Prrrrft is just salty he got banned from the slack for concern trolling. This is literally all he has ever done in the expanse slack. Atleast a few times a week he would do this. Ask anyone from the EXP chat.
Check it. I specifically remember when Chris was talking about doing a charity event for Borderless Charity to give back to the homeless center, or maybe it was a woman's center. Anyhow, Prfft went on for about 3 hours saying that what we were doing was wrong.
Who the hell bashes on a charity???
Now you're just making stuff up, post a screenshot. For the record i always thought the charity was a nice thing and if i did anything to attack it i apologize.
Why are you even trying to discredit me anyway. I haven't said anything that isn't either true or my honest opinion and now i'm being accused of 'concern trolling' and attacking a charity?
That's low man, really low. If anything is toxic in the community it's this right here.
I'm not making stuff up. Maybe you forgot the scenario, but the definition of being toxic is exactly why you were banned.
We get suggestions and open ideas all the time. They are very much welcome.
As i said, show me exactly how this happened. I'm not a person to bash a charity and again
if i said anything to undermine the charity i apologize. Whatever way my comments came across i can assure you i didn't mean to badmouth the charity.
You think you're open to ideas but in reality you're not, i saw it on the slack all the time. Someone says something and team member will say 'great feedback, we're going to do that!'. And then nothing happens with it. Then if people start to ask further questions you get more and more annoyed.
Or in that case, maybe you are open to ideas, but you don't process them, and then get annoyed when people are still asking for it.
Another thing that often happens is someone asks you a question, you give a partial answer which doesn't really answer the question, they keep asking and the team gets annoyed. As a result the conversation gets more bitter with each response. The person asking the question doesn't feel understood and the team members feel attacked (somehow).
Now i'm the kind of person who will not let something like that go and i'll keep bringing it up until something actually happens or until i get an actual answer, and that's how i frustrated you. I never meant to do or say anything bad or particularly critical but the team's constant avoiding reaction steered the conversation that way.
I'm part of many communities and nowhere do i have a problem like this, most are very friendly and positive. There's something wrong with the way you handle certain community members - if you handle it well a situation like this can at all times be avoided. You can say it's my responsibility to keep the peace but it really isn't, its yours because it's mainly in your interest.
I mean, it isn't just me. I've seen team members be horrible to other members on the slack too. It's always the people who ask sensitive questions though. You have to find a way to deal with that. As a dev team you can't allow yourself to feel attacked that easily.
Maybe you should take a look at how other dev teams deal with community feedback/questions/concerns.
Obey chat rules, and all will go well. Otherwise, ya get banned. Thanks for the apology, but that still has a long way to come from all the other toxicity. It's not about asking sensitive question. The problem was that we would answer your question several times, but you would keep going on like we would ignore you. Maybe it wasn't the answer you wanted to hear or was looking for, but the fact remains we answered it accordingly.
A lot of communities face similar problems, from shilling of other token projects to fud. No crypto project is the perfect utopia when it comes to the overall community. Even bitcoin has its problems.
An example is that I was banned from the ETH discord for posting information in thread where moderators specifically instructed me to do so. One guy, who wasn't even supposed to have admin access, banned me because he didn't agree with the news of the article. This was just news, no shill or fud.
I'm not trying to patch things up with you or get back into the slack, i could make a new account but i have no interest in following the project any further. I apologized for that specific instance because if anything of the sort happened i take responsibility for it, and i'm not going to let my account get slandered like that.
I've said it before and i'll say it again, if i kept asking it's because you didn't answer my question sufficiently. The team has a long-standing pattern of answering questions without actually saying anything, or just trying to discredit whatever the source was.
I've seen it happen to other people as well, for example the guy who was asking about the Tokenlab price bonuses for larger investments. He didn't mean anything bad, just wanted your point of view and the conversation turned incredibly toxic.
In like 3 sentences the conversation turned to slandering Vitalik Buterin, because he said something like ICO's with bonuses don't understand how it works, instead of answering the question. What in the actual hell. It wasn't the guy asking the question who made that toxic, it was the team's reaction.
It's such a cop-out answer to say "there can be no utopia". It's a way of saying everything you do is as possible and whatever bad stuff happens is not your fault, it's again very fitting for the attitude of the team. There's always something to improve.
first of all, we answer all the questions. this isnt some shady scam project. sure, EXP faced a lot of heat after ETH messed up their DAO and many considered EXP would soon follow, but it did not. The DAO is finished and moving towards beta testing next year.
Next, VB made comments on his twitter account about ICOs being wrong about offering tiered bonuses. You asked why, and we provided an answer. This answer, word-for-word, because we decided to. That was the answer. However, because you did not agree with that answer, you, and only you, kept going on and on about why should not be doing that. My comments about anything VB says should not be credible since this is a guy that supports CP.
There were many back and forth situations going like this each every time we did an update, posted a video, distributed the newsletters.
It's situations like this, no I should say, exactly like this, is how you were trying to turn the community against us. A few others in that conversation understood what was happened, but as soon as the question was answered, that was the end of it. Only you kept pressuring us, kinda like you are now.
Take it however you will. I've been in crypto since 2013. Have seen everything from straight up legit projects to 100% scams. There is no perfect community. Why? Because different folks have different strokes. I like something you may now, and visa versa.
So let me ask you, what are your motives now? Doesn't seem like much has changed.