The message on the front page of MinerPools is incorrect.
The seed node has them as an addnode and when the seed node was updated we deleted the peers.dat to rediscover the network through them.
Edit to add: if they are seeing something we are not then let's compare notes and see what's up.
Can you answer what im asking.Why was the fork with the most miners on it and would stand to lose the most coins not consider the right fork.Just want to know the reasoning for this.It makes no sense.The seed node has them as an addnode and when the seed node was updated we deleted the peers.dat to rediscover the network through them.
Edit to add: if they are seeing something we are not then let's compare notes and see what's up.
I'll be happy to start moderating the thread if you are unable to read it. That's clearly not the case.
The network suffered some rocking and rolling today and is attempting to correct. It was designed to work that way.
The assumption is always that someone is trying to screw over the community because that is what has happened since this forum first went online. The assumption being made specifically in this case is that we're somehow trying to screw over the community as opposed to resolving a technical problem for the long term.
I simply expect such comments like this will continue forever, so it is only on rare occasions like this one that I bother to respond.
You shouldn't have, it was simply a joke. Notice the winky face? Don't be so defensive, it almost makes it seem as though you have something to feel guilty of
Also, you can't start moderating this thread... you made it unmoderated, you would have to make another. Are you new here
? Hahaha.. fair enough. It's been a long day, as you can imagine.
Meanwhile, the seed node has been corrected.
I repeated the exercise of deleting the peers (and blockchain database) and explored the network through MinerPools.
