HR, you've always produced good pieces of writing but this time this feels more like a rant. I'm not sure what you aim to achieve by saying the above, as it feels as if we were sitting there drinking good wine, not doing anything and having a good laugh reading posts of people who struggle. Which in my view is an assumption taken way too far.
I didn't beg anyone to stay as you implied, I just hinted that there is no point in wasting electricity on some not working pool, while something that might just solve the issue is arriving. We work with other people and are dependant on their availability.. when it comes it comes.
I didn't beg anyone to stay as you implied, I just hinted that there is no point in wasting electricity on some not working pool, while something that might just solve the issue is arriving. We work with other people and are dependant on their availability.. when it comes it comes.
popshot, I didn't quote you on anything other than your initial, pre blockchain 386228 stop re-post you did of Alex's post on April 26. Did you miss the compare and contrast between now and then basic idea of my whole post? Where do you get the idea that I was quoting you about begging?
Rant? Have you read the post? Have you reflected on what was said? A flippant attitude is inconsistent with serious efforts to deal with a challenging situation. That's what I said. Would you, or anyone else argue with that? You might argue that you all are not being flippant, displaying a general sense of being disconnected, but you can't argue the premise, correct? Now, if you want to argue that you are NOT creating an overall impression inconsistent with the serious nature of the challenge you have before you, you'll need to point out all those serious posts that you Devs have made, and challenge others to post the contrary: cheeky, glib, frivolous, impertinent, offhanded comments, or even the outright ignoring or glossing over of important questions, that completely fly in the face of the current situation. I think you know how that contest would turn out. I'm just describing the situation, but you've taken it as a rant. Think about it again. A rant?
It's not the good old days when things were going great like back then in your re-post of Alex's post, things are radically different now.
The comment you referred to, by the way, was this one (and the word I used was "pleading"):
this time we wont hurry we will deliver stable software and tested in every thinkable usecase
it might be possible we pre-release a pool only mining patched wallet but even that will need some time
people have always the choice
stay with us
Now, if you're not even reading and thinking about what's been described, that would be worse still, but I'm going to give you the benefit of the doubt and assume that since you're so busy, you saw something that wasn't there, interpreted things incorrectly, and made an honest mistake.
But make no mistake, people don't take the time I've taken just for fun. I'm not into wasting my time, and if this is falling on deaf ears . . . it's looking to me more and more like you're all in denial, if that's the case, I'll be done and wishing you all the best (as I alluded to in my last post).
It's up to you.
