[ANN] | DUSK Network | Privacy-oriented blockchain for Digital Securities! - page 144.

belechau

full member

Activity: 686

Merit: 100

Quote from: Rigorous on September 30, 2018, 04:51:41 PM

I was just checking out the Dusk Github organization and noticed it has 4 members. Now I see there is also a new blog post announcing 2 new members one of which is already in the Dusk Github organization.
https://medium.com/dusk-network/adding-a-wealth-of-knowledge-to-dusk-core-46b57ab9eb92

This was mentioned earlier, about the expansion of the team, I hope that good members and advisers join the project and help in its development and expansion

Roels Major

member

Activity: 191

Merit: 56

Quote from: Rigorous on September 30, 2018, 04:51:41 PM

I was just checking out the Dusk Github organization and noticed it has 4 members. Now I see there is also a new blog post announcing 2 new members one of which is already in the Dusk Github organization.

https://medium.com/dusk-network/adding-a-wealth-of-knowledge-to-dusk-core-46b57ab9eb92

Would be very interesting to see github progress of development but so far, nothing has been done except published whitepaper.

The github activities is one of important parameter. GitHub activity is an interesting metric when analyzing ICOs and crypto projects. There are a couple of websites that try to track dev activity and compare projects, but if you dig deeper in their stats you will find the result is not good.

Rigorous

full member

Activity: 574

Merit: 115

I was just checking out the Dusk Github organization and noticed it has 4 members. Now I see there is also a new blog post announcing 2 new members one of which is already in the Dusk Github organization.

https://medium.com/dusk-network/adding-a-wealth-of-knowledge-to-dusk-core-46b57ab9eb92

loup

full member

Activity: 462

Merit: 100

Quote from: aveon on September 30, 2018, 01:13:08 PM

Quote from: o48o on September 30, 2018, 12:49:27 PM

Quote from: king_of_alts on September 30, 2018, 01:30:46 AM

Quote from: omwibya on September 30, 2018, 12:49:27 AM

Quote from: Rigorous on September 29, 2018, 05:00:14 PM

Really glad you are removing the bonuses. I have raised the issue with bonuses before. Besides hindering decentralization, they distort the market in such a way much of the risk is transferred from private sale investors to public sale investors. I hope other projects follow this fair practice of equal risk and opportunity.

they must be really confident to do that. and raising the cap is an interesting move.

Yes, this is something I have never seen before. It raises the hardcap as you mentioned and in times like this such decision means they are very confident in the project.

There has been some ico projects without bonuses in the past. The one thing they had in common that people invested just in the last minutes, or on the last day, not before

They were not private sales though.

Well, I hope they are not just pretending to be THAT sure in their creation, and there are definite reasons for their confidence.

Giving big bonuses many times causes that some investors sell their tokens quickly causing a price drop. So I think it's a way to guarantee the value of token.

ParRus

full member

Activity: 490

Merit: 104

Quote from: aveon on September 30, 2018, 01:13:08 PM

Quote from: o48o on September 30, 2018, 12:49:27 PM

Quote from: king_of_alts on September 30, 2018, 01:30:46 AM

Quote from: omwibya on September 30, 2018, 12:49:27 AM

Quote from: Rigorous on September 29, 2018, 05:00:14 PM

Really glad you are removing the bonuses. I have raised the issue with bonuses before. Besides hindering decentralization, they distort the market in such a way much of the risk is transferred from private sale investors to public sale investors. I hope other projects follow this fair practice of equal risk and opportunity.

they must be really confident to do that. and raising the cap is an interesting move.

Yes, this is something I have never seen before. It raises the hardcap as you mentioned and in times like this such decision means they are very confident in the project.

There has been some ico projects without bonuses in the past. The one thing they had in common that people invested just in the last minutes, or on the last day, not before

They were not private sales though.

Well, I hope they are not just pretending to be THAT sure in their creation, and there are definite reasons for their confidence.

Do you think what they already have private investors with whom this project anyway will be launched? I also think that they should have reasons for such confidence in success.

traveler007

member

Activity: 840

Merit: 10

ZooomEx- a new cryptocurrency exchange!

I know a lot of private coins already (Dash, Monero, Zcash, Spectrecoin, Deeponion). What advntages you offer before this coins?

aveon

member

Activity: 434

Merit: 10

Quote from: o48o on September 30, 2018, 12:49:27 PM

Quote from: king_of_alts on September 30, 2018, 01:30:46 AM

Quote from: omwibya on September 30, 2018, 12:49:27 AM

Quote from: Rigorous on September 29, 2018, 05:00:14 PM

Really glad you are removing the bonuses. I have raised the issue with bonuses before. Besides hindering decentralization, they distort the market in such a way much of the risk is transferred from private sale investors to public sale investors. I hope other projects follow this fair practice of equal risk and opportunity.

they must be really confident to do that. and raising the cap is an interesting move.

Yes, this is something I have never seen before. It raises the hardcap as you mentioned and in times like this such decision means they are very confident in the project.

There has been some ico projects without bonuses in the past. The one thing they had in common that people invested just in the last minutes, or on the last day, not before

They were not private sales though.

Well, I hope they are not just pretending to be THAT sure in their creation, and there are definite reasons for their confidence.

o48o

legendary

Activity: 3052

Merit: 1168

Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform

Quote from: king_of_alts on September 30, 2018, 01:30:46 AM

Quote from: omwibya on September 30, 2018, 12:49:27 AM

Quote from: Rigorous on September 29, 2018, 05:00:14 PM

Really glad you are removing the bonuses. I have raised the issue with bonuses before. Besides hindering decentralization, they distort the market in such a way much of the risk is transferred from private sale investors to public sale investors. I hope other projects follow this fair practice of equal risk and opportunity.

they must be really confident to do that. and raising the cap is an interesting move.

Yes, this is something I have never seen before. It raises the hardcap as you mentioned and in times like this such decision means they are very confident in the project.

There has been some ico projects without bonuses in the past. The one thing they had in common that people invested just in the last minutes, or on the last day, not before

They were not private sales though.

bitcoin-shark

hero member

Activity: 2968

Merit: 605

Quote from: king_of_alts on September 30, 2018, 01:30:46 AM

Quote from: omwibya on September 30, 2018, 12:49:27 AM

Quote from: Rigorous on September 29, 2018, 05:00:14 PM

Really glad you are removing the bonuses. I have raised the issue with bonuses before. Besides hindering decentralization, they distort the market in such a way much of the risk is transferred from private sale investors to public sale investors. I hope other projects follow this fair practice of equal risk and opportunity.

they must be really confident to do that. and raising the cap is an interesting move.

Yes, this is something I have never seen before. It raises the hardcap as you mentioned and in times like this such decision means they are very confident in the project.

i think they did it because they received investments in the private sale beyond their expectations so given the high investor interest in the project they prolonged the private sale and raised the hard cap, i think they did well, the project will be successful...

the_donald

full member

Activity: 588

Merit: 100

Quote from: levyashin on September 30, 2018, 09:36:02 AM

Quote from: kraterion on September 30, 2018, 03:46:56 AM

Quote from: clasico on September 29, 2018, 07:05:39 PM

Is Dusk have a own blockchain? And is Dusk have a protocol masternode?

Yes Dusk will have own blockchain and it will have two type of nodes: (just quoting the community manager here)

Network nodes - transactional network clients. They compete with each other by locking an arbitrary amount for the generating and proposing of new blocks. Block generation is a computationally light task and therefore running a node does not require neither specialised equipment nor storage. The intention is for normal mobile devices to be able to run as a node within the network. The non-deterministic nature of the bidding process makes it so that even nodes bidding the minimum amount of DUSK have a fair chance to win the block generation sortition lottery

Provisioners - These are nodes that have committed a certain minimum stake to the Dusk Network and take care of more network intensive tasks such as block verification, voting, and notarization (VVN operations). These types of nodes are non-transactional
The intention is to create an economy where nodes compete for block rewards, while Provisioners earn a steady ROI.

I wonder how much do we need to spend on ico to make our own masternode and get passive income.

maybe they should post such calculations so people can associate and buy their own masternode.

levyashin

sr. member

Activity: 980

Merit: 276

$CYBERCASH METAVERSE

Quote from: kraterion on September 30, 2018, 03:46:56 AM

Quote from: clasico on September 29, 2018, 07:05:39 PM

Is Dusk have a own blockchain? And is Dusk have a protocol masternode?

Yes Dusk will have own blockchain and it will have two type of nodes: (just quoting the community manager here)

Network nodes - transactional network clients. They compete with each other by locking an arbitrary amount for the generating and proposing of new blocks. Block generation is a computationally light task and therefore running a node does not require neither specialised equipment nor storage. The intention is for normal mobile devices to be able to run as a node within the network. The non-deterministic nature of the bidding process makes it so that even nodes bidding the minimum amount of DUSK have a fair chance to win the block generation sortition lottery

Provisioners - These are nodes that have committed a certain minimum stake to the Dusk Network and take care of more network intensive tasks such as block verification, voting, and notarization (VVN operations). These types of nodes are non-transactional
The intention is to create an economy where nodes compete for block rewards, while Provisioners earn a steady ROI.

I wonder how much do we need to spend on ico to make our own masternode and get passive income.

Frank37

sr. member

Activity: 770

Merit: 250

CryptoTalk.Org - Get Paid for every Post!

Quote from: wissy on September 30, 2018, 09:20:08 AM

Quote from: batako on September 30, 2018, 04:16:07 AM

Quote from: rjp55 on September 30, 2018, 02:59:24 AM

Quote from: king_of_alts on September 30, 2018, 01:30:46 AM

Quote from: omwibya on September 30, 2018, 12:49:27 AM

Quote from: Rigorous on September 29, 2018, 05:00:14 PM

Really glad you are removing the bonuses. I have raised the issue with bonuses before. Besides hindering decentralization, they distort the market in such a way much of the risk is transferred from private sale investors to public sale investors. I hope other projects follow this fair practice of equal risk and opportunity.

they must be really confident to do that. and raising the cap is an interesting move.

Yes, this is something I have never seen before. It raises the hardcap as you mentioned and in times like this such decision means they are very confident in the project.

Too much confidence increases the risk of failure but they are well known people in their areas so i don't think it can be an issue for dusk.

I think they are already calculate the risk and with such decision I am sure they do believe that the project will run as planned based on their evaluations.

I hope they know what they are doing and they thoroughly considered all the risks. Because such decision can have some bad consequences.

Yes I hope so too. You cant calculate such risks unless you already have enough investors with solid commitments.

wissy

full member

Activity: 658

Merit: 102

Quote from: batako on September 30, 2018, 04:16:07 AM

Quote from: rjp55 on September 30, 2018, 02:59:24 AM

Quote from: king_of_alts on September 30, 2018, 01:30:46 AM

Quote from: omwibya on September 30, 2018, 12:49:27 AM

Quote from: Rigorous on September 29, 2018, 05:00:14 PM

Really glad you are removing the bonuses. I have raised the issue with bonuses before. Besides hindering decentralization, they distort the market in such a way much of the risk is transferred from private sale investors to public sale investors. I hope other projects follow this fair practice of equal risk and opportunity.

they must be really confident to do that. and raising the cap is an interesting move.

Yes, this is something I have never seen before. It raises the hardcap as you mentioned and in times like this such decision means they are very confident in the project.

Too much confidence increases the risk of failure but they are well known people in their areas so i don't think it can be an issue for dusk.

I think they are already calculate the risk and with such decision I am sure they do believe that the project will run as planned based on their evaluations.

I hope they know what they are doing and they thoroughly considered all the risks. Because such decision can have some bad consequences.

lobat999

sr. member

Activity: 1078

Merit: 310

Quote from: omwibya on September 30, 2018, 12:49:27 AM

Quote from: Rigorous on September 29, 2018, 05:00:14 PM

Really glad you are removing the bonuses. I have raised the issue with bonuses before. Besides hindering decentralization, they distort the market in such a way much of the risk is transferred from private sale investors to public sale investors. I hope other projects follow this fair practice of equal risk and opportunity.

they must be really confident to do that. and raising the cap is an interesting move.

As with previous history of ICO's, most projects with big bonus schemes don't help the project / token at all especially with regards to its price. So it a wise decision to not implement it.

Makkara

full member

Activity: 1064

Merit: 166

It's quite a lot of money, a mvp could go a long way if it could demonstrates some of the feature.

Nowadays there are many team making not so easy to accomplish promises, hipe you can convince people you can actually do everything described here.

batako

sr. member

Activity: 1022

Merit: 252

Quote from: rjp55 on September 30, 2018, 02:59:24 AM

Quote from: king_of_alts on September 30, 2018, 01:30:46 AM

Quote from: omwibya on September 30, 2018, 12:49:27 AM

Quote from: Rigorous on September 29, 2018, 05:00:14 PM

Really glad you are removing the bonuses. I have raised the issue with bonuses before. Besides hindering decentralization, they distort the market in such a way much of the risk is transferred from private sale investors to public sale investors. I hope other projects follow this fair practice of equal risk and opportunity.

they must be really confident to do that. and raising the cap is an interesting move.

Yes, this is something I have never seen before. It raises the hardcap as you mentioned and in times like this such decision means they are very confident in the project.

Too much confidence increases the risk of failure but they are well known people in their areas so i don't think it can be an issue for dusk.

I think they are already calculate the risk and with such decision I am sure they do believe that the project will run as planned based on their evaluations.

kraterion

full member

Activity: 616

Merit: 145

🚀🚀 ATHERO.IO 🚀🚀

Quote from: clasico on September 29, 2018, 07:05:39 PM

Is Dusk have a own blockchain? And is Dusk have a protocol masternode?

Yes Dusk will have own blockchain and it will have two type of nodes: (just quoting the community manager here)

Network nodes - transactional network clients. They compete with each other by locking an arbitrary amount for the generating and proposing of new blocks. Block generation is a computationally light task and therefore running a node does not require neither specialised equipment nor storage. The intention is for normal mobile devices to be able to run as a node within the network. The non-deterministic nature of the bidding process makes it so that even nodes bidding the minimum amount of DUSK have a fair chance to win the block generation sortition lottery

Provisioners - These are nodes that have committed a certain minimum stake to the Dusk Network and take care of more network intensive tasks such as block verification, voting, and notarization (VVN operations). These types of nodes are non-transactional
The intention is to create an economy where nodes compete for block rewards, while Provisioners earn a steady ROI.

rjp55

sr. member

Activity: 798

Merit: 250

CurioInvest [IEO Live]

Quote from: king_of_alts on September 30, 2018, 01:30:46 AM

Quote from: omwibya on September 30, 2018, 12:49:27 AM

Quote from: Rigorous on September 29, 2018, 05:00:14 PM

Really glad you are removing the bonuses. I have raised the issue with bonuses before. Besides hindering decentralization, they distort the market in such a way much of the risk is transferred from private sale investors to public sale investors. I hope other projects follow this fair practice of equal risk and opportunity.

they must be really confident to do that. and raising the cap is an interesting move.

Yes, this is something I have never seen before. It raises the hardcap as you mentioned and in times like this such decision means they are very confident in the project.

Too much confidence increases the risk of failure but they are well known people in their areas so i don't think it can be an issue for dusk.

king_of_alts

member

Activity: 476

Merit: 10

Quote from: omwibya on September 30, 2018, 12:49:27 AM

Quote from: Rigorous on September 29, 2018, 05:00:14 PM

Really glad you are removing the bonuses. I have raised the issue with bonuses before. Besides hindering decentralization, they distort the market in such a way much of the risk is transferred from private sale investors to public sale investors. I hope other projects follow this fair practice of equal risk and opportunity.

they must be really confident to do that. and raising the cap is an interesting move.

Yes, this is something I have never seen before. It raises the hardcap as you mentioned and in times like this such decision means they are very confident in the project.

omwibya

member

Activity: 434

Merit: 10

Quote from: Rigorous on September 29, 2018, 05:00:14 PM

Really glad you are removing the bonuses. I have raised the issue with bonuses before. Besides hindering decentralization, they distort the market in such a way much of the risk is transferred from private sale investors to public sale investors. I hope other projects follow this fair practice of equal risk and opportunity.

they must be really confident to do that. and raising the cap is an interesting move.

Topic: [ANN] | DUSK Network | Privacy-oriented blockchain for Digital Securities! - page 144. (Read 145674 times)