Why should ETC tokens have value at all? The tokens depend on non-consensus of ETH and them moving over. Otherwise the snapshotted state has no meaning. The occurring fungibility problems are a huge red flag. Listing ETC is bad for the exchanges who have to deal with this. This really shows the issues with hard-forks.
ETC is ethereum pre-hardFork, so why not keep it and change ticker/name to the other ethereum hardfork to something like ETHF or ETF ?
ETH miners have been upgrading software given them from ETH team from the beginning - why should this upgrade by different? The issue is you can't get rid of the dev team like this. If you have a new team, you have a new coin (team roughly corresponds to commit rights).
Little doubt in my mind ETC holders will loose out from this valuation. Most holding ETC, previous ETH holders, don't use /accept them. ETC has no development team. As an exchange listing ETC means taking on huge risks, as we have seen.
It seems hard-forks are not well understood, in particular in relation to source code publishing. I guess we will see what happens? As a merchant and exchange I think there are a lot of risks associated with ETC (and ETH I guess).
on long run ETH lost the credit liability, goodwill because the hate. The ETH investors don't like this. This is total damage for the ethereum foundation.
I believe that ETC has already won. We waiting only for the right price.
for ETH is better to setup a holding company ETC / ETH
Only real people losing out is people that are holding hard fork ETH. ETC is ETH and you wonder why there is a bitcoin blocksize debate for over 2 years.
Problem with people saying that ETC is worthless is because they are invested in ETH and now that a hardfork has happen there are two chain and reply attacks. ETC is here to say and its more likely will gain ETH market shares.
