Topic: [ANN] DigitalNote |XDN| - ICCO Announce - NEWS - page 39. (Read 450281 times)
Think digitalnote will reach a a penny soon?
Very well, raise the price of more than 100%.
my xdn are stock on poloniex for months now, the wallet has been disabled for months, they don't even reply to support tickets.
Yeah...there was a period of time where apparently Poloniex helped users get their XDN out of their exchange but I also have a couple thousand coins in there I would like to get out. They haven't responded to me either (about a month now). Hopefully you don't have too much on there! The price has more than doubled in the last day alone! Really nice volume too.
my xdn are stock on poloniex for months now, the wallet has been disabled for months, they don't even reply to support tickets.
Is anyone familiar with the merge mining of Digitalnote? Afaik it is only available on minergate, who I've never used at all.
What I'm curious about is why does FCN have a much higher hashrate than XDN? If I recall merge mining was added to both by dNote, with FCN supposed to serve as a testnet of sorts. So:
Why is the less valuable coin getting so much more hashrate, both on minergate pool and on entire network?
Can't you normally mergemine multiple coins with one parent coin? Is this not the case with dNote and minergate implementation? Only one merged coin at a time?
Even if you can only merge mine one at a time, why so many choose FCN over XDN?
Also just curious about people's insights in general that have used minergate for merge mining cryptonotes.
What I'm curious about is why does FCN have a much higher hashrate than XDN? If I recall merge mining was added to both by dNote, with FCN supposed to serve as a testnet of sorts. So:
Why is the less valuable coin getting so much more hashrate, both on minergate pool and on entire network?
Can't you normally mergemine multiple coins with one parent coin? Is this not the case with dNote and minergate implementation? Only one merged coin at a time?
Even if you can only merge mine one at a time, why so many choose FCN over XDN?
Also just curious about people's insights in general that have used minergate for merge mining cryptonotes.
Bump. Nobody merge mining or have any idea about this?
Could be because you can only mine xdn with xmr together.
At fcn it looks already different, which goes with qcn, inf8, dsh, and xmr.
Maybe because of this?!
But why though? Wasn't merge mining implemented the same in both coins? And why can't you mine Monero and merge mine both XDN and FCN at same time?
Think this is on minergate, which coin is to mine with others,
they have determined it in the gui.
After which they have decided, no idea.
Certainly it would work different, for example fcn with xdn, or dsh with xmr.
The best way to ask directly at Minergate, is whether this can change and whether they do it.
Cool would be, to be able to select every cryptonote coin, with each other cryptonote coin to mine.
Is there any real news or development behind the price rise? What do you expect the price in the future to be?
Dnote made announcment on ICCO here?! Long time he is offline.
ICCO Terms and answers to some questions by dNote on Ryver today (https://digitalnote.ryver.com):
"1. HitBTC will open new market called XDN-ICCO
2. Any user will be able to fund his XDN-ICCO hitbtc address with DigitalNote. This is called Initial Crowdfunding stage. One week is a duration of IC stage.
XDN-ICCO wallet will be open only for deposit for one week.
After one week deposits to XDN-ICCO wallet will be closed.
After that users shares will be calculated.
Imagine 1000 users will fund XDN-ICCO wallet with 1000 XDN in total, like every person will send 1 XDN. Single user share = 1/1000 in that case.
After one week the second stage will be started.
The new XDN-ICCO sale market will be open at HitBTC with a fixed 320000XDN lots and fixed prices, 0.5->0.6->0.7BTC.
CO stage will have a max. duration of 4 weeks. If all XDN-ICCO funds will be sold earlier, ICCO will be closed.
After that the amount of sold XDN will be calculated and participants will get BTC according to their share.
In case there will be unsold XDN participants will have XDN refund as well as BTC reward, according to their share.
1. There will be several wallets to ensure funds security. 2. There will be cold wallets to ensure funds security 3. Cold wallets will be controlled by XDN team. Since HitBTC don't need to have XDN on hot wallets because there will be no withdrawals from XDN-ICCO wallets before ICCO ends. Also I want to admit - HitBTC is an exchange with high reputation and big trading volumes.
You can treat ICCO as a "Great coins redistribution" for easy understanding."
I don't really understand this whole ICCO thing, but the XDN price is rising rapidly, which is good
Is anyone familiar with the merge mining of Digitalnote? Afaik it is only available on minergate, who I've never used at all.
What I'm curious about is why does FCN have a much higher hashrate than XDN? If I recall merge mining was added to both by dNote, with FCN supposed to serve as a testnet of sorts. So:
Why is the less valuable coin getting so much more hashrate, both on minergate pool and on entire network?
Can't you normally mergemine multiple coins with one parent coin? Is this not the case with dNote and minergate implementation? Only one merged coin at a time?
Even if you can only merge mine one at a time, why so many choose FCN over XDN?
Also just curious about people's insights in general that have used minergate for merge mining cryptonotes.
What I'm curious about is why does FCN have a much higher hashrate than XDN? If I recall merge mining was added to both by dNote, with FCN supposed to serve as a testnet of sorts. So:
Why is the less valuable coin getting so much more hashrate, both on minergate pool and on entire network?
Can't you normally mergemine multiple coins with one parent coin? Is this not the case with dNote and minergate implementation? Only one merged coin at a time?
Even if you can only merge mine one at a time, why so many choose FCN over XDN?
Also just curious about people's insights in general that have used minergate for merge mining cryptonotes.
Bump. Nobody merge mining or have any idea about this?
Could be because you can only mine xdn with xmr together.
At fcn it looks already different, which goes with qcn, inf8, dsh, and xmr.
Maybe because of this?!
But why though? Wasn't merge mining implemented the same in both coins? And why can't you mine Monero and merge mine both XDN and FCN at same time?
XDN was pumped hard with volume of over 620 Bitcoins and an increase of 155.40%. This is typical pump groups involvement seems here. The way price reached at highest for last 24 hours and then declined back at some middle leveled price. I think it got whatever they wanted already with so much volume and is late to join the party at this point.
why is polo keeping their wallet offline..... any one know why their xdn wallet has been offline so long?
XDN seems to be crazy :-).
Yes, to the moon...
What's going on ?
I sell ? I buy ?
My sell order is at 315 sat. No idea of he result in the next hours/days.
Yes, to the moon...
What's going on ?
I sell ? I buy ?
My sell order is at 315 sat. No idea of he result in the next hours/days.
Is anyone familiar with the merge mining of Digitalnote? Afaik it is only available on minergate, who I've never used at all.
What I'm curious about is why does FCN have a much higher hashrate than XDN? If I recall merge mining was added to both by dNote, with FCN supposed to serve as a testnet of sorts. So:
Why is the less valuable coin getting so much more hashrate, both on minergate pool and on entire network?
Can't you normally mergemine multiple coins with one parent coin? Is this not the case with dNote and minergate implementation? Only one merged coin at a time?
Even if you can only merge mine one at a time, why so many choose FCN over XDN?
Also just curious about people's insights in general that have used minergate for merge mining cryptonotes.
What I'm curious about is why does FCN have a much higher hashrate than XDN? If I recall merge mining was added to both by dNote, with FCN supposed to serve as a testnet of sorts. So:
Why is the less valuable coin getting so much more hashrate, both on minergate pool and on entire network?
Can't you normally mergemine multiple coins with one parent coin? Is this not the case with dNote and minergate implementation? Only one merged coin at a time?
Even if you can only merge mine one at a time, why so many choose FCN over XDN?
Also just curious about people's insights in general that have used minergate for merge mining cryptonotes.
Bump. Nobody merge mining or have any idea about this?
Could be because you can only mine xdn with xmr together.
At fcn it looks already different, which goes with qcn, inf8, dsh, and xmr.
Maybe because of this?!
Is anyone familiar with the merge mining of Digitalnote? Afaik it is only available on minergate, who I've never used at all.
What I'm curious about is why does FCN have a much higher hashrate than XDN? If I recall merge mining was added to both by dNote, with FCN supposed to serve as a testnet of sorts. So:
Why is the less valuable coin getting so much more hashrate, both on minergate pool and on entire network?
Can't you normally mergemine multiple coins with one parent coin? Is this not the case with dNote and minergate implementation? Only one merged coin at a time?
Even if you can only merge mine one at a time, why so many choose FCN over XDN?
Also just curious about people's insights in general that have used minergate for merge mining cryptonotes.
What I'm curious about is why does FCN have a much higher hashrate than XDN? If I recall merge mining was added to both by dNote, with FCN supposed to serve as a testnet of sorts. So:
Why is the less valuable coin getting so much more hashrate, both on minergate pool and on entire network?
Can't you normally mergemine multiple coins with one parent coin? Is this not the case with dNote and minergate implementation? Only one merged coin at a time?
Even if you can only merge mine one at a time, why so many choose FCN over XDN?
Also just curious about people's insights in general that have used minergate for merge mining cryptonotes.
Bump. Nobody merge mining or have any idea about this?
My guess is that big whales don't bother to buy on each two exchange platforms as many XDN as they can, for a question of time. Better to have them all in a place.
Even at 156 satoshis XDN is still very cheap for a big whales. It's not as expensive as BTC.
Even at 156 satoshis XDN is still very cheap for a big whales. It's not as expensive as BTC.
I think that there are a couple benefits beyond pricing, too:
1) Redistribution of XDN to a broader audience. Basically it will allow others to have a larger stake in the currency without having been an early adopter etc.
2) Large investors can buy a bigger parcel of XDN at a time without heavily effecting the market price on the exchanges.
I think that the reason why people would buy the coins at 2-3x their current market price is because that could soon be the market price. When the XDN ICCO begins the selling phase, the price of XDN will probably catch up to the ICCO parcel price (per XDN) naturally.
I personally don't think the ICCO is a necessity, but I do think it is a great option. Meaning that I think it only opens more doors but is not a requirement for the coin's success. Holders can also choose to participate or not, but it is not a requirement. The tech is very strong, the community is growing, and the devs are on point. I think that the coin is extremely undervalued and that the ICCO price is still a great deal, especially when you consider it as a competitor to Monero (which it is--they were both forked from Bytecoin). It's interesting to look at the market caps and total coin supplies of Monero and Bytecoin vs DigitalNote. If you understand the crypto market and how those coins are perceived, you will understand why the potential with DigitalNote is huge.
Does somebody understand this ICCO thing ?
What happens to the coins sent to the ICCO offering exactly ?
And what happens to the ones we are holding in wallets ?!?!
In general if all XDN will be sold at the very first price stage and you will put say 1mln you will get 1mln*156 satoshi so 1.56BTC. In that case you will receive it on your HitBTC BTC account after the end of ICCO and will be able to withdraw it at any time. What happens to the coins sent to the ICCO offering exactly ?
And what happens to the ones we are holding in wallets ?!?!
If ICCO goes wrong you will have all your coins back.
If you leave your XDN coins to your personal wallet and decide to not partecipate to ICCO, nothing will happen to your coins.
As you can see by partecipating to ICCO you have something gain and nothing to lose.
Go and partecipate to ICCO before it's too late.
Any further question about xdn ICCO you can do it here: https://digitalnote.ryver.com/application/signup/members/RW4rHGiKm9nPu3Z
You have DNOTE and the fast growing community to help you out.
The question is why would someone buys in the 2nd stage (CO) at 156 satoshis, if XDN are available at around 60 satoshis on exchanges ?!
Even at 156 satoshis XDN is still very cheap for a big whales. It's not as expensive as BTC.
Haters gonna hate and be left in the pond. 
If you want to stay up to date, I suggest swinging by on Ryver https://digitalnote.ryver.com/application/signup/members/RW4rHGiKm9nPu3Z, or the subreddit https://www.reddit.com/r/digitalNote/ or follow the news on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/digitalnote/
If you want to stay up to date, I suggest swinging by on Ryver https://digitalnote.ryver.com/application/signup/members/RW4rHGiKm9nPu3Z, or the subreddit https://www.reddit.com/r/digitalNote/ or follow the news on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/digitalnote/
where we have Dnote?!! he was online here???
He's been online & is currently online on Ryver. I asked him what is the reason that he is not active and he replied " Can't handle 1.SMF forum format 2. Parts of Bitcointalk community are very rude, etc 3. Bitcointalk experiencing a serious security problems. 4. There is no life interaction at BTCtalk, etc "
The fact is he miserable coward.
He prefer not to answer to our rude and simple questions.
He likes to brainfucking noobs much more.
Seems like he was spot on about rude people
where we have Dnote?!! he was online here???
He's been online & is currently online on Ryver. I asked him what is the reason that he is not active and he replied " Can't handle 1.SMF forum format 2. Parts of Bitcointalk community are very rude, etc 3. Bitcointalk experiencing a serious security problems. 4. There is no life interaction at BTCtalk, etc "
The fact is he miserable coward.
He prefer not to answer to our rude and simple questions.
He likes to brainfucking noobs much more.
This is for you XDN haters!
Jump to: