So how does asics, which lower the value of this coin, and take the mining ability away from the community that would use the coin, make the coin more secure?
Well, mathematically, you need hashrate for depth and power of security. For instance, I could take over your entire coin myself, because it's lacking hashrate. Right now. I could invite some people I know over, and we'd own the coin. Your whole foundation would have to give in to our demands, or start from scratch. Of course I wouldn't, I'm just playing out a hypothetical. The primary reason you haven't seen such an attack is you're low on the radar, which is good.
Having said that, I like your thinking, but from a broad perspective you're not solving the problem. You're wanting to rely on a group of people who, largely, don't trust the internet, much less will get involved in using their personal systems to run software that they don't understand, to burn up their electricity and, in the long run, wear out their systems, to support a transaction system that may or may not take off.
The reason coins lose values with ASIC mining isn't the ASIC, it's the lack of tangible value for the coin. Take a look at NLG, while it was scrypt it had epic tangible value. It was used during the World Cup. It's used to buy food and other goods. They've recently switched some technical details a few times to help manage the growth, and they're still going strong. It's tangible. Yours is also tangible, but not nearly as much, and until you have market share it's only going to weaken.
I think it's good you've taken a proactive measure looking for a longterm solution. I simply disagree with it based on my experience in this industry, analyzing coin ideas, execution, etc. I think, at this point, the most important aspect is getting the transaction system to work flawless from a merchant/user standpoint, setting up all the required endpoints and details, while simultaneously getting stores to accept it. NLG has done a good job. PotCoin had a good start in this as well, getting their own 'ATM' machines, and are deployed in a group of merchant shops.
I say that not knowing what your merchant distribution is, I'm just saying what has to happen within a good timeframe.
I get that you, looking at this strictly as just another crypto, wouldn't have the perspective to understand the dynamics around guncoin, this is why I gave you mine. And I hope you get it.
You shouldn't presume too much. If you knew me, you'd know that I have more perspective than you probably realize. I'm also no stranger to the firearms crowd. Part of why I've been eyeing this from day 1 is because I liked the idea, and the other part is that it's just one of hundreds that I keep an eye on and analyze.
And of course, I wish you the best. You seem to have made a functional switchover which is good. I'm glad this has been a peacable discussion, you have been able to answer the questions amicably and that's very appreciated.