[ANN] First 500Gh/s BFL unit up and running! - page 8.

kano

legendary

Activity: 4466

Merit: 1798

Linux since 1997 RedHat 4

And ...

Quote from: kano on June 19, 2013, 12:55:37 AM

... and an update? to my previous post also

I was downgraded to a 4xSingle Minirig Cheesy

But now even on windows (got forbid Tongue

) it's hashing away so well.

Yeah my post above became a certain other non-cgminer person's MiniRig

Anyway ...

and yes the HW error rate - like ckolivas mentioned above - is low
In my case below 1% ... but at 236GH/s .. who cares?

jamesg

vip

Activity: 1358

Merit: 1000

AKA: gigavps

Quote from: PuertoLibre on June 19, 2013, 12:51:33 AM

I wonder if GigaVPS made the pic that way to give a false impression?

Really?

I took a picture of my setup in the datacenter to share and you think I'm trying to give "false impressions"? Cry

Also, I edited the OP to add the link to the stats page. Lips sealed

-ck

legendary

Activity: 4088

Merit: 1631

Ruu \o/

Quote from: crazyates on June 19, 2013, 01:04:12 AM

Quote from: roy7 on June 19, 2013, 01:02:32 AM

Quote from: ultrix on June 19, 2013, 12:38:43 AM

Pretty bad when hardware error rate exceeds accepted count.

How does difficulty play into that though? It's set at 500. So it is really 16*500 shares vs 193 errors?

Exactly. Which turns out to be ~3%.

Yes and as always, when you first start it, it looks worse. Here it is after running for ~2hrs without changing the code.

Code:

 cgminer version 3.2.2 - Started: [2013-06-19 03:21:34]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 (5s):479.5G (avg):478.1Gh/s | A:1502  R:0  HW:5182  U:12.7/m  WU:6662.8/m
 ST: 2  SS: 0  NB: 14  LW: 824569  GF: 0  RF: 0
 Connected to XXX diff 500
 Block: 005c9eedec8c830c...  Diff:19.3M  Started: [05:12:05]  Best share: 914K
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 [P]ool management [S]ettings [D]isplay options [Q]uit
 BAS 0:  max 68C 3.28V | 47.90G/58.20Gh/s | A:186 R:0 HW: 337 U: 1.58/m
 BAS 1:  max 70C 3.28V | 67.61G/60.23Gh/s | A:180 R:0 HW: 674 U: 1.53/m
 BAS 2:  max 76C 3.27V | 68.62G/59.84Gh/s | A:200 R:0 HW: 550 U: 1.70/m
 BAS 3:  max 80C 3.27V | 46.95G/61.31Gh/s | A:198 R:0 HW: 644 U: 1.68/m
 BAS 4:  max 86C 3.27V | 56.42G/60.44Gh/s | A:178 R:0 HW:1274 U: 1.51/m
 BAS 5:  max 71C 3.28V | 48.24G/58.86Gh/s | A:183 R:0 HW: 542 U: 1.55/m
 BAS 6:  max 82C 3.27V | 56.12G/58.79Gh/s | A:193 R:0 HW: 347 U: 1.64/m
 BAS 7:  max 77C 3.26V | 60.53G/60.45Gh/s | A:184 R:0 HW: 815 U: 1.56/m
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Accepted is 1502, so 1502 * 500 = 751000 accepted diff 1 shares, so HW errors are 5182 or 5182 / 751000 * 100 ~0.7%

Number 4 definitely runs hotter, and consequently has the highest HW error rate.

PuertoLibre

legendary

Activity: 1834

Merit: 1003

Quote from: Syke on June 19, 2013, 01:09:24 AM

Quote from: PuertoLibre on June 19, 2013, 01:07:57 AM

So far, (from looking at the plugs) I only see 1/3rd of a minirig being pictured. Where are the other two units?

In Inaba's farm.

That explains this message from him then.

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.2456884

Quote from: Inaba on June 12, 2013, 07:48:19 PM

Ok folks... we are at a critical juncture here and I'm looking for input on how to move forward.

I am not able to host all the singles, given the new power requirements. I would have to split it into separate DC's and even if I were to keep them in the current locations, the increased power cost far exceeds the 10% held back on the units. In short, I simply can't operate this number of singles even at break even on my part.

Obviously, this is an untenable situation for me. I'm considering invoking the original clause:

Quote

Should mining become unprofitable or other circumstances cause the operator to be unable or unwilling to perform his duties, sale of all hardware and equal distribution of funds will commence according to the number of shares held by each individual.

I am obviously not willing to operate at a continual loss. If anyone has suggestions on moving forward, I'm open to them.

Syke

legendary

Activity: 3878

Merit: 1193

Quote from: PuertoLibre on June 19, 2013, 01:07:57 AM

So far, (from looking at the plugs) I only see 1/3rd of a minirig being pictured. Where are the other two units?

In Inaba's farm.

PuertoLibre

legendary

Activity: 1834

Merit: 1003

Quote from: Luke-Jr on June 19, 2013, 12:57:03 AM

Quote from: PuertoLibre on June 19, 2013, 12:51:33 AM

I wonder if GigaVPS made the pic that way to give a false impression?

How is it gigavps's fault that you can't read?? Huh

Ah, luke:

« Last Edit: June 18, 2013, 07:17:33 PM by gigavps »

The first OP post was edited after it was made.

Also, I understood there was three components to a BFL [ASIC] minirig. I saw several so I assumed GigaVPS was showing more than 1/3.

So far, (from looking at the plugs) I only see 1/3rd of a minirig being pictured. Where are the other two units?

PuertoLibre

legendary

Activity: 1834

Merit: 1003

crazyates

legendary

Activity: 952

Merit: 1000

Quote from: roy7 on June 19, 2013, 01:02:32 AM

Quote from: ultrix on June 19, 2013, 12:38:43 AM

Pretty bad when hardware error rate exceeds accepted count.

How does difficulty play into that though? It's set at 500. So it is really 16*500 shares vs 193 errors?

Exactly. Which turns out to be ~3%.

roy7

sr. member

Activity: 434

Merit: 250

Quote from: ultrix on June 19, 2013, 12:38:43 AM

Pretty bad when hardware error rate exceeds accepted count.

How does difficulty play into that though? It's set at 500. So it is really 16*500 shares vs 193 errors?

juhakall

sr. member

Activity: 657

Merit: 250

Quote from: fran2k on June 19, 2013, 12:58:42 AM

Quote from: ultrix on June 19, 2013, 12:38:43 AM

Pretty bad when hardware error rate exceeds accepted count.

Only 6% accepted. wtf!

http://kcmo2.gigamining.com/?ref=60&rig=2

Compare difficulty accepted with rejected+hardware errors.

Syke

legendary

Activity: 3878

Merit: 1193

Quote from: crazyates on June 18, 2013, 09:11:27 PM

Quote from: Syke on June 18, 2013, 09:00:29 PM

"Came through"?! It was supposed to be 1500 GH/s @ 1500 watts in October '12. Now it's 500 GH/s at 2400 watts in June '13. They didn't "come through". They blew it.

A) They will be compensating customers with 3x the number of units, so you will be getting the same hashrate as what you paid for.

B) Lets see you do any better.

2000 BTC invested in a BFL pre-order 1 year ago now generates 13 BTC a day! Wow!!! This *might* break even someday.

100 BTC invested in an Avalon pre-order 9 months ago has already made back its investment several times over.

fran2k

hero member

Activity: 784

Merit: 500

Quote from: ultrix on June 19, 2013, 12:38:43 AM

Pretty bad when hardware error rate exceeds accepted count.

Only 6% accepted. wtf!

Luke-Jr

legendary

Activity: 2576

Merit: 1186

Quote from: PuertoLibre on June 19, 2013, 12:51:33 AM

I wonder if GigaVPS made the pic that way to give a false impression?

How is it gigavps's fault that you can't read?? Huh

papaminer

sr. member

Activity: 462

Merit: 250

Free World

im so jealous...

i have seen gigavps mining rigs before... and here it is again....

a new set of money making machines..

PuertoLibre

legendary

Activity: 1834

Merit: 1003

Quote from: Sitarow on June 19, 2013, 12:40:52 AM

Quote from: jamesg on June 18, 2013, 07:47:02 PM

Fellow Bitcoiners,

It has been a long road to get to this point but I am pleased to announce that the first 500Gh/s BFL units have been delivered and are happily hashing away as I type this. This is a huge milestone for BFL and shows their continued efforts to fulfill their promises to customers.

http://kcmo2.gigamining.com/

The picture above shows multiple FPGA minirigs along with 1 ASIC minirig.

The rig will be up and down for the evening while conman works to get cgminer fine tuned with the new firmware.

Best,
James

Congrats.

Oh,

I get the joke!

I was thinking they were all ASIC miners....

Now I finally understand that only one of them is the latest generation of ASIC while the others that look similar are just the older FPGA version from the previous generation.

I wonder if GigaVPS made the pic that way to give a false impression?

Which one is of the three or four is the actual current generation ASIC?

crazyates

legendary

Activity: 952

Merit: 1000

Quote from: ultrix on June 19, 2013, 12:38:43 AM

Quote from: -ck on June 18, 2013, 10:18:34 PM

It's been up and down numerous times as I've been chipping away at the code to make it work at its theoretical maximum 480GH.

It's mostly working now. Here's what I've got:

Code:

 cgminer version 3.2.2 - Started: [2013-06-19 02:17:06]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 (5s):477.6G (avg):472.1Gh/s | A:16  R:0  HW:193  U:10.8/m  WU:6575.3/m
 ST: 2  SS: 0  NB: 2  LW: 11012  GF: 0  RF: 0
 Connected to XXX diff 500
 Block: 00179d4404ca1359...  Diff:19.3M  Started: [02:18:28]  Best share: 9.56K
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 [P]ool management [S]ettings [D]isplay options [Q]uit
 BAS 0:  max 68C 3.28V | 56.23G/58.22Gh/s | A:1 R:0 HW:18 U: 0.67/m
 BAS 1:  max 69C 3.27V | 58.92G/60.48Gh/s | A:1 R:0 HW:23 U: 0.67/m
 BAS 2:  max 74C 3.27V | 60.53G/59.85Gh/s | A:4 R:0 HW:19 U: 2.69/m
 BAS 3:  max 80C 3.28V | 62.52G/61.58Gh/s | A:1 R:0 HW:20 U: 0.67/m
 BAS 4:  max 86C 3.27V | 74.56G/59.90Gh/s | A:4 R:0 HW:39 U: 2.69/m
 BAS 5:  max 71C 3.28V | 64.25G/58.79Gh/s | A:1 R:0 HW:25 U: 0.67/m
 BAS 6:  max 81C 3.27V | 59.93G/58.98Gh/s | A:2 R:0 HW:25 U: 1.34/m
 BAS 7:  max 72C 3.27V | 43.22G/60.81Gh/s | A:2 R:0 HW:25 U: 1.34/m
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Note the hardware error count may appear very high, but bear in mind that it's mining at diff 500

Pretty bad when hardware error rate exceeds accepted count.

I want you to switch your miners to a diff=500, and see how many shares you submit to your pool. Hint, my FPGA Single would get less than 40 shares a day at that diff.

PuertoLibre

legendary

Activity: 1834

Merit: 1003

Quote from: TheSwede75 on June 19, 2013, 12:05:25 AM

I will buy it right now for 100.000 BitBar! I hear they are worth 7 BTC each and come with Scrypt FPGA so what do you say? Roll Eyes

Tell us more?

PuertoLibre

legendary

Activity: 1834

Merit: 1003

Quote from: -ck on June 18, 2013, 11:05:47 PM

Quote from: PuertoLibre on June 18, 2013, 10:46:04 PM

Quote from: -ck on June 18, 2013, 10:18:34 PM

It's been up and down numerous times as I've been chipping away at the code to make it work at its theoretical maximum 480GH.

Why 480 and not 500?

It behaves like 8 60GH singles instead of some separate unit. I have no idea about their claims and whatnot.

Nah, don't worry about it. I am just wondering [rhetorically] why they didn't spec test the unit before sending it out.

Keep us posted on any developments.

Sitarow

legendary

Activity: 1792

Merit: 1047

Quote from: jamesg on June 18, 2013, 07:47:02 PM

Fellow Bitcoiners,

It has been a long road to get to this point but I am pleased to announce that the first 500Gh/s BFL units have been delivered and are happily hashing away as I type this. This is a huge milestone for BFL and shows their continued efforts to fulfill their promises to customers.

http://kcmo2.gigamining.com/

The picture above shows multiple FPGA minirigs along with 1 ASIC minirig.

The rig will be up and down for the evening while conman works to get cgminer fine tuned with the new firmware.

Best,
James

Congrats.

ultrix

full member

Activity: 125

Merit: 100

Quote from: Hippie Tech on June 19, 2013, 12:36:39 AM

Quote from: kev7112001 on June 18, 2013, 11:41:36 PM

Quote from: johnyj on June 18, 2013, 10:50:06 PM

Quote from: -ck on June 18, 2013, 10:18:34 PM

It's been up and down numerous times as I've been chipping away at the code to make it work at its theoretical maximum 480GH.

It's mostly working now. Here's what I've got:

Code:

 cgminer version 3.2.2 - Started: [2013-06-19 02:17:06]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 (5s):477.6G (avg):472.1Gh/s | A:16  R:0  HW:193  U:10.8/m  WU:6575.3/m
 ST: 2  SS: 0  NB: 2  LW: 11012  GF: 0  RF: 0
 Connected to XXX diff 500
 Block: 00179d4404ca1359...  Diff:19.3M  Started: [02:18:28]  Best share: 9.56K
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 [P]ool management [S]ettings [D]isplay options [Q]uit
 BAS 0:  max 68C 3.28V | 56.23G/58.22Gh/s | A:1 R:0 HW:18 U: 0.67/m
 BAS 1:  max 69C 3.27V | 58.92G/60.48Gh/s | A:1 R:0 HW:23 U: 0.67/m
 BAS 2:  max 74C 3.27V | 60.53G/59.85Gh/s | A:4 R:0 HW:19 U: 2.69/m
 BAS 3:  max 80C 3.28V | 62.52G/61.58Gh/s | A:1 R:0 HW:20 U: 0.67/m
 BAS 4:  max 86C 3.27V | 74.56G/59.90Gh/s | A:4 R:0 HW:39 U: 2.69/m
 BAS 5:  max 71C 3.28V | 64.25G/58.79Gh/s | A:1 R:0 HW:25 U: 0.67/m
 BAS 6:  max 81C 3.27V | 59.93G/58.98Gh/s | A:2 R:0 HW:25 U: 1.34/m
 BAS 7:  max 72C 3.27V | 43.22G/60.81Gh/s | A:2 R:0 HW:25 U: 1.34/m
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Note the hardware error count may appear very high, but bear in mind that it's mining at diff 500

That's just too hot, 86C degree??? Delta fans needed Cool

it may not be accurate because there are a lot of units in that room heating up the room temp so who knows what it would when you have it

Considering it just started.. notice the share count.. thats pretty damn hot.

Pretty bad when hardware error rate exceeds accepted count.

Topic: [ANN] First 500Gh/s BFL unit up and running! - page 8. (Read 30794 times)