what is ur opionion to block time versus blockchain size and synctime
u would love a smaller chain and faster sync and accept slower blocktime?
we run now average 52sec blocktime
one of the fastest coins
but i have to say from my perspective we see not much advantage to be faster than others
beside faster raise of blockchain size and longer sync times for people who open wallet just once every 14 days
i full agree 10 min blocktime like bitcoin have is stoneage
what u think would be a good blocktime and keep in mind slower is always more slim chain and faster sync time
52 sec (like now)
100 sec
150 sec (like LTC)
300 sec
600 sec (like BTC)
I think of DMD more like an Asset or a Commodity at its current Stage.
i dont think that we need 52sec blocktime or 20mb blocks yet.
Maybe DMD should go for the Path of being a more modular, better developed XCP in the Future?
So the Core-Coin could be simply the fuel for the other stuff build on Top of DMD via sidechains or something?
At its current state i think the smallest Chain would be the best solution aswell.
So even 10 mins and as small as possible would be fine to me.
That's exactly what we have in mind when talking about the roadmap and 'services on top'.
We very much want to see DMD Diamond becoming the fuel that powers stuff and gets utility value in the process.
Whatever the final platform will be it won't be reliant on DMD block speed.
I think 150 seconds per block is a good compromise. It's a reasonable amount of time someone would need to wait and as DMD is not exactly a consumer coin that setup would be more appropriate/reflective of true nature of this coin.