, and in which case nvminer is throwing an error about not being able to find CUDA devices. When POSTing off an NV GPU this issue does not occur.
I am asking because I need this functionality for a special configuration where I must POST/display off iGPU.
Thanks!
The only thing you need is to have the drivers installed.
So no need for cuda and visual studio?
no just the display drivers. the cuda runtime that is needed is in the drivers already
September 22, 2014, 04:41:05 AM
Hi all,
Is there any way that ccminer/nvminer can detect that it can run CUDA if the primary display GPU is not NV? I.e. there are multiple NV cards installed, but I am POSTing and displaying off iGPU, and in which case nvminer is throwing an error about not being able to find CUDA devices. When POSTing off an NV GPU this issue does not occur.
I am asking because I need this functionality for a special configuration where I must POST/display off iGPU.
Thanks!
Is there any way that ccminer/nvminer can detect that it can run CUDA if the primary display GPU is not NV? I.e. there are multiple NV cards installed, but I am POSTing and displaying off iGPU, and in which case nvminer is throwing an error about not being able to find CUDA devices. When POSTing off an NV GPU this issue does not occur.
I am asking because I need this functionality for a special configuration where I must POST/display off iGPU.
Thanks!
The only thing you need is to have the drivers installed.
So no need for cuda and visual studio?
September 22, 2014, 01:52:13 AM
Drivers are installed for all GPUs in device manager.
If I POST/display off an NV GPU ccminer detects the cards and is able to mine. Just not when on iGPU.
I'm using the H81 BTC Pro btw, I had read some others with this board might have been having this issue, where they had to have a display on one of the cards...
If I POST/display off an NV GPU ccminer detects the cards and is able to mine. Just not when on iGPU.
I'm using the H81 BTC Pro btw, I had read some others with this board might have been having this issue, where they had to have a display on one of the cards...
September 22, 2014, 01:09:24 AM
Hi all,
Is there any way that ccminer/nvminer can detect that it can run CUDA if the primary display GPU is not NV? I.e. there are multiple NV cards installed, but I am POSTing and displaying off iGPU, and in which case nvminer is throwing an error about not being able to find CUDA devices. When POSTing off an NV GPU this issue does not occur.
I am asking because I need this functionality for a special configuration where I must POST/display off iGPU.
Thanks!
Is there any way that ccminer/nvminer can detect that it can run CUDA if the primary display GPU is not NV? I.e. there are multiple NV cards installed, but I am POSTing and displaying off iGPU, and in which case nvminer is throwing an error about not being able to find CUDA devices. When POSTing off an NV GPU this issue does not occur.
I am asking because I need this functionality for a special configuration where I must POST/display off iGPU.
Thanks!
The only thing you need is to have the drivers installed.
September 22, 2014, 12:10:02 AM
Hi all,
Is there any way that ccminer/nvminer can detect that it can run CUDA if the primary display GPU is not NV? I.e. there are multiple NV cards installed, but I am POSTing and displaying off iGPU, and in which case nvminer is throwing an error about not being able to find CUDA devices. When POSTing off an NV GPU this issue does not occur.
I am asking because I need this functionality for a special configuration where I must POST/display off iGPU.
Thanks!
Is there any way that ccminer/nvminer can detect that it can run CUDA if the primary display GPU is not NV? I.e. there are multiple NV cards installed, but I am POSTing and displaying off iGPU, and in which case nvminer is throwing an error about not being able to find CUDA devices. When POSTing off an NV GPU this issue does not occur.
I am asking because I need this functionality for a special configuration where I must POST/display off iGPU.
Thanks!
Jump to: