@crypto-rainbow Why you ignore my question?
Who possesses addresses from top-10 except for the first three addresses.
And why such huge sums of ONION within several days have been sent to them?
If we speak about transparency and equitable initial distribution, then the community has to know to whom these addresses belong and whether they will participate in POS. It is especially important in view of possible fast emergence at the exchanges.
My guess is that they belong to developers, or other bounty wallets. No matter what it's okay that the developers of this great project keeps some coins. Did you think they would work so hard, and just give it all away? of course not. I definently appreciate that the amazing devs on this project keeps a lot of coints for themselves.
maybe it someone who join the airdrop using many account so he can get many of Onion Coin
btw how the airdrop work ?
This is simply not possible: only 300k coins have been distributed, which means the amount present on the mentioned accounts in red, which is around 2 million, does not correspond.
If you sum the amounts on the 7 accounts, you have a little under 2 million coins. If you look at the project specs, the total mineable amount is 2 million coins.
They cannot be mined coins as well : we have seen a member on the forum stating that he was dedicating 40Mhs/s to mine 5 onions per day. If we consider the first account with 500k coins, and the beginning of the mining process 14 days ago (airdrops), that is 35k coins per day.
With some easy calculation you can estimate the processing power at around 285 Ths/s (roughly)
Highly unlikely (even with lesser numbers).
the most logical conclusion is that these coins are dev-held and spread through different wallets for redundancy purposes (in case of a hack, not all coins are lost)
If I am right, then the total amount of the 7 addresses will drop incrementally (with the increasing number of drops).
I hope this reassures everyone here
P.S : thank you @bumblebee24 for strengthening my understanding, it appears yes I was wrong in my previous conclusion.